Cent Eur J Public Health 2020, 28(2):114-119 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a5730

Analysis of incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and evaluation of their control in epidemiological survey in the Czech Republic

Zdeněk Chmelík1, Martina Vaclová1, Věra Lánská2, Jiří Laštůvka1,3, Michal Vrablík1
1 Third Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism, First Medical Faculty, Charles University, General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Hygiene, Institute of Clinical, Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Internal Department, Masaryk Hospital, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic

Objective: The aim of this analysis was to analyze the presence of the most important cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and to discuss patterns of LDL cholesterol management in the population studied.

Methods: We enrolled 961 males, average age of 42.9 ± 4.7, and 851 females, average age of 51.2 ± 3.6. Data on personal, pharmacological and family history, and laboratory examinations were collected. Cardiovascular (CV) risk was calculated using the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) algorithm with modifications according to the guidelines.

Results: The distribution of CV risk in the observed cohort was as follows: 24% of the subjects had low, 51% moderate, 17% high and 8% very high risk. The percentage of patients who reached target values of LDL cholesterol was dramatically lower in the groups with very high (1%) and high (3%) risk than in the groups with moderate (14%) or low risk (59%). Dyslipidemia was newly identified in 20% of both sexes. Arterial hypertension was newly diagnosed in 8% of males and 5% of females, and type 2 diabetes mellitus was newly diagnosed in 3% of both the males and females. Dyslipidemia was present in 39% of males and 41% of females; arterial hypertension in 43% of males and 45% of females, and type 2 diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 11% of the subjects of both sexes. 49% of males and 31% of females were overweight and 32% of both genders were obese. There were 36% of male smokers and 22% of female smokers. 48% of the participants were pharmacologically treated. Non-pharmacological treatment was recommended to 62% of male and to 65% of female participants. Pharmacological intervention was started in 53% of males and 51% of females. In both gender antihypertensive treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (29% of males and 27% of females) and lipid lowering therapy with a statin (28% of males, 27% of females) were the most commonly initiated treatments. In the subgroup of the 101 patients with LDL cholesterol levels > 5 mmol/L 56% were not treated with a statin. The analysis of relationship between the positive family history of any of the followed CV risks showed significant increases of the risk for arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia.

Conclusion: European guidelines suggest general screening for risk factors, including analysis of lipid profiles in the population of 40-year-old males and 50-year-old or postmenopausal women. Our study documents high prevalence and incidence of CV risk factors together with insufficient control of the risk factors in Czech patients of this age range. This finding suggests that preventive examinations should be undertaken earlier (e.g., in 30-year-old males and 40-year-old women). Exact timing of the preventive check-ups to yield the best cost-benefit ratio needs to be verified.

Keywords: screening, risk factors, SCORE, LDL cholesterol, familiar hypercholesterolemia

Received: March 2, 2019; Revised: May 6, 2019; Accepted: May 6, 2020; Published: June 27, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chmelík Z, Vaclová M, Lánská V, Laštůvka J, Vrablík M. Analysis of incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and evaluation of their control in epidemiological survey in the Czech Republic. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2020;28(2):114-119. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a5730. PubMed PMID: 32592555.
Download citation

References

  1. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(29):2315-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Walldius G, Jungner I, Holme I, Aastveit AH, Kolar W, Steiner E. High apolipoprotein B, low apolipoprotein A-I, and improvement in the prediction of fatal myocardial infarction (AMORIS study): a prospective study. Lancet. 2001;358(9298):2026-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, et al.; INTERHEART Study Investigators. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):937-52. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Vrablík, M. Treatment of hypertension for a long-term satisfaction of the patient as well as the physician. Practicus. 2015;14(6):22-4. (In Czech.)
  5. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren M, et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J. 2012;33(13):1635-701. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Filipovský J, Widímský J Jr, Ceral J, Cífková R, Horký K, Linhart A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of arterial hypertension. 2012 Guidelines of the Czech Hypertension Society. Vnitr Lek. 2012;58(10):785-801. (In Czech.) Go to PubMed...
  7. Czech Health Statistics Yearbook. Prague: Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic; 2013. (In Czech, English.)
  8. Cífková R, Skodová Z, Bruthans J, Adámková V, Jozífová M, Galovcová M, et al. Longitudinal trends in major cardiovascular risk factors in the Czech population between 1985 and 2007/8. Czech MONICA and Czech post-MONICA. Atherosclerosis. 2010;211(2):676-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Mayer O Jr, Bruthans J, Timoracká K; Czech EUROASPIRE I-IV investigators. The changes in cardiovascular prevention practice between 1995 and 2012 in the Czech Republic. A comparison of EUROASPIRE I, II, III and IV study. Cor Vasa. 2014;56(2):e91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2014.01.008. Go to original source...
  10. Marks D, Thorogood M, Neil HA, Humphries SE. A review on the diagnosis, natural history, and treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia. Atherosclerosis. 2003;168(1):1-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Austin MA, Hutter CM, Zimmern RL, Humphries SE. Familial hypercholesterolemia and coronary heart disease: a HuGE association review. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(5):421-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Piťha J, Staněk V, Aschermann M, Skalická H, Matoušková J, Kruger A, et al. Influence of a positive family history on the age of manifestation of an acute coronary syndrome and on the cardiovascular risk factors in females. 17th Congress of the Czech Coronary Society, May 10-13, 2009, Brno. Cor Vasa. 2009;51 Suppl. (In Czech.) Go to PubMed...
  13. Vrablîk M, et al. Question marks in cardiovascular prevention 2009. Brno: Facta Medica; 2009. (In Czech.)
  14. Soška V, Vaverková H, Vrablîk M, Bláha V, Cífková R, Freiberger T, et al. Position statement of the Executive Board of Czech Society for Atherosclerosis to the ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias 2011. Diabetol Metab Endokrinol Vyz. 2013,16(1):26-31. (In Czech.)
  15. Genest J, Frohlich J, Fodor G, McPherson R; Working Group on Hypercholesterolemia and Other Dyslipidemias. Recommendations for the management of dyslipidemia and the prevention of cardiovascular disease: summary of the 2003 update. CMAJ. 2003;169(9):921-4. Go to PubMed...