THE MODEL OF CORRUPTION COURT BASED ON IT IN THE ARCHIPELAGO PROVINCE AS A QUICK, LOW COSTS, AND SIMPLE IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Sulistyanta;

The enactment of Law Number 46 Year 2009 on The Corruption Court, is authorized to examine and decide the crime of corruption cases proposed by KPK or Prosecutor. Based on Article 35 paragraph (1) jo paragraph (4) of Law Number 46 of 2009, confirmed that corruption courts (Tipikor courts) are only located in each provincial capital whose jurisdiction covers the province concerned. By this provision, the Prosecutor Office in each district/city must transfer the corruption cases to the Corruption Court in the provincial capital. There are the problems as the following: first one, Is the process of criminal justice in the archipelago province (like NTT) able to fulfill the judicial principle of quick, low cost and simple?; second one, Is this condition not an obstacle in the process of criminal law enforcement in NTT?; The result of this research is that the Corruption Court in Kupang, conducted by several Prosecutor Offices, the samples do not meet the judicial principles of quick, low costs and simple. The obstacles besides spending much expenses, there are other factors such as weather, intentionally neglect the obligation as the experts, witnesses due to long time and high expenses. Law enforcement becomes less maximal due to the existing budget, and it can only be done by a minimal law enforcement process with a fairly expensive cost. Keyword (Keywords): Trial, Criminal Court, Archipelago, Expenses incurred.


C. RESEARCH METHODS
This research is conducted descriptively which means all the primary data that have been collected are analyzed descriptively. The costs incurred by the state prosecutor apparatus in order to enforce the law is to sue the perpetrators of corruption in their respective jurisdictions. In research year I (one) it was directed to detect / describe all costs incurred in the law enforcement. This description is important to illustrate that the great distance between the court and the location where the Prosecutor Office is, takes the great cost. While the primary data collection (field): conducted directly to the location. Conducting interviews with the appointed informants i.e. Chief Prosecutor and or with the represent one, Special Criminal Attorney (Jampidsus). The interview was conducted based on the questionnaire (open). Data analysis is obtained descriptively: The collected primary data are edited, coded and tabulated by then. The analysis is adjusted to the issues that will be answered which is related to the frequency of cases in the last 3 (three) years, the use expenses to solve a case of corruption, the completion time of corruption cases, the frequency of trials conducted in the Corruption Court in Kupang. The data are presented in either simple or narrative frequency table which is included in the explanatory / analytical descriptions.

Principles of Criminal Procedure Law: quick, low cost, and simple
The word "principle" literally means basic meaning, fundamental, starting, ground, and / or joints. (YahyaHarahap: 1993) in the context of justice law, a principle of law becomes the fundamental or general reference for the courts in solving cases, so the judges' ruling has strong joints and norms to create the expected law objectives for the litigants. confirmed that the judiciary is done in simple, quick, and low costs way. In the explanation, it is known that "simple" means the examination is done efficiently and effectively, clear procedure, easy to understand and not convoluted, while the "low costs" means the costs of the case can be paid by the civil people. Low costs in this case means no other costs are required unless there is a necessary cost in real terms for settlement of cases such as, the cost of administration, the registration of the case, the cost of witnesses, expert witnesses, stamp cost. Then what is mean of "quick" in judicial principle means that the settlement of the case takes not too long time. However, the quick settlement should always run on the right, fair and conscientious law rules.
The implementation of these principles should not decrease the accuracy of judicial and legal checks and judgments. If the simple, quick, low costs principles become the spirit of law enforcement, an effective and efficient criminal justice system can be created (Mukti comparable cost with the interest of social cost, in other words the costs are higher and the expected outcomes are lower ( Bambang Poernomo: 1993). If all these factors are maximized, it is not impossible that the criminal justice system will be better and will create a clean, fair, objective and fair judiciary (Mafta Setiawan: 2014).

The Corruption Court
In the context of Indonesia Law State, Article 24 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution amendment determines: Judicial power is an independent power to administer justice in order to uphold law and justice. Judicial power is exercised by a Supreme Court and the lower courts within the general court, the religious court, the military court, the state administrative court, and by a Constitutional Court.
The Court of Corruption in Indonesia is essentially a judicial power whose authority In relation to the principles of quick, simple and low costs as a general principles of criminal procedure law, it also can be found in Article 29 of Law Number 46 of 2009 on Corruption Courts that corruption cases are examined, judged and decided by the first level of Corruption Court within 120 (one hundred and twenty) of working days from the date of the case to the Corruption Court. In connection with the Corruption Court which is only located in provincial capital of NTT in Kupang raises some problems in enforcing the law when it is associated with a quick, simple and low costs judicial principles. Since the NTT province consist of islands of the Prosecutor Office"s which are equivalent to district areas are also spreading in some of these islands, which is geographically far enough from the provincial capital.

Archipelago Province and the Model of Court based on Information Technology
Archipelago province is defined as an area withaquatic terrestrial characteristic (the sea is larger than the land) such as Maluku Province, which is 92.6% sea territorial, Riau Islands Province is 96%, East Nusa Tenggara is 80.8%, Province of Bangka Belitung Islands is 79.9%, West Nusa Tenggara Province is 59.13%, North Sulawesi Province is 95.8%, and North Maluku Province is 69% sea territorial. Besides aquatic terrestrial, the regions in Indonesia aredivided into terrestrial (entirely mainland) and terrestrial aquatic (the land is larger than the sea) regions. Terrestrial and terrestrial aquatic regions have many advantages than aquatic terrestrial regions. In the aquatic terrestrial region which is known as the archipelago, the people tend to be isolated because they do not have access in various sectors, especially education, health, economy, politic and socio-culture.
There are some unique and special characteristics that found in the archipelago (AkhmadAulawi: 2012), firstly, the vast sea area is greater than the land area. Secondly, in terms of demographic distribution, the archipelago population is usually relatively small and its distribution is uneven. Thirdly, in terms of socio-culture, the communities in the archipelago region are segregated in settlements according to the territorial of an island, so it is commonly implicated as the strong sense of attachment to the land (read: islands), the pattern of life on small islands is more like to be in harmony with nature (slow to accept some changes). Next, in terms of socio-economy, economic activity, types and degrees of technology can certainly help the isolated areas and / or can press the expenses which is spent by the justice seekers by accessing the justice more easily.

E. Research Result and Discussion
According to the research result, the data can be seen in: The total costs Rp 558,840,000, -is estimated to be sufficient to afford 3 (three) cases.
However it still depends on the existing case, whether the proof is relatively easy or not.
Thus, if there are more than 3 (three) cases in one year, it is estimated that there will be case arrears which will be settled with the next year budget. This situation becomes wrong because the cumulative case can be a bad precedent for law enforcement.
In connection with the use of the budget, one of them is influenced by the frequency of the trial (prosecution stage) which means how long it takes to decide the corruption 23 Yustisia Vol. 6 No. 1 Januari -April 2017 The Model of Corruption Court ...
crimecase. The frequency of trials conducted by the Prosecutor Office"s sample as written in Table 2. 354,220,000, -It is also seen that the greater the distance from Kupangcity, the greater the cost. The most important thing is that the total expenses have exceeded the cost limit for the prosecution whichthe amount has been determined previously; Rp. 190,000,000, -. Thus it can be concluded that the farther the distance and the longer the trial process takes time, the greater the cost. is worth the distance that must be taken by the public prosecutor, the witnesses, experts, security and accused.
In connection with the great expenses, rises a question, could the enforcement of the law can be implemented maximally? Especially whenso many corruption cases are found in theProsecutor Office. It is for sure that the law enforcement could not be done optimally. The Prosecutor Office will set a priority scale which means not all cases can be prosecuted at once. Precisely, this priority scale can backfire to the Prosecutor Office. This is related to the demand of society who always ask for all cases to be prosecuted. If it is not done then the society will assume that the Prosecutor Office is not serious to prosecute. Seeing from the cause him to "escape" from NTT. Certainly, to track the "runaway" defendant, it will take costs. Similarly, if the defendant is sentenced freely and / or free from indictment, it will increase the cost that must be incurred because there is a possibility of Public Prosecutor using the appeal and / or cassation and or vice versa, the defendant through his / her legal counsel to appeal and / or cassation.
Another issue is that the judge's decision on the amount of the state financial loss, as a result of corruption, is smaller than the cost of prosecuting in corruption trial. As shown in Table 3 below: Thus, is the prosecution of corruption crime cases in archipelago province, such as NTT based on economic calculations, could fulfill the judicial principles of quick, simple, (especially) low costs? In the researchers" opinion: it could not fulfill these principles because there are various obstacles in the prosecution process in corruption court. In order to hold the trial, it will take a long time (2-3 months average), the great distance which takes great cost, simultaneously could impact on law enforcement of corruption case.
Besides the issue of cost, the application of quick, cheap and simple judicial principles at the prosecution stage of corruption trial in the archipelagic province contained obstacles.
Those obstacles can be identified as follows: 2. Internal factors of witnesses, experts / translators. Long distances make them leave their jobs (permission not to work) and will be more chaotic when the trial schedule is often delayed. On the other hand they must fulfill their obligations as witnesses.
If these witnesses are summoned by law enforcement officers and intentionally 3. Weather: generally weather become obstacles for flights to the NTT area in certain months. This condition could give an effect on the smoothness of air transportation.
For example, when there is a trial in Kupang and the public prosecutor in the Prosecutor Office ofManggarai (Ruteng) Flores island want to go there, his or her departure will be delayed due to weather condition. Alternatively, she or he can look for another flight from the nearest airport in Labuan Bajo (West Manggarai District) and to get to the nearest airport could be by driving. Or look for other alternatives via airport in Maumere or Ende and to reach those two airports must be driving first. Driving takes a long time, and quite tiring. Surely, in terms of cost becomes greater because it is not only in the cost of transportation, but also in consumption and or hotel (if needed).

Conclusion
Based on the discussion above, it can be summarized that: a. Prosecutor Office sample in archipelago province (NTT) for prosecution in corruption courts in Kupang require considerable cost, time and effort to meet the judicial principles of quick, low cost and simple. In addition, holding corruption trials in archipelago region (long distances) depends on several factors such as, weather (bad weather causing fail to flight). Another effect in terms of taking-long-time causing the postponement of the handled cases, and could affect the witnesses and translators as well.
b. The law enforcement becomes less optimal because with the available budget and the existing conditions could only hold a minimal law enforcement.

Suggestions
The judiciary in Indonesia needs to create a corruption trial model based on archipelago provinceso the judicial principles of quick, low cost, and simple could be fulfilled. The model