TEACHER EDUCATION FOR SINGLE-GRADE TEACHING DISQUALIFIES MULTI-GRADE TEACHING FOR RURAL EDUCATION

Received: 13th September 2021; Revised: 19th January 2022, 30th March 2022; Accepted: 02nd April 2022

Authors

  • Ntando Mpahla PhD, Acting HoD, Continuing Adult Professional Teacher Development, Butterworth, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa
  • Bulelwa Makena DEd, Lecturer, Continuing Adult Professional Teacher Development, Butterworth, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2022.61.192201

Keywords:

Teacher Education, Single-Grade Teaching, Multi-Grade Teaching, Rural, Education

Abstract

This paper examined the collision of teacher education for single-grade teacher classroom practices with multi-grade classroom teaching. Teachers educated for the normal situation of single-grade classroom teaching are not linked to the competencies required to practice and teach multi-grade classrooms. Of the current models of teacher education, none pays attention to the multi-grade teaching of rural education but only focuses on monograde classroom teaching. The paper used a qualitative research methodology. The researchers felt it vital to use a qualitative approach as the paper studies the life experiences of teachers in their natural and context-specific settings. Participants were selected through purposive sampling because of their common defining characteristics in the problem under study. Data collection came through semi-structured interviews and observation. When analysing data, a narrative analysis was used. The results of this paper indicated that the current crop of teachers in multi-grade schools does not possess the pedagogical knowledge required. This finding concludes that teachers have no specialised knowledge that would improve learner outcomes from the quality of teaching workforce and the quality of teaching.

References

Bartleton, L., 2018. A Case study of teacher’s perceptions of the impact of continuing professional development on their professional practice in a further education college in the West Midlands. The University of Wolverhampton.

Berry, C., 2010. Multi-grade Teaching. Discussion Document. http://www.ioe.ac.uk

Cornish, L., 2014. What is multi-grade teaching? Reaching EFA through multi-grade teaching, Kardoorair Press, Armidale, Australia.

Dale, A., 2006. Quality Issues with Survey Research. International Journal of Social Research. Vol 9 (2): Quality in Social Research, https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600595330

DBE, 2014. MULTIGRADE TEACHER Training Manual. 2030NDP.

DBE, 2015. Multi-Grade Strategy and Basic Education Sector Plan: Strengthening the Provision of Quality Teaching and Learning in Multi-Grade Schools.

Engin, G., 2018. The opinions of the multi-grade classroom teachers on Multi-grade class teaching practices. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14 (1) (2018), pp. 177-200. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.129.13

Henning, E, Van Rensburg, W, & Smit, B., 2009. Finding your way in qualitative research. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

Hyry-Beihammer, E. K. & Hascher, T., 2015. Multi-grade teaching practices in Austrian and Finnish primary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 74 (1), pp. 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.07.002

Joubert, J., 2009. Multi-grade Schools in South Africa. Cape Peninsula University of Technology, CMGE.

Joubert, J., 2010. Multi-grade Teaching in South Africa. Commonwealth Education Partnerships. https://bit.ly/3ivc8Xa

Juvane, V., 2007. Multi-grade teaching can improve the quality of primary education. Commonwealth Education. http://www.thecommonwealth.org/news/160291/090307teaching.htm

Kivunja, C., 2014. The Urgent Need to Train Teachers for Multigrade Pedagogy in African Schooling Contexts: Lessons from Uganda and Zambia. International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 3 (2), pp 125-134. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p63

Ko, J. Sammons, P. & Bakkum, L., 2016. Effective Teaching. Education Development Trust. The University of Oxford.

Mpahla, N. & Makena, B., 2020. Continuing professional teacher development for rural education: the essence to introduce effective professional development. Proceedings of the ICERI20 13th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (pp. 01-08). Seville, Spain. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2020.1513

Naparan, G, P. & Alisung, V, G., 2021. Classroom strategies of multi-grade teachers. Social Sciences & Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100109

Naparan, G. P., 2021. Classroom strategies of multi-grade teachers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100109

OECD, 2012. Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852

Pedder, D. & Opfer, V. D., 2010. Access to Continuous Professional Development by teachers in England. The Curriculum Journal Vol 21 (4), pp. 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2010.529680

Quail, A. & Smyth, E., 2014. Multigrade teaching and age composition of the class: The influence on academic and social outcomes among students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43 (1), pp. 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.06.004

Smagorinsky, P., 2018. Deconflating the ZPD and instructional scaffolding: Retranslating and reconceiving the zone of proximal development as the zone of the next development. Learning. Culture and Social Interaction, 16 (1), pp. 70-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.009

Taleb, N., 2016. The Bed of Procrustes: Philosophical and Practical Aphorisms (Incerto) Paperback.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-06

How to Cite

Mpahla, N., & Makena, B. (2022). TEACHER EDUCATION FOR SINGLE-GRADE TEACHING DISQUALIFIES MULTI-GRADE TEACHING FOR RURAL EDUCATION: Received: 13th September 2021; Revised: 19th January 2022, 30th March 2022; Accepted: 02nd April 2022. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 6(1), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2022.61.192201