Skip to main content
Log in

Sulphur Mustard Injuries of the Skin

Pathophysiology and Management

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Toxicological Reviews

Abstract

Sulphur mustard is a vesicant (blistering agent), which produces chemical burns with widespread blistering. It was used extensively as a chemical warfare agent in the First World War, and has allegedly been employed in a number of conflicts since then, most recently by Iraq against Iran (1984–1987). The potential further use of mustard in military conflicts and by terrorists remains a significant threat that if realised in practice would result in a large number of casualties with severely incapacitating, partial thickness burns. Such injuries clearly present a huge potential wound care problem.

The development and healing of mustard-induced cutaneous injuries has not only been observed in human casualties, but has been studied recently at the microscopic and ultrastructural levels in several animal models. Vesication generally begins on the second day after exposure, and may progress for up to 2 weeks. Wound healing is considerably slower than for a comparable thermal burn, and patients often require extended hospital treatment. The current management strategy is essentially symptomatic and supportive. Recently, two techniques for removing damaged tissue and improving wound healing have been investigated. Mechanical dermabrasion and laser debridement (‘lasablation’) both produced an increased rate of wound healing in animal models, and may be of benefit in a clinical context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Table I.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of tradenames is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Mandl H, Freilinger G. First report on victims of chemical warfare in the Gulf-war treated in Vienna. Proceedings of the First World Congress on Biological and Chemical Warfare; 1984 Ghent, Belgium, 330–40

  2. Pauser G, Alloy A, Carvena M, et al. Lethal intoxication by war gases on Iranian soldiers: therapeutic interventions on survivors of mustard gas and mycotoxin immersion. Proceedings of the First World Congress on Biological and Chemical Warfare; 1984 Ghent, Belgium, 51

  3. Colardyn F, De Keyser H, Ringoir S, et al. Clinical observation and therapy of injuries with vesicants. J Toxicol Clin Exp 1986; 6: 217–46

    Google Scholar 

  4. Willems JL. Clinical management of mustard gas casualties. Ann Med Mil (Belg) 1989; 3 Suppl.: 1–61

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schrafl A. The symptoms, prophylaxis and the therapy of mustard injuries to the skin. Protar 1938; 4: 111–8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gales KA, Gross CL, Krebs RC, Smith WJ. Proceedings of the 1989 Medical Defence Bioscience Review (PMBR), USAMRDC; 1989 Aug 15/17; MD: USAMRICD, 1989: 437–40

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flesch P, Goldstone SB, Weidman FD. Blister formation and separation of the epidermis from the corium in laboratory animals. J Invest Dermatol 1952; 18: 187–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McAdams AJ. A study of mustard vesication. J Invest Dermatol 1956; 26: 317–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Papirmeister B, Gross CL, Petrali JP, et al. Pathology produced by sulphur mustard in human skin grafts on a thymic nude mice: I. Gross and light microscopic changes. J Toxicol Cutaneous Ocul Toxicol 1984; 3: 371–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Foulkes CH. Gas: the story of the special brigade. London: William Blackwood and Son, 1934

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guthrie F. On some derivatives from the olefins. London: Chemical Society, 1860; XII: 109

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer V. Versuche über die haltbarkeit von Sublimatlosungen. Berichte Deutsch Chem Gesellschaft 1886; 1: 1725–39

    Google Scholar 

  13. Papirmeister B, Feister AJ, Robinson SI, Ford RD, editors. Historical and modern use of sulphur mustard in warfare. In: Medical defense against mustard gas. Boston (MA): CRC Press, 1991: 1–9

  14. Ireland MM. Medical aspects of gas warfare. In: The medical department of the United States army in the World War. Vol. XIV. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1926

    Google Scholar 

  15. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. History of the Great War. Medical services: diseases of the war. Vol. II. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1923: 291

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haidane JBS. Callinicus, a defence of chemical warfare. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd, 1925

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alexander SF. Medical report of the Bari harbour mustard casualties. Mil Surg 1947; 101: 1–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Medema J. Mustard gas: the science of H. Nucl Biol Chem Defence Technol Int 1982; 1(4): 66–71

    Google Scholar 

  19. United Nations Security Council. Report of the specialists appointed by the Secretary General to investigate allegations by the Islamic Republic of Iran concerning the use of chemical weapons. New York: United Nations Security Council; 1984 Mar 26. UN Report S1/6433

    Google Scholar 

  20. United Nations Security Council. Report of the mission dispatched by the Secretary General to investigate allegations of the use of chemical weapons in the conflict between Iran and Iraq. New York: United Nations Security Council; 1986 Mar 12. UN Report S/17911

    Google Scholar 

  21. United Nations Security Council. Report of the mission dispatched by the Secretary General to investigate allegations of the use of chemical weapons in the conflict between the Islamic Republics of Iran and Iraq. New York: United Nations Security Council; 1987 May 8. UN Report S1/8852

    Google Scholar 

  22. Newman-Taylor AJ. Experience with mustard gas casualties [letter]. Lancet. 1991; 337: 242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Parry EJ. The chemistry of essential oils and artificial perfumes. Vol. 1. London: Scott, Greenwood and Son, 1921

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reynolds JE, editor. Martindale: the extra pharmacopoeia. 27th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  25. Windholz M, Budavari S, Stroumtsos LY, et al., editors. The Merck Index: an encyclopaedia of chemicals and drugs. 9th ed. Rathway (NJ): Merck, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  26. Warthin AS, Weller CV. The medical aspects of mustard gas poisoning. London: Henry Kimpton, 1919

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cullumbine H. Medical aspects of mustard gas poisoning. Nature (Lond) 1947; 159: 151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Eady RA. Babes, blisters and basement membranes: from sticky molecules to epidermolysis bullosa. Clin Exp Dermatol 1987; 12: 161–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin AN, Carter DM. Epidermolysis bullosa: when the skin falls apart. J Paediatr 1989; 114: 349–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gawkrodger DI, Stavropoulos PG, McLaren KM, et al. Bullous lichen planus and lichen planus pemphigoides: clinicopathological comparisons. Clin Exp Dermatol 1989; 14: 150–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilsteed EM, Bhogal BS, Das AK, et al. Lichen planus pemphigoides: a clinicopathological study of nine cases. Histopathology 1991; 19: 147–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lindsay CD, Rice P. Changes in connective tissue macromolecular components of Yucatan mini-pig skin following application of sulphur mustard vapour. Hum Exp Toxicol 1995; 14: 341–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mershon MM, Mitcheltree LW, Petrali JP, et al. Hairless guinea-pig bioassay model for vesicant vapour exposure. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1990; 15: 622–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mitcheltree LW, Mershon MM, Wall HG, et al. Microblister formation in vesicant-exposed pig skin. J Toxicol Cutaneous Ocul Toxicol 1989; 8: 309–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Brown RF, Rice P. Histopathological changes in large white pig skin following challenge with sulphur mustard. J Cell Pathol 1998; 3(2): 43–56

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pearson RW. Some observations on epidermolysis bullosa and experimental blisters. In: Montagna W, Lobitz WC, editors. The Epidermis. New York: Academic, 1964: 611–626

    Google Scholar 

  37. Takigawa M, Ofuji S. Early changes in human epidermis following thermal burn: an electron microscopic study. Acta Derm Venereol 1977; 57: 187–93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sulzberger MB, Katz JH. The absence of skin irritants in the contents of vesicles. US Navy Med Bull 1943; 43: 1258–62

    Google Scholar 

  39. Renshaw B. Mechanisms in the production of cutaneous injuries by sulphur and nitrogen mustards. In: Chemical warfare agents and related chemical problems. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: US Office of Science Research and Development, National Defence Research Committee, 1940: 479–518

    Google Scholar 

  40. Papirmeister B, Gross CL, Meier HL, et al. Molecular basis for mustard-induced vesication. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1985; 5 Suppl.: 134–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Renshaw B. Observations on the role of water in the susceptibility of human skin to injury by vesicant vapours. J Invest Dermatol 1947; 9: 75–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Melior SG, Rice P, Cooper GJ. Vesicant burns. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44: 434–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Vögt RF, Dannenberg AM, Schofield BH, et al. The pathogenesis of skin lesions caused by sulphur mustard. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1984; 4 Suppl.: 71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hendrickx A, Hendrickx B. Management of war gas casualties [letter]. Lancet 1990; 336: 1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Brown RF, Rice P. Histopathological changes in Yucatan mini-pig skin following challenge with sulphur mustard: a sequential study of the first 24 hours following challenge. Int J Exp Pathol 1997; 78: 9–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Woodley DT, O’Keefe EJ, Prunieras M. Cutaneous wound healing: a model for cell-matrix interactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985; 12: 420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Shakespeare VA, Shakespeare PG. Growth of cultured human keratinocytes on fibrous dermal collagen: a scanning electron microscopic study. Burns Incl Therm Inj 1987; 13: 343–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fleming S. Cell adhesion and epithelial differentiation. J Pathol 1991; 164: 95–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Holmes JD, Rayner CR. The technique of late dermabrasion for deep dermal burns: implications for planning treatment. Burns Incl Therm Inj 1984; 10: 349–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Rice P, Brown RF, Lam DG, et al. Dermabrasion: a novel concept in the surgical management of sulphur mustard injuries. Burns 2000; 26: 34–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Evison D, Brown RF, Rice P. The treatment of sulphur mustard burns with laser debridement. Br J Plast Surg. In Press

  52. Lam DG, Rice P, Brown RF. The treatment of Lewisite burns with laser debridement: lasablation. Burns 2002; 28: 19–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

© British Crown copyright 2003/Dstl — published with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this manuscript. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rice, P. Sulphur Mustard Injuries of the Skin. Toxicol Rev 22, 111–118 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2165/00139709-200322020-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00139709-200322020-00006

Keywords

Navigation