skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Alternatives to accuracy and bias metrics based on percentage errors for radiation belt modeling applications

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1260362· OSTI ID:1260362
 [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)

This report reviews existing literature describing forecast accuracy metrics, concentrating on those based on relative errors and percentage errors. We then review how the most common of these metrics, the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), has been applied in recent radiation belt modeling literature. Finally, we describe metrics based on the ratios of predicted to observed values (the accuracy ratio) that address the drawbacks inherent in using MAPE. Specifically, we define and recommend the median log accuracy ratio as a measure of bias and the median symmetric accuracy as a measure of accuracy.

Research Organization:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
DOE Contract Number:
AC52-06NA25396
OSTI ID:
1260362
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-16-24592; TRN: US1601539
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English