RESEARCH PARADIGM AND THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Siti Soraya Lin Binti Abdullah Kamal School of Education, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.43.13861394

Keywords:

Constructivist Paradigm, Qualitative Research, Ontology, Epistemology, Methodology

Abstract

This paper principally describes the link between the research paradigm (constructivism) and the philosophical basis (ontology, epistemology and methodology) of a qualitative study. This article begins with an overview of qualitative study which consists of its meanings and features followed by the definition of research paradigm. The constructivist paradigm is explained alongside the example of my own qualitative research project. This paper also discusses how the constructivist paradigm relates to the ontology, epistemology and methodology of a qualitative study. It is hoped that this article will facilitate novice researchers particularly to know what the meaning of each philosophical term is, how the research paradigm is interwoven within the philosophical basis of a qualitative research and how different research paradigms serve different research purposes.

References

Antwi, S.K., &Hamza, K. (2015). Qualitative and Quantitative Research Paradigms in Business Research: A Philosophical Reflection. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(3), 217-226.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Brooke, M. (2013). Which Research Paradigm for TESOL? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Academy Publisher, 3(3), 430-436. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.3.430-436

Bunnis, S., & Kelly, D.R. (2010). Research paradigms in medical education research.

Medical Education, 44, 358–366. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann Educational.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chilisa, B. & Kawulich, B. (2012). Selecting a research approach: Paradigm, methodology and methods. Retrieved April, 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257944787

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison K. (2000). Research Methods in Education (5th Ed.). London: Routledge Falmerh. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342_chapter_1

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. London: Sage.

Fraser, S.& Robinson, C. (2004). Paradigms and philosophy. In S. Fraser, V. Lewis, S. Ding, M. Kellett and C. Robinson (Eds.), Doing Research with Children and Young People. London: Sage.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

Gray, D.E. (2014). Doing research in the real world. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Guba, E. G. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation, 8. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California.

Guba, E.G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In E.G. Guba (Eds.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17-30). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publication.

Hammersley, M. (1992). What's wrong with ethnography? London: Routledge.

Hitchcock, G. & Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the Teacher (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Hughes, P. (2010). Paradigms, methods and knowledge in G. MacNaughton, S. Rolfe and I. Siraj-Blatchford (Eds.), Doing Early Childhood Research, (2nd ed.,) Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Kivunja, C. &Kuyini, A.B. (2017). Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts. International Journal of Higher Education.6 (5). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26

Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited In N. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lincoln, Y,S. & Guba, E.G. (2013). The Constructivist Credo. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

Merriam, S.B., & Tisdell, E.J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Mukherji, P. & Albon, D. (2015). Research Methods in Early Childhood. An Introductory Guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Schwandt, T.A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Schwandt, T. A. (2007). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986281

Vickers, J. (2016). Exploring Engagement: A Grounded Theory Study of Young People's Interactions with Healthcare Professionals (PhD Thesis, The University of Salford, Salford, UK). Retrieved from http://usir.salford.ac.uk/38623/1/Jason%20Vickers%20thesis%20%28FINAL%29.pdf

Downloads

Published

2019-01-31

How to Cite

Kamal, S. S. L. B. A. (2019). RESEARCH PARADIGM AND THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF A QUALITATIVE STUDY. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 1386–1394. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.43.13861394