Menakar Penerapan New Public Management dalam Birokrasi Indonesia

Authors

  • Winengan Winengan Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2019.004.01.10

Keywords:

bureaucracy, new public management, performance, public sector

Abstract

The presence of New Public Management as a new paradigm of public
administration is projected to provide solutions to the complexity of public sector issues. The New Public Management offers an the idea to improve public sector performance by transforming the spirit of private sector that prioritizes the value of effectiveness and efficiency. In Indonesian bureaucracy, the opportunity in applying “The New Public Management†in strategic. Because of support bureaucratic reform policies that have been continuously buzzed by the government since the birth of the Reform Orde. In reality, applying is still constrained by the mental apparatus of bureaucracy that lack of commitment to make changes, the work culture of the organization is not creative, and the model of leadership that is not transformative.

References

Anderson, Eve et.al. (2002). Managerialism and The Australian Public Service: Valuing Efficiency and Equity. New Zealand Journal Industrial and Relation, Vol. 27 (1), pp. 13-31.

BPK. (2013). Seminar Reformasi Pelayanan Publik oleh CPA Australia. Dapat diakses pada http://pusdiklat.bpk.go.id/?p=5548 [Diakses 2 September 2015].

Denhardt, Janet V., & Robert B. Denhardt. (2003). The New Public Service, Serving not Steering. New York: M.E. Sharepe, Inc.

Donovan, O’, Ita. (1994). Organization Behaviour in Local Government. Great Britain: Longman Group.

Dwiyanto, Agus. (2008), Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Dwiyanto, Agus. (2011). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik: Peduli, Inklusif, dan Kolaboratif. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Ferlie, Ewan et.al. (1996). The New Public Management in Action. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hodge, BJ.et.al. (1996). Organization Theory A Strategic Approach. Fifth Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Hughes, E, Owen. (1994). Public Management And Administration. United States of America: St. Martin’s.

Keban, Yeremis T. (2005). Indikator Kinerja Pemda: Pendekatan Manajemen dan Kebijakan. Makalah. MAP UGM, Yogyakarta.

Miles, E, Raymond. (1975). Theories of Management: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Development. United States of America: Mc Graw-Hill Book Company.

Osborne, David., & Gaebler, Ted. (1992). Mewirausahakan Birokrasi: Mentranformasi Semangat Wirausaha ke Dalam Sektor Publik. Jakarta: PPM.

Osborne, David dan Plastrik, Peter. (1997). Memangkas Birokrasi: Lima Strategi Menuju Pemerintahan Wirausaha. Jakarta: PPM. Robbins, Stephen. (1996). Perilaku Organisasi, Konsep, Kontroversi dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Prenhalindo.

Russell, Joyce and Bernardin, John. (1993). Human Resources Management An Experiential Approach. Singapore: Mc. Graw.

Suryawikarta, Bey, et.al. (1997). Birokrasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Departemen Dalam Negeri.

Syarifuddin. (2014). Implementasi Kebijakan Transparansi Pengelolaan Dana Bos: Studi Terhadap Instruksi Gubernur NTB Tentang Transparansi Pengelolaan Dana Bos di MI Kota Mataram. Antologi Hasil Penelitian. Mataram: Lemlit IAIN Mataram.

Thoha, Miftah. (2005). Administrasi Publik dan Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Tjiptoherijanto. (2006). Akuntabilitas dan Good Governance. Jakarta: LAN dan BPKP.

Transparency International. (2013). Corruption Perceptions Index 2013. Dapat diakses pada https://www.transparency.org/cpi2013/results [Diakses 26 September 2015].

Suaedi, Falih., & Wardiyanto, Bintoro (Editor). (2010). Revitalisasi Administrasi Negara: Reformasi Birokrasi dan e-Governance. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Winengan. (2014). Penerapan Standar Pelayanan Publik Pada Pembuatan Buku Catatan Nikah di KAU se-Kota Mataram. Lemlit, Vol.10(2), pp.1-18.

Wright, Peter.et al. (1996). Strategic Management Concept and Cases. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Yudha, Dino. (2011). Perkembangan dan Penerapan New Public Management di Indonesia. Dapat diakses pada http://fia-ub.blogspot.co.id/2012/06/perkembangan-dan-penerapan-new-public.html [Diakses 28 Agustus 2017].

Yudhi, Nanere., & Kyobe. (2006). Comparative Study of Negotiation Styles of Education Manager in Australia and Indonesia. Dapat diakses pada http://www.seameo.org/vl/library/dlwelcome/publications/paper/ABFE06/AFBE06.htm [Diakses 13 Agustus 2014].

Zarzycka, Ewelina., & Michalak, Marcin. (2013). Measuring Local Government Performance and Analysis Manager Those Entities and Personnel Information Needs in the Context of New Public Management. Dapat diakses pada https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/cer.2013.16.issue-2/cer-2013-0015/cer-2013-0015.pdf [Diakses 13 Agustus 2014].

Downloads

Published

2018-05-09

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik (JIAP)

Section

Articles

License

If your paper is accepted, the author identified as the formal corresponding author for the paper will receive an email prompting them to login into Author Services; where via the JIAP Author Licensing Service they will be able to complete the license agreement on behalf of all authors on the paper.