Skip to main content
Log in

Etoposide

A Review of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties, and Therapeutic Potential in Combination Chemotherapy of Cancer

  • Drug Evaluation
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Synopsis

Etoposide is a podophyllotoxin derivative which delays progression of the cell cycle through the late S or early G2 phase. In vitro antitumour activity is dose and administration schedule— dependent and synergy, notably with cisplatin, has been demonstrated. The clinical profile of etoposide has been well characterised in small and non— small cell lung cancer and testicular cancer. The combination of etoposide and cisplatin has demonstrated substantial antineoplastic activity in the treatment of small cell lung cancer, testicular cancer, and promising activity in non— small cell lung cancer and acute myelogenous leukaemia. Etoposide and cisplatin provide a useful combination that is particularly beneficial as salvage chemotherapy in a variety of tumours resistant to other combination regimens. The therapeutic potential of the synergistic combination of etoposide with cisplatin or carboplatin continues to be explored and the optimum dosage schedule remains to be determined. Etoposide in combination with other cytotoxic drugs has shown substantial activity in the treatment of small cell lung cancer and testicular cancer, both seminomatous and nonseminomatous, as well as in the treatment of adult and childhood acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia, Hodgkin’s and non- Hodgkin’s lymphoma, some childhood solid tumours and trophoblastic disease. The adverse effect profile of etoposide is well characterised with myelosuppression, predominantly leucopenia, as the only major dose-limiting toxicity.

Thus, etoposide, administered as an intravenous infusion or orally, in conjunction with other cytotoxic drugs produces favourable remission rates as a first-line agent and as salvage chemotherapy in a variety of cancers, especially small cell lung and testicular cancer.

Pharmacodynamic Properties

The cytotoxicity of etoposide in vitro is both concentration-and time-dependent. Various animal and human carcinoma cell lines are sensitive to etoposide, and synergism has been demonstrated in tumours in mice with doxorubicin (adriamycin), cisplatin, 4-hydroxyperoxycyclophosphamide and vindesine. The sensitivity of cell lines to etoposide is also increased by verapamil. In vivo etoposide is particularly active against Lewis lung carcinoma and leukaemias in mice. The activity of etoposide is increased with multiple dosing and with certain frequencies of administration. Etoposide is thus dose schedule-dependent, with treatment every third or fourth day being optimal against murine leukaemias.

Certain metabolites of etoposide may be cytotoxic, probably from oxidation-reduction with a dehydrogenase enzyme. The mechanism by which etoposide or its metabolites, or both, causes DNA damage is probably from stabilisation of a DNA topoisomerase II complex such that the strand-rejoining activity of the enzyme is impaired. The number of single- and double-strand breaks is proportional to the concentration and length of incubation with etoposide, with more double-strand breaks occurring at higher concentrations and longer incubation times. Crossresistance has been demonstrated between other cytotoxic drugs that share a similar action on DNA topoisomerase II.

Etoposide delays progression of the cell cycle through late S or early G2 phases, and is without effect on tubulin assembly or accumulation of cells during metaphase. Inhibition of thymidine uptake as well as that of uridine, adenosine and guanosine, into isolated tumour cells is both concentration-and time-dependent. Recovery of granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM), an indicator of the haematopoietic reconstitution capacity of purged bone marrow in vitro, is also concentration-and time-dependent following addition of etoposide. Various leukaemia and lymphoma cell lines are sensitive to etoposide at concentrations which allow recovery of CFU-GM within 1 to 2 weeks.

Other mechanisms, however, are involved in resistance and crossresistance such as reduced drug uptake, and deactivation of etoposide or its metabolites.

Pharmacokinetic Properties

The plasma decay of etoposide usually fits a 2-compartment model. The peak plasma concentration of etoposide and area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) show an approximately linear relation to increasing intravenous dose. After intravenous infusion of etoposide 100 mg/m2 over a period of 30 to 60 minutes, a plasma concentration of 21 mg/L was observed within 5 minutes of completing administration. No evidence of drug accumulation is seen with daily infusions of etoposide 100 mg/m2. After oral administration peak plasma concentrations are achieved within 2 to 3 hours, but a linear relation of peak plasma concentration and AUC to increasing oral dose has not been clearly established although there is some evidence that such a dose-proportional relationship does exist up to 250 mg/m2 but not at higher dosages. The mean bioavailability of orally administered etoposide is approximately 50%.

The median apparent volume of distribution after a single intravenous dose and at steady-state is 9.7 and 8.3 L/m2, respectively; slightly higher values are found after oral administration. Penetration of etoposide into cerebrospinal fluid has been variable but generally low, while distribution into other tissues is poorly documented. Etoposide is highly bound to plasma albumin (approximately 94%).

Renal clearance accounts for up to 40% of the administered dose, and the principal metabolites recovered from urine are the hydroxy acid and the glucuronide. Biliary excretion plays a minor role in the elimination of etoposide. The median terminal phase elimination half-life of etoposide from studies in healthy adults evaluated using 2-compartment models is 5.6 hours after intravenous administration; similar half-lives are reported for the oral route.

Renal impairment decreases the plasma clearance and increases volume of distribution and elimination half-life of etoposide; a good correlation of plasma clearance with creatinine clearance is observed. Hepatic impairment appears to have less influence on etoposide pharmacokinetics. Prior administration of cisplatin increased etoposide AUC. Apart from this, disposition of etoposide is not altered by concomitant administration of a number of other cytotoxic agents often used in chemotherapy regimens, although the Tween 80 component of the intravenous formulation of etoposide may alter the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin.

Therapeutic Trials

Etoposide alone, administered intravenously, has demonstrated single agent cytotoxic activity with a response rate of at least 20% in the treatment of small cell lung cancer, nonseminomatous testicular cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, acute nonlymphocytic leukaemia and neuroblastoma. Consequently, etoposide has been added to standard chemotherapy regimens shown to be active in these tumours in an attempt to improve response rates. The dose-schedule dependency of etoposide was shown in vitro against various human malignant cell lines and animal models of leukaemia, and the various schedules used in early studies were prompted by this awareness. Recent studies of etoposide as primary treatment of patients with previously untreated small cell lung cancer have clearly demonstrated that efficacy of etoposide is related to administration schedule, although the optimum schedule remains to be established.

Etoposide has proved to be a very active cytotoxic agent in combination with cisplatin and the synergy of the 2 drugs is clinically relevant in small cell lung cancer, germ cell tumours and various other malignancies. Etoposide has been studied extensively in the initial treatment of small cell lung cancer. Nonrandomised studies of intravenous etoposide-containing regimens for primary treatment of limited disease small cell lung cancer showed the most active combinations to be etoposide with cyclosphosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine (CAV) or etoposide/cisplatin alternating with CAV or ifosfamide. In limited disease, complete responses (CR) were achieved in up to 76% of patients and overall responses [CR + partial responses (PR)] in 88 to 93%. In extensive disease these combination regimens achieved complete responses in 27% and 34% of patients, and overall responses in 65% and 78%, respectively. Randomised studies in patients with small cell lung cancer also show intravenous etoposide and cisplatin is an effective combination either alone or alternating with CAV. Etoposide also effectively substitutes for doxorubicin in the CAV regimen, and to improve response and, in one study, survival, when added to this regimen (CAVE) in patients with extensive disease. Used in intensification or consolidation therapy, etoposide in combination with cisplatin has demonstrated activity in patients with limited small cell lung cancer. Generally, lower overall response rates (27 to 75%) are observed with etoposide and cisplatin as salvage chemotherapy in relapsed or resistant small cell lung cancer than when used in previously untreated patients.

In non—small cell lung cancer, etoposide and cisplatin induced complete remission in 2 to 16% and partial remission in a further 24 to 53% of patients, with a median survival of 11 to 15 months. Addition of other drugs to this combination did not improve the response and survival rates. These results have been confirmed in randomised studies where complete remission in 1 to 11% and an overall response rate of 10 to 38% has been achieved with etoposide/cisplatin, or with etoposide combined with cyclophosphamide and/or doxorubicin (ACE).

Etoposide in combination with other cytotoxic drugs has also shown considerable activity in the treatment of testicular cancer. Complete remission rates achieved with cisplatin, bleomycin and vincristine were similar to those with cisplatin, bleomycin and etoposide in patients with seminoma (74 vs 68%), embryonal carcinoma (88 vs 93%) and teratocarcinoma (70 vs 78%), with a 2-year survival rate of approximately 80% in both treatment groups. Etoposide and cisplatin produced a 93% CR rate in seminomatous testicular cancer, and addition of bleomycin to this combination achieved 83 to 100% complete remission rate in nonseminomatous patients. As salvage chemotherapy, etoposide as monotherapy or in combination is of variable activity inducing CR in 11 to 71% of patients.

In acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia (ANLL), etoposide in combination with standard therapy of daunorubicin and cytarabine (cytosine arabinoside) improved remission duration and disease-free survival compared with doxorubicin and cytarabine. As salvage chemotherapy, etoposide has shown promising activity in combination with doxorubicin and cytarabine, and with amsacrine or azacitidine, or both, in children or adults with ANLL.

In Hodgkin’s disease, etoposide as first-line chemotherapy in combination with standard chemotherapy consisting of vincristine, chlorambucil and prednisolone, and etoposide alternated with these drugs plus procarbazine, was active as induction (77% CR). As salvage therapy, when combined with cyclophosphamide and carmustine, or combined with vinblastine, doxorubicin and prednisone and alternated with chlorambucil, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisolone, etoposide was effective (CR) in 23 to 67% of patients. In non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, induction with etoposide as monotherapy or in combination with CAV as first line therapy achieved response rates of 56 to 100%, while as salvage chemotherapy etoposide-containing regimens induced complete response in up to 29% of patients with refractory or relapsed lymphomas.

Etoposide in combination with doxorubicin as salvage therapy, induced complete remission in about 10% and overall response in less than 40% of patients with advanced breast cancer. In patients with advanced refractory ovarian adenocarcinoma, etoposide exhibited minimal activity when used intravenously, although better results were achieved when given intraperitoneally. In trophoblastic disease, etoposide as monotherapy or in combination produced complete remission in all of the small number of patients studied. The combination of etoposide and cisplatin has also demonstrated promising activity in small numbers of children with solid tumours including advanced neuroblastoma, advanced germ cell tumours and soft tissue sarcomas, both as induction or salvage therapy.

Adverse Effects

The dose-limiting toxicity of etoposide alone is myelosuppression, predominantly leucopenia. The leucocyte nadir occurs 8 to 10 days after treatment, with recovery usually by day 21. Thrombocytopenia is less common and recovery is evident by 21 to 28 days. Stomatitis is generally reported only occasionally at usual therapeutic dosages, although it is dose-limiting with high-dose regimens, diarrhoea is infrequent, and bronchospasm has occurred rarely. Alopecia, however, is frequent and even universal with some etoposide regimens. Neurotoxicity has seldom been reported, but the possible potentiation of vincristine-induced neurotoxicity by etoposide needs further investigation. Bolus intravenous injection has been associated with hypotension; thus it is recommended that etoposide be administered over a period of 30 to 60 minutes.

Dosage and Administration

The recommended intravenous dose of etoposide is an infusion of 50 to 100 mg/m2 over 30 to 60 minutes on 5 consecutive days, or 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5. For oral administration, twice the relevant intravenous dose should be given. The dosage should be repeated every 21 or 28 days, but should be adjusted on the basis of both nadir and pretreatment blood counts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abromowitch M, Bowman WP, Ochs J, Rivera G. Etoposide (VP-16) with prednisone and vincristine for the treatment of refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology 3: 789–792, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adamo V, Altavilla G, Buemi B, Catisti N, Maisano R, et al. Mitomycin C and etoposide as third line chemotherapy in metastatic and refractory breast cancer. Abstract. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (Suppl. 23): 60, 1989

  • Ahmann DL, Bisel HF, Edmonson JH, Hahn RG, O’Connell MJ, et al. Phase II study of VP-16-213 versus dianhydrogalactitol in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Cancer Treatment Reports 60: 1681–1682, 1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger P, Kühböck J, Kuzmits R, Schwarz HP. VP-16 therapy in cis-platinum-resistant testicular tumors. Proceedings of 12th International Congress of Chemotherapy, Florence, 1981

  • Aisner J, VanEcho DA, Whitacre M, Wiernik PH. A phase I trial of continuous infusion VP16-213 (Etoposide). Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 157–160, 1982b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aisner J, Whitacre M, Abrams J, Propert K. Doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide and platinum, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide for small-cell carcinoma of the lung. Seminars in Oncology 13: 54–62, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aisner J, Whitacre M, VanEcho DA, Wesley M, Wiernik PH. Doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and VP16-213 (ACE) in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 187–193, 1982a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alberto P, Mermillod B, Joss R, Obrecht JP, Martz G, et al. Etoposide, cisplatin and doxorubicin in patients with small lung cell cancer: tumor response and long term survival. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 22: 701–708, 1986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen LM, Marks C, Creaven PJ. 4’-demethyl-epipodophyllic acid-9-(4,6, O-ethylidene-beta-D-glucopyranoside), the major urinary metabolite of VP16-213 in man. Proceedings of the American Association of Cancer Research 17: 6, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Amadori S, Ceci A, Comelli A, Madon E, Masera G, et al. Treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia in children: results of the Italian Cooperative Study AIEOP/LAM 8204. Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 1356–1363, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson G, Payne H. Response rate and toxicity of etoposide (VP-16) in squamous carcinoma of the lung: report from the Lung Cancer Treatment Study Group. Seminars in Oncology XII (Suppl. 2): 21–22, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuck SG, Douglass HO, Crom WR, Goodwin P, Silk Y, et al. Etoposide pharmacokinetics in patients with normal and abnormal organ function. Journal of Clinical Oncology 4: 1690–1695, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ardizzoni A, Canobbio L, Pronzato P, Rubagotti A, De Palma M, et al. Etoposide and high-dose cisplatin in good-risk patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung. Cancer Treatment Reports 70: 891–892, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold AM, Dodson M, Renwick A, Whitehouse JMA. Pharmacokinetics of VP 16-213 using a new HPLC assay. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 5 (Suppl.): 2, 1980

  • Atassi G, Kenis Y, Dumont P, Rozencweig M. Animal screening of new platinum derivatives — studies with single agents and combinations. 4th NCI-EORTC Symposium on new drugs in cancer therapy, Belgium, Dec 14–17. Abstract 27, 1983

  • Athanassiades P, Bacoyiannes H, Kontoyiannes D. Etoposide (VP-16-213) and cis-dichloro-diammineplatinum (DDP) in advanced breast carcinoma resistant to previous chemotherapy. Chemioterapia V: 125–127, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassiou AE, Bafaloukos D, Pectasidis D. Acute vasomotor response — a reaction to etoposide. Journal of Clinical Oncology 6: 1204–1205, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey-Wood R, Dallimore CM, Littlewood TJ, Bentley DP. The effect of etoposide on human CFV-GM. British Journal of Cancer 52: 613–617, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bajetta E, Buzzoni R, Viviani S, Vaglini M, Nava M, et al. Prospective randomized trial in advanced malignant melanoma with cis-platinum, vindesine, and etoposide vs cis-platinum, vindesine, and lomustine. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 8: 401–405, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bandini G, Baccarani M, Cavazzini G, Battista R, Lesni F, et al. Treatment of acute non lymphocytic leukemia: results of a prospective trial of daunorubicin, arabinosylcytosine and 6-thioguanine (DAT) versus DAT plus vindesine and etoposide. Haematologica 72: 431–437, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banham S, Dorward A, Hutcheon A, Ahmedzai S, Cunningham D, et al. The role of VP-16 in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: studies of the West of Scotland Lung Cancer Group. Seminars in Oncology XII (Suppl. 2): 2–6, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett CL, Sinkule JA, Schilsky RL, Senekjian E, Choi KE. Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of 72-hour continuous infusion of etoposide in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Research 47: 1952–1956, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett JM, Lymann GH, Cassileth PA, Glick JH, Oken MM. A phase II trial of VP 16-213 in adults with refractory acute myeloid leukemia. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 7: 471–473, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bern MM, Wallach SR, Arkin CF, Lokich JJ, Huberman MS, et al. Etoposide in combination with cytarabine, doxorubicin, and 6-thioguanine for treatment of acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia in a protocol adjusted for age. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 201–203, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand M, Multhauf P, Presant C, Rappaport D, Blayney DW, et al. Phase II trial of etoposide, vincristine, and high-dose cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treatment Reports 69: 1335–1336, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop JF, Joshua DE, Lowenthal RM, Kronenberg H, Whiteside MG, et al. A phase I–II study of cytosine arabinoside, daunorubicin, and VP-16-213 in adult patients with acute non-lymphocytic leukemia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 16: 48–51, 1986a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop JF, Kefford R, Raghavan D, Zalcberg J, Stuart-Harris R, et al. Etoposide, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide and vincristine (ECCO) in previously untreated patients with small cell lung cancer. In press, 1990

  • Bishop JF, Lowenthal RM, Joshua D, Matthews JP, Todd D, et al. Etoposide in acute non-lymphocytic leukemia. In press, 1990

  • Bishop JF, Lowenthal RM, Matthews JP, Joshua DA. A randomized trial of cytosine arabinoside, daunorubicin ± VP 16-213 (73 vs 737) as induction for acute non-lymphocytic leukaemia (ANLL) for the ALSG. Abstract. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 17 (Suppl. 2): 534, 1987b

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop JF, Raghavan D, Stuart-Harris R, Morstyn G, Aroney R, et al. Carboplatin (CBDCA, JM-8) and VP-16-213 in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 1574–1578, 1987a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop JF, Stuart-Harris R, Raghavan D, Olver I, Ball D, et al. Carboplatin (CBDCA, JMS) VP 16-213 in previously untreated patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 16 (Suppl. 3): 621, 1986b

    Google Scholar 

  • Boni C, Cocconi G, Bisagni G, Ceci G, Petacchia G. Cisplatin and etoposide (VP-16) as a single regimen for small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial. Cancer 63: 638–642, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bosl GJ, Geller NL, Bajorin D, et al. Reduced toxicity with etoposide plus cisplatin for good-risk patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology 6: 1231–1238, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bosl GJ, Yagoda A, Golbey RB, Whitmore W, Herr H, et al. Role of etoposide-based chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with refractory or relapsing germ cell tumors. American Journal of Medicine 78: 423–428, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bosl GJ, Yagoda A, Whitmore WF, Sogani P, Herr H, et al, VP-16-213 and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with refractory germ cell tumours. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 7: 327–330, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brada M, Horwich A, Peckham MJ. Treatment of favorable-prognosis nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors with etoposide, cisplatin, and reduced dose of bleomycin. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 655–656, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer K, Niederle N, Krischke W, Higi M, Scheulen ME, et al. Etoposide and etoposide-ifosfamide therapy for refractory testicular tumors. Cancer Treatment Reviews 9 (Suppl. A): 79–84, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brindley CJ, Antoniw P, Newlands ES, Bagshawe KD. Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of the epipodophyllotoxin derivative etoposide (VP 16-213) in patients with gestational choriocarcinoma and malignant teratoma. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 15: 66–71, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brindley CJ, Pedley RB, Antoniw P, Newlands ES. Activity and distribution studies of etoposide and mitozolomide in vivo and in vitro against human choriocarcinoma cell lines. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 19: 221–225, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cabanillas F, Hagemeister FB, McLaughlin P, Velasquez WS, Riggs S, et al. Results of MIME salvage regimen for recurrent or refractory lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 407–412, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carella AM, Congui AM, Gaozza E, Mazza P, Ricci P, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation in 50 advanced Hodgkin’s disease patients: an Italian Study Group Report. Journal of Clinical Oncology 6: 1411–1416, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carella AM, Martinengo M, Santini G, Gaozza E, Damasio E, et al. Idarubicin in combination with etoposide and cytarabine in adult untreated acute non lymphoblastic leukemia. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 23: 1673–1678, 1987

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carella AM, Porcellini A, Coser P, Tura S, Mandelli F, et al. Massive chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in advanced resistant Hodgkin’s disease: an Italian study group. Abstract 1071, ASCO 8: 274, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli M, Perilongo G, di Montezemolo LC, De Bernardi B, Ceci A, et al. Phase II trial of cisplatin and etoposide in children with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a report from the Italian Cooperative Rhabdomyosarcoma Group. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 525–527, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castello MA, Dominici C, Clerico A. A pilot study of 5-day continuous infusion of high-dose cisplatin and pulsed etoposide in childhood solid tumors. American Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 10: 103–108, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattan A, Pourny C, Carpentier Y, Catton E, Barouh M. Anti-metastasis effect of two derivatives of epipodophyllotoxin in mice. European Journal of Cancer 12: 797–805, 1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli F. VP-16 in the treatment of malignant lymphomas: a report from the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). Seminars in Oncology XII (Suppl. 2): 33–36, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli F, Klepp O, Renard J, Röhrt M, Alberto P. A phase II study of oral VP 16-213 (Etoposide) in nonseminomatous testicular cancer. European Journal of Cancer 17: 245–249, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli F, Sonntag RW, Jungi F, Senn HJ, Brunner KW. VP-16-213 monotherapy for remission induction of small cell lung cancer: a randomised trial using three dosage schedules. Cancer Treatment Reports 62: 473–475, 1978

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavazzana M, Calvo F, Facchin P, Barreau P, Geny B, et al. Use of liquid culture and cell cycle analysis to compare drug damage following in vitro treatment of normal human bone marrow cells with adriamycin, arabinosyl-cytosine, and etoposide. Experimental Hematology 16: 876–883, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti I, Corrado C, Santarelli MT, Milone G, Garay G, et al. Management of limited stage non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of unfavourable histology with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and etoposide (CAPVE). Abstract 1010. ASCO 8: 259, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervantes F, Reverker J-C, Montserrat E, Rozman C. Treatment of advanced resistant Hodgkin’s disease with lomustine, etoposide, and prednimustine. Cancer Treatment Reports 70: 665–667, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers SK, Chambers JT, Kohorn El, Schwartz PE. Etoposide (VP-16-213) plus cis-diamminedichloroplatinum as salvage therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 27: 233–240, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang T-T, Gulati S, Chou T-C, Colvin M, Clarkson B. Comparative cytotoxicity of various drug combinations for human leukemic cells and normal hematopoietic precursors. Cancer Research 47: 119–122, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman R, Itri L, Gralla R, Kelsen D, Casper E, et al. Phase II trial of VP 16-213 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 205–207, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen GL, Yang L, Rowe TC, Halligan BD, Tewey KM, et al. Nonintercalative antitumor drugs interfere with the breakage-reunion reaction of mammalian DNA topoisomerase II. Journal of Biological Chemistry 259: 13560–13566, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chisesi T, Santini G, Congiu A, Sertoli MR, Porcellini A, et al. Alternating PROMACE/MOPP chemotherapy in intermediate and high-grade diffuse non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Abstract 1059. ASCO 8: 271, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciobanu N, Paietta E, Andreeff M, Papenhausen P, Wiernik PH. Etoposide as an in vitro purging agent for the treatment of acute leukemias and lymphomas in conjunction with autologous bone marrow transplantation. Experimental Hematology 14: 626–635, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cobleigh MA, Hill JH, Lad TE, Shevrin DE, Applebaum EL. Phase II study of etoposide in previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 321–322, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cocconi G, Tonato M, Di Costanzo F, Bisagni G, Belsanti V, et al. Platinum and etoposide in chemotherapy refractory metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC). European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 22: 761–764, 1986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo T, Broggini M, Vaghi M, Amato G, Erba E, et al. Comparison between VP16 and VM26 in Lewis lung carcinoma of the mouse. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 22: 173–179, 1986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comis RL. Clinical trials of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and vincristine in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Seminars in Oncology 13 (Suppl. 3): 40–44, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comis RL. Cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and vincristine in the treatment of extensive small cell lung cancer. In Gralla & Einhorn (Eds) Treatment and prevention of small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer, pp. 39–42, Royal Society of Medicine Services, London, New York, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Coonley CJ, Bains M, Heelan R, Dukeman M, Kelsen DP. Phase II study of etoposide in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma. Cancer Treatment Reports 67: 397–398, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cox EB, Burton GV, Olsen GA, Vugrin D. Cisplatin and etoposide: an effective treatment for refractory breast carcinoma. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 12: 53–56, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Creaven PJ. The clinical pharmacology of VM26 and VP 16-213. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 133–140, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crist WM, Raney RB, Ragab A, Heyn R, Wharan M, et al. Intensive chemotherapy including cisplatin with or without etoposide for children with soft-tissue sarcomas. Medical and Pediatric Oncology 15: 51–57, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crivellari D, Veronesi A, Magri MD, Tirelli V, Comoretto R, et al. Phase II trial of oral VP 16-213 (etoposide) in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Tumori 71: 499–500, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crom WR, Kalwinsky D, Glynn AM, Evans WE. Clearance of etoposide during continuous 72-hour intravenous infusion in children. Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy 20: 472, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen J, Caldwell S, McGuire P, Beatty E, Stork L, et al. Successful therapy for malignant germ cell tumours of childhood. Abstract 1201. ASCO 8: 308, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen MH, Latief TN, Spooner D, Mould JJ, Chetiyawaraana AD. Cisplatin, etoposide, and radiotherapy in regional inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the bronchus. Seminars in Oncology XII (Suppl. 2): 14–16, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings J, Forrest GJ, Cunningham D, Gilchrist NL, Soukop M. Influence of polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) and etoposide (VP-16-213) on the pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion of adriamycin and its metabolites in cancer patients. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 17: 80–84, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham D, Banham SW, Hutcheon AH, Dorward A, Ahmedzai S, et al. High-dose cyclophosphamide and VP16 as late dosage intensification therapy for small cell carcinoma of lung. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 15: 303–306, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham D, Cummings J, Blackie RB, McTaggart L, Banham SW, et al. The pharmacokinetics of high dose cyclophosphamide and high dose etoposide. Medical Oncology and Tumour Pharmacotherapy 5: 117–123, 1988

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham D, McTaggart L, Soukop M, Cummings J, Forrest GJ, et al. Etoposide: a pharmacokinetic profile including an assessment of bioavailability. Medical Oncology and Tumour Pharmacotherapy 3: 95–99, 1986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daugaard G, Rorth M. High-dose cisplatin and VP-16 with bleomycin, in the management of advanced metastatic germ cell tumours. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 22: 477–485, 1986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • David J-C, Bassez T, Bonhommet M, Rusquet R. Inhibition of DNA ligase from human thymocytes and normal or leukemic lymphocytes by antileukemic drugs. Cancer Research 45: 2177–2183, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis S, Tonato M, Crino L, Colozza MA, Lubansky K, et al. Cisplatin, etoposide, and mitomycin in the treatment of non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Cancer 58: 1018–1019, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Fabritiis P, Pulsoni A, Sandrelli A, Simone F, Amadori S, et al. Efficacy of a combined treatment with ASTA-Z-7654 and VP16-213 in vitro in eradicating clonogenic tumour cells from human bone marrow. Bone Marrow Transplantation 2: 287–298, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Lena M, Lorusso V, Ronito S. Cisplatin plus etoposide as second-line treatment in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Treatment Reports 70: 893–895, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dhingra HM, Valdivieso M, Carr DT, Chiuten DF, Farha P, et al. Randomized trial of three combinations of cisplatin with vindesine and/or VP-16-213 in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 3: 176–183, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DTncalci M, Erba E, Vaghi M, Morasca L. In vitro cytotoxicity of VP 16 on primary tumor and metastasis of Lewis lung carcinoma. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 18: 377–380, 1982a

    Google Scholar 

  • D’lncalci M, Farina P, Sessa C, Mangioni C, Conter V, et al. Pharmacokinetics of VP16-213 given by different administration methods. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 141–145, 1982b

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Incalci M, Rossi C, Zucchetti M, Urso R, Cavalli F, et al. Pharmacokinetics of etoposide in patients with abnormal renal and hepatic function. Cancer Research 46: 2566–2571, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Incalci M, Sessa C, Rossi C, Roviaro G, Mangioni C. Pharmacokinetics of etoposide in gestochoriocarcinoma. Cancer Treatment Reports 69: 69–72, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dombernowsky P, Nissen NI. Schedule dependency of the anti-leukemic activity of the podophyllotoxin-derivative VP 16-213 (NSC-141540) in L1210 leukaemia. Acta Pathologica Micro-biologica et Immunologica Scandinavica Section A 81: 715–724, 1973

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dombernowsky P, Nissen NI. Combination chemotherapy with 4’demethylepipodophyllotoxin 9-(4,6-O-ethylidene-β-D-glucopyranoside), VP 16-213 (NSC 141540) in LI210 leukemia. European Journal of Cancer 12: 181–188, 1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domingo EO, Lingao AL, Lao JY, Raymundo MAA. Therapeutic activity and efficacy of etoposide in hepatocellular carcinoma. Philippine Journal of Internal Medicine 20: 106–112, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Dottino PR, Goodman HM, Kredenster D, Rosenberg M, Cohen CJ. Clinical trial of etoposide and cisplatin as salvage therapy in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology 27: 350–356, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Douglass HO, Lavin PT, Evans JT, Mittelman A, Carbone PP. Phase II evaluation of diglycoaldehyde, VP-16-213 and the combination of methyl-CCNV and β-2′-deoxythioguanosine in previously treated patients with colorectal cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (EST-1275). Cancer Treatment Reports 63: 1355–1357, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dow LW, Sinkule JA, Look AT, Horvath A, Evans WE. Comparative cytotoxic and cytokinetic effects of the epipodophyllotoxins 4′-demethylepipodophyllotoxin-9-(4,6,-O-2-ethylidene-β-D-glucopyronoside/ and 4′-demethylepipodophyllotoxin-9-(4,6-O-2-thenylidene-β-D-glucopyranoside) and their metabolites on human leukemic lymphoblasts. Cancer Research 43: 5699–5706, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Downes CS, Mullinger AM, Johnson RT. Action of etoposide (VP-16-213) on human cells: no evidence for topoisomerase II involvement in excision repair of u.v.-inducetf DNA damage, nor for mitochondrial hypersensitivity in ataxia kelangiectasia. Carcinogenesis 8: 1613–1618, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewinko B, Barlogie B. Survival and cycle-progression delay of human lymphoma cells in vitro exposed to VP-16-213. Cancer Treatment Reports 60: 1295–1306, 1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drings P, Abel U, Bülzebruck H, Stiefel P, Kleckow M, et al. Experience with ifosfamide combinations (etoposide or DDP) in non—small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 18 (Suppl. 2): S34–S39, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durand RE, Goldie JH. Interaction of etoposide and cisplatin in an in vitro tumour model. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 673–679, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eagan R, Carr D, Frytak S. VP 16-213 versus polychemotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer. Cancer Treatment Reports 60: 949–951, 1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edmundson J, Thatcher N, Wilkinson PM, Margison J, Steward W, et. al. Pharmacokinetics of etoposide (VP) in patients with small cell lung cancer. British Journal of Cancer 48: 114, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CM, Glisson BS, King CK, Smallwood-Kentro S, Ross WE. Etoposide-induced DNA cleavage in human leukemia cells. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 20: 162–168, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn LH, Crawford J, Birch R, Omura G, Johnson DH, et al. Cisplatin plus etoposide consolidation following cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine in limited small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 6: 451–456, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EORTC Clinical Screening Group. Epipodophyllotoxin VP 16-213 in the treatment of acute leukaemias, haematosarcomas and solid tumours. British Medical Journal 3: 199–202, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Erba E, Ubezio P, Colombo T, Broggini M, Torti L, et al. Flow-cytometric analysis of DNA distribution after VP 16-213 treatment of Lewis lung carcinoma. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 10: 208–211, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Estape J, Cirera L, Milla A, Doncel F. VP 16-213 and cyclophosphamide in advanced breast cancer, a phase II study. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 10: 154–157, 1983b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Estape J, Milla A, Agusti A, Sanchez-Lloret J, Santabarbara P, et al. VP-16 plus cyclophosphamide in the treatment of advanced lung cancer. Cancer 51: 385–389, 1983a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esumi N, Todo S, Arakawa S, Inashuku S. Etoposide and cytosine arabinoside combination chemotherapy for refractory acute lymphocytic leukemia in childhood. Journal of Clinical Oncology 4: 1089–1093, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Organization for Research on the Treatment of Cancer, Clinical Screening Group. Epipodophyllotoxin VP 16213 in treatment of acute leukaemias, haematosarcomas, and solid tumours. British Medical Journal 3: 199–202, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans WE, Sinkule JA, Crom WR, Dow L, Look AT, et al. Pharmacokinetics of teniposide (VM 26) and etoposide (VP16-213) in children with cancer. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 147–150, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans WK, Feld R, Murray N, Willan A, Coy P, et al. Superiority of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine 107: 451–458, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans WK, Osoba D, Feld R, Shepherd FA, Bazos MJ, et al. Etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin: an effective treatment for relapse in small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 3: 65–71, 1985b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans WK, Shepherd FA, Feld R, Osoba D, Dang P, et al. VP-16 and cisplatin as first-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 3: 1471–1477, 1985a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falkson G, van Dyk J, van Eden E. A clinical trial of the oral form of 4′-demethylepipodophyllotoxin-beta-D-ethylideneglucoside. Cancer 35: 1141–1144, 1975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feld R, Evans WK, Coy P, Hodson I, MacDonald AS, et al. Canadian multicenter randomised trial comparing sequential and alternating administration of two non-cross resistant chemotherapy combinations in patients with limited small-cell carcinoma of the lung. Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 1401–1409, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson PJ, Fisher MH, Stephenson J, Li D, Zhou B, et al. Combined modalities of resistance in etoposide-resistant human KB cell lines. Cancer Research 48: 5956–5964, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fetherston CA, Merry S, Kaye SB, Freshney RI. Verapamil enhances the sensitivity to adriamycin and VP16-213 of human lung cancer in vitro. British Journal of Cancer 51: 598–599, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Feun LG, Lee Y-Y, Yung W-KA, Savaraj N, Wallace S. Intracarotid VP-16 in malignant brain tumours. Journal of Neuro-Oncology 4: 397–401, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Figoli F, Veronesi A, Ardizzoni A, Canobbio L, Bruschi G, et al. Cisplatin and etoposide as second-line chemotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer. Cancer Investigation 6: 1–5, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein DM, Ettinger DS, Ruckdeschel JC. Long term survivors in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 4: 702–709, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finn GP, Bozek T, Souhami RL, Slevin ML, Thomas DGT. High-dose etoposide in the treatment of relapsed primary brain tumours. Cancer Treatment Reports 69: 603–605, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzharris BM, Kaye SD, Savermuttu S, Newlands ES, Barrett A, et al. VP 16-213 as a single agent in advanced testicular tumours. European Journal of Cancer 16: 1193–1197, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest GJ, Cummings J, Cunningham D, Blackie R, Gilchrist NL, et al. Influence of Tween 80 on the pharmacokinetics, metabolism and urinary excretion of adriamycin in the cancer patient. British Journal of Cancer 52: 463, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosser VP, Salvagno L, Segati R, Pappagallo GL, Ferrazzi E, et al. Cis-dichlorodiammine-platinum (II), VP 16-213, and prednisone (DVP regimen) in the treatment of pretreated advanced malignant lymphomas. Tumori 68: 515–518, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frytak S, Eagan RT, Richardson RL, Creagan ET, Jett JL, et al. Cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and infusion cisplatin in refractory small cell lung cancer. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 10: 33–35, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuks JZ, Aisner J, Van Echo DA, Schipper H, Levitt M, et al. Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VP16-213) with or without cisplatinum in non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1: 295–301, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaver RC, Deeb G. The effect of other drugs on the in vitro binding of 14C-etoposide to human serum proteins. Abstract. Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research 30: 536, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Geran RI, Congleton GF, Dudeck LE, Abbott BJ, Gargus JL. A mouse ependymoblastoma as an experimental model for screening potential antineoplastic drugs. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports 4: 53–87, 1974

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosn M, Droz JP, Theodore C, Pico JL, Baune D, et al. Salvage chemotherapy in refractory germ cell tumours with etoposide (VP-16) plus ifosfamide plus high-dose cisplatin. Cancer 62: 24–27, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giannone L, Wolff SN. Phase II treatment of central nervous system gliomas with high-dose etoposide and autologous bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 759–761, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glisson B, Gupta R, Hodges RP, Ross W. Cross-resistance to intercalating agents in an epipodophyllotoxin-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cell line: evidence for a common intracellular target. Cancer Research 46: 1939–1942, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glisson BS, Smallwood SE, Ross WE. Characterisation of VP-16 induced DNA damage in isolated nuclei from L1210 cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 783: 74–79, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gockerman JP, Bartolucci AA, Nelson MO, Silberman H, Velez-Garcia E, et al. Phase II evaluation of etoposide in refractory multiple myeloma: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group Trial. Cancer Treatment Reports 70: 801–802, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhirsch A, Joss RA, Cavalli F, Sonntag RW, Brunner KW. Cis-Dichlorodiammine-platinum (II) and VP 16-213 combination chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Medical and Pediatric Oncology 9: 205–208, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman GE, Miller TP, Manning MM, Davis SL, McMahon LJ. Treatment of small cell lung cancer with VP-16, vincristine, doxorubicin (adriamycin), cyclophosphamide (EVAC), and high-dose chest radiotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1: 483–488, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gore M, Powles R, Lakhani A, Milan S, Maitland J, et al. Treatment of relapsed and refractory acute leukaemia with high-dose cytosine arabinoside and etoposide. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 23: 373–376, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gouyette A, Deniel A, Pico J-L, Droz J-P, Baune D, et al. Clinical pharmacology of high-dose etoposide associated with cisplatin: pharmacokinetic and metabolic studies. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 23: 1627–1632, 1987

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grieder A, Maurer R, Stähelin H. Effect of an epipodophyllotoxin derivative (VP 16-213) on macromolecular synthesis and mitosis in mastocytoma cells in vitro. Cancer Research 34: 1788–1793, 1974

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grunberg SM, Felman IE, Gala KV, Johson KB, Owens JC. Phase II study of etoposide (VP-16) in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 8: 393–395, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RS. Podophyllotoxin-resistant mutants of Chinese hamster ovary cells: cross-resistance studies with various microtubule inhibitors and podophyllotoxin analogues. Cancer Research 43: 505–512, 1983a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RS. Genetic, biochemical, and cross-resistance studies with mutants of Chinese hamster ovary cells resistant to the anti-cancer drugs, VM-26 and VP16-213. Cancer Research 43: 1568–1574, 1983b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RS, Bromke A, Bryant DW, Gupta R, Singh B, et al. Etoposide (VP16) and teniposide (VM26): novel anticancer drugs, strongly mutagenic in mammalian but not prokoryotic test systems. Mutagenesis 2: 179–186, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemeister FB, Tannir N, McLaughlin P, Salvador P, Riggs S, et al. MIME chemotherapy (methyl-GAG, ifosfamide, methotrexate, etoposide) as treatment for recurrent Hodgkin’s disease. Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 556–561, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn RG, Bauer M, Wolter J, Creech R, Bennett JM, et al. Phase II study of single-agent therapy with megestrol acetate, VP-16-213, cyclophosphamide, and dianhydro-galactitol in advanced renal cell cancer. Cancer Treatment Reports 63: 513–515, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haim N, Nemec J, Roman J, Sinha BK. Peroxidase-catalyzed metabolism of etoposide (VP-16-213) and covalent binding of reactive intermediates to cellular macromolecules. Cancer Research 47: 5835–5840, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hainsworth JD, Johnson DH, Frazier SR, Greco FA. Chronic daily administration of oral etoposide — a phase I trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7: 396–401, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hainsworth JD, Williams SD, Einhorn LH, Birch R, Greco FA. Successful treatment of resistant germinal neoplasms with VP-16 and cisplatin: results of a Southeastern Cancer Study Group Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 3: 666–671, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hainsworth JD, Porker LL, Johnson DH, Hande KR, Wolff SN, et al. Combination chemotherapy with vindesine, etoposide, and cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer: a pilot study of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. Cancer Treatment Reports 70: 339–341, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall KS, Fossa SD, Aas M. High-dose cis-platinum combination chemotherapy in advanced nonseminomatous malignant germ cell tumours with emphasis on nephrotoxicity. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 18: 74–77, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock BW, Hudson GV. The British National Lymphoma Investigation Study of leukeran, oncovin, procarbazine, prednisolone (LOPP), leukeran, oncovin, procarbazine, prednisolone/etoposide, vinblastine, adriamycin, prednisolone LOPP (EVAP) in advanced Hodgkins disease: a progress report. Abstract. Proceedings of the American Society for Clinical Oncology 8: 262, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Hande KR, Wedlund PJ, Noone RM, Wilkinson GR, Greco FR, et al. Pharmacokinetics of high-dose etoposide (VP-16-213) administered to cancer patients. Cancer Research 44: 379–382, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hande KR, Anthony LB, Wolff SN, Johnson DH. Etoposide clearance in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 41: 161, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MM, Bloomfield CD, Jorgensen J, Ersboll J, Pedersen-Bjergaard J, et al. VP-16-213 in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone in the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Cancer Treatment Reports 64: 1135–1137, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen SW, Daugaard G, Rørth M. Treatment of persistent or relapsing advanced germ cell neoplasms with cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 22: 595–599, 1986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M, Hirsch F, Dombernowsky P, Hansen HH. Treatment of small cell anaplastic carcinoma of the lung with the oral solution of VP-16-213 (NSC 141340, 4-demethylepipodophyllotoxin 9-(4,6-0-ethylidene-β-D-glucopyranoside). Cancer 40: 633–637, 1977

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harper PG, Dally MB, Geddes DM, Spiro SG, Smyth JF, et al. Epipodophyllotoxin (VP16-213) in small cell carcinoma of the bronchus resistant to initial combination chemotherapy. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 179–180, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann O, Pinkerton CR, Philip T, Zucker JM, Breatnach F. Very high-dose cisplatin and etoposide in children with untreated advanced neuroblastoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 6: 44–50, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey VJ, Slevin ML, Joel SP, Johnston A, Wrigley PFM. The effect of food and concurrent chemotherapy on the bioavailability of oral etoposide. British Journal of Cancer 52: 363–367, 1985b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey VJ, Slevin ML, Joel SP, Johnston A, Wrigley PFM. The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 16: 178–181, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey VJ, Slevin ML, Joel SP, Smythe MM, Johnston A, et al. Variable bioavailability following repeated oral doses of etoposide. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 21: 1315–1319, 1985a

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Havemann K, Wolf M, Holle R, Gropp C, Drings P, et al. Alternating versus sequential chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer. A randomized German multicenter trial. Cancer 59: 1072–1082, 1987

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hillcoat BL, Campbell JJ, Pepperell R, Quinn MA, Bishop JF, et al. Phase II trial of VP-16-213 in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology 22: 162–166, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch FR, Hansen HH, Hansen M, Osterlind K, Vindelov LL, et al. The superiority of combination chemotherapy including etoposide based on in vivo cell cycle analysis in the treatment of extensive small-cell lung cancer: a randomised trial of 288 consecutive patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 585–591, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ho AD, Lipp T, Ehninger G, Illiger H-J, Meyer P, et al. Combination of mitoxantrone and etoposide in refractory acute myelogenous leukaemia-an active and well tolerated regimen. Journal of Clinical Oncology 6: 213–217, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holthuis JJM, Postmus PE, Van Oork WJ, Hulshoff B, Verluen H, et al. Pharmacokinetics of high dose etoposide (VP 16-213). European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 22: 1149–1155, 1986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holthuis JJM, Van de Vyver FL, Van Oort WJ, Verleun H, Bekaert AB, et al. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of increasing dosages of etoposide in a chronic haemodialysis patient. Cancer Treatment Reports 69: 1279–1282, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong WK, Nicaise C, Lawson R, Maroun JA, Comis R, et al. Etoposide combined with cyclophosphamide plus vincristine compared with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide plus vincristine and with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus vincristine in the treatment of small-cell carcinoma of the lung: a randomised trial of Bristol Lung Cancer Study Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7: 450–456, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz SB, Loike JD. A comparison of the mechanism of action of VP-16-213 and podophyllotoxin. Lloydia Journal of Natural Products 40: 82–89, 1977

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howell SB, Horn D, Sanga R, Vick JS, Abramson IS. Comparison of synergistic potentiation of etoposide, doxorubicin and vinblastine cytotoxicity by dipyridamole. Cancer Research 49: 3178–3183, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CC, Hou Y, Wong JJ. Effects of a new antitumour agent, epipodophyllotoxin, on growth and chromosomes in human hematopoietic cell lines. Cancer Research 33: 3123–3129, 1973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Issell BF. The podophyllotoxin derivatives VP 16-213 and VM 26. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 73–80, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Issell BF, Crooke ST. Etoposide (VP 16-213). Cancer Treatment Reviews 6: 107–124, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Issell BF, Einhorn LH, Comis RL, Lawson RD, Baker LH, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of etoposide small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treatment Reports 69: 127–128, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Issell B, Rudolph A, Louie A. In Issell B, et al. (Eds) Etoposide (VP-16) current status and new developments, pp. 4–16, Academic Press, Orlando, 1984

  • Jackson DV, Case LD, Zekan PJ, Powell BL, Caldwell RD, et al. Improvement of long-term survival in extensive small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 6: 1161–1169, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DV, Long TR, Rice DG, Morgan TM. Combination vincristine and VP-16-213: evaluation of drug sequence. Cancer Biochemistry Biophysics 8: 265–275, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DV, Long TR, Trahey TF, Morgan TM. Synergistic antitumour activity of vincristine and VP-16-213. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 13: 176–180, 1984a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DV, Wells HB, White DR, Muss HB, Richards F, et al. Lack of potentiation of vincristine-induced neurotoxicity by VP-16-213. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 6: 327–330, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DV, Zekan PJ, Caldwell RD, Slakkoff ML, Harding RW, et al. VP-16-213 in combination chemotherapy with chest irradiation for small-cell lung cancer: a randomized trial of the Piedmont Oncology Association. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2: 1343–1351, 1984b

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs P, King HS, Cassidy F, Dent DM, Harrison T. VP-16-213 in the treatment of stage III and IV diffuse lymphocytic lymphoma of the large cell (histiocytic) variety: an interim report. Cancer Treatment Reports 65: 987–993, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs P, King H, Dent DM, Hayes M. VP-16-213 in the treatment of Stage III and IV diffuse large cell lymphoma. Cancer 56: 1006–1013, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jagannath S, Armitage JO, Dicke KA, Tucker SL, Velasquez WS, et al. Prognostic factors for response and survival after high-dose cyclophosphamide, carmustine and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation for relapsed Hodgkins Disease. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7: 179–185, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jagannath S, Dicke KA, Armitage JO, Cabonillas FF, Horwitz LJ, et al. High-dose cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide and autologous bone marrow transplantation for relapsed Hodgkin’s disease. Annals of Internal Medicine 104: 163–168, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joss RA, Alberto P, Obrecht JP, Barrelet L, Holdener EE, et al. Combination chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with doxorubicin and mitomycin or cisplatin and etoposide. Cancer Treatment Reports 68: 1079–1084, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Judson IR, Wiltshaw E. Cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum (cis-platinum) and etoposide (VP-16) in malignant lymphoma — an effective salvage regimen. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 14: 258–261, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jungi WF. Etoposide single-agent chemotherapy for solid tumours. Cancer Treatment Reviews 9 (Suppl. A): 31–37, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalwinsky DK, Dahl GV, Mirro J, Jackson CW, Look AT. Induction failures in childhood acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: etoposide/5-azacytidine for cases refractory to daunorubicin/ cytarabine. Medical and Pediatric Oncology 14: 245–250, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalwinsky DK, Look AT, Ducore J, Fridland A. Effects of the epipodophyllotoxin VP-16-213 on cell cycle traverse, DNA synthesis, and DNA strand size in cultures of human leukemic lymphoblasts. Cancer Research 43: 1592–1597, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalwinsky D, Mirro J, Schell M, Behm F, Mason C, et al. Early intensification of chemotherapy for childhood acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia: improved remission induction with a five-drug regimen including etoposide. Journal of Clinical Oncology 6: 1134–1143, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen DP, Buckner J, Einzig A, Magill G, Heelan R, et al. Phase II trial of cisplatin and etoposide in adenocarcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 329–330, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klastersky J, Nicaise C, Longeval E, Stryckmans P, et al. Cisplatin, adriamycin, and etoposide (CAV) for remission induction of small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer 50: 652–658, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klastersky J, Sculier JP, Bureau G, Libert P, Ravez P, et al. Cisplatin versus cisplatin plus etoposide in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7: 1087–1092, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klastersky J, Sculier JP, Nicaise C, Weerts D, Mairesse M, et al. Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide, and vindesine in non—small cell lung carcinoma: a clinical trial of the EORTC Lung Cancer Working Party. Cancer Treatment Reports 67: 727–730, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klastersky J, Sculier JP, Ravez P, Libert P, Michel J, et al. A randomized study comparing a high and a standard dose of cisplatin in combination with etoposide in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 4: 1780–1786, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konits PH, Van Echo DA, Aisner J, Morris D, Wiernik PH. Doxorubicin plus VP-16-213 for the treatment of refractory breast carcinoma. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 515–519, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Köppler H, Pflüger KH, Eschenbach I, Pfab R, Lennert K, et al. CHOP-VP 16 chemotherapy and involved field irradiation for high grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: a phase II multicentre study. British Journal of Cancer 60: 79–82, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovnar E, Kun L, Horowitz M, Etcubanas E, Douglass E. Treatment of high-risk medulloblastoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumors with preirradiation cisplatin and etoposide. Annals of Neurology 24: 361, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishan A, Paika K, Frei E. Cytofluorometric studies on the action of podophyllotoxin and epipodophyllotoxins (VM-26, VP-16-213) on the cell cycle traverse of human lymphoblasts. Journal of Cell Biology 66: 521–530, 1975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kroner T, Obrecht JP, Jungi WF. Etoposide as a single agent and in combination with cis-platinum for malignant lymphomas. Cancer Treatment Reviews 9 (Suppl. A): 39–43, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kung FH, Pratt CP, Krischer JP. Ifosfamide and VP 16 in the treatment of recurrent malignant solid tumors of childhood: a phase II study. Abstract 1174. ASCO 8: 301, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushner BH, Kwon J-H, Gulati SC, Castro-Malaspina H. Preclinical assessment of purging with VP-16-213: key role for long-term marrow cultures. Blood 69: 65–71, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix H, Klastersky J, Sculier JP, Dabouis G, Bareau G, et al. A randomised study comparing cisplatin plus etoposide with carboplatin plus etoposide in patients with advanced non—small cell lung cancer. 5th European Conference on Clinical Oncology, London, Sept 3–7, Abstract 2, 1989

  • Lederman GS, Garnick MB. Possible benefit of doxorubicin treatment in patients with refractory germ call cancer. Cancer 58: 2393–2398, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman GS, Garnick MB, Canellos GP, Richie JP. Chemotherapy of refractory germ cell cancer with etoposide. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1: 706–709, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JL, Catane R, Rozencweig M, et al. Analysis and interpretation of response rates for anticancer drugs. Cancer Treatment Reports 63: 1713–1720, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y-C, Saijo N, Sasaki Y, Takahashi H, Sakurai M, et al. Antitumour effect of two-drug simultaneous or sequential use of cisplatin, vindesine or etoposide on human pulmonary adenocarcinoma cell lines in tumor clonogenic assay. Japanese Journal of Cancer Research 77: 312–318, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leff RS, Thompson JM, Daly MB, Johnson DB, Harden EA, et al. Acute neurologic dysfunction after high-dose etoposide therapy for malignant glioma. Cancer 62: 32–35, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lele SB, Piver MS, Malfetano J. Cisplatin plus VP16-213 in refractory ovarian carcinoma. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 10: 21–22, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi F, Ceci G, Bertusi M, Lottici R, Rodino C, et al. Platinum and etoposide (PE) vs CAMP in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a prospective randomised study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOLRC): preliminary data. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 18 (Suppl. 1): A43, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind MJ, Anderson H, Smith DB, Stout R, Thatcher N. Carboplatin, ifosfamide, etoposide and mid-course vincristine and thoracic radiotherapy for limited stage small cell lung cancer. ECCO, Madrid, Nov 1–4, 1987. Abstract 27, p. 7, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood TJ, Bentley DP, McQueen INF. High dose etoposide does not cause peripheral neuropathy. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 19: 180–181, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood TJ, Smith AP, Anderson G, Chappell AG, James KW. Cisplatin and etoposide alternating with vincristine, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in patients with small cell lung cancer. European Journal of Respiratory Diseases 67: 294–300, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston RB, McCracken JD, Crowley J. Southwest Oncology Group trial of simultaneous chemotherapy and radiation therapy in limited small cell lung cancer. In Gralla & Einhorn (Eds) Treatment and prevention of small cell lung cancer and non—small cell lung cancer, pp. 43–49, Royal Society of Medicine Services, London, New York, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock RB, Hill BT. Differential patterns of anti-tumour drug responses and mechanisms of resistance in a series of independently-derived VP-16-resistant human tumour cell lines. International Journal of Cancer 42: 373–381, 1988

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loehrer PJ, Einhorn LH, Williams SD. VP-16 plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin as salvage therapy in refractory germ cell cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 4: 528–536, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loehrer PJ, Lauer R, Roth BJ, Williams SD, Kalasinski LA, et al. Salvage therapy in recurrent germ cell cancer: ifosfamide and cisplatin plus either vinblastine or etoposide. Annals of Internal Medicine 109: 540–546, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loike JD, Horwitz SB. Effects of podophyllotoxin and VP-16-213 on microtubule assembly in vitro and nucleoside transport in HeLa cells. Biochemistry 15: 5435–5442, 1976a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loike JD, Horwitz SB. Effect of VP-16-213 on the intracellular degradation of DNA in HeLa cells. Biochemistry 15: 5443–5448, 1976b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long BH, Musial ST, Brattain MG. Single-and double-strand DNA breakage and repair in human lung adenocarcinoma cells exposed to etoposide and teniposide. Cancer Research 45: 3106–3112, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Longeval E, Klastersky J. Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide in bronchogenic squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. A study by the EORTC Lung Cancer Working Party (Belgium). Cancer 50: 2751–2756, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Longo DL, Glatstein E, Duffey PL, Ihde DC, Hubbard SM, et al. Treatment of localised aggressive lymphomas with combination chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7: 1295–1302, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Look AT, Dahl GV, Rivera G, Mauer AM. Clinical and cell kinetic studies of the effects of the epipodophyllotoxin VP16-213 during therapy of refractory acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 161–167, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez JA, Mann J, Grapski RT, Nassif E, Vannicola P, et al. Etoposide and cisplatin salvage chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treatment Reports 69: 369–371, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loprinzi CL, Trump DL. Phase II trial of etoposide (VP16-213) in advanced prostate cancer. Clinical Research 32: 418A, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu K, Savaraj N, Feun L, Leaven M, Leo XL. Clinical pharmacology and intracerebral tumor penetration of 4′-demethyl epipodophyliotoxin-9-(4,6-O-ethylidene-β-D glucopyranoside) (VP-16 NSC-141540). Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 31: 245, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Luikart SD, Mitchell EP, Van Echo DA, Propert K, Modear C, et al. Phase I/II trial of etoposide and carboplatin in untreated extensive small cell lung cancer. ASCO 7: A574, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Manga GP, Alonso PM, Carbuccia HA. Adriamycin and VP16-213 combination treatment for breast cancer previously treated by the CMF regimen. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 231–233, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Marechal F, Nasca S, Morel M, Jezekova D, Conink P, et al. A phase III of cisplatinum versus cisplatinum-etoposide for previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Anticancer Research 7: 455–458, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli G, Kaplan S, Piazza E, Maruzzi M, Grasselli G, et al. Cis-platin (CP), VP-16 (V) and mitomycin-C (M) in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 14 (Suppl.): S45, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskens AP, Armand J-P, Lacave AJ, De Jager RL, Hansen HH, et al. Phase II clinical trial of VP-16-213 in ovarian cancer. Cancer Treatment Reports 65: 329–330, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathé G, Schwarzenberg L, Pouillart P, Oldham R, Weiner R, et al. Two epipodophyllotoxin derivatives. VM 26 and VP 16213, in the treatment of leukemias, hematosarcomas, and lymphomas. Cancer 34: 985–992, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsui Y, Oshima S, Kado M, Nakayama M, Shimokata K, et al. Phase II study of oral VP-16-213 in small cell lung cancer. Cancer 60: 2882–2885, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mclllmurray MB, Bibby RJ, Taylor BE, Omerod LP, Edge JR, et al. Etoposide compared with the combination of vincristine, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Thorax 44: 215–219, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead GM, Thompson J, Sweetenham JW, Buchanan RB, White-house JMA, et al. Extensive stage small cell carcinoma of the bronchus. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 19: 172–174, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. Controlled trial of twelve versus six courses of chemotherapy in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. British Journal of Cancer 59: 584–590, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Messeih AA, Schweitzer JM, Lipton A, Harvey HA, Simmonds MA, et al. Addition of etoposide to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for remission induction and survival in patients with small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 61–66, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JC, Loehrer PJ, Williams SD, Einhorn LH. Phase II study of daily oral VP-16 in refractory germ cell tumours. Abstract 566, ASCO 8: 145, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Miser JS, Kinsella TJ. Triche TJ, Tsokos M, Jorosinski P, et al. Ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection and etoposide: an effective regimen in the treatment of recurrent sarcomas and other tumors of children and young adults. Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 1191–1198, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Miser J, Krailo M, Smithson W, Belasco J, Ortega J, et.al. Treatment of children with recurrent brain tumors with ifosfamide, etoposide and mesna. Results of a phase II trial. Abstract 328. ASCO 8: 84, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer J, Bukowski RM, Montie J, Hewlett JS, Livingston RB. VP16-213, cisplatinum, and adriamycin salvage therapy of refractory and/or recurrent nonseminomatous germ cell neoplasms. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 215–218, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray N, Shah A, Brown E, Kostashuk E, Laukkanen E, et al. Alternating chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin-etoposide for limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung. Seminars in Oncology 13: 24–30, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray N, Shah A, Wilson K, Goldie J, Voss N, et al. Cyclic alternating chemotherapy for small cell carcinoma of the lung. Cancer Treatment Reports 69: 1241–1242, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Natale RB, Shank B, Hilaris BS, Wittes TE. Combination cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and vincristine rapidly alternating with combination cisplatin and VP-16 in treatment of small cell lung cancer. American Journal of Medicine 79: 303–308, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newlands ES, Bagshawe KD. The role of VP16-213 (Etoposide; NSC-141540) in gestational choriocarcinoma. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 211–214, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newlands ES, Bagshawe KD, Begent RHJ, Rustin GJS, Holden L, et al. Developments in chemotherapy for medium-and high-risk patients with gestational trophoblastic tumours (1979–1984). British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 93: 63–69, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newlands ES, Begent RHJ, Rustin GJS, Parker D, Bagshawe KD. Further advances in the management of malignant teratomas of the testis and other sites. Lancet 1: 948–951, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman EM, Doroshow JH, Forman SJ, Blume KG. Pharmacokinetics of high-dose etoposide. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 43: 561–564, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicaise C, Goodlow J, Rozencweig M. Clinical development of etoposide in small cell lung cancer. In Gralla & Einhorn (Eds) Treatment and prevention of small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer, pp. 29–37, Royal Society of Medicine Services, London, New York, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols CR, Tricot G, Williams SD, van Besien K, Loehrer PJ, et al. Dose-intensive chemotherapy in refractory germ cell cancer — a phase I/II trial of high-dose carboplatin and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7: 932–939, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niitamo-Korhonen S, Holsti P, Holsti LR, Pyrohönen S, Mattson K. A comparison of cis-platinum-vindesine and cis-platinumetoposide combined with radiotherapy for previously untreated localised inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. European Journal of Clinical Oncology 25: 1039–1043, 1989

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen I, Pajak T, Leone L. Clinical trial of VP16-213 (NSC 141540) IV twice weekly in advanced neoplastic disease. Cancer 45: 232–235, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell MR, Forman SJ, Levine AM, Territo M, Farbstein MJ, et al. Cytarabine, cisplatin, and etoposide chemotherapy for refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 187–189, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer PJ, Leyland-Jones B, Alonso MT, Marsoni S, Wittes RE. Etoposide. Current status of an active anticancer drug. New England Journal of Medicine 312: 692–700, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer PJ, Weiss RB. Hypersensitivity reactions induced by etoposide. Cancer Treatment Reports 68: 959–961, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohnoshi T, Hayashi K, Veska H, Yamane T, Veno K, et al. Salvage chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with a combination of mitoxantrone, etoposide, cisplatin, and prednisolone. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 639–641, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RTD. Chemotherapy of invasive carcinoma of the bladder. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 55: 249–252, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oscier DG, Worsley A, Hamblin TJ, Mufti GJ. Treatment with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia with low dose etoposide. British Journal of Haematology 72: 468–471, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osoba D, Rusthoven JJ, Turnbull KA, Evans WK, Shepherd FA. Combination chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin in metastatic non—small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 3: 1478–1485, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozols R, Ihde DC, Linehan WM, Young RC. Management of high risk patients with advanced testis cancer. Seminars in Oncology 15: 335–338, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paccagnella A, Brondes A, Pappagallo GL, Simioni G, Fosser VP, et al. Cisplatin plus vindesine versus cisplatin plus VP16 versus doxorubicin plus cytoxan in non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung: a randomised study. Tumori 72: 417–425, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panduro J, Hansen M, Hansen HH. Oral VP-16-213 in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a phase II study. Cancer Treatment Reports 65: 703–704, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peckham MJ, Barrett A, Liew KH, Horwich A, Robinson B, et al. The treatment of metastatic germ-cell testicular tumours with bleomycin, etoposide and cis-platin (BEP). British Journal of Cancer 47: 613–619, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peckham MJ, Horwich A, Blackmore C, Hendry WF. Etoposide and cisplatin with or without bleomycin as first-line chemotherapy for patients with small-volume metastases of testicular nonseminoma. Cancer Treatment Reports 69: 483–488, 1985a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peckham MJ, Horwich A, Hendry WF. Advanced seminoma: treatment with cis-platinum-based combination chemotherapy or carboplatin (JM8). British Journal of Cancer 52: 7–13, 1985b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perin G, Dallorso S. Stura M, Moroni C, Rogers D, et al. High-dose cisplatin and etoposide in advanced malignancies of childhood. Pediatric Hematology and Oncology 4: 329–336, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perren TJ, Selby PJ, Albidde EK, McElwain TJ. Etoposide containing combination chemotherapy (CT) for Hodgkin’s disease (HD). British Journal of Cancer 54: 207, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry MC, Eaton WL, Propert KJ, Ware JH, Zimmer B, et al. Chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy in limited small-cell carcinoma of the lung. New England Journal of Medicine 316: 912–918, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perry MC, Moertel CG. Schutt AJ, Reitemeier RJ, Hahn RG. Phase II studies of dianhydrogalactitol and VP-16-213 in colorectal cancer. Cancer Treatment Reports 60: 1247–1250, 1976

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pflüger KH, Hahn M, Schmidt L, Jungclas H, Havemann K. Pharmacokinetic parameters of etoposide in correlation to clinical condition. Abstract. Proceedings of the European Conference on Clinical Oncology 5: 0–0132, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflüger K-H, Schmidt L, Merkel M, Jungclas H, Havemann K. Drug monitoring of etoposide (VP16-213). Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 20: 59–66, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Philip T, Ghalie R, Pinkerton R, Zucker JM, Bernard JL, et al. A phase II study of high-dose cisplatin and VP-16 in neuro-blastoma: a report from the Société Française d’Oncologie Pédiatrique. Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 941–950, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton CR, Levitt J, Oakhill A, Mott M, Broadbent V, et al. Carboplatin, etoposide, bleomycin regimen for advanced malignant germ cell tumours in children. Abstract 1165. ASCO 8: 299, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton CR, Pritchard J, Spitz L. High complete response rate in children with advanced germ cell tumours using cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 4: 194–199, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzocaro G, Piva L, Salvioni R, Zanoni F, Milani A. Cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin first-line therapy and early resection of residual tumor in far-advanced germinal testis cancer. Cancer 56: 2411–2415, 1985a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzocaro G, Pasi M, Salvioni R, Zanoni F, Milani A, et al. Cisplatin and etoposide salvage therapy and resection of the residual tumor in pretreated germ cell testicular cancer. Cancer 56: 2399–2403, 1985b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponder BAJ, Oliver RTD. Phase II study of VP 16-213 (etoposide) in metastatic transitional cell urothelial cancer. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 12: 64–65, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porter LL, Johnson DH, Hainsworth JD, Hande KR, Greco FA. Cisplatin and etoposide combination chemotherapy for refractory small cell carcinoma of the lung. Cancer Treatment Reports 69: 479–481, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postmus PE, Holthuis JJM, Haaxma-Reiche H, Mulder NH, Vercken LM, et al. Penetration of VP 16-213 into cerebrospinal fluid after high-dose intravenous administration. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2: 215–220, 1984a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Postmus PE, Mulder NH, Sleijfer DT, Meinesz AF, Vriesendorp R, et al. High dose etoposide for refractory malignancies: a phase I study. Cancer Treatment Reports 68: 1471–1474, 1984b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powell BL, Muss HB, Capizzi RL, Caponera ME, White DR, et al. Phase I study of high-dose cytosine arabinoside and etoposide in patients with advanced malignancies. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 19: 250–252, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preusser P, Wilke H, Achterrath W, Fink U, Lenaz L, et al. Phase II study with the combination etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin in advanced measurable gastric cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7: 1310–1317, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajantie J, Wikström S, Perkkiö M, Hovi L, Makipernaa A, et al. Improved prognosis for children with stage IV neuroblastoma. Pediatric Hematology and Oncology 5: 125–135, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raney RB. Inefficacy of cisplatin and etoposide as salvage therapy for children with recurrent or unresponsive soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 407–408, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichman B, Markman M, Hakes T, Hoskins W, Rubin S, et al. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and etoposide in the treatment of refractory/recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Journal of Clinicial Oncology 7: 1327–1332, 1989

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Remick SC, Neville AJ, Willson JKV. Phase II trial evaluating continuous infusion of etoposide, cisplatin, and hexamethyl-melamine in extensive-disease small cell carcinoma of the lung. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 575–580, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards MA, Waxman JH, Man T, Ganesan TS, Barnett MJ, et al. EVA treatment for recurrent or unresponsive Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 18: 51–53, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera G, Avery T, Roberts D. Response of L1210 to combinations of cytosine arabinoside and VM-26 or VP16-213. European Journal of Cancer 11: 639–647, 1975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodman JH, Abromowitch A, Sinkule JA, Hayes FA, Rivera GK, et al. Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion of teniposide: systemic exposure as a determinant of response in a phase I trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 1007–1014, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roed H, Vindelor LL, Christensen IJ, Spang-Thomsen M, Hansen HH. The effect of the two epipodophyllotoxin derivatives etoposide (VP-16) and teniposide (VM-26) on cell lines established from patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 19: 16–20, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross WE, Glaubiger D, Kohn KW. Qualitative and quantitative aspects of intercalator-induced DNA strand breaks. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 562: 41–50, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross W, Rowe T, Glisson B, Yalowich J, Liu L. Role of topoisomerase II in mediating epipodophyllotoxin-induced DNA cleavage. Cancer Research 44: 5857–5860, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Greco FA, Einhorn LH, Goodlow JL, et al. A phase III trial of etoposide (E) and cisplatin (P) versus cyclophosphamide (C), doxorubicin (A) and vincristine (V) versus alternation of the two therapies for patients with extensive small cell lung cancer: preliminary results. Abstract. Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 8: 225, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin J, Decker DA, Ahmann DL, Eagan RT, Ingle JN, et al. An evaluation of two schedules of VP-16 and adriamycin in patients with advanced breast cancer. Oncology 37: 149–151, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruckdeschel JC, Day R, Weissrnan CH, Stolbach LL, Creech RH. Chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide versus mitomycin and vinblastine (EST 2575, Generation IV). Cancer Treatment Reports 68: 1325–1329, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruckdeschel JC, Finkelstein DM, Ettinger DS, Creech RH, Mason BA, et al. A randomised trial of the four most active regimens for metastatic non—small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 4: 14–22, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rustin GJS, Newlands ES, Begent RHJ, Dent J, Bagshawe KD. Weekly alternating etoposide, methotrexate and actinomycin/ vincristine and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for the treatment of CNS metastases of choriocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7: 900–903, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santoro A, Viviani S, Valagussa P, Bonfonte V, Bonadonna G. CCNV, etoposide, and prednimustine (CEP) in refractory Hodgkin’s disease. Seminars in Oncology 13: 23–26, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scagliotti GV, Lodico D, Gozzelino F, Bardessono F, Albera C, et al. Unresectable non-small cell lung cancer chemotherapy with high-dose cisplatin and etoposide. Oncology 42: 224–228, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schabel Jr FM, Trader MW, Lasker Jr WR, Corbett TH, Gris-wold Jr DP. cis-Dichlorodiammineplatinum (II): combination chemotherapy and cross-resistance studies with tumors of mice. Cancer Treatment Reports 63: 1459–1473, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schell FC, Yap HY, Hortobagyi GN, Issell B, Esparza L. Phase II study of VP16-213 (etoposide) in refractory metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 223–225, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheulen ME, Bremer K, Niederle N, Seeber S. Treatment of refractory malignant lymphomas with ifosfamide/etoposide combination chemotherapy. Cancer Treatment Reviews 10 (Suppl. A): 137–143, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheulen ME, Niederle N, Höffken K, Schütte J, Seeber S, et al. Chemotherapy of disseminated non-seminomatous testicular cancer and metastatic seminoma with ifosfamide/mesna. Contributions to Oncology 26: 278–286, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoll H. Review of etoposide single-agent activity. Cancer Treatment Reviews 9 (Suppl. A): 21–30, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz N, Gassmann W, Rister M, Johannson W, Suttorp M, et al. Fractionated total body irradiation and high-dose VP 16-213 followed by allogenic bone marrow transplantation in advanced leukemias. Blood 72: 1567–1573, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnoll HJ, Schubert I, Arnold G, Dölken G, Hecht Th, et al. Disseminated testicular cancer with bulky disease: results of a phase-II study with cisplatin ultra high dose/VP-16/bleomycin. International Journal of Andrology 10: 311–317, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Sculier JP, Klaskersky J, Becquart D, Vandermoten G, Thiriaux J, et al. Intensive induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, adriamycin, etoposide and cyclophosphamide (CAVE) in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 18 (Suppl. 1): A64, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeber S. Model studies of etoposide resistance. Cancer Treatment Reviews 9 (Suppl. A): 15–20, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seeber S, Osieka R, Schmidt CG, Achterrath W, Crooke ST. In vivo resistance towards anthracyclines, etoposide, and cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II). Cancer Research 42: 4719–4725, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shimazaki C, Gulati SC, Atzpodien J, Fried J, Colvin OM, et al. Ex vivo treatment of myeloma cells by 4-hydroperoxycyclo-phosphamide and VP-16-213. Acta Haematologica 80: 17–22, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shiu W, Mok SD, Leung N, Li M, Zacharia A, et al. Phase 2 study of high dose etoposide (VP16-213) in hepatocellular carcinoma. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 17: 113–115, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha BK, Eliot HM, Kalayanaraman B. Iron-dependent hydroxyl radical formation and DNA damage from a novel metabolite of the clinically active antitumor drug VP-16. FEBS Letters 227: 240–244, 1988a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha BK, Hain N, Dusre L, Kerrigan D, Pannier Y. DNA strand breaks produced by etoposide (VP-16,213) in sensitive and resistant human breast tumor cells: implications for the mechanism of action. Cancer Research 48: 5096–5100, 1988b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha BK, Trush MA, Kalyanaraman B. Microsomal interactions and inhibition of lipid peroxidation by etoposide (VP-16,213): implications for mode of action. Biochemical Pharmacology 34: 2036–2042, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkule JA. Etoposide: a semisynthetic epipodophyllotoxin: chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, adverse effects and use as an antineoplastic agent. Pharmacotherapy 4: 61–73, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkule JA, Hutson P, Hayes FA, Etcubanas E, Evans W. Pharmacokinetics of etoposide (VP16) in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors. Cancer Research 44: 3109–3113, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sioud M, Forterre P, de Recondo AM. Effects of the antitumor drug VP16 (etoposide) on the archaebacterial Halobacterium GRB 1.7kb plasmid in vivo. Nucleic Acids Research 15: 8217–8234, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slater LM, Murray SL, Wetzel MW, Sweet P, Stupecky M. Verapamil potentiation of VP-16-213 in acute lymphatic leukemia and reversal of pleiotropic drug resistance. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 16: 50–54, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slayton RE, Blessing JA, Delgado G. Phase II trial of etoposide in the management of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer Treatment Reports 66: 1669–1671, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slayton RE, Creasman WT, Petty W, Bundy B, Blessing JA. Phase II trial of VP-16-213 in the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and adenocarcinoma of the ovary: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer Treatment Reports 63: 2089–2092, 1979a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slayton R, Petty W, Blessing J. Phase II trial of VP-16 in treatment of advanced ovarian adenocarcinoma. Abstract. Cancer Research 20: 190, 1979b

    Google Scholar 

  • Slayton RE, Blessing JA, DiSaia PJ, Christopherson WA. Phase II trial of etoposide in the management of advanced or recurrent mixed mesodermal sarcomas of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 661–662, 1987a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slayton RE, Blessing JA, Beecham J, DiSaia PJ. Phase II trial of etoposide in the management of advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and carcinoma of the vagina: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer Treatment Reports 71: 869–870, 1987b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slayton RE, Blessing JA, Homesley HD. Phase II trial of etoposide in the management of advanced or recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer Treatment Reports 68: 1513–1514, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slevin ML, Clark PI, Joel SP, Malik S, Osborne RJ, et al. A randomised trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7: 1333–1340, 1989b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slevin ML, Clark PI, Joel P, Thompson P, Talbot D, et al. A randomised trial to examine the effect of more extended scheduling of etoposide administration in small cell lung cancer. Abstract 921. ASCO 8: 236, 1989c

    Google Scholar 

  • Slevin ML, Joel SP, Richards M, Harvey VJ, Whomsley R, et al. The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide. British Journal of Cancer 54: 212, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Slevin ML, Joel JP, Whomsley R, Devenport K, Harvey VJ, et al. The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide: confirmation of a clinically relevant observation. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 24: 329–331, 1989a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit EF, Carney DN, Harford P, Sleijfer DT, Postmus PE A phase II study of oral etoposide in elderly patients with small cell lung cancer. Thorax 44: 631–633, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith IE, Clink HM, Gerken ME, McElwain TJ. VP 16-213 in acute myelogenous leukaemia. Postgraduate Medical Journal 52: 66–70, 1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith IE, Evans BD, Gore ME, Vincent MD, Repetto L, et al. Carboplatin (paraplatin; JMS) and etoposide (VP-16) as first line combination therapy for small cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 185–189, 1987a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith IE, Perren TJ, Plant MJ, Yarnold JR. Carboplatin, VP 16, and ifosfamide intensive chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. ECCO, Madrid, Nov 1–4, 1987. Abstract 22, p. 6, 1987b

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith PJ, Anderson CO, Watson JV. Predominant role for DNA damage in etoposide-induced cytotoxicity and cell cycle perturbation in human SV40-transformed fibroblasts. Cancer Research 46: 5641–5645, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro SG, Souhami RL, Geddes DM, Ash CM, Quinn H, et al. Duration of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a Cancer Research Campaign Trial. British Journal of Cancer 59: 578–583, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer G, Farha P, Valdivieso M, Dicke K, Zonder A, et al. High-dose intensification therapy with autologous bone marrow support for limited small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 4: 4–13, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Splinter T, Kok T, Kho S, Lameris H, ten Kate F, et al. A multicenter phase II trial of cisplatin and oral etoposide (VP-16) in operable non—small-cell lung cancer. Seminars in Oncology 13: 97–103, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Splinter TAW, Kok T, Lameris H, Kate FT, Dalesio O, et al. Two consecutive multicentre phase II trials of combination chemotherapy including cisplatin and oral etoposide in non— small cell lung cancer. In Gralla (Ed.) Treatment and prevention of non—small cell lung cancer, pp. 127–135, Royal Society of Medicine Services, London, New York, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Stähelin H. Activity of a new glycosidic lignan derivative (VP16-213) related to podophyllotoxin in experimental tumours. European Journal of Cancer 9: 215–221, 1973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg CN, Magill GB, Cheng EW, Applewhite A, Sordillo PP. Etoposide (VP-16) in the treatment of advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 11: 172–173, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart CF, Pieper JA, Arbuck SG, Evans WE. Altered protein binding of etoposide in patients with cancer. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 45: 49–55, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart DJ, Nundy D, Maroun JA, Tetreault L, Prior J. Bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and clinical effects of an oral preparation of etoposide. Cancer Treatment Report 69: 269–273, 1985

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart DJ, Richard MT, Hugenholtz H, Dennery J, Belanger R, et al. Penetration of VP-16 (etoposide) into human intracerebral and extracerebral tumours. Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2: 133–139, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan DM, Chow KC, Glisson BS, Ross WE. Role of proliferation in determining sensitivity to topoisomerase II-active chemotherapy agents. National Cancer Institute Monographs 4: 73–78, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamayo E, Hervé P. Preclinical studies of the combination of mafosfamide (Asta-Z 7654) and etoposide (VP-16-213) for purging leukemic autologous marrow. Experimental Hematology 16: 97–101, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura T, Fukuoka M, Furuse K, Nishiwaki Y, Ikegami H, et al. Japanese multicenter randomised trial: cyclophosphamide/ adriamycin/vincristine (CAV) versus cisplatin/etoposide (PVP) versus CAV alternating with PVP (CAV-PAP) in patients with small cell lung cancer. Abstract. Proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology 8: 220, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RE, McElwain TJ, Barett A, Peckham MJ. Etoposide as a single agent in relapsed advanced lymphomas, a phase II study. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 175–177, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teicher BA, Holden SA, Rose CM. Effect of oxygen on the cytotoxicity and antitumour activity of etoposide. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 75: 1129–1133, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thant M, Hawley RJ, Smith MT, Cohen MH, Minna JD, et al. Possible enhancement of vincristine neuropathy by VP-16. Cancer 49: 859–864, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher N, Cerny T, Stout R, Anderson H, Barber PV, et al. Ifosfamide, etoposide, and thoracic irradiation therapy in 163 patients with unresectable small cell lung cancer. Cancer 60: 2382–2387, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher N, James RD, Steward WP, Barber PV, Feinmann D, et al. Three months’ treatment with cyclophosphamide, VP-16-213 followed by methotrexate and thoracic radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer. Cancer 56: 1332–1336, 1985a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher N, Lind M, Stout R, Payne C, Carroll KP, et al. Carboplatin, ifosfamide and etoposide with mid-course vincristine and thoracic radiotherapy for ’limited’ stage small cell carcinoma of the bronchus. British Journal of Cancer 60: 98–101, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher N, Stout R, Smith DB, Grötte G, Winson M, et al. Three months treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer. British Journal of Cancer 52: 327–332, 1985b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timothy AR, Caiman FMB, Bateman NT, Farebrother M, Slevin ML, et al. Single-dose etoposide in combination with vincristine and doxorubicin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Seminars in Oncology XII (Suppl. 2): 45–47, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirelli V, D’lncalci M, Canetta R, Tumolo S, Franchin G, et al. Etoposide (VP-16-213) in malignant brain tumors: a phase II study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2: 432–437, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trump DL, Hortvet L. Etoposide and very high dose cisplatin: salvage therapy for patients with advanced germ cell neoplasms. Cancer Treatment Reports 69: 259–261, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tschopp L, von Fliedner VE, Sauter C, Maurice P, Gratwohl A, et al. Efficacy and clinical cross-resistance of a new combination therapy (AMSA/VP16) in previously treated patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology 4: 318–324, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuruo T, Kawabata H, Naguno N, Iida H, Kitatani Y, et al. Potentiation of antitumor agents by calcium channel blockers with special reference to cross-resistance patterns. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 15: 16–19, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Echo DA, Wiernik PH., Aisner J. High-dose VP 16-213 (NSC 141540) for the treatment of patients with previously treated acute leukemia. Cancer Clinical Trials 3: 325–328, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Hoogenhuijze J, Lankelma J, Stam J, Pinedo HM. Unchanged pharmacokinetics of VP-16-213 (etoposide, NSC 141540) during concomitant administration of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 23: 807–811, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • van Maanen JMS, de Ruiter C, van de Straat R, Broersen J, de Vries J, et al. Chemical and biological oxidation of the dimethoxyphenol ring of etoposide. British Journal of Cancer 52: 463, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen JMS, van Oort WJ, Pinedo HM. Studies on the metabolism of VP 16-213 in the rat. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 7: 236, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zandwijk N. EORTC 08825: induction versus induction plus maintenance chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer phase II evaluation. European Journal of Respiratory Diseases 69: A173, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zandwijk N, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Wanders J, Simonetti G, Dubbelman R, et al. Dose finding studies with carboplatin, ifosfamide, etoposide and Mesna in non small cell lung cancer. ASCO 7: A757, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zandwijk N, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Wanders J, Simonetti G, Dubbelman R, et al. Dose finding studies with carboplatin, ifosfamide, etoposide and Mesna in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer. ECCO, Madrid, Nov 1–4, 1987. Abstract 39, p. 10, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Varini M, Cavalli F. Etoposide therapy for therapy resistant testicular tumours. Cancer Treatment Reviews 9 (Suppl. A): 73–78, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn CB, Green SJ, O’Bryan R, Reed M, Grozea PN, et al. VP-16 + adriamycin vs adriamycin alone in advanced adenocarcinoma of the breast, phase II, a randomized trial: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. Medical and Paediatric Oncology 16: 312–319, 1988

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn CB, Maniscalco-Greb E, Lockhard C, Groshko G, Enochs K, et al. VP-16 and adriamycin in patients with advanced breast cancer. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 505–507, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn CB, Panettiere F, Thigpen T, Bottomley R, Hoogstraten B, et al. Phase II evaluation of VP-16-213 in patients with advanced breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. Cancer Treatment Reports 65: 443–445, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vellekoop L, Jagannath S, Spitzer G, Zander AR, Horwitz LJ, et al. High-dose cyclophosphamide, BCNN, and etoposide followed by autologous bone marrow rescue as treatment for adult acute leukemia in relapse. American Journal of Clinical Oncology: 307–310, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi A, Zagonel V, Santarossa M, Tirelli V, Galligioni E, et al. cis-Platinum and etoposide combination chemotherapy of advanced non-oat cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 11: 35–37, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi A, Magri MD, Tirelli V, Carbone A, Mazza F, et al. Chemotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, methotrexate, and procarbazine versus cisplatin and etoposide: a randomized study. American Journal of Clinical Oncology II: 566–571, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Villalon AH. Chemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with the use of cis-platinum and VP 16-213. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 16: 641–645, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walther PJ, Williams SD, Troner M, Greco FA, Birch R, et al. Phase II study of etoposide for carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Treatment Reports 70: 771–772, 1986a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walther PJ, Williams SD, Troner M, Greco FA, Birch R, et al. Phase II study of etoposide for carcinoma of the bladder: the Southeastern Cancer Study Group Experience. Cancer Treatment Reports 70: 1337–1338, 1986b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wander H-E, Rauschning W, Meyer D, Achterrath W, Nagel G-A. Phase II study with etoposide in previously untreated breast cancer. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 24: 261–263, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warrell RP, Straus DJ, Martin M, Kempin SJ, Lee BJ, et al. Short term intensive treatment of intermediate grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma using infusional chemotherapy. Abstract 1054. ASCO 8: 270, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilke H, Achterrath W, Gunzer N, Fink N, Preusser P, et al. Etoposide and split dose of cisplatin: a phase II study in non— small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tumordiagnostik und Therapie 8: 194–198, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilke H, Preusser P, Fink U, Gunzer U, Meyer H-J, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced and nonresectable gastric cancer: a phase II study with etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7: 1318–1326, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SD, Einhorn LH. Etoposide salvage therapy for refractory germ cell tumours: an update. Cancer Treatment Reviews 9 (Suppl A): 67–71, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SD, Einhorn LH, Greco FA, Oldham R, Fletcher R. VP-16-213 salvage therapy for refractory germinal neoplasms. Cancer 46: 2154–2158, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SD, Birch R, Einhorn LH, Irwin L, Greco FA, et al. Treatment of disseminated germ-cell tumors with cisplatin, bleomycin, and either vinblastine or etoposide. New England Journal of Medicine 316: 1435–1440, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wils J, Ukama I, Smeets J. Chemotherapy consisting of epirubicin, cisplatin, and etoposide followed by irradiation in stage III non—small cell lung cancer and chemotherapy alone in stage IV non—small cell lung cancer. Oncology 45: 413–416, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf M, Havemann K, Holle R, Gropp C, Drings P, et al. Cisplatin/etoposide versus ifosfamide/etoposide combination chemotherapy in small—cell lung cancer: a multicenter German randomised trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 5: 1880–1889, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff SN, Fer MF, McKay CM, Hande KR, Hainsworth JD, et al. High-dose VP-16-213 and autologous bone marrow transplantation for refractory malignancies: a phase I study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1: 701–705, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff SN, Grosh WW, Prater K, Hande KR. In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of VP-16-213 in implications for chemotherapy. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 19: 246–249, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff SN, Johnson DH, Hainsworth JD, Greco FA. High-dose VP-16-213 monotherapy for refractory germinal malignancies: a phase II study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2: 271–274, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong LC, Choo YC, Ma HK. Oral etoposide in gestational trophoblastic disease. Cancer Treatment Reports 68: 775–777, 1984a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong LC, Choo YC, Ma HK. Use of oral VP16-213 as primary chemotherapeutic agent in treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 150: 924–927, 1984b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong LC, Choo YC, Ma HK. Etoposide, methotrexate, and bleomycin in drug-resistant gestational trophoblastic disease. Gynecologic Oncology 24: 51–57, 1986a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong LC, Choo YC, Ma HK. Primary oral etoposide therapy in gestational trophoblastic disease. Cancer 58: 14–17, 1986b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worsley AM, Catovsky D, Goldman JM, Galton DAG. New combination chemotherapy for relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia. Lancet 1: 1232, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wozniak AJ, Biggar S, Samson MK, Corbett TH. In vivo synergy between carboplatinum and etoposide as demonstrated in a murine tumor model. Abstract 2153. Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research 30: 541, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Wozniak AJ, Ross WE. DNA damage as a basis for 4′-demethylepipodophyllotoxin-9-(4,6-0-ethylidene-β-D-glucopyranoside) (Etoposide) cytotoxicity. Cancer Research 43: 120–124, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wozniak AJ, Glisson BS, Hande KR, Ross WE. Inhibition of etoposide-induced DNA damage and cytotoxicity in L1210 cells by dehydrogenase inhibitors and other agents. Cancer Research 44: 626–632, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yalowich JC, Goldman ID. Analysis of the inhibitory effects of VP-16-213 (etoposide) and podophyllotoxin on thymidine transport and metabolism in Ehrlich ascites tumor cells in vitro. Cancer Research 44: 984–989, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yalowich JC, Ross WE. Verapamil-induced augmentation of etoposide accumulation in L1210 cells in vitro. Cancer Research 45: 1651–1656, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zander AR, Vellekoop L, Spitzer G, Verma DS, Litam J, et al. Combination of high-dose cyclophosphamide, BCNV, and VP-16-213 followed by autologous marrow rescue in the treatment of relapsed leukemia. Cancer Treatment Reports 65: 377–381, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zupi G, Greco C, Sacchi A, Calabresi F. Etoposide prior to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum in combination chemotherapy: in vitro and in vivo studies. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 21: 1501–1506, 1985

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: J.C. Allen, Division of Pediatric Neurology, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; J.F. Bishop, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; D. Cunningham, Section of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, England; M. D’Incalci, Instituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy; B.D. Evans, Department of Clinical Oncology, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; W. K. Evans, Ottawa Regulatory Cancer Center, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; V.J. Harvey, Department of Clinical Oncology, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; K. Havemann, Department of Haematology/Oncology, Klinkum, der Philipps-Universität Marburg, Federal Republic of Germany; I.R. Judson, Drug Development Section and Section of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, England; F.M. Muggia, Kenneth Norris Jr Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA; W.E. Ross, Department of Pharmacology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henwood, J.M., Brogden, R.N. Etoposide. Drugs 39, 438–490 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199039030-00008

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199039030-00008

Keywords

Navigation