Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Feb 15, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 19, 2019 - Apr 11, 2019
Date Accepted: Jul 13, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Using Wearable Physiological Monitors With Suicidal Adolescent Inpatients: Feasibility and Acceptability Study

Kleiman E, Millner AJ, Joyce VW, Nash CC, Buonopane RJ, Nock MK

Using Wearable Physiological Monitors With Suicidal Adolescent Inpatients: Feasibility and Acceptability Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(9):e13725

DOI: 10.2196/13725

PMID: 31586364

PMCID: 6783695

Feasibility and acceptability of using wearable physiological monitors with suicidal adolescent inpatients

  • Evan Kleiman; 
  • Alexander J Millner; 
  • Victoria W Joyce; 
  • Carol C Nash; 
  • Ralph J Buonopane; 
  • Matthew K Nock

ABSTRACT

Background:

Wearable physiological monitoring devices enable the continuous measurement of human behavior and psychophysiology in the real world. Although such devices are promising, their availability does not guarantee that participants will continuously wear and interact with them, especially during times of psychological distress. Wearable physiological monitoring devices enable the continuous measurement of human behavior and psychophysiology in the real world. Although such devices are promising, their availability does not guarantee that participants will continuously wear and interact with them, especially during times of psychological distress.

Objective:

The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of using a wearable behavioral and physiological monitor, the Empatica E4, to continuously assess a group of suicidal adolescent inpatients.

Methods:

Participants (n = 50 adolescent inpatients) were asked to wear an Empatica E4 on their wrist for the duration of their inpatient stay. In addition to assessing behavioral meta-data (e.g., hours worn per day) we also used qualitative interviews and self-report measures to assess participants’ experience of wearing the device.

Results:

Results supported the feasibility and acceptability of this approach. Participants wore the device for average for 18 hours a day and reported that despite sometimes finding the device uncomfortable, they did not mind wearing it. Many of the participants noted that the part of the study they enjoyed most was contributing to scientific understanding, especially if it could help people like them in the future.

Conclusions:

These findings provide promising support for using wearable monitors in clinical samples in future studies, especially if participants are invested in being part of a research study.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kleiman E, Millner AJ, Joyce VW, Nash CC, Buonopane RJ, Nock MK

Using Wearable Physiological Monitors With Suicidal Adolescent Inpatients: Feasibility and Acceptability Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(9):e13725

DOI: 10.2196/13725

PMID: 31586364

PMCID: 6783695

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement