Background The diagnostic sensitivity of current bronchoscopy for peripheral lung cancer is inadequate because the bronchoscope insertion range is limited and confirmation of the position of the biopsy apparatus at the lesion under X-ray fluoroscopy is inaccurate. The combination of ultrathin bronchoscopy and computed tomography (CT) is effective for solving these problems.
Objective This study was a retrospective study analyzing prospectively collected data to identify factors contributing to the diagnosis and the appropriate biopsy method in CT-guided ultrathin bronchoscopy for peripheral lung cancer.
Methods The subjects comprised 86 patients (88 lesions) who underwent CT-guided ultrathin bronchoscopy and were finally diagnosed with peripheral lung cancer. We evaluated the diagnostic yield according to specific factors and also according to the sample collection method.
Results Sixty-nine lesions were diagnosed as lung cancer, and the diagnostic yield was 78.4% (80.3% in lesions ≤2 cm in diameter). Multivariate analysis showed that the factors contributing to the diagnosis were the observation range by ultrathin bronchoscopy and the presence/absence of the involved bronchus or pulmonary artery. Pathological evaluation facilitated histological diagnoses in 53 (65.4%) of 81 lesions. In 16 lesions, only the cytological diagnosis was positive.
Conclusion CT-guided ultrathin bronchoscopy may be particularly useful for lesions for which the involved bronchus or pulmonary artery can be confirmed, and observation of bronchi of the 6th generation or more is possible. Since the specimen preparation rate is low, the combination of histopathological diagnosis with cytological diagnosis particularly that of the discharge attached to the forceps, is optimal.