JURIDIC REVIEW ON INTEGRATED LAW ENFORCEMENT IN ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME

The potential for environmental problems that can have a major impact on the preservation of nature and human health raises awareness of the need to regulate environmental issues with legal instruments. The mechanism for enforcing environmental crimes in Indonesia is contained in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management and the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XII/2014 dated January 21, 2015, which is carried out in an integrated manner. Nevertheless, there are problems in implementation, namely due to the unclear model of the application in terms of coordination between lemabaga, resulting in law enforcement in an integrated manner less efficient and effective implementation of this research is library researchusing methods Juridical Empirical and manifold qualitative by examining various kinds of primary and secondary data and will describe how the implementation of integrated law enforcement in environmental crimes based on Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management and Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XII/2014 Date January 21, 2015. Support for environmental criminal law enforcement contained in UUPPLH is the existence of environmental Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) (Article 94) who have the authority to conduct investigations in cases of environmental pollution and or destruction. Therefore, to inhibit the rate of pollution and environmental destruction, in particular, it is necessary to enforce environmental laws in an integrated manner. Enforcement of environmental law is closely related to the ability of the apparatus and the compliance of citizens with laws and regulations. Seeing the courts decision in this study, it is suspected that environmental law enforcement officials have not made much progress and do not understand the environmental law enforcement system, which should be carried out in an integrated manner.

The potential for environmental problems that can have a major impact on the preservation of nature and human health raises awareness of the need to regulate environmental issues with legal instruments. The mechanism for enforcing environmental crimes in Indonesia is contained in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management and the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XII/2014 dated January 21, 2015, which is carried out in an integrated manner. Nevertheless, there are problems in implementation, namely due to the unclear model of the application in terms of coordination between lemabaga, resulting in law enforcement in an integrated manner less efficient and effective implementation of this research is library researchusing methods Juridical Empirical and manifold qualitative by examining various kinds of primary and secondary data and will describe how the implementation of integrated law enforcement in environmental crimes based on Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management and Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XII/2014 Date January 21, 2015. Support for environmental criminal law enforcement contained in UUPPLH is the existence of environmental Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) (Article 94) who have the authority to conduct investigations in cases of environmental pollution and or destruction. Therefore, to inhibit the rate of pollution and environmental destruction, in particular, it is necessary to enforce environmental laws in an integrated manner. Enforcement of environmental law is closely related to the ability of the apparatus and the compliance of citizens with laws and regulations. Seeing the court's decision in this study, it is suspected that environmental law enforcement officials have not made much progress and do not understand the environmental law enforcement system, which should be carried out in an integrated manner.

Introduction:-
In the era of globalization, environmental problems are no longer an individual problem or just one or two countries, but are the shared responsibility of all mankind in the world. Environmental damage caused by human activities can be said to have almost reached a high culmination point. A series of environmental disasters that have occurred in almost all epicenter points of the world, Indonesia is no exception. In this study, the authors focus on an integrated law enforcement mechanism in handling environmental crimes

Statement of the Problem:
Based on the background described above, the main problems are as follows: 1. How is law enforcement in an integrated manner in handling environmental crimes according to the Criminal Procedure Code in Indonesia? 2. What are the legal consequences in the law enforcement process against environmental crimes that are not through the Integrated Law Enforcement Team?

Methodology:-
This research uses a normative juridical approach. The juridical approach is research on legal products.This approach to legal products is carried out to examine all laws and regulations related to the research to be researched. While normative is a study of legal principles, legal systematics, legal synchronization and legal or doctrinal comparisons in the dogmatic realm of law.
This study examines or analyzes secondary data in the form of secondary legal materials by understanding the law as a set of regulations or positive norms in the legal system that regulates human life. So this research is understood as library research.
The approach to the problem in this research is a statutoryapproach. This statutory approach is carried out to examine all laws and regulations related to the research to be researched. This legal approach will open up opportunities for researchers to study whether there is consistency and conformity between one law and another.In addition, this research also uses a case studyapproach, namely based on the Padang District Court Decision Number: 642/Pid.Sus-LH/2019/PN.Pdg. An investigation into an environmental crime is carried out if there is sufficient preliminary evidence in accordance with the legislation. Investigations are carried out by POLRI Investigators and/or Civil Servant Investigating Officers who are members of the STPHL. Environmental Problems Settlement Task Force (STP2LH). If there are obstacles in carrying out an investigation in the field, the POLRI Investigator is obliged to provide assistance in the investigation and security of both evidence and security of officers who are carrying out investigation tasks in the field. In the event that POLRI investigators conduct investigations, STPHL is obliged to provide the necessary assistance in the context of accelerating the settlement of environmental crime cases. Police investigation and security assistance is given to: STPHL officers who will and are carrying out the investigation process. Crime scene investigation includes searching and confiscation of evidence as well as searching for suspects as well as collecting information from witnesses of STPHL officers who will and are carrying out the task of investigating environmental crimes.

Result and Discussion
STPHL officers who will and are carrying out the act of confiscation of goods and/or bringing evidence from the scene to the State Storage or Storage House for Confiscated Goods (RUPBASAN). In an effort to complete the investigation process, the STPHL Officer is obliged to coordinate with the POLRI Investigator in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations. Evaluation of Coordination between STPHL Officers with POLRI Investigators and the Prosecutor's Office (Prosecutor) is carried out periodically at least once every 3 (three) months. Before the case file of the First Stage is submitted to the Public Prosecutor. Investigators are obliged to carry out a case title. The prosecution of environmental crimes is carried out on cases resulting from investigations that have been declared to meet the formal and material requirements by the Public Prosecutor and have been followed by the submission of suspects and evidence to the Public Prosecutor. The prosecution is carried out by the Public Prosecutor, both those who are members of the STPHL and outside the STPHL in accordance with the laws and regulations. Prosecutors who are members of STPHL can coordinate prosecution of Public Prosecutors other than STPHL who handle cases. PPNS is only required to coordinate with Polri investigators at the time of arrest and detention, coordination is an act of consultation in order to obtain assistance from personnel, facilities and infrastructure needed in the investigation and also in the case of PPNS conducting investigations to notify the commencement of the investigation to Polri investigators as well as in the case of delegating cases to PU. Coordination is useful in minimizing differences in the understanding of law enforcement officers in the application of environmental criminal law. In addition, by coordinating the proof, it will become easier.

Recommendations:-
In carrying out law enforcement, environmental crimes should be carried out in an integrated manner. Because there are regulations that implicitly regulate this. So that there is no legal disability and guarantees a legal certainty.