Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the Feasibility of Using an Adverse Drug Reaction Preventability Scale in Clinical Practice

A Study in a French Emergency Department

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To assess the preventability of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) leading to hospital admissions and to investigate the feasibility of the use of a standardised preventability scale in clinical practice.

Design: The study was a prospective pharmacovigilance study. All patients more than 15 years old admitted to an emergency department during a period of 4 weeks were included. Characteristics of patients admitted for a suspected ADR (cases) were compared to those admitted for other reasons (controls). Preventability was assessed in two different ways: (i) by using a standardised preventability scale; and (ii) by the assessment of four reviewers without the scale. Results of the two methods were compared.

Patients: In total, 671 patients were admitted to an emergency department during the study period.

Results: Overall, 44 ADRs were identified involving 41 patients. The incidence of hospital admissions for ADRs was 6.1 per 100 admissions (95% CI 4.4–8.3). According to the French causality assessment method, 71% of ADRs were ‘possible’, 18% were ‘plausible’ and 11% were ‘likely’. Using the standardised preventability scale, one-third of all ADRs were considered as being preventable (9% ‘definitely’ and 25% ‘potentially’ preventable). Reviewers found that 54.5% of ADRs were ‘preventable’. Discrepancies between the two methods concerned mainly cases defined as not preventable by the scale. In general, reviewers overestimated the preventability of ADR compared with the scale.

Conclusions: These results emphasise that ADRs leading to hospitalisation are frequent, with one-third of them likely to be preventable. Moreover, the risk of ADRs mainly involved a small number of drugs. Our experience suggests that there is a need for further studies to validate the French standardised scale of preventability assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, et al. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: excess lenght of stay, extra costs and attribuable mortality. JAMA 1997; 277(4): 301–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hallas J, Harvald B, Gram LF, et al. Drug related hospital admissions: the role of definitions and intensity of data collection. J Intern Med 1990; 228: 83–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Detournay B, Fagnani F, Pouyanne P, et al. Cost of hospitalizations related to side-effects of drugs. Therapie 2000; 55: 137–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Einarson TR. Drug related hospital admissions. Ann Pharmacother 1993; 27: 832–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Imbs JL, Pouyanne P, Haramburu F, et al. Iatrogénie médicamenteuse: estimation de sa prévalence dans les hôpitaux publics français. Therapie 1999; 54: 21–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pouyanne P, Haramburu F, Imbs JL, et al. Admissions to hospital caused by adverse drug reactions: cross sectional incidence study [letter]. BMJ 2000; 320: 1036

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Letrilliart L, Hanslik T, Biour M, et al. Postdischarge adverse drug reactions in primary care originating from hospial care in France: a nationwide prospective study. Drug Saf 2001; 24(10): 781–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lagnaoui R, Moore N, Fach J, et al. Adverse drug reactions in a department of systemic diseases-oriented internal medicine: prevalence, incidence, direct costs and avoidability. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 55: 181–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pearson TF, Pittman DG, Longley JM, et al. Factors associated with preventable adverse drug reactions. Am J Hosp Pharm 1994; 51: 2268–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. JAMA 1995; 274: 29–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dartnell JGA, Anderson RP, Chohan V, et al. Hospitalisation for adverse events related to drug therapy: incidence, avoidability and costs. Med J Aust 1996; 164: 659–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Petersen LA, Brennan TA, O’Neil AC, et al. Does housestaff discontinuity of care increase the risk for preventable adverse events? Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 866–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Raschetti R, Morgutti M, Menniti-Ippolito F, et al. Suspected adverse drug events requiring emergency department visits or hospital of admissions. Eur Clin J Pharmacol 1999; 54: 959–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schumock GT, Thornton JP. Focusing on preventability of adverse drug reactions [letter]. Hosp Pharm 1992; 27: 538

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Imbs JL, Pletan Y, Spriet A, et al. Evaluation de la iatrogénèse médicamenteuse évitable: méthodologie. Therapie 1998; 53: 365–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organization. Collaborating centers for international drug monitoring. WHO publication DEM/NC/ 84.153 (E). Geneva: WHO, 1984

  17. Organisation Mandiale de la Santos. Classification Internationale des Maladies, geme revision(ICD-9). Geneva, Switzerland, 1977

  18. Anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification index, Geneva: WHO Collaborating Center for Drug Statistics Methodology, 1992

  19. Bégaud B. Dictionary of pharmacoepidemiology. ARME-Pharmacovigilance. New York; John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bégaud B, Evreux JC, Jouglard J, et al. Unexpected or toxic drug reaction assessment (imputation): actualization of the method used in France. Therapie 1985; 40: 115–8

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hallas J, Gram LF, Grodum E, et al. Drug-related admissions to medical wards: a population base survey. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 33: 61–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bongard V, Menard-Tache S, Bagheri H, et al. Perception of the risk of adverse drug reactions: difference between health professionals and non-health professionals. Br J Clin Pharmacol. In press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olivier, P., Boulbés, O., Tubery, M. et al. Assessing the Feasibility of Using an Adverse Drug Reaction Preventability Scale in Clinical Practice. Drug-Safety 25, 1035–1044 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200225140-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200225140-00005

Keywords

Navigation