Skip to main content
Log in

Differences of Fluorine in Cements Determined by Photometric Methods after Distillation and Pyrolysis

  • Notes
  • Published:
Analytical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a spectrophotometric method after distillation separation is a standard test method widely employed for the determination of fluorine (F) in cement. Using a flow injection (FI) method after pyrolysis separation for quantification of fluorine in cement has recently been developed. Differences between the fluorine content values obtained by each method have been noted. This paper documents the differences between fluorine content (distillation F) measured spectrophotometrically after distillation and that (pyrolysis F) determined using the FI method after pyrolysis for fourteen commercial Portland cements and identifies a factor contributing to the differences between distillation F and pyrolysis F values. A highly significant relationship existed between distillation F and pyrolysis F values for fourteen cements (r2 = 0.998, p < 0.001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Wada, H. Mori, and G. Nakagawa, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1985, 172, 297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Noguchi, T. Maruta, and T. Yamane, Environment and Measurement Technology, 2004, 31, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ISO 2828, “Aluminium Oxide Primarily Used for the Production of Aluminium—Determination of Fluorine Content-alizarin Complexone and Lanthanum Chloride Spectrophotometric Method”, 1973, International Organization for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  4. JIS K 0102, “Testing Methods for Industrial Wastewater”, 1999, Japanese Industrial Standard Committee, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  5. CAJS I-51, “Standard Test Method for Cements and Raw Materials”, 1981, Japan Cement Association, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. B. Li and X. R. Xu, Talanta, 1999, 48, 57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Shimada, T. Shimoda, H. Kokusen, and S. Nakano, Talanta, 2005, 66, 80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Hashitani and H. Muto, Bunseki Kagaku, 1965, 14, 1114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Noguchi, T. Maruta, N. Kiba, and T. Yamane, Bunseki Kagaku, 2007, 56, 939.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Iwata, Tetsu to Hagane, 1987, 73, 1103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. H. Powell and O. Menis, Anal. Chem., 1958, 30, 1546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noguchi, Y., Maruta, T., Yamane, T. et al. Differences of Fluorine in Cements Determined by Photometric Methods after Distillation and Pyrolysis. ANAL. SCI. 24, 673–675 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.24.673

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.24.673

Navigation