Toll-like receptors and COVID-19: a two-faced story with an exciting ending

Livia Onofrio1, Michele Caraglia2, Gaetano Facchini3, Vincenzo Margherita1, Sabino De Placido1 & Carlo Buonerba*,4,5 1Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy 2Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy 3Medical Oncology, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, “S.M. delle Grazie Hospital”, Pozzuoli (NA), Italy 4Regional Reference Center for Rare Tumors, Department of Oncology & Hematology, AOU Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy 5National Reference Center for Environmental Health, Zoo-prophylactic Institute of Southern Italy, Portici, Italy *Author for correspondence: carlo.buonerba@izsmportici.it

demonstrated some efficacy [8]. Results from a large prospective trial with tocilizumab [9] are pending. Although other pharmacological agents have been proposed or tested, including azithromycin, recombinant soluble ACE2, lopinavir/ritonavir [10] as well as eculizumab [11], effective pharmacological agents against such a deadly disease remain a compelling need at the present time.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) [12] may be involved both in the initial failure of viral clearance and in the subsequent development of the deadly clinical manifestations of severe COVID-19 -essentially ARDS with fatal respiratory failure. TLRs are ubiquitously present in the animal kingdom. In humans, the TLR family comprises ten members (TLR1-TLR10), which are expressed in innate immune cells such as macrophages as well as in epithelial and fibroblast cells. Activation of TLRs can be induced by a multitude of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) present in bacteria, viruses and other foreign organisms. TLRs play a major role in the initiation of innate immune responses, with the production of inflammatory cytokines, type I IFN and other mediators. TLRs can be localized either on the cell surface, such as TLR-1, -2, -4, -5, -6, -10 or in the endosome compartment, such as TLR-3, -7, -8, -9 [12]. Importantly, while TLR3 recognizes viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), TLR7 recognizes viral single-stranded RNA and is therefore, likely to be implicated in clearance of SARS-CoV-2 [13]. TLR activation via MyD88-dependent and TRIF-dependent pathways causes nuclear translocation of the transcription factors NF-κB, IRF-3 and IRF-7, with production of innate pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α) and type I IFN-α/β, which are essential for anti-viral responses [13]. Similarly to SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 may prevent a successful immune response in infected individuals who progress to severe COVID-19 via inhibition of the TNF-receptor-associated factors (TRAF) -3 and -6, which play an essential role in inducing IRF-3/7 in response to TLR-7 activation. Available agonists against TLR-7 may prevent onset of severe COVID-19 in symptomatic patients and synergize with active anti-viral therapy.
In experimental mouse models of ARDS induced by multiple noxae, including SARS-CoV, genetic inactivation of the TLR-4 gene, but not of TLR-3 or 9 genes, was associated with reduced acute lung injury [14]. An improvement was also noted in IL-6-/-mice, which is consistent with the promising results obtained with tocilizumab. In patients with severe COVID-19, lung macrophages may play a key role in the massive release of IL-6 and other cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10 and IL-12 via TLRs activation [15]. Of note, in an in vitro model, stimulation of human lung macrophages with subtype-selective agonists against various TLRs demonstrated that TLR4 stimulation induced the strongest effect in terms of cytokine release. Although SARS-CoV-2 is unlikely to activate TLR-4 directly, as TLR-4 responds to bacteria [12], one hypothesis based on a mouse model of acute lung injury is that oxidized phospholipids can be responsible for activation of TLR-4 and onset of ARDS [14]. It is interesting to note that neutrophil myeloperoxidase, which is reported to be at increased levels in COVID-19 patients, especially in those on ventilation support [16], is capable to oxidase phospholipids [17] abundant in alveolar surfactant [18]. TLR-4 may, therefore, represent a druggable target against COVID-19 via the use of TLR-4 antagonists.
Major difficulties in identifying effective therapeutic options in patients with severe COVID-19 lie in the heterogeneity of the disease and its erratic course, with some patients with mild symptoms at presentation developing sudden respiratory failure. On 1 May 2020, remdesivir was authorized by the FDA, MA, USA for treatment of severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalization, on the grounds of data obtained with the NIAID [7] and the Gileadsponsored [19] trials. These trials enrolled hospitalized patients with different levels of respiratory insufficiency, including patients not requiring supplemental oxygen with an SpO 2 <94% and those requiring mechanical ventilation, but it is currently unknown whether remdesivir efficacy may vary according to severity of the disease. Pending full analysis of remdesivir efficacy data, which should disclosure whether there are subgroup of patients who benefit less from treatment (e.g., those with more severe disease), we hypothesize that remdesivir may synergize with pharmacological agonists against TLR-7, which may be involved in viral escape mechanisms from immune clearance, as discussed above. In simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)-SF162P3-infected rhesus monkeys, administration of the TLR7 agonist vesatolimod during anti-retroviral therapy (ART) was associated with a delayed viral rebound after ART suspension [20]. In a Phase II trial conducted in 162 patients with hepatitis B, vesatolimod demonstrated remarkable safety in combination antiviral treatment, with signs of biological activity determined by an increase in IFN-stimulated gene mRNA expression [21]. Vesatolimod has been shown to be safe and biologically active and may be tested in COVID-19 in combination with active anti-viral therapy. Conversely, TLR-4 antagonists may be useful in patients on respiratory support with ARDS, possibly in combination with anti-IL-6 agents. Eritoran is a well-tolerated TLR4 antagonist that was tested for the treatment of severe sepsis in a large randomized controlled clinical trial, where it exhibited an excellent safety profile, although it yielded no improvement in mortality [22]. In an influenza mouse model, Eritoran was able to improve clinical symptoms and pathologic lung damage, while decreasing oxidized phospholipid and cytokine levels, as well as mortality [23].
Clinical testing of TLR agonists/antagonists may be optimized on the grounds of the following three key points. First, even patients with severe COVID-19 demonstrate a time-dependent spectrum of clinical manifestations, ranging from desaturation with no oxygen supplementation required to need of mechanical ventilation. We hypothesize that patients with less severe disease may more likely benefit from early anti-viral therapy, possibly in combination with TLR-7 agonists. Conversely, patients on mechanical ventilation suffering from ARDS may benefit from anti-IL-6 treatment, possibly in combination with TLR-4 antagonists. Second, intermediate biological markers of therapy efficacy that may also be useful in clinical practice represent a powerful tool to explore efficacy of multiple TLR-modulating agents. Signs of efficacy of TLR-7 agonists in combination with anti-viral therapy may be captured by an early drop in viral load, while decreasing IL-6 levels may capture efficacy of TLR-4 antagonists even in small patient populations. Third, the target population may include mildly symptomatic patients positive to SARS-CoV-2 with known risk factors for COVID-19 mortality, such as age and comorbidities, who may benefit from early treatment before onset of severe COVID-19.
In the current scenario in which only few therapeutic options against COVID-19 are available, targeting TLRs using pharmacological agents ready for clinical testing may provide major therapeutic advances in the fight against this deadly disease, which is unlikely to be eradicated for the next decades.

Financial & competing interests disclosure
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Open access
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecomm ons.org/licenses/by/4.0/