Venous Thromboembolism and Ovarian Torsion-detorsion in Pregnancy: a Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature

The safety of adnexal detorsion in pregnant women is debatable as the hypercoagulable state during pregnancy intensies the risk of thromboembolism. The diagnosis and treatment is challenging because its rarity and complexity due to the foetal health. Here we presented a rare case of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after ovarian detorsion during early pregnancy and conducted a review of the literature. VTE after ovarian torsion-detorsion in pregnancy is an infrequent event and is more likely to occur in the rst and second trimester. The diagnosis depends mainly on the clinical manifestation, D-dimer level and imaging tests such as compression ultrasonography and computed tomography pulmonary angiogram. Low-molecular-weight heparin remains the drug of choice for both prophylactic measurement and therapeutic strategy. With prompt diagnosis and immediate treatment, VTE after ovarian torsion-detorsion is usually uneventful.


Introduction
Ovarian torsion during pregnancy, although fairly uncommon, is a well-recognized gynaecological emergency. It has been assumed that venous thromboembolism (VTE), being the leading cause of maternal death, was associated with ovarian torsion-detorsion. In order to avoid the release of emboli from the thrombotic vessels in the twisted adnexa, salpingo-oophorectomy without unwinding the adnexa was once the preferred surgical strategy [1]. However, in recent years, researchers have been advocating adnexal detorsion in place of salpingo-oophorectomy with the claim that infarcted adnexa were rarely attributed to VTE [2][3][4][5]. As a result, adnexal detorsion has now taken over as the mainstay of treatment for adnexal torsion to preserve ovarian function in young women. Even so, the safety of adnexal detorsion in pregnant women is still debatable as the hypercoagulable state during pregnancy intensi es the risk of thromboembolism. Consequently, we presented a case report of VTE after ovarian detorsion in pregnancy and conducted a systematic review of the literature.

Case Report
A 28-year-old women, gravida 1, para 0, in the 7th week of gestation was admitted to our hospital, complaining of lower abdominal pain and vomiting. Bimanual examination showed a pelvic mass and a point of tenderness in the right lower abdominal quadrant. Laboratory results revealed that the white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, hepatic enzymes and urine analysis were within normal ranges.
Transvaginal ultrasound showed one intrauterine gestational sac with a viable embryo. The left adnexa were normal whereas the right ovary was enlarged, measuring 8.5*7.3*5.3 cm and a 6.9*5.8*4.8 ovarian cyst could be appreciated with an absence of vascular ow. The kidneys, pancreases, gall bladder and appendix showed no signs of abnormalities. In view of the above-mentioned ndings, an explorative laparotomy was performed and an ischemic oedematous ovary was noted, containing a haemorrhagic corpus luteum cyst, around two thirds of which was dark bluish in colour and twisted for 1080 degree.
Detorsion of the twisted adnexa was done and re-colouration of the adnexa was noted during the observation period. Therefore, ovarian cystectomy was performed. The post-operative pathology report described a corpus luteum cyst. The necessary measures to prevent thrombosis were taken. For instance, early ambulation and anti-embolism stockings were encouraged. Nevertheless, on the third post-operative day, the patient complained of calf pain in her right leg. Palpation of the affected limb showed Neuhof's sign positive. Ultrasonography revealed an extensive thrombosis within the deep veins of her right leg. An elevated D-dimer of 2.4 mg/l was noted. The patient commenced on low weight molecular heparin (LWMH, Nadropin calcium) 4100 IU twice daily subcutaneously for 14 days. By the 10th day of treatment, the level of D-dimer dropped to 0.55 mg/l. Moreover, the follow-up ultrasonography performed at her 3 months review showed that the deep vein thrombosis in her right leg had completely disappeared. The patient eventually delivered a healthy infant at 39 weeks of gestation. Prophylactic administration of lowmolecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was initiated after the delivery and the postpartum ultrasound examinations showed no signs of any further venous thrombosis.

Discussion
One may argue that the current study is a case of ovarian torsion simultaneously with an event of VTE; however, we believe there is no need to debate as it is virtually impossible to con rm the relationship between ovarian torsion and VTE. The clinical signi cance of this study is to remind physicians that 1) VTE could occur after ovarian detorsion during pregnancy; 2) Early ambulation and anti-embolism stockings may not prevent VTE and therefore 3) the epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment regimens should be reviewed due to its rarity and complexity regarding to foetal health during pregnancy.

Current research status
About 10-22% of adnexal torsion occurred during pregnancy [6,7]. It is more likely to occur between the 10th week and the 17th week of gestation with an ovarian mass larger than 4 cm in diameter [8]. The venous thromboembolism risk was reported to be 0.03% in pregnant women, which is increased by 5 folds as compared to non-pregnant women [9,10]. The above-mentioned data were mainly focused on the population of pregnant women. In addition to that, to the best of our knowledge, the subgroup of pregnancies with VTE after ovarian torsion-detorsion has seldom been evaluated. A comprehensive search was performed in Embase and PubMed. The search strategies were designed using controlled vocabulary and plain language without language restrictions (Supplementary material). As a result, there has been only one case of VTE and three cases of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with adnexal torsion in the literature across the globe. Three of four cases received adnexal resection without detorsion and all of the three cases were complicated with PE. One of four cases received cystectomy with detorsion and developed postoperative DVT. However, none of the cases occurred during pregnancy [ Table 1]. Therefore, we are the rst to present a case of an ovarian torsion in a pregnant woman which has been complicated with VTE after the surgical intervention with ovarian detorsion. cases had isolated fallopian tube torsion, amounting to an incidence of 0.11% and 0.007%, respectively. Of the 260 cases, 223 had ovarian tumour and 1 case developed VTE after the surgical detorsion, giving an incidence of 0.38% ( Fig. 1 ow diagram).

Evaluation and diagnosis
The diagnosis of VTE after ovarian torsion-detorsion during pregnancy mainly depends on the clinical symptoms, physical examination and imaging tests. Patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) may present with calf pain, swelling and tenderness in the leg and a positive Neuhof's sign. On the other hand, those who develop iliac vein thrombosis may complain of inguinal, pelvic, or abdominal pain, and experience swelling of the entire leg. Pregnant women with a high suspicion of DVT should undergo a Ddimer test and compression ultrasonography (CUS). If the initial CUS is negative, repeat CUS must be performed when there is a high index of suspicion. In comparison with DVT, PE is more challenging to diagnose as the clinical presentation may be non-speci c. One should be cautious of PE when the patient complains of weakness and faintness, which is usually considered as the normal recovery process after the surgical detorsion and is therefore neglected. Some may experience tachycardia and tachypnea [11]. Under such circumstances, a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) is highly recommended [12]. CUS should be performed after the con rmation of PE as DVT and PE are usually associated. In our study, the patient presented with calf pain and soreness of the lower limb and the diagnosis was established with an elevated D-dimer level and CUS. We did not perform further test for PE as the patients showed no clinical signs of any respiratory or cardiovascular diseases.

Treatment
The prophylactic measurements after surgical detorsion during pregnancy are early ambulation, antiembolism stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression devices. It should be noted that the prophylactic measurements may not be able to prevent VTE. As in our case, VTE occurred although early ambulation and anti-embolism stockings were applied. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and LMWH are both safe during pregnancy as neither will cross the placenta. However, administration of anticoagulants need careful considerations as heavy bleeding has been reported in 1.98% of pregnancies [13]. In clinical practice, LMWH is the drug of choice for it is relatively easy to use and doses not require tedious monitoring. Guideline from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists [14] suggests that thromboprophylactic doses for antenatal LMWH should be based on weight with the most frequently used LMWH being Enoxaparin, Dalteparin and Tinzaparin. LMWH is recommended in therapeutic doses once daily or twice daily in the management of acute VTE in pregnancy. Nevertheless, for pregnant women with PE or severe VTE, LMWH should be initiated with therapeutic doses twice daily [12]. In the current study, we started the treatment with therapeutic doses twice daily, and the complete resolution of emboli occurred in two weeks.

Conclusion
In conclusion, VTE after ovarian torsion-detorsion in pregnancy is an infrequent event and is more likely to occur in the rst and second trimester.