Back to Journals » Risk Management and Healthcare Policy » Volume 15

Effectiveness of Social Video Platforms in Promoting COVID-19 Vaccination Among Youth: A Content-Specific Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Topic Videos on Bilibili

Authors Gao H , Yin H, Peng L, Wang H 

Received 29 June 2022

Accepted for publication 25 August 2022

Published 1 September 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 1621—1639

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S374420

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jongwha Chang



Hao Gao,1 Hao Yin,1 Li Peng,1 Han Wang2

1School of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210097, People’s Republic of China; 2School of Journalism and Communication, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Han Wang, School of Journalism and Communication, Jinan University, No. 601, West Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]

Background: With the widespread promotion of the COVID-19 vaccination in China, videos about the vaccination have become increasingly available on social video platforms. With the User Generated Content model, different creators’ interpretations of COVID-19 vaccines may influence the attitudes towards the vaccines and vaccination.
Objective: To explore the overview of COVID-19 vaccine-related videos on Bilibili, discussing the communication effects of COVID-19 topic videos and its influencing factors.
Methods: A content analysis was applied to the 202 video samples obtained through data mining regarding the creator’s information, video presentation, and COVID-19 vaccine-related content.
Results: Individuals and medical professionals preferred VLOG videos, media chose to upload informational videos, and enterprises preferred to post showcase videos. Individuals were more likely to discuss the adverse reactions in their videos, while medical professionals were more likely to discuss the vaccination process for the COVID-19 vaccine. Videos with core issues positively influenced the video’s dissemination breadth. The attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine in the videos positively influence the recognition of the videos. The richness of knowledge points related to the COVID-19 vaccine negatively affected the recognition and participation.
Conclusion: Social video platforms could play an active role in the vaccination promotion for the youth. Health promotion-related departments and individuals could strengthen agenda setting, grasp the characteristics of young groups, and express positive attitudes toward health issues to achieve better health (vaccine) promotion.

Keywords: COVID-19 vaccine, social media, Bilibili, health promotion, vaccination

Introduction

Social media has become an essential platform for health communication and promotion, and it has great potential to provide health knowledge to the public.1–5 Compared with traditional ways, social media has a vast audience base on the Internet, allowing health-related organizations to access a wider range of users6 and instantly transmit health information to a wide range of mobile devices.7,8 Social media also encourage users to upload and share health information content, making health-related content production creative and interesting.9 Videos can transmit abstract and incomprehensible health information to audiences with low reading levels through easy-to-read ways such as storytelling and visual formats.10,11 Therefore, video social platforms could present health knowledge in the form of videos and enhance the viewability of content to attract more audiences.12,13

The high usage of social media has made it an essential channel for health promotion organizations to disseminate health information and for users to search for health information.14,15 As COVID-19 is a new virus, people urgently need to understand related information and its prevention and control methods.16 With the massive amount of information and convenient search and sharing functions, social media has become the preferred platform for users to seek information about the COVID-19 outbreak.17–20 In the face of the global epidemic of COVID-19, vaccination is considered economical and practical.21 Since the COVID-19 vaccine is a new type of vaccine, the short interval between its development and launch has led to concerns and questions about its safety and efficacy among the general public, with reports of side effects of previous vaccinations and the dissemination of misinformation.22–25 This concern has been widely discussed on various social media platforms,26 and videos related to the COVID-19 vaccine and vaccination have appeared on video social platforms such as YouTube.27–29

In terms of social media platform users, young people are the most widespread and active group.30–32 Social media has become the primary platform for young people to get information related to COVID-19.33 Meanwhile, young people are more likely to be vaccine hesitancy when faced with vaccination,34,35 and vaccine promotion to young people becomes very important. Therefore, it is necessary to disseminate vaccine-related knowledge to the youth through appropriate channels, such as social media, to reduce vaccine hesitancy in this group and promote vaccination.33

Vaccine-related content on social video platforms is prevalent and has received scholarly attention, focusing on three main areas: assessment of video quality, exploration of video communication effects, and the impact of videos on health beliefs. Firstly, scholars generally focus on the content about vaccines disseminated on social video platforms and assess the quality of the content.36–38 Secondly, scholars evaluated the dissemination effects of vaccine-related videos on YouTube using data such as views, likes, and dislikes.28,37 Thirdly, some studies focus on the impact of vaccine videos, especially the dissemination of misinformation, on people’s health (vaccination) beliefs.39 Some scholars have pointed out that these effects may come from the video distributor, the distribution’s content, and the communication’s form.31,40 Sangyeon et al have found that interfering with anti-vaccine videos on YouTube by placing links to related videos can reduce their impact.27 Scholars have also focused on the issue of vaccine hesitancy on social video platforms, with studies focusing on the causes and effects of vaccine hesitancy and the monitoring and governance of vaccine hesitancy on these platforms. Regarding the causes and consequences of vaccine hesitancy, scholars have argued that anti-vaccine creators and vaccine conspiracy theorists are facilitated by the freedom to express their views on social video platforms.41–44 As a result, the number of anti-vaccine videos on social video platforms has increased dramatically,29 and the infodemic has become more prevalent,45 exacerbating vaccine hesitancy.46 Moreover, vaccine hesitancy can severely reduce people’s willingness to vaccinate and create a crisis of confidence in health organizations and governments.17,26,47 Regarding the monitoring and governance of vaccine hesitancy on video social platforms, scholars believe that monitoring these platforms helps public health institutions to form an overall knowledge of the causes of vaccine hesitancy.48,49 In turn, communication strategies could be adopted to reduce vaccine hesitancy by using social media for health communication.26,40

In China, with 975 million online video users by 2021,50 video is becoming a primary form of content output on the Internet.51 As one of the video platforms, Bilibili has become famous for Chinese youth by its 86% share of young people under 35 years old.52 After the COVID-19 outbreak, many videos about COVID-19 vaccination have also appeared on Bilibili, which has become an essential source for Chinese youth to access related knowledge. Hence, we focus on this platform to explore the characteristics and communication effects of the COVID-19 vaccine topic videos.

In summary, few existing studies have explored social media and health (vaccine) promotion from the perspective of young users. Until the paper’s completion, we were unaware of any studies addressing COVID-19 vaccination or promotion-related topics on the Bilibili platform. This study focuses on the communication effects of the videos about the COVID-19 vaccine on Bilibili, which can fill the gaps in existing studies. At the same time, this study combines seven indicators on the Bilibili platform into three communication effect models to analyze the data results in more detail, which could provide specific communication strategies for vaccine promotion on social media, especially on social video platforms.

Materials and Methods

Samples

We used the keywords COVID-19 vaccine, COVID-19 virus vaccine, and Vaccine booster shots and set the period from February 9, 2020, to March 12, 2021, to collect the videos. February 9, 2020, was the earliest date for posting COVID-19 Vaccines-related videos on BiliBli, and March 12, 2022, was the start date of this study. We finally collected 351 videos, removing the ones with content utterly unrelated to the COVID-19 vaccine, with the remaining 202 videos being used for analysis. The basic information about the videos was also available, which contains title, URL, publisher, number of plays, number of retweets, number of comments, number of likes, number of favorites, number of bullet subtitles, and number of coins (a feature fans tip the video author).

Coding

Dependent Variable

The dependent variable in this study is the video communication effect. Referring to Chen et al,53 this study divided the communication effect into three dimensions: communication breadth, communication recognition, and communication participation, as a way to measure the impact of each element of the video on the communication effect (Table 1). In social media research, “retweets” refers to reposts of other’s tweets and can indicate the amount of information disseminated on Twitter or other social media spaces.54 In this study, the communication breadth emphasizes the extent to which information is transmitted. Therefore, we use the number of video retweets to measure the breadth of video dissemination. Communication recognition reflects users’ attitudes and acceptance. Referring to the existing literature,53 we use the number of video plays, likes, coins, and favorites to measure communication recognition. Participation is defined as a user-initiated action in a broad sense.55 Different social media platforms have various indicators for measuring participation, but the general understanding of participation can be interpreted in two forms: participation (active) and consumption (passive).56 Since behavioral indicators of passive consumption (eg, reading comments) cannot be quantified, engagement in this study refers mainly to active participation. As a primary way of interacting with Bilibili videos, bullet subtitles are posted on the videos and traverse the video content, forming a different kind of information interaction from the traditional commenting mode. As studies have pointed out, the number of bullet subtitles and comments best reflect the active participation behavior of Bilibili users.53 Thus, we choose the number of bullet subtitles and comments as indicators of communication participation.

Table 1 Dependent Variable and Independent Variables

Independent Variables

Creator information, video presentation, and COVID-19-related content features were used as independent variables.

Referring to the existing literature,57 we include the type of video creators as one of the indicators. In addition, considering the possible influence of the number of followers of the video producer on the video popularity (video popularity),58 we also include the number of followers in the indicators. Therefore, the creator information consists of the types of creators and the number of followers (Table 1). According to the homepage certification and profile information, the creators are classified into four categories: individuals, medical workers, media (including traditional media, corporate media, and personal new media), and corporate companies. The number of followers was obtained from the creators’ homepage. Video presentation includes four categories, video types, cover, visual effects, and video duration (Table 1). Six dimensions of scientific basis, core topic, cues to action, vaccine attitude, knowledge points, and issues related to COVID-19 vaccination were used to determine COVID-19-related content features (Table 1). The more knowledge points covered in the video, the higher the richness of Vaccine knowledge. Each knowledge point is scored as 1 point. The minimum score for the richness of Vaccine knowledge is 0, and the maximum score is 7. The more issues related to COVID-19 vaccination in the video, the higher the richness of Vaccine issues. Each issue related to COVID-19 vaccination scored 1 point, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 6 for the richness of Vaccine issues.

Reliability Test

Before the formal coding, 50 video samples were randomly selected for pre-coding, and Holsti’s method was used to test the reliability of coders.60 Two coders completed the coding part. After two training sessions, the general coefficient of reliability between the two coders was 0.901, and the reliability between the two coders met the standard.61

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables are represented by frequency (%). A Chi-square test was used to examine the relationship between creator and video type, COVID-19 vaccine knowledge points, and COVID-19 vaccination-related issues. ANOVA was used to analyze the relationship between creator type, video type, other variables, and the dissemination effect. The hierarchical regression examined the relationship between the independent and dependent variables (communication effect). IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 was used to process all coded data, and the level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

Overall Overview of the COVID-19 Vaccine Topic Videos

Among the 202 videos, media creators accounted for the highest proportion at 45.5%, followed by individual creators, accounting for 37.1%. Medical worker creators are relatively few, accounting for only 14.9%, and corporate company creators the least, accounting for only 2.5% (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Overall overview of the COVID-19 vaccine topic videos.

In terms of video category, videos in the form of Vlogs accounted for 39.1%, showcases and news accounted for 22.3%, interviews accounted for 9.4%, and animation and short videos accounted for 4.9% and 2%, respectively. 70.3% of the videos were designed with a cover, most did not insert visual effects to enhance viewing (73.3%), and 87.6% were less than 10 minutes (Figure 1).

From the perspective of content, the vast majority of content related to the COVID-19 vaccine was not based on exact science and did not have a scientific source for viewers (86.6%). 54.5% of the videos had a core issue, and only 22.8% of videos explicitly presented action tips on COVID-19 vaccine vaccination. 54% of the creators expressed a positive attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination, 39.1% remained neutral, and only 6.9% had a negative attitude towards the vaccination (Figure 1).

The chi-square analysis shows that individual creators and medical workers prefer to create videos in the form of Vlogs, media prefer to create news videos, and corporate company creators choose to create display videos (p<0.01) (Table 2). In discussions on issues related to COVID-19 vaccination, different creators show different concerns. Videos made by individuals prefer to discuss the adverse reactions of COVID-19 vaccination (P=0.045), while those produced by medical workers more often mention the process of COVID-19 vaccination (P=0.016) (Table 3).

Table 2 Chi-Square Analysis Results Between Creator Type and Video Type

Table 3 Chi-Square Analysis Between Creator Types and Issues Related to COVID-19 Vaccination

The ANOVA results show that the videos of media creators have a better communication breadth, communication participation, and communication recognition (P<0.01) (Table 4).

Table 4 Analysis of ANOVA Results

The Communication Effect of COVID-19 Topic Videos and Its Influencing Factors

Tables 57 shows the results of the bivariate correlation analysis between the communication effect and its influencing factors. Significant correlations exist between creator type, the number of followers, core issues (with), and video communication breadth. There are significant correlations between creator type, number of followers, core issues (with), and the breadth of communication. And there are significant correlations between creator type, cover (with), video type, number of followers, vaccine knowledge points, vaccine attitude, and communication recognition. Also, there are significant correlations between the number of followers, vaccine knowledge points, vaccine attitude, and communication participation.

Table 5 Bivariate Correlation Analysis Between Video Spread and Other Variables

Table 6 Bivariate Correlation Analysis Between Video Communication Approval and Other Variables

Table 7 Bivariate Correlation Analysis Between Video Communication Engagement and Other Variables

Based on the bivariate correlation analysis, this study conducted stratified regression analysis. The number of followers of the video creators significantly and positively influenced the communication effect of the videos (p<0.01), making it the most important factor affecting the communication effect among the creator factors (Tables 8–10). From the results of the stratified regression between video communication forms and communication effects, only the cover(with) positively and significantly affected the communication participation of videos (B=0.231, p<0.05) (Table 10). In contrast, the communication forms of video types, visual effects, and video duration were unrelated to communication effects.

Table 8 Results of the Stratified Regression Analysis with the Dependent Variable Being Communication Breadth

Table 9 Results of Stratified Regression Analysis with the Dependent Variable Being Communication Recognition

Table 10 Results of Stratified Regression Analysis with the Dependent Variable Being Communication Participation

Having a core issue significantly increased the communication breadth of the video when information about the COVID-19 vaccine was mentioned in the video (B=0.499, p<0.01) (Table 8). When the video showed a more positive attitude towards vaccines, the identification degree of the video was better (P<0.05) (Table 9). However, the more questions related to COVID-19 vaccination in the video, the more limited the communication breadth (B=−0.122, P<0.05) (Table 8). Similarly, the richness of the knowledge of the COVID-19 vaccine in the video also negatively affects communication recognition and communication participation (P<0.05) (Tables 9 and 10).

Discussion

This study explored the communication effect of the video social media platform when promoting vaccines to youth groups through a content analysis of the COVID-19 vaccine-themed videos on the Bilibili platform. The results showed that for youth groups, the users of video platforms, the content of the video, and the vaccine belief of the creators significantly impact the videos’ communication effect. In contrast, the communication forms of video have a limited impact on the communication effect.

Social Video Platforms and Vaccine Promotion for Youth Groups

This study shows that the number of followers of the video creators significantly influenced the communication effect of COVID-19 vaccine-themed videos. Studies have indicated that social media influencers, who have many followers on social media, have become online opinion leaders who influence their audiences’ attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors.62 Initially, the significant influence of social media influencers was widely used in commercial promotion.63 With health issues becoming popular on social media, social media influencers also impact other users after participating in health issues. Their positive attitudes toward vaccines also positively influenced other users’ attitudes toward vaccines.40 For young people, social media is an important channel and approach for their media use.64 After establishing emotional bonds with social influencers during long-term media use,65 their attitudes are easily influenced.66 It offers useful ideas for youth-oriented health promotion, including vaccine promotion.

The results indicate that only 14.9% of the COVID-19 vaccine-themed videos were produced and uploaded by medical workers, a relatively low percentage of the creators. Similar results could also be found in other studies. For example, medical organizations and doctors account for less than one-third of creators of COVID-19 vaccine-related videos on YouTube.67 The reason is related to the existing social media content production mechanism.

Social media platforms with a UGC mode encourage user creation, allowing creators of all types to disseminate information, including health information,68 forming a multi-subject, inter-professional health communication situation.69 Health organizations and health workers are responsible and obligated to transmit correct knowledge and information to the public during public health emergencies.70 The question of taking advantage of professionals’ health information communication on social media needs further exploration.

Video Content and Vaccine Promotion for Youth Groups

This study concludes that the presence or absence of core issues in COVID-19 vaccine-themed videos significantly influenced the communication effect, mainly regarding the core issues’ ability to stimulate users’ retweeting behavior. The users’ retweeting behavior reflects that the relevant content has a particular value and needs to be re-distributed to highlight the importance of the content.71 These videos focus on possible adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines, the brands of COVID-19 vaccines, and the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, which are all core topics of public concern when facing COVID-19 vaccines. This finding illustrates the need for targeted agenda setting based on an understanding of the focus of public attention when conducting health promotion. The core of agenda-setting is to influence the audience to repeatedly feel and think about an issue by constantly showing a message in the media,72 which is considered an important way for media information to influence the public.73 Similarly, social media agenda-setting on health topics could impact young people’s health promotion. Meydan et al revealed that the youth users exposed to COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccine information on social media for a long time would increase their willingness to vaccinate.74

This study shows that the richness of the COVID-19 vaccine knowledge and issues about the COVID-19 vaccination contained in the videos were negatively correlated with the communication effect. The result is similar to the findings of Moon and other scholars on YouTube videos about COVID-19. The videos with better content and more information that the creators believe to be helpful to the audience fail to have a good communication effect.59 Although some scholars have suggested that health promoters should provide more information to promote COVID-19 vaccination among young people,73 still needs to consider the information dissemination platform and its audience’s needs. Studies have indicated that excessive information knowledge or valuable content in a single media product on social media would limit its communication effect on the platform.75 Therefore, a certain level of information redundancy needs to be maintained for individual works.

From the perspective of content preferences of different creators, this study indicates that compared with other types of creators, medical workers prefer to discuss procedures of COVID-19 vaccination. In contrast, individual creators choose to discuss topics such as adverse reactions and emergency treatment after the COVID-19 vaccination. It reflects the difference in the identity of different creators concerned with vaccination for COVID-19. Introducing the operational points of the vaccination process, such as appointment methods, site selection, and mixed vaccination, is a cue to action for health workers. Doctors’ social media recommendations could encourage users to vaccinate.76 The choice of topics by individual creators, to some extent, represents the focus of public attention on the COVID-19 vaccine. For new vaccines, the public often pays attention to their safety, and the concern about the safety of vaccines is an essential reason for public hesitancy about vaccines.77,78 Reasonable explanations of adverse reactions could eliminate vaccination concerns of the public,79 but excessive disclosures would instead exacerbate public hesitancy about vaccines.80

The result suggests that although social media platforms emphasize the content production of multiple creative subjects, their content preferences still reflect identity characteristics. Therefore, it is essential to consider taking advantage of the creators’ identity to promote health.

Communicator Attitudes and Vaccine (Health) Beliefs Among Youth Groups

This study indicates that creators’ positive attitudes toward covid-19 vaccine significantly affect the video’s communication effect, and videos with more positive attitudes receive more plays, likes, favorites, and coins from viewers. It has been shown that social media creators’ attitudes and views on health information affect and change users’ perspectives.42 Regarding vaccine hesitancy, both positive and negative emotions play a role in communication, and there are differences in the outcome of the emotions.81 In health communication, positive content is likelier to be liked by the audience.82 In terms of vaccine-related content communication, positive emotions of the communicators could improve users’ attitudes towards vaccines and thus promote vaccination.40,83,84 For young people, when receiving health information, both positive and negative emotions could be identified by perception.81 Therefore, when conducting vaccine (health) promotion for youth groups through social media, it is necessary to play the role of positive emotions to convey the correct health concepts to youth groups.85

Mode of Transmission and Vaccine Promotion Among Young People

This study discovered that the form of communication of COVID-19 vaccine-related videos had a limited impact on communication effectiveness. In many forms of communication, only the video cover impacts the communication breadth. As for the importance of covers for videos on social media, Moon et al believe that designing video covers could increase users’ clicks.59 This study concludes that video covers as an essential form of carrying information could also gain more user retweeting behavior on video social platforms.

Previous studies have also indicated that video formats, visual effects, and other communication forms could lead to better communication effects on video social platforms,59,86,87 which is somewhat different from the results of this study. For young people, the knowledge and science in the videos are more critical when acquiring knowledge about the COVID-19 vaccination through social media platforms, and the form of communication does not directly affect their decision-making for vaccination. In other words, this finding reflects young people’s preference for information needs of health issues. It also suggests that young people’s information needs should be considered for health promotion.

There were some limitations in this study. First, although this study found that the COVID-19 vaccine information richness caused counter-effects, as well as video formats, visual effects, and other forms of communication, failed to get better communication effects, the reasons were not further investigated. Second, the coding table entries were not exhaustive in covering all aspects of the videos, and further revisions and additions are needed for subsequent related studies. Moreover, we only analyzed seven indicators, such as the number of plays and likes, when measuring the effectiveness of the videos. Subsequent studies will consider including specific content that could directly express viewers’ opinions, such as viewers’ comments and bullet subtitles, to evaluate the communication effect indicators in more depth.

Conclusion

This study provides a perspective on health promotion for youth groups by recognizing the role of video social platforms. Content creation could be based on the core issues of health-related content when communicating health information through agenda-setting. Likewise, the youth group audience’s characteristics should be considered to grasp the redundancy of information and optimize the format of video communication. In addition, positive attitudes towards health topics should be expressed in the communication process to promote better health (vaccination).

Abbreviation

COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019.

Ethics Approval

This study did not involve human subjects and was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of Nanjing Normal University (the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee) to be exempt from its ethical review application.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation, or in all these areas; they took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 17CXW016).

Disclosure

All authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Kubheka BZ, Carter V, Mwaura J. Social media health promotion in South Africa: opportunities and challenges. Afr J Prm Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1):a2389. doi:10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2389

2. Levac Joëlle J, O’Sullivan T. Social media and its use in health promotion. Revue Interdisciplinaire des Sciences de la Santé. 2010;1(1):47. doi:10.18192/riss-ijhs.v1i1.1534

3. Stellefson M, Paige SR, Chaney BH, Chaney JD. Evolving role of social media in health promotion: updated responsibilities for health education specialists. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1153. doi:10.3390/ijerph17041153

4. Mehmet M, Roberts R, Nayeem T. Using digital and social media for health promotion: a social marketing approach for addressing co-morbid physical and mental health. Aust J Rural Health. 2020;1–10. doi:10.1111/ajr.12589

5. Alshammari AS, Alshammari HS. Use of social media and other electronic media in health education and health promotion: pilot study. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2017;69(6):2658–2662. doi:10.12816/0042244

6. Chou W-ying S, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4). doi:10.2196/jmir.1249

7. Asongu N, Acha-Anyi PN, Asongu S, Tchamyou V. Social media for health promotion: a visual analysis of ‘Tb Proof’ South Africa’s Facebook page. SSRN Electron J. 2020. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3687892

8. Neiger BL, Thackeray R, Van Wagenen SA, et al. Use of social media in health promotion. Health Promot Pract. 2012;13(2):159–164. doi:10.1177/1524839911433467

9. Schillinger D, Chittamuru D, Ramírez AS. From “infodemics” to health promotion: a novel framework for the role of social media in public health. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(9):1393–1396. doi:10.2105/ajph.2020.305746

10. Basch CH, Hillyer GC, Meleo-Erwin ZC, Jaime C, Mohlman J, Basch CE. Preventive behaviors conveyed on YouTube to mitigate transmission of COVID-19: cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(2). doi:10.2196/18807

11. Lim MS, Molenaar A, Brennan L, Reid M, McCaffrey T. Young adults’ use of different social media platforms for Health Information: insights from web-based conversations. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(1):e23656. doi:10.2196/23656

12. O’Mara B. Social media, digital video and health promotion in a culturally and linguistically diverse Australia. Health Promot Int. 2012;28(3):466–476. doi:10.1093/heapro/das014

13. Rao Q, Zhang Z, Lv Y, Zhao Y, Bai L, Hou X. Factors associated with influential health-promoting messages on social media: content analysis of Sina Weibo. JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8(10):e20558. doi:10.2196/20558

14. Islam MM, Islam MM, Ahmed F, Rumana AS. Creative social media use for covid-19 prevention in Bangladesh: a structural equation modeling approach. Soc Netk Anal Mining. 2021;11(1). doi:10.1007/s13278-021-00744-0

15. Zhao Y, Cheng S, Yu X, Xu H. Chinese public’s attention to the COVID-19 epidemic on social media: observational descriptive study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):e18825. doi:10.2196/18825

16. Hernández-García I, Giménez-Júlvez T. Characteristics of YouTube videos in Spanish on how to prevent covid-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4671. doi:10.3390/ijerph17134671

17. Wang Z, She R, Chen X, et al. Parental acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination for children under the age of 18 years among Chinese doctors and nurses: a cross-sectional online survey. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(10):3322–3332. doi:10.1080/21645515.2021.1917232

18. Zhang S, Pian W, Ma F, Ni Z, Liu Y. Characterizing the covid-19 infodemic on Chinese social media: exploratory study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021;7(2):e26090. doi:10.2196/26090

19. Ahmad AR, Murad HR. The impact of social media on panic during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iraqi Kurdistan: online questionnaire study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):e19556. doi:10.2196/19556

20. Kostygina G, Tran H, Binns S, et al. Boosting health campaign reach and engagement through use of social media influencers and memes. Soc Media Soc. 2020;6(2):205630512091247. doi:10.1177/2056305120912475

21. Finney Rutten LJ, Zhu X, Leppin AL, et al. Evidence-based strategies for clinical organizations to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(3):699–707. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.12.024

22. Anand P, Stahel VP. The safety of covid-19 mRNA vaccines: a Review. Patient Saf Surg. 2021;15(1). doi:10.1186/s13037-021-00291-9

23. Wang J, Lu X, Lai X, et al. The changing acceptance of covid-19 vaccination in different epidemic phases in China: a longitudinal study. Vaccines. 2021;9(3):191. doi:10.3390/vaccines9030191

24. Zhou Y, Zhang J, Wu W, Liang M, Wu Q-S. Willingness to receive future covid-19 vaccines following the COVID-19 epidemic in Shanghai, China. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1). doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11174-0

25. Lin Y, Hu Z, Zhao Q, Alias H, Danaee M, Wong LP. Understanding covid-19 vaccine demand and hesitancy: a nationwide online survey in China. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(12):e0008961. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0008961

26. Puri N, Coomes EA, Haghbayan H, Gunaratne K. Social media and vaccine hesitancy: new updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(11):2586–2593. doi:10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846

27. Kim S, Yalcin OF, Bestvater SE, Munger K, Monroe BL, Desmarais BA. The effects of an informational intervention on attention to anti-vaccination content on youtube. Proc Int AAAI Conf Web Soc Media. 2020;14:949–953.

28. Basch CH, Hillyer GC, Zagnit EA, Basch CE. YouTube coverage of COVID-19 vaccine development: implications for awareness and uptake. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(11):2582–2585. doi:10.1080/21645515.2020.1790280

29. Basch CE, Basch CH, Hillyer GC, Meleo-Erwin ZC, Zagnit EA. YouTube videos and informed decision-making about covid-19 vaccination: successive sampling study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021;7(5):e28352. doi:10.2196/28352

30. Dunlop S, Freeman B, Jones SC. Marketing to youth in the digital age: the promotion of unhealthy products and health promoting behaviours on social media. Media Commun. 2016;4(3):35–49. doi:10.17645/mac.v4i3.522

31. Bell IH, Thompson A, Valentine L, Adams S, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Nicholas J. Ownership, use of, and interest in digital mental health technologies among clinicians and young people across a spectrum of clinical care needs: cross-sectional survey. JMIR Mental Health. 2022;9(5):e30716. doi:10.2196/30716

32. Kligler-Vilenchik N, Literat I. Youth digital participation: now more than ever. Media Commun. 2020;8(2):171–174. doi:10.17645/mac.v8i2.3180

33. Basch CH, Meleo-Erwin Z, Fera J, Jaime C, Basch CE. A global pandemic in the time of viral memes: COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and disinformation on TikTok. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(8):2373–2377. doi:10.1080/21645515.2021.1894896

34. Allington D, McAndrew S, Moxham-Hall V, Duffy B. Coronavirus conspiracy suspicions, general vaccine attitudes, trust and coronavirus information source as predictors of vaccine hesitancy among UK residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Med. 2021;1–12. doi:10.1017/s0033291721001434

35. Yu Y, Lau JTF, Lau MMC, Wong MCS, Chan PKS. Understanding the prevalence and associated factors of behavioral intention of COVID-19 vaccination under specific scenarios combining effectiveness, safety, and cost in the Hong Kong Chinese general population. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2021. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2021.02

36. Ache KA, Wallace LS. Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(4):389–392. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.029

37. Briones R, Nan X, Madden K, Waks L. When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube. Health Commun. 2012;27(5):478–485. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.610258

38. Tan RY, Pua AE, Wong LL, Yap KY-L. Assessing the quality of COVID-19 vaccine videos on video-sharing platforms. Exploratory Res Clin Soc Pharmacy. 2021;2:100035. doi:10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100035

39. Guess AM, Nyhan B, O’Keeffe Z, Reifler J. The sources and correlates of exposure to vaccine-related (mis)information online. Vaccine. 2020;38(49):7799–7805. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.018

40. Bonnevie E, Rosenberg SD, Kummeth C, Goldbarg J, Wartella E, Smyser J. Using social media influencers to increase knowledge and positive attitudes toward the flu vaccine. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240828. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240828

41. Donzelli G, Palomba G, Federigi I, et al. Misinformation on vaccination: a quantitative analysis of YouTube videos. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(7):1654–1659. doi:10.1080/21645515.2018.1454572

42. Karafillakis E, Martin S, Simas C, et al. Methods for social media monitoring related to vaccination: systematic scoping review. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021;7(2):e17149. doi:10.2196/17149

43. Ginossar T, Cruickshank IJ, Zheleva E, Sulskis J, Berger-Wolf T. Cross-platform spread: vaccine-related content, sources, and conspiracy theories in YouTube videos shared in early Twitter Covid-19 conversations. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18(1):1–13. doi:10.1080/21645515.2021.2003647

44. Jennings W, Stoker G, Bunting H, et al. Lack of trust, conspiracy beliefs, and social media use predict COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines. 2021;9(6):593. doi:10.3390/vaccines9060593

45. Clark SE, Bledsoe MC, Harrison CJ. The role of social media in promoting vaccine hesitancy. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2022;34(2):156–162. doi:10.1097/mop.0000000000001111

46. Cardenas NC. ‘Europe and United States vaccine hesitancy’: leveraging strategic policy for ‘infodemic’ on covid-19 vaccines. J Public Health. 2021;44(2). doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdab228

47. Al-Hasan A, Khuntia J, Yim D. Does seeing what others do through social media influence vaccine uptake and help in the herd immunity through vaccination? A cross-sectional analysis. Front Public Health. 2021;9. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.715931

48. Porreca A, Scozzari F, Di Nicola M. Using text mining and sentiment analysis to analyse YouTube Italian videos concerning vaccination. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1). doi:10.1186/s12889-020-8342-4

49. Garett R, Young SD. The role of social media in monitoring Covid‐19 vaccine uptake. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022;28(4):650–652. doi:10.1111/jep.13656

50. The 49th statistical report on China’s internet development - CNNIC. Available from: https://www.cnnic.com.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/202204/P020220424336135612575.pdf. Accessed May 05, 2022.

51. Gu Y. New media communication to generation Z youth under the wave of video. Bilibili; 2022. Available from: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1cY4y187UG/. Accessed May 20, 2022.

52. Bilibili. Investor home. Available from: https://ir.bilibili.com/. Accessed May 4, 2022.

53. Qiang C, Yangyi Z, Xiaoyue M, Runxi Z. The influence factors and empirical research of the information communication effect of government official accounts on Bilibili. Library Info Service. 2020;64(22):126–134. doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.22.013

54. Xue J, Macropol K, Jia Y, et al. Harnessing big data for social justice: an exploration of violence against women‐related conversations on Twitter. Human Behav Emerg Technol. 2019;1(3):269–279. doi:10.1002/hbe2.160

55. Gluck M. Digital ad engagement: an industry overview and reconceptualization; 2012. Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB). Available from: http://www.iab.net/media/file/IAB-Ad-Engagement-Whitepaper-12-05-12-tweaks.pdf. Accessed August 26, 2020.

56. Khan ML. Social media engagement: what motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube?[J]. Comput Human Behav. 2017;66:236–247. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024

57. Stellefson M, Chaney B, Ochipa K, et al. YouTube as a source of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education: a social media content analysis. Chron Respir Dis. 2014;11(2):61–71. doi:10.1177/1479972314525058

58. Borghol Y, Ardon S, Carlsson N, et al. The untold story of the clones: content-agnostic factors that impact YouTube video popularity[C]. Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 2012: 1186–1194.

59. Moon H, Lee GH. Evaluation of Korean-language COVID-19–related medical information on YouTube: cross-sectional Infodemiology study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e20775. doi:10.2196/20775

60. Holsti OR. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley; 1969.

61. Lombard M, Snyder-Duch J, Bracken CC. Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of Intercoder Reliability. Hum Commun Res. 2002;28(4):587–604. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x

62. Xu X, Pratt S. Social Media influencers as endorsers to promote travel destinations: an application of self-congruence theory to the Chinese Generation Y. J Travel Tour Market. 2018;35(7):958–972. doi:10.1080/10548408.2018.1468851

63. Ahmad AH, Idris I, Mason C, Chow SK. The impact of young celebrity endorsements in social media advertisements and brand image towards the purchase intention of young consumers. Int J Financial Res. 2019;10(5):54. doi:10.5430/ijfr.v10n5p54

64. Robichaud P, Hawken S, Beard L, et al. Vaccine-critical videos on YouTube and their impact on medical students’ attitudes about seasonal influenza immunization: a pre and post study. Vaccine. 2012;30(25):3763–3770. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.074

65. Ki C-W, Cuevas LM, Chong SM, Lim H. Influencer marketing: social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. J Retail Consumer Services. 2020;55:102133. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102133

66. Smit CR, Buijs L, van Woudenberg TJ, Bevelander KE, Buijzen M. The impact of social media influencers on children’s dietary behaviors. Front Psychol. 2020;10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02975

67. Chan C, Sounderajah V, Daniels E, et al. The reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of public health information regarding COVID-19 vaccination: cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021;7(7):e29942. doi:10.2196/29942

68. Puntha P, Jitanugoon S, Lee P-C. Engagement on social networks during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison among healthcare professionals, fitness influencers, and Healthy Food Influencers. The 8th Multidisciplinary International Social Networks Conference. 2021. doi:10.1145/3504006.3504008.

69. El-Awaisi A, O’Carroll V, Koraysh S, Koummich S, Huber M. Perceptions of who is in the healthcare team? A content analysis of social media posts during COVID-19 pandemic. J Interprof Care. 2020;34(5):622–632. doi:10.1080/13561820.2020.1819779

70. Mehdipour S, Jannati N, Negarestani M, et al. Health pandemic and social media: a content analysis of COVID-related posts on a telegram channel with more than one million subscribers. Navig Healthc Through Challenging Times. 2021. doi:10.3233/shti210098

71. Webberley W, Allen S, Whitaker R. Retweeting: a study of message-forwarding in Twitter. 2011 Workshop on Mobile and Online Social Networks. 2011. doi:10.1109/mosn.2011.6060787.

72. McCombs ME, Shaw DL. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opin Q. 1972;36(2):176. doi:10.1086/267990

73. Kozel CT, Kane WM, Hatcher MT, et al. Introducing health promotion agenda-setting for Health Education Practitioners. Californian J Health Promot. 2006;4(1):32–40. doi:10.32398/cjhp.v4i1.730

74. Gewirtz-Meydan A, Mitchell K, Shlomo Y, Heller O, Grinstein-Weiss M. Covid-19 among youth in Israel: correlates of decisions to vaccinate and reasons for refusal. J Adolesc Health. 2022;70(3):396–402. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.11.016

75. Maharani DA, Rachmawati YL, Putri DW, Hariyani N, Bahar A. Analysis of quality, usefulness, reliability, visibility, and popularity of videos about dental caries on YouTube: a cross-sectional analysis. J Int Soc Prev Commun Dent. 2022;12(2):245. doi:10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_246_21

76. Rapisarda V, Vella F, Ledda C, Barattucci M, Ramaci T. What prompts doctors to recommend COVID-19 vaccines: is it a question of positive emotion? Vaccines. 2021;9(6):578. doi:10.3390/vaccines9060578

77. Wismans A, Thurik R, Baptista R, Dejardin M, Janssen F, Franken I. Psychological characteristics and the mediating role of the 5C model in explaining students’ covid-19 vaccination intention. PLoS One. 2021;16(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255382

78. Euser S, Kroese FM, Derks M, de Bruin M. Understanding covid-19 vaccination willingness among youth: a survey study in the Netherlands. Vaccine. 2022;40(6):833–836. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.062

79. Brandt EJ, Rosenberg J, Waselewski ME, Amaro X, Wasag J, Chang T. National study of youth opinions on vaccination for covid-19 in the U.S. J Adolesc Health. 2021;68(5):869–872. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.02.013

80. Fazel M, Puntis S, White SR, et al. Willingness of children and adolescents to have a COVID-19 vaccination: results of a large whole schools survey in England. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;40:101144. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101144

81. Chou W-YS, Budenz A. Considering emotion in COVID-19 vaccine communication: addressing vaccine hesitancy and fostering vaccine confidence. Health Commun. 2020;35(14):1718–1722. doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1838096

82. Shukla A. Covid-19 pandemic: an analysis of popular YouTube videos as an alternative health information platform. Health Informatics J. 2021;27(2):146045822199487. doi:10.1177/1460458221994878

83. Abao RP, Estuar MR, Cataluna AA, Aureus JP, Mapua DC. Emotion analysis of comments from vaccine-related YouTube videos: understanding the public’s response to covid-19 vaccination. 2021 Eighth International Conference on Social Network Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS). 2021. doi:10.1109/snams53716.2021.9732116.

84. Fan C-W, Chen I-H, Ko N-Y, et al. Extended theory of planned behavior in explaining the intention to covid-19 vaccination uptake among mainland Chinese university students: an online survey study. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(10):3413–3420. doi:10.1080/21645515.2021.1933687

85. Broniatowski DA, Dredze M, Ayers JW. “First do no harm”: effective communication about covid-19 vaccines. Am J Public Health. 2021;111(6):1055–1057. doi:10.2105/ajph.2021.306288

86. Zhou M, Rincón‐Gallardo Patiño S, Hedrick VE, Kraak VI. An accountability evaluation for the responsible use of celebrity endorsement by the food and beverage industry to promote healthy food environments for Young Americans: a narrative review to inform Obesity Prevention Policy. Obes Rev. 2020;21(12). doi:10.1111/obr.13094

87. Velho RM, Mendes AM, Azevedo CL. Communicating science with YouTube videos: how nine factors relate to and affect video views. Front Commun. 2020;5. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2020.567606

Creative Commons License © 2022 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.