Skip to main content
Log in

Cutaneous Reactions to Chemotherapy and their Management

  • Therapy In Practice
  • Published:
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International data from 2002 report 10.9 million new cases of cancer and 6.7 million cancer deaths. Chemotherapy is an essential component in the multidisciplinary management of most cancers. Cutaneous reactions to chemotherapeutics are common and may contribute significantly to the morbidity, and rarely to the mortality, of patients undergoing such treatments. Recognition and management of these reactions is important to provide optimal care.

This article aims to present the most common cutaneous reactions to frequently used chemotherapies and provides management guidelines. A MEDLINE search from 1966 through June 2005 was conducted to identify reports of common cutaneous toxicities with systemic chemotherapy and their appropriate management.

An analysis of our literature search is presented in review form outlining common chemotherapy-related cutaneous reactions and their management, as well as the chemotherapeutics responsible for the cutaneous toxicity. Chemotherapy-related cutaneous toxicity includes generalized rashes such as the spectrum between erythema multiforme and toxic epidermal necrolysis, and site-specific toxicity such as mucositis, alopecia, nail changes, extravasation reactions, or hand-foot syndrome. Most of the toxicity is reversible with chemotherapy dose reductions or delays. Certain toxicities can be effectively treated or prevented, allowing optimal delivery of chemotherapy (e.g. premedications to prevent hypersensitivity, prophylactic mouthwashes to prevent mucositis). Newer non-chemotherapeutic targeted therapies such as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (e.g. gefitinib, cetuximab) may also be associated with cutaneous toxicity and can be distressing for patients. Recent data suggest that skin toxicity associated with these agents may correlate with efficacy.

Cutaneous toxicity occurs frequently with chemotherapy and non-chemotherapeutic biologic therapies. Early recognition and treatment of the toxicity facilitates good symptom control, prevents treatment-related morbidity, and allows continuation of anti-cancer therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Table I
Table II
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, et al. American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004; 54: 8–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Parkin DM. Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol. 2001; 2:53–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bunn Jr PA, Franklin W. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression, signal pathway, and inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 2002; 29 (5 Suppl. 14): 38–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee MW, Seo CW, Kim SW, et al. Cutaneous side effects in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with Iressa (ZD1839), an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor. Acta Derm Venereol. 2004; 84: 23–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kris MG, Natale RB, Herbst RS, et al. Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003; 290: 2149–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Perez-Soler R. Can rash associated with HERI/EGFR inhibition be used as a marker of treatment outcome?. Oncology (Williston Park) 2003; 17 (11 Suppl. 12): 23–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roskoski Jr R. The ErbB/HER receptor protein-tyrosine kinases and cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 319: 1–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Herbst RS, Langer CJ. Epidermal growth factor receptors as a target for cancer treatment: the emerging role of IMC-C225 in the treatment of lung and head and neck cancers. Semin Oncol. 2002; 29 (1 Suppl. 4): 27–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Busam KJ, Capodieci P, Motzer R, et al. Cutaneous side-effects in cancer patients treated with the antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody C225. Br J Dermatol. 2001; 144: 1169–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 337–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lotem M, Hubert A, Lyass O, et al. Skin toxic effects of polyethylene glycolcoated liposomal doxorubicin. Arch Dermatol. 2000; 136: 1475–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Epstein Jr EH, Lutzner MA. Folliculitis induced by actinomycin D. N Engl J Med. 1969; 281: 1094–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leo S, Tatulli C, Taveri R, et al. Dermatological toxicity from chemotherapy containing 5-fluorouracil. J Chemother. 1994; 6: 423–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cetkovska P, Pizinger K, Cetkovsky P. High-dose cytosine arabinoside-induced cutaneous reactions. J Fur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2002; 16: 481–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Litt JZ. Drug eruption reference manual. 9th ed. New York (NY): Parthenon Publishing Group Inc., 2003

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grem JL. Biochemical modulation of 5-FU in systemic treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2001; 15 (1 Suppl. 2): 13-9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Laack E, Mende T, Knuffmann C, et al. Hand-foot syndrome associated with short infusions of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine. Ann Oncol. 2001; 12: 1761–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vassallo C, Passamonti F, Merante S, et al. Muco-cutaneous changes during long-term therapy with hydroxymea in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Clin Exp Dermalot. 2001; 26: 141–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Feizy V, Namazi MR, Barikbin B, et al. Methotrexate-induced acral erythema with buttons reaction. Dermatol Online. 12003; 9: 14

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hellier I, Bessis D, Sotto A, et al. High-dose methotrexate-induced buttons variant of acral erythema. Arch Dermatol. 1996; 132: 590–1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zimmerman GC, Keeling JH, Burris HA, et al. Acute cutaneous reactions to docetaxel, a new chemotherapeutic agent. Arch Dermatol. 1995; 131: 202–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Portal I, Cardenal F, Garcia-del-Muro X. Etoposide-related acral erythema. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994; 34: 181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vakalis D, Ioannides D, Lazaridou E, et al. Acral erythema induced by chemotherapy with cisplatin. Br J Dermatol. 1998; 139: 750–1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown J, Burck K, Black D, et al. Treatment of cytarabine acral erythema with corticosteroids. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991; 24 (6 Pt 1): 1023–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagore E, Insa A, Sanmartin O. Antineoplastic therapy-induced palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (‘hand-foot’) syndrome: incidence, recognition and management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2000; 1: 225–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jansman FG, Sleijfer DT, de Graaf JC, et al. Management of chemotherapy-induced adverse effects in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Drug Saf. 2001; 24: 35–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fabian CJ, Molina R, Slavik M, et al. Pyridoxine therapy for palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia associated with continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion. Invest New Drugs. 1990; 8: 57–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Katoh M, Kadota M, Nishimura Y. A case of docetaxel-induced erythrodysesthesia. J Dermatol. 2004; 31: 403–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lombardi D, Crivellad D, Scuderi C, et al. Long-term, weekly one-hour infusion of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II monoinstitutional study. Tumod. 2004; 90: 285–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fontana JA. Radiation recall associated with VP-16-213 therapy. Cancer Treat Rep. 1979; 63: 224–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Verschraegen CF, Levy T, Kudelka AP, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan in prior chemotherapy-treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 1997; 15: 625–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hussein MA, Anderson KC. Role of liposomal anthracyclines in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Semin Oncol. 2004; 31: 147–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Limpongsanurak S. Prophylactic actinomycin D for high-risk complete hydatidiform mole. J Reprod Med. 2001; 46: 110–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Blumenreich MS, Woodcock TM, Richman SP, et al. A phase I trial of dactinomycin intravenous infusion in patients with advanced malignancies. Cancer. 1985; 56: 256–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hussein AM, Jimenez JJ, McCall CA, et al. Protection from chemotherapy-induced alopecia in a rat model. Science. 1990; 249: 1564–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hussein AM. Chemotherapy-induced alopecia: new developments. South Med J. 1993; 86: 489–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hussein AM. Protection against cytosine arabinoside-induced alopecia by minoxidil in a rat animal model. Int J Dermatol. 1995; 34: 470–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Manuskiatti W, Fitzpatrick RE. Treatment response of keloidal and hypertrophic stemotomy scars: comparison among intralesional corticosteroid, 5-fluorouracil, and 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser treatments. Arch Dermatol. 2002; 138: 1149–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vanhooteghem O, Richert B, de la Brassinne M. Raynaud phenomenon after treatment of verruca vulgaris of the sole with intralesional injection of bleomycin. Pediatr Dermatol. 2001; 18: 249–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Passiu G, Cauli A, Atzeni F, et al. Bleomycin-induced scleroderma: report of a case with a chronic course rather than the typical acute/subacute self-limiting form. Clin Rheumatol. 1999; 18: 422–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dacey MJ, Callen JP. Hydroxymea-induced dermatomyositis-like eruption. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003; 48: 439–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Daoud MS, Gibson LE, Pittelkow MR. Hydroxymea dermopathy: a unique lichenoid eruption complicating long-term therapy with hydroxyurea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997; 36 (2 Pt 1): 178–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kupfer I, Balguerie X, Courville P, et al. Scleroderma-like cutaneous lesions induced by paclitaxel: a case study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003; 48: 279–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hassell G, Harnett P, Manolios N. Scleroderma in association with the use of docetaxel (taxotere) for breast cancer. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001; 19: 197–200

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cleveland MG, Ajaikumar BS, Reganti R. Cutaneous fibrosis induced by docetaxel: a case report. Cancer. 2000; 88: 1078–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lo SK, Yip D, Leslie M, et al. 5-fluorouracil-induced erythema multiforme. Int J Clin Pract. 1999; 53: 219–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hirai K, Ishiko O, Nakajima S, et al. Local erythematous dermatitis after intravenous docetaxel. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002; 53: 118–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Harrison PV. Methotrexate-induced epidermal necrosis. Br J Dermatol. 1987; 116: 867–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sommers KR, Kong KM, Bui DT, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient receiving concurrent radiation and gemcitabine. Anticancer Drugs. 2003; 14: 659–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lowndes S, Darby A, Mead G, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome after treatment with rituximab. Ann Oncol. 2002; 13: 1948–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Arias D, Requena L, Hasson A, et al. Localized epidermal necrolysis (erythema multiforme-like reaction) following intravenous injection of vinblastine. J Cutan Pathol. 1991; 18: 344–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wolff K, Tappeiner G. Treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis: the uncertainty persists but the fog is dispersing. Arch Dermatol. 2003; 139: 85–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Trent JT, Kirsner RS, Romanelli P, et al. Analysis of intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis using SCORTEN: the University of Miami Experience. Arch Dermatol. 2003; 139: 39–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bachot N, Revuz J, Roujeau JC. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a prospective noncomparative study showing no benefit on mortality or progression. Arch Dermatol. 2003; 139: 33–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ener RA, Meglathery SB, Styler M. Extravasation of systemic hematooncological therapies. Ann Oncol. 2004; 15: 858–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Cox RF. Managing skin damage induced by doxorubicin hydrochloride and daunorubicin hydrochloride. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1984; 41: 2410–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Fitzpatrick JE, Yokel BE, Hood AF. Mucocutaneous complications of antineoplastic therapy. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, et al., editors. Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in general medicine. 5th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill, 1999: 1649.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Baer D, Wilkinson LS. Daunomycin, adriamycin, and recall effect. Ann Intern Med. 1976; 85: 259–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Forte FA. Vincristine neuropathy [letter]. JAMA. 1974; 227: 325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Dorr RT, Alberts DS. Vinca alkaloid skin toxicity: antidote and drug disposition studies in the mouse. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985; 74: 113–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Bertelli G, Dim D, Forno GB, et al. Hyaluronidase as an antidote to extravasation of Vinca alkaloids: clinical results. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1994; 120: 505–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Parashos PJ. A rational approach for the management of tissue extravasation due to antineoplastic drugs. Microlink Update. 1986; 2: 13–5

    Google Scholar 

  63. Bellone JD. Treatment of vincristine extravasation [letter]. JAMA. 1981; 245: 343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Olver IN, Aisner J, Hament A, et al. A prospective study of topical dimethyl sulfoxide for treating anthracycline extravasation. J Clin Oncol. 1988; 6: 1732–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Lawrence JH, Walsh D, Zapotowski KA, et al. Topical dimethylsulfoxide may prevent tissue damage from anthracycline extravasation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1989; 23: 316–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Ludwig CV, Stoll HR, Obrist R, et al. Prevention of cytotoxic drug induced skin ulcers with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and alpha-tocopherol. Fur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1987; 23: 327–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Nobbs P, Barr RD. Soft-tissue injury caused by antineoplastic drugs is inhibited by topical dimethyl sulphoxide and alpha tocopherol. Br J Cancer. 1983; 48: 873–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Van Raalte J, Rice C, Moss CE. Visible-light system for detecting doxorubicin contamination on skin and surfaces. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990; 47: 1067–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Andersson AP, + Dahlstrom KK. Clinical results after doxorubicin extravasation treated with excision guided by fluorescence microscopy. Fur J Cancer. 1993; 29A: 171–4

    Google Scholar 

  70. Rentschler R, Wilbur D. Pyridoxine: a potential local antidote for mitomycin-C extravasation. J Surg Oncol. 1988; 37: 269–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Dorr RT. Antidotes to vesicant chemotherapy extravasations. Blood Rev. 1990; 4: 41–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Bertelli G. Prevention and management of extravasation of cytotoxic drugs. Drug Safl. 1995; 12: 245–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Larson DL. What is the appropriate management of tissue extravasation by antitumor agents?. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985; 75: 397–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Berghammer P, Pohnl R, Baur M, et al. Docetaxel extravasation. Support Care Cancer. 2001; 9: 131–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Ascherman JA, Knowles SL, Attkiss K. Docetaxel (taxotere) extravasation: a report of five cases with treatment recommendations. Ann Plast Surg. 2000; 45: 438–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Stanford BL, Hardwicke F. A review of clinical experience with paclitaxel extravasations. Support Care Cancer. 2003; 11: 270–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Gordon AN, Granai CO, Rose PG, et al. Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18: 3093–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Lautenschlager S, Itin PH. Reticulate, patchy and mottled pigmentation of the neck: acquired forms. Dermatology. 1998; 197: 291–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Aste N, Fumo G, Contu F, et al. Nail pigmentation caused by hydroxyurea: report of 9 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002; 47: 146–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Hernandez-Martin A, Ros-Forteza S, de Unamuno P. Longitudinal, transverse, and diffuse nail hyperpigmentation induced by hydroxyurea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999; 41 (2 Pt 2): 333–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Jeevankumar B, Thappa DM. Blue lunula due to hydroxyurea. J Dermatol. 2003; 30: 628–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Schrijvers D, Van Den Brande J, Vermorken JB. Supravenous discoloration of the skin due to docetaxel treatment. Br J Dermatol. 2000; 142: 1069–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Shah PC, Rao KR, Patel AR. Cyclophosphamide-induced nail pigmentation [letter]. Lancet. 1975; II: 548–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Kroumpouzos G, Travers R, Allan A. Generalized hyperpigmentation with daunorubicin chemotherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002; 46 (2 Suppl.): 1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Krutchik AN, Buzdar AU. Pigmentation of the tongue and mucous membranes associated with cancer chemotherapy. South Med J. 1979; 72: 1615–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Abess A, Keel DM, Graham BS. Flagellate hyperpigmentation following intralesional bleomycin treatment of verruca plantaris. Arch Dermatol. 2003; 139: 337–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Miori L, Vignini M, Rabbiosi G. Flagellate dermatitis after bleomycin: a histological and immunohistochemical study. Am J Dermatopathol. 1990; 12: 598–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Marcoux D, Anex R, Russo P. Persistent serpentine supravenous hyperpigmented eruption as an adverse reaction to chemotherapy combining actinomycin and vincristine. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000; 43: 540–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Robak T, Blasinska-Morawiec M, Krykowski E, et al. 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine (cladribine)-related eosinophilia in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases. Fur J Haematol. 1997; 59: 216–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Moon C, Verschraegen CF, Bevers M, et al. Use of docetaxel (Tax otere) inpatients with paclitaxel (Taxol) hypersensitivity. Anticancer Drugs. 2000; 11: 565–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Tucci E, Pirtoli L. Etoposide-induced hypersensitivity reactions: report of two cases. Chemioterapia. 1985; 4: 460–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Kasperek C, Black CD. Two cases of suspected immunologic-based hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide therapy. Ann Pharmacother. 1992; 26: 1227–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Shepherd GM. Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2003; 24: 253–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Siderov J, Prasad P, De Boer R, et al. Safe administration of etoposide phosphate after hypersensitivity reaction to intravenous etoposide. Br J Cancer. 2002; 86: 2–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Bernstein BJ, Trotter MB. Successful rechallenge with etoposide phosphate after an acute hypersensitivity reaction to etoposide. Pharmacotherapy. 1999; 19: 989–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Markman M, Hsieh F, Zanotti K, et al. Initial experience with a novel desensitization strategy for carboplatin-associated hypersensitivity reactions: carboplatin-hypersensitivity reactions. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004; 130: 25–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Markman M, Zanotti K, Peterson G, et al. Expanded experience with an intradermal skin test to predict for the presence or absence of carboplatin hypersensitivity. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 4611–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Thong BY, Leong KP, Thumboo J, et al. Cyclophosphamide type I hypersensitivity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2002; 11: 127–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Minami R, Himse N, Motomma S, et al. Anaphylactoid reaction to cyclophosphamide in a patient with T cell lymphoma and hemophagocytic syndrome. Int J Hematol. 1999; 69: 57–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Salles G, Vial T, Archimbaud E. Anaphylactoid reaction with bronchospasm following intravenous cyclophosphamide administration. Ann Hematol. 1991; 62: 74–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Khansur T, Little D, Tavassoli M. Fulminant and fatal angioedema caused by bleomycin treatment. Arch Intern Med. 1984; 144: 2267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Collins JA. Hypersensitivity reaction to doxorubicin. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1984; 18: 402–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Vogelzang NJ. “Adriamycin flare”: a skin reaction resembling extravasation. Cancer Treat Rep. 1979; 63: 2067–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Young PC, Montemarano AD, Lee N, et al. Hypersensitivity to paclitaxel manifested as a buttons fixed drug eruption. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996; 34 (2 Pt 1): 313–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Porzio G, Marchetti P, Paris I, et al. Hypersensitivity reaction to carboplatin: successful resolution by replacement with cisplatin. Fur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2002; 23: 335–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Ottaiano A, Tambaro R, Greggi S, et al. Safety of cisplatin after severe hypersensitivity reactions to carboplatin in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Anticancer Res 2003; 23: 3465–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Libra M, Sorio R, Buonadonna A, et al. Cisplatin may be a valid alternative approach in ovarian carcinoma with carboplatin hypersensitivity: report of three cases. Tumori. 2003; 89: 311–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Kechijian P, Sadick NS, Mariglio J, et al. Cytarabine-induced inflammation in the seborrheic keratoses of Leser-Trelat. Ann Intern Med. 1979; 91: 868–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Omura EF, Torre D. Inflammation of actinic keratoses due to systemic fluorouracil therapy. JAMA. 1969; 208: 150–1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Epstein E. Does intermittent “pulse” topical 5-fluorouracil therapy allow destruction of actinic keratoses without significant inflammation?. J Am Acad Dermalot. 1998; 38: 77–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Johnson TM, Rapini RP, Duvic M. Inflammation of actinic keratoses from systemic chemotherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987; 17 (2 Pt 1): 192–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Hardwick N, Murray A. Inflammation of actinic keratoses induced by cytotoxic drugs. Br J Dermatol. 1986; 114: 639–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Coppes MJ, Jorgenson K, Arlette JP. Cutaneous toxicity following the administration of dactinomycin. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1997; 29: 226–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Coldiron BM, Manders SM. Persistent Candida intertrigo treated with fluconazole. Arch Dermatol. 1991; 127: 165–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Halme M, Jekunen A, Tamminen K, et al. Phase II study of weekly gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Respir Med. 1997; 91: 423–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Fitzpatrick JE. New histopathologic findings in drug eruptions. Dermatol Clin. 1992; 10: 19–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Yokel BK, Friedman KJ, Farmer ER, et al. Cutaneous pathology following etoposide therapy. J Cutan Pathol. 1987; 14: 326–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Wade TR, Ackerman AB. The effects of resin of podophyllin on condyloma acuminatum. Am J Dermatopathol. 1984; 6: 109–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Sinibaldi VJ, Carducci M, Laufer M, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a short course of estramustine phosphate and docetaxel (Taxotere) in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Semin Oncol. 1999; 26 (5 Suppl. 17): 45–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Ek T, Jarfelt M, Mellander L, et al. Proinflammatory cytokines mediate the systemic inflammatory response associated with high-dose cytarabine treatment in children. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001; 37: 459–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Cling WJ. Cytarabine syndrome revisited [letter]. Br J Haematol. 2003; 122: 875

    Google Scholar 

  122. Manoharan A. The cytarabine syndrome in adults. Aust N Z J Med. 1985; 15: 45–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Naidu MU, Ramana GV, Ram PU, et al. Chemotherapy-induced and/or radiation therapy-induced oral mucositis: complicating the treatment of cancer. Neoplasia. 2004; 6: 423–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Aranda E, Diaz-Rubio E, Cervantes A, et al. Randomized trial comparing monthly low-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus with weekly high-dose 48-hour continuous-infusion fluorouracil for advanced colorectal cancer: a Spanish Cooperative Group for Gastrointestinal Tumor Therapy (TTD) study. Ann Oncol. 1998; 9: 727–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Del Pozo J, Martinez W, Garcia-Silva J, et al. Cutaneous ulceration as a sign of methotrexate toxicity. Fur J Dermatol. 2001; 11: 450–2

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Camps C, Felip E, Sanchez JM, et al. Phase II trial of the novel taxane BMS-184476 as second-line in non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2005; 16: 597–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Picozzi VJ, Pohlman BL, Morrison VA, et al. Patterns of chemotherapy administration in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Oncology (Williston Park). 2001; 15: 1296–314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Ferrara F, Palmieri S, De Simone M, et al. High-dose idarubicin and busulphan as conditioning to autologous stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2005; 128: 234–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Aguilar-Ponce J, Granados-Garcia M, Villavicencio V, et al. Phase II trial of gemcitabine concurrent with radiation for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol. 2004; 15: 301–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Clarkson JE, Worthington HV, Eden OB. Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; (3): CD000978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Spielberger R, Stiff P, Bensinger W, et al. Palifermin for oral mucositis after intensive therapy for hematologic cancers. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 2590–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Palifermin (Kepivance) for myelotoxic-therapy-related mucositis. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2005; 47: 36

  133. Albares MP, Belinchon I, Pascual JC, et al. Subungal abscesses secondary to paclitaxel. Dermatol Online J. 2003; 9: 16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Mackay-Wiggan J, Nair KG, Halasz CL. Onycholysis associated with paclitaxel. Cutis. 2003; 71: 229–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Leonard GD, Zujewski JA. Docetaxel-related skin, nail, and vascular toxicity. Ann Pharmacother. 2003; 37: 148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Hainsworth JD. Practical aspects of weekly docetaxel administration schedules. Oncologist. 2004; 9: 538–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Dainichi T, Tanaka M, Tsuruta N, et al. Development of multiple paronychia and periungual granulation in patients treated with gefitinib, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor. Dermatology 2003; 207: 324–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Curran CF. Onycholysis in doxorubicin-treated patients. Arch Dermatol. 1990; 126: 1244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Nicolopoulos J, Howard A. Docetaxel-induced nail dystrophy. Aus J Dermatol. 2002; 43: 293–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Piroth MD, Krempien R, Wannenmacher M, et al. Radiation recall dermatitis from docetaxel. Onkologie. 2002; 25: 438–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Friedlander PA, Bansal R, Schwartz L, et al. Gemcitabine-related radiation recall preferentially involves internal tissue and organs. Cancer. 2004; 100: 1793–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz Van Haperen V, et al. Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 3402–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Armstrong RB, Poh-Fitzpatrick MB. Methotrexate and ultraviolet radiation. Arch Dermatol 1982; 118: 177–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Guzzo C, Kaidby K. Recurrent recall of sunburn by methotrexate. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1995; 11: 55–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Morkas M, Fleming D, Hahl M. Challenges in oncology: case 2. Radiation recall associated with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 867–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Breza TS, Halprin KM, Taylor JR. Photosensitivity reaction to vinblastine. Arch Dermatol. 1975; 111: 1168–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. Boman NL, Tron VA, Bally MB, et al. Vincristine-induced dermal toxicity is significantly reduced when the drug is given in liposomes. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1996; 37: 351–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Arthur DW, Koo D, Zwicker RD, et al. Partial breast brachytherapy after lumpectomy: low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate experience. Int J Radial Oncol Biol Phys. 2003; 56: 681–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Groen HJ, Sleijfer S, Meijer C, et al. Carboplatin- and cisplatin-induced potentiation of moderate-dose radiation cytotoxicity in human lung cancer cell lines. Br J Cancer. 1995; 72: 1406–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. Solberg Jr LA, Wick MR, Bruckman JE. Doxorubicin-enhanced skin reaction after whole-body electron-beam irradiation for leukemia cutis. Mayo Clin Proc; 1980; 55: 711–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Venal-Bouvet L, Ly K, Szelag JC, et al. Thrombotic microangiopathy and digital necrosis: two unrecognized toxicities of gemcitabine. Anticancer Drugs. 2003; 14: 829–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Geisler JP, Schraith DF, Manahan KJ, et al. Gemcitabine associated vasculitis leading to necrotizing enterocolitis and death in women undergoing primary treatment for epithelial ovarian/peritoneal cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 92: 705–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Dereure O, Navarro R, Rossi JF, et al. Rituximab-induced vasculitis. Dermatology. 2001; 203: 83–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. Weinlich G, Schuler G, Greil R, et al. Leg ulcers associated with long-term hydroxyurea therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998; 39 (2 Pt 2): 372–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Nuver J, Gietema JA. Thromboembolic complications during cisplatin-containing chemotherapy for testicular cancer: a problem in the short and possibly also the long term. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003; 147: 428–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Icli F, Karaoguz H, Dincol D, et al. Severe vascular toxicity associated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Cancer. 1993; 72: 587–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. Berger CC, Bokemeyer C, Schneider M, et al. Secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon and other late vascular complications following chemotherapy for testicular cancer. Fur J Cancer. 1995; 31A (13-14): 2229–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Voorburg AM, van Beek FT, Slee PH, et al. Vasculitis due to gemcitabine. Lung Cancer. 2002; 36: 203–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Aragane Y, Okamoto T, Yajima A, et al. Hydroxyurea-induced foot ulcer successfully treated with a topical basic fibroblast growth factor product. Br J Dermatol. 2003; 148: 599–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Kido M, Tago O, Fujiwara H, et al. Leg ulcer associated with hydroxyurea treatment in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukaemia: successful treatment with prostaglandin El and pentoxifylline. Br J Dermatol. 1998; 139: 1124–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. Uthman I. Pharmacological therapy of vasculitis: an update. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2004; 4: 177–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. Lamprecht P, Lerin-Lozano C, Merz H, et al. Rituximab induces remission in refractory HCV associated cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003; 62: 1230–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. Saigal K, Valencia IC, Cohen J, et al. Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis with angioedema, a rare presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus: rapid response to rituximab. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003; 49 (5 Suppl.): 283–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Zaja F, De Vita S, Mazzaro C, et al. Efficacy and safety of rituximab in type II mixed cryoglobulinemia. Blood. 2003; 101: 3827–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  165. Arzoo K, Sadeghi S, Liebman HA. Treatment of refractory antibody mediated autoimmune disorders with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab). Ann Rheum Dis. 2002; 61: 922–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  166. Specks U, Fervenza FC, McDonald TJ, et al. Response of Wegener’s granulomatosis to anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 44: 2836–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. Needle MN. Safety experience with IMC-C225, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody. Semin Oncol. 2002; 29 (5 Suppl. 14): 55–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  168. Motzer RJ, Amato R, Todd M, et al. Phase II trial of antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody C225 in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Invest New Drugs. 2003; 21: 99–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. Saltz LB, Meropol NJ, Loehrer Sr PJ, et al. Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 1201–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. Curran CF. Doxorubicin-associated facial flushing. Arch Dermatol. 1992; 128: 1408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. Skelton H, Linstrum J, Smith K. Host-vs.-altered-host eruptions in patients on liposomal doxorubicin. J Cutan Pathol. 2002; 29: 148–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Pascual JC, Banuls J, Belinchon I, et al. Trichomegaly following treatment with gefitinib (ZD1839). Br J Dermatol. 2004; 151: 1111–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. Gooptu C, Littlewood TJ, Frith P, et al. Paraneoplastic pemphigus: an association with fludarabine?. Br J Dermatol. 2001; 144: 1255–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. Ahmed AR, Avram MM, Duncan LM. Case 23-2003: a 79-year-old woman with gastric lymphoma and erosive mucosal and cutaneous lesions. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 382–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Schadlow MB, Anhalt GJ, Sinha AA. Using rituximab (anti-CD20 antibody) in a patient with paraneoplastic pemphigus. J Drugs Dermatol. 2003; 2: 564–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Senet P, Aractingi S, Pomeuf M, et al. Hydroxyurea induced dermatomyositis like eruption. Br J Dermatol. 1995; 133: 455–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  177. Pamuk GE, Turgut B, Vural O, et al. Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin in chronic myeloid leukaemia: complication of hydroxymea therapy. Clin Lab Haematol. 2003; 25: 329–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  178. Sanchez-Palacios C, Guitart J. Hydroxyurea-associated squamous dysplasia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004; 51: 293–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. De Benedittis M, Petruzzi M, Giardina C, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma during long-term treatment with hydroxymea. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2004; 29: 605–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Van Cutsem E, Blijham GH. Irinotecan versus infusional 5-fluorouracil: a phase III study in metastatic colorectal cancer following failure on first-line 5-fluorouracil. V302 Study Group. Semin Oncol. 1999; 26 (1 Suppl. 5): 13–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Von Hoff DD. The taxoids: same roots, different drugs. Semin Oncol; 1997; 24 (4 Suppl. 13): 3–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Snehal P. Amin, MD, for providing the clinical images of his patient used in figure 8 and figure 9. No funding sources were used to assist in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela J. Wyatt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wyatt, A.J., Leonard, G.D. & Sachs, D.L. Cutaneous Reactions to Chemotherapy and their Management. Am J Clin Dermatol 7, 45–63 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200607010-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200607010-00005

Keywords

Navigation