Skip to main content
Log in

Lack of Bioequivalence between Two Aciclovir Tablets in Healthy Subjects

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to compare the systemic bioavailability of two aciclovir tablets, Rouz-Aciclovir (test) and Zovirax® (reference), in 12 healthy volunteers.

Methods:

In a crossover design, each subject received a single oral dose of aciclovir 400 mg followed by a 7-day washout period. Plasma concentrations of aciclovir were measured for up to 12 hours using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with a lower limit of quantification of 50 μg/L.

Results:

The mean values of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 12 hours (AUC12) and from time 0 to infinity (AUC), and plasma half-life following administration of the test product were 999.6 μg/L, 2.08 h, 4911.2 μg/L · h, 5417.7 μg/L · h and 3.08 h, respectively, and for the reference product 775.8 μg/ L, 2.58 h, 3862.1 μg/L · h, 4295.4 μg/L · h and 3.14 h, respectively. The test/ reference geometric ratio for Cmax (90% CI) was 1.30 (97.1, 174.8). The test/ reference geometric ratios for AUC12 (90% CI) and AUC (90% CI) were 1.26 (99.7, 159.1) and 1.24 (98.9, 155.6), respectively. Therefore, the 90% CIs of Cmax, AUC12 and AUC were not within the acceptable range of 80 and 125 suggested by the US FDA bioequivalence guideline.

Conclusion:

The results of the present study suggest that the aciclovir test product was not bioequivalent to the reference product. The exact reasons for this remain to be determined. However, we think the difference should be attributed to the difference in the type and amounts of ingredients used in the formulation that probably affect the contact time of aciclovir with the sites of absorption in the gut.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Table I
Table II
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Elion GB, Furman PA, Fyfe JA, et al. The selectivity of action of an antiherpetic agent, 9-(2-hydroxyethoxymethyl) guanine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977; 74: 5716–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeClercq E. Antivirals for the treatment of herpesvirus infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 1993; 32Suppl. A: 121–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McEvoy G. AHFS Drugs information, American Society of Health System Pharmacists. Bethesda (MD): Atlantic Books, 1998: 471–80

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fletcher C, Bean B.Evaluation of oral acyclovir therapy. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1985; 19: 518–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagstaff AJ, Faulds D, Goa KL. Acyclovir: a reappraisal of its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 1994; 47: 153–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bahrami G, Mirzaeei S, Kiani A. Determination of acyclovir in human serum by high-performance liquid chromatography using liquid-liquid extraction and its application in pharmacokinetic studies. J Chromatogr B 2005; 816: 327–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bangaru RA, Bansal YK, Rao ARM, et al. Rapid, simple and sensitive high-performance liquid Chromatographic method for detection and determination of acyclovir in human plasma and its use in bioavailability studies. J Chromatogr B 2000; 739: 231–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vergin H, Kikuta C, Mascher H, et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of different formulations of acyclovir. Arzneimittelforschung 1995; 45: 508–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Najib NM, Idkaidek N, Beshtawi M, et al. Bioequivalence assessment of Lovrak (Julphar, UAE) compared with Zovirax (GlaxoWellcome, UK), two brands of acyclovir, in healthy human volunteers. Biopharma Drug Dispos 2005; 26: 7–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Meadows KC, Dressman JB. Mechanism of acyclovir uptake in rat jejunum. Pharm Res 1990; 7: 299–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miserocchi E, Modorati G, Galli L, et al. Efficacy of valacyclovir vs acyclovir for the prevention of recurrent herpes simplex virus eye disease: a pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 144: 547–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghosh PK, Majithiya RJ, Umrethia ML, et al. Design and development of microemulsion drug delivery system of acyclovir for improvement of oral bioavailability. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2006; 7article 77): E1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Corti G, Maestrelli F, Cirri M, et al. Development and evaluation of an in vitro method for prediction of human drug absorption: II. Demonstration of the method suitability. Eur J Pharm Sci 2006; 27: 354–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindenberg M, Kopp S, Dressman JB. Classification of orally administered drugs on the World Health Organization Model list of Essential Medicines according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004; 58: 265–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Blume HH, Schug BS. The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS): class III drugs. Better candidate for BA/BE waiver? J Pharm Sci 1999; 9: 117–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Polli JE. In vitro-in vivo relationships of several ‘immediate’ release tablets containing a low permeability drug. Adv Exp Med Biol 1997; 423: 191–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koch KM, Parr AF, Tomlinson JJ, et al. Effect of sodium acid pyrophosphate on ranitidine bioavailability and gastrointestinal transit time. Pharm Res 1993; 10: 1027–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adkin DA, Davis SS, Sparrow RA, et al. The effect of mannitol on the oral bioavailability of cimetidine. J Pharm Sci 1995; 84: 1405–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Rouzdaru Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Tehran, Iran. Dr Ghaffari is an employee of Rouzdaru Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. The other authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Amini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amini, H., Javan, M., Gazerani, P. et al. Lack of Bioequivalence between Two Aciclovir Tablets in Healthy Subjects. Clin. Drug Investig. 28, 47–53 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200828010-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200828010-00006

Keywords

Navigation