Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of Life Evaluation of Antihypertensive Drugs

  • Review Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Eleven studies (10 randomised controlled trials and 1 large open study) that evaluated quality of life (QOL) are reviewed. The areas of QOL measured by the studies are compared and a consensus is reported that health-related QOL measures in patients with hypertension should include: symptomatic and psychological well-being, activity (work, leisure, sleep, sexual activity and social participation), cognitive function and life satisfaction. Recommended methods for measuring these aspects of QOL are noted.

Seven studies included atenolol as 1 of the treatments and the effects of this drug on QOL are reviewed. The drug appears to maintain QOL as well as the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors captopril, enalapril and cilazapril. One trial also suggests that verapamil maintains QOL as well as atenolol, although this was not suggested by the nonrandomised study. Nifedipine slow release (SR) and propranolol both fared worse than atenolol in 2 separate trials, but 1 trial suggested that nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) was preferred to atenolol in terms of QOL. In the latter study, however, only patients completing the prescribed therapy revealed a preference for nifedipine GITS; this was absent in an intention-to-treat analysis. The rate of discontinuation of nifedipine therapy was high, underlining the necessity for an intention-to-treat analysis in trials assessing QOL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care 19: 787–805, 1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bulpitt CJ, Fletcher AE. The measurement of quality of life in hypertensive patients: a practical approach. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 30: 353–364, 1990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A, Converse PE, Rodgers WL. The quality of American life, p. 554, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Croog SJ, Kong BW, Levine S, Weir MR, Baume RM, et al. Hypertensive black men and women: quality of life and effects of antihypertensive medications. Archives of Internal Medicine 150: 1733–1741, 1990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Croog SH, Levine S, Testa MA, Brown B, Bulpitt CJ, et al. The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life. New England Journal of Medicine 314: 1657–1664, 1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L. The SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 9: 13–28, 1973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis LR, Spencer PM. The brief symptom inventory (BSI), administration, scoring and procedures manual I. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, privately printed, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy HJ. The psychological general well-being (PGWB) index. In Wenger et al. (Eds) Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies, pp. 170–183, LeJacq, New York, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher AE, Bulpitt CJ. Quality of life during antihypertensive treatment: results from a randomised double-blind trial of pinacidil and nifedipine. Journal of Hypertension 7 (Suppl. 6): S364, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher AE, Bulpitt CJ, Chase DM, Collins WCJ, Furberg CD, et al. Quality of life on three antihypertensive treatments: cilazapril, atenolol, nifedipine. Second International Symposium on ACE Inhibition, London, 17–21 February 1991.

  • Fletcher AE, Bulpitt CJ, Hawkins CM, Havinga TK, ten Berge BSt, et al. Quality of life on antihypertensive therapy: a randomized double-blind controlled trial of captopril and atenolol. Journal of Hypertension 8: 463–466, 1990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher AE, Chester PC, Hawkins CMA, Latham SN, Pike LA, et al. The effects of verapamil and propranolol on quality of life in hypertension. Journal of Human Hypertension 3: 125–130, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher AE, Hunt BM, Bulpitt CJ. Evaluation of quality of life in clinical trials in cardiovascular disease. Journal of Chronic Disease 40: 557–566, 1987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D. Manual of the general health questionnaire, Windsor NFER-Nelson Publishing Company, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison WM, Stewart J, Ehrhardt AA, Rabkin J, McGrath P, et al. A controlled study of the effects of antidepressants on sexual function. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 21: 85–88, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchett S, Schuman H. White respondents and race of interviewer effects. Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 523–528, 1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick AL, Waller PC, Bernn KE, Pringle SD, Callender JS, et al. Comparison of enalapril and atenolol in middle to moderate hypertension. American Journal of Medicine 86: 421–426, 1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • House JS. Work stress and social support, Addison Wesley, Reading, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner R, Sheffield BF. A self-rating scale of distress. Psychological Medicine 3: 88–100, 1973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ley P. The measurement of comprehensibility. Journal of the Institute of Health Education 11: 17–20, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair DM, Lorr M, Doppleman LF. Manual for the profile of mood states. San Diego Educational and Industrial Testing Services, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer A, Fletcher A, Hamilton G, Muriss S, Bulpitt C. A comparison of verapamil and nifedipine on quality of life. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 30: 365–370, 1990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reitan RM. Trail making manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Department of Neurology, Section of Neuropsychology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey A. L’examine psychologique dans les cas d’encephalopathie traumatique. Archiv für Psychologie 28: 286–340, 1941

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielman AJ, Tannebaum R, Saskin P, et al. A comparison between objective and subjective sleep latency in patients with chronic insomnia. Abstract. Sleep Research 9: 225, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner SS, Friedhoff AJ, Wilson BL, Wecker JR, Santo JP. Antihypertensive therapy and quality of life: a comparison of atenolol, captopril, enalapril and propranolol. Journal of Human Hypertension 4: 217–225, 1990

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach WJ, Rush DR, Brucker PC, Holverson H, Emmett ID, et al. A report from CEN. Managing hypertension in family practice: a nationwide collaborative study of the use of four antihypertensives in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 2: 172–190, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa MA, Hollenberg NK, Anderson RB, Williams GH. Assessment of quality of life by patient and spouse during antihypertensive therapy with atenolol and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system. American Journal of Hypertension 4: 363–373, 1991

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Testa MA, Simonson DC. Measuring quality of life in hypertensive patients with diabetes. Postgraduate Medical Journal 64 (Suppl. 3): 50–58, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veit CT, Ware JE. The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 51: 730–742, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler D. A standardized memory scale for clinical use. Journal of Psychology 19: 87–95, 1945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler adults intelligence scale. Psychological Corporation, New York, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman MM, Bothwell S. Assessment of social adjustment by patient self report. Archives of General Psychiatry 33: 1111–1115, 1976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 ONN, England

    Christopher J. Bulpitt & Astrid E. Fletcher

Authors
  1. Christopher J. Bulpitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Astrid E. Fletcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bulpitt, C.J., Fletcher, A.E. Quality of Life Evaluation of Antihypertensive Drugs. Pharmacoeconomics 1, 95–102 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199201020-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199201020-00006

Keywords

Search

Navigation