Summary
Synopsis
Metipranolol is a non-selective β-adrenoceptor blocking agent used for the topical treatment of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with chronic open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In double-blind comparative studies of up to 4 months duration, metipranolol 0.1 to 0.6% produced comparable reductions in intraocular pressure to timolol 0.25 to 0.5% and levobunolol 0.5%, lowering pressure by about 20 to 29% from baseline. Metipranolol has been well tolerated by most patients, producing only minor changes in objective measurements of ophthalmic status and systemic parameters. Similarly, subjective ophthalmic complaints have been minimal although reports of initial stinging or burning upon instillation have occurred. Further published reports, in which larger numbers of patients are treated over extended periods, are needed to confirm the drug’s apparent long term comparative efficacy.
Studies of ocular metipranolol to date are encouraging, and the drug demonstrates a lasting intraocular pressure reducing effect with good tolerability. Thus, ocular metipranolol provides a viable alternative to ocular timolol and levobunolol in the topical treatment of chronic open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Pharmacodynamic Studies
Following ocular instillation, metipranolol produced a significant reduction in intraocular pressure in healthy subjects and in patients with open angle glaucoma. The maximum effect on intraocular pressure occurred with metipranolol 0.6%, with peak effects appearing approximately 2 hours following instillation and intraocular pressure reductions persisting for at least 24 hours. In comparative single-dose studies in patients with chronic open angle glaucoma, metipranolol 0.6% produced comparable reductions in intraocular pressure to timolol 0.5%, and to levobunolol 0.5 to 1% and befunolol 0.25 to 0.5%. The mechanism by which topical metipranolol reduces intraocular pressure appears to be primarily related to suppression of aqueous humour formation. Although the effects of the drug on corneal sensitivity have varied, it has been suggested that caution be exercised in patients wearing contact lenses.
Haemodynamic changes following ocular application of metipranolol have been limited to small statistically insignificant reductions in heart rate and systemic blood pressure, which were not considered to be clinically important.
Pharmacokinetic Studies
There is no published information available on the pharmacokinetic properties of metipranolol following ocular administration in man — such studies are needed to ascertain the extent of systemic absorption of the drug after ocular administration.
Metipranolol is rapidly absorbed after oral administration in healthy volunteers, with mean peak plasma concentrations occurring approximately 1 hour after administration. The drug undergoes complete and rapid deacetylation in plasma to form the biologically active metabolite, deacetyl metipranolol. This metabolite appears to be extensively distributed in body tissues, with an apparent volume of distribution of 3.5 L/kg after a 6 to 25mg intravenous dose of metipranolol in healthy subjects. Following oral administration, 4% of the dose appeared in the urine as deacetyl metipranolol. There are no published data available regarding the faecal excretion, if any, of this metabolite. The elimination half-life appears to be approximately 2.5 to 4 hours, with a total clearance of 0.94 L/h/kg in healthy volunteers.
Therapeutic Trials
Metipranolol has been evaluated in uncontrolled and in double-blind comparative trials with timolol and levobunolol in patients with chronic open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. However, the controlled comparative studies reporting such data were usually relatively small and only of a few months duration. Further trials in which larger numbers of patients are treated over extended periods are required to confirm the comparative efficacy of metipranolol in the treatment of patients with these conditions.
In uncontrolled studies of up to 12 months duration, metipranolol 0.1 to 0.6% produced a mean decrease in intraocular pressure of 25 to 34% from baseline. Furthermore, in short to medium term comparative studies, twice daily ocular instillation of metipranolol 0.1 to 0.6% reduced intraocular pressure by 15 to 24% from baseline, which was not statistically different from the 12 to 26% pressure reduction produced by timolol 0.25 to 0.5%. A 3-month study comparing metipranolol 0.6% with levobunolol 0.5% demonstrated a mean decrease in intraocular pressure of 29% with both drugs with no significant differences between treatment groups over the course of the study. In addition, the percentage of patients who achieved satisfactory intraocular pressure control with metipranolol was equivalent to that with timolol and levobunolol. Although the initial magnitude of the reduction in pressure diminished slightly after the first 1 to 2 weeks of metipranolol therapy, subsequent long term therapy did not produce a further decrease in effect.
While placebo-controlled trials involving the administration of metipranolol to patients with glaucoma have not been published, the prophylactic use of metipranolol has been compared with placebo in patients undergoing extraction of senile cataracts. In a 10-day double-blind study, only 10% of patients receiving metipranolol 0.6% experienced an elevation of intraocular pressure within the first 24 hours of cataract removal, compared with 65% receiving placebo.
Side Effects
The ocular instillation of metipranolol (0.1 to 0.6%) has generally been well tolerated in studies of up to 12 months duration. However, the comparative tolerability of metipranolol with timolol or levobunolol has been restricted to short term studies in relatively small numbers of patients and additional comparative studies involving larger patient numbers over extended periods are needed to confirm its side effect profile in relationship to other similar agents. The most frequent subjective complaint, reported by approximately 12 to 56% of patients, was initial stinging or burning upon instillation of the drug, which was more common with metipranolol than with timolol or levobunolol although this difference was not significant. Other ocular side effects, such as hyperaemia of the lid and conjunctiva, and a slight reduction in tear production, occurred in isolated cases and were of insufficient severity to necessitate discontinuation of metipranolol. Systemic adverse reactions such as respiratory difficulty and hypersensitivity were reported infrequently (occurring in up to 6% of patients) and in 1 study were responsible for 1 and 2 out of 47 patients, respectively, being withdrawn from treatment. Changes in heart rate and blood pressure following metipranolol administration were usually small and not clinically significant although subjects with cardiovascular or bronchospastic disease were excluded from these studies. Consequently, these findings of minimal systemic effects of ocular metipranolol cannot be assumed in such patients and caution should therefore be exercised.
Dosage and Administration
The most commonly administered dosage of metipranolol is 1 drop of 0.3% solution in the affected eye(s) twice daily. If response is inadequate, the 0.6% solution may be administered in the same manner. Carefully conducted studies in patients with conditions which might be aggravated by β-blockade are needed before the safety of this drug in such patients can be established.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abshagen U, Betzien G, Kaufmann B, Endele G. Pharmacokinetics of metipranolol in normal man. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 21: 293–301, 1982
Bartsch W, Dietmann K, Leinert H, Sponer G. Cardiac action of carazolol and methypranol in comparison with other β-receptor blockers. Arzneimittel-Forschung 27: 1022–1026, 1977
Baumgart P, Zidek W, Schmidt W, Haecker W, Vetter H. The effect of β-adrenoreceptor blockers on the intracellular calcium in essential hypertension. Journal of Hypertension 3: 404, 1985
Berlin I, Marcel P, Uzzan B, Millon D, Le Hoang P, et al. A single dose of three different ophthalmic beta-blockers antagonizes the chronotropic effect of isoproterenol in healthy volunteers. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 41: 622–626, 1987
Bleckmann H, Pham Duy T, Grajewski O. Therapeutic efficacy of metipranolol eye drops 0.3% versus timolol eye drops 0.25%: a double-blind cross-over study. In Merté (Ed.) Metipranolol, pp. 106–120, Springer-Verlag Wien, New York, 1983
Brewitt H, Dausch D. Morphological studies on corneal epithelium after long-term topical application of antiglaucomatous eye drops. Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie 79: 118–124, 1982
Ceremuzynski L, Zaleska T, Nauman J, Nauman A, Zalewski A. Effects of beta-blocking agent metipranolol on metabolic variables in patients with ischemic heart disease, hyperkinetic syndrome, hyperthyreosis and in healthy subjects. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmacy 17: 244–249, 1979
Cifkova R, Niederle P, Widimsky J. Antihypertensive treatment and its effect on left ventricular hypertrophy: one year follow-up. European Heart Journal 6: 131, 1985
Coakes RL, Brubaker RF. The mechanism of timolol in lowering intraocular pressure in the normal eye. Archives of Ophthalmology 96: 2045–2048, 1978
Dausch D, Brewitt H, Edelhoff R. Metipranolol eye drops: clinical suitability in the treatment of chronic open angle glaucoma. In Merté (Ed.) Metipranolol, pp. 132–147, Springer-Verlag Wien, New York, 1983
De Groot AC, Conemans J. Contact allergy to metipranolol. Contact Dermatitis 18: 107–108, 1988
Demailly P, Lecherpie F. Métipranolol 0.1%: l’effet d’une dose unique sur la courbe tensionnelle nycthémérale d’un oeil porteur d’un glaucome chronique primitif à angle ouvert. Journal Français d’Ophthalmologie 10: 447–449, 1987
Demmler N. Experiments on the regulation of intraocular pressure with metipranolol eye drops in some special forms of glaucoma. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 182: 153–155, 1983
Denffer H. Efficacy and tolerance of metipranolol: results of a multicenter long-term study. In Merté (Ed.) Metipranolol, pp. 121–125, Springer-Verlag Wien, New York, 1983
Draeger J, Winter R. The local anaesthetic action of metipranolol versus timolol in patients with healthy eyes. In Merté (Ed.) Metipranolol, pp. 76–84, Springer-Verlag Wien, New York, 1983
Ecoffet M, Demailly P. Résultats d’une étude à moyen terme à double insu comparant le métipranolol au timolol dans le traitement du glaucome primitif à angle ouvert. Journal Français d’Ophthalmologie 10: 451–454, 1987
Gonzalez JP, Clissold SP. Ocular levobunolol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 34: 648–661, 1987
Jounella AJ, Pentikainen PJ, Neuvonen PJ. Antihypertensive effect of metipranolol, a new beta-blocking agent. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmacy 16: 183, 1978
Kessler C. Normoglaucon field study. Medical Digest Ophthalmologie 6: 18–22, 1987
Krieglstein GK, Novack GD, Voepel E, Schwarzbach G, Lange U, et al. Levobunolol and metipranolol: comparative ocular hypotensive efficacy, safety and comfort. British Journal of Ophthalmology 71: 250–253, 1987
Kruse W. Metipranolol: a new beta-receptor blocking agent. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 182: 582–584, 1983a
Kruse W. Results of a long-term study with metipranolol. In Merté (Ed.) Metipranolol, pp. 126–131, Springer-Verlag Wien, New York, 1983b
Kruse W. Metipranolol in glaucoma therapy. Der Augenarzt 3: 168–172, 1983c
Lesar TS. Comparison of ophthalmic β-blocking agents. Clinical Pharmacy 6: 451–463, 1987
Mayer O, Cepelak V, Vitous J, Potmesil J. β-blocking drug metipranolol: plasma levels and pharmacodynamic action in man. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy and Toxicology 18: 113–120, 1980
Melander A, Danielson K, Schersten B, Wahhlin E. Enhancement of the bioavailability of propranolol and metoprolol by food. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 22: 108–112, 1977
Merté HJ, Stryz JR, Mertz M. Comparative studies on initial pressure reduction using metipranolol 0.3% and timolol 0.25% in eyes with open-angle glaucoma. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 182: 286–289, 1983
Mertz M. Results of a 6 weeks’ multicenter double-blind trial, metipranolol versus timolol. In Merté (Ed.) Metipranolol, pp. 93–105, Springer-Verlag Wien, New York, 1983
Mills KB, Wright G. A blind randomised cross-over trial comparing metipranolol 0.3% with timolol 0.25% in open-angle glaucoma: a pilot study. British Journal of Ophthalmology 70: 39–42, 1986
Müller O, Knobel HR. Efficacy and tolerance of metipranolol: results of a Swiss long-term multicenter study. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 188: 62–63, 1986
Noack E. Ocular hypotensive action of beta-adrenergic blockers, with special consideration of metipranolol (Beta-Ophtiole). Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 189: 1–3, 1986
Ober M, Scharrer A, Novack GD, Lue JC. Comfort of levobunolol and metipranolol in a double-blind study in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Ophthalmologica 192: 159–164, 1986
Pentikäinen PJ, Neuvonen PJ, Penttilä A. Assessment of beta-blocking activity of trimepranol in man. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Therapy and Toxicology 16: 279–284, 1978
Potter DE. Adrenergic pharmacology of aqueous humor dynamics. Pharmacological Reviews 33: 133–153, 1981
Rich W, Radtke N, Cohan B. Early ocular hypertension after cataract extraction. British Journal of Ophthalmology 58: 725–731, 1974
Scharrer A, Ober M. Metipranolol 0.1% und pilokarpin 2% als fixe kombination im vergleich zu den monosubstanzen in der behandlung des glaukoms. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 189: 450–455, 1986
Scharrer A, Ober M. Glaukom-behandlung mit metipranolol 0.3% 1 × täglich. Der Augenspiegel 33: 39–40, 1987
Schmitz-Valckenberg P. The use of metipranolol to prevent elevation of intraocular pressure after cataract extraction. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 182: 150–152, 1983
Schmitz-Valckenberg P, Jonas J, Brambring DF. Reductions in pressure with metipranolol 0.1%. Zeitschrift für Praktische Augenheilkunde 5: 171–175, 1984
Seyfried C, Ledermann H, Rennekamp H, L’age M, Abshagen U. Pharmacokinetics of the β-receptor blocker metipranolol in patients with liver cirrhosis. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 107: 21–26, 1982
Skutta T, Röhmel J. Antiglaucomatous long-term therapy with metipranolol eye drops in 2483 patients (multicenter 12-month study). Zentralblatt Ophthalmologie 127: 398, 1985
Stryz JR, Merté HJ. Comparison of different β-blockers in open angle glaucomas. In Greve et al. (Eds) Second European Symposium, Helsinki, 1984, pp. 119–123, Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, 1985
Watanabe K, Chiou GCY. Action mechanism of timolol to lower the intraocular pressure in rabbits. Ophthalmic Research 15: 160–167, 1983
Zimmerman TJ, Kaufman HE. Timolol: dose response and duration of action. Archives of Ophthalmology 95: 605–607, 1977
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: G.M. Clover, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; G.K. Krieglstein, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, West Germany; I.H. Leopold, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA; C. Negishi, Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan; C.I. Phillips, Department of Ophthalmology, Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Edinburgh, Scotland; R. Ritch, Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, New York, USA; K. Segawa, Department of Ophthalmology, Shinshu University, Nagano-Ken, Japan; H. von Denffer, Eye Infirmary and Outpatient Eye Clinic, Nechts der Isar-Technical University, Munich, West Germany.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Battershill, P.E., Sorkin, E.M. Ocular Metipranolol. Drugs 36, 601–615 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198836050-00004
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198836050-00004