드론 정책 비교 연구

@article{ART002189572},
author={ 이한영 and 차성민 },
title={드론 정책 비교 연구},
journal={한국비교정부학보},
issn={1598-964X},
year={2016},
volume={20},
number={4},
pages={305-324},
doi={10.18397/kcgr.2016.20.4.305},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.18397/kcgr.2016.20.4.305}

TY - JOUR
AU - 이한영
AU - 차성민
TI - 드론 정책 비교 연구
T2 - 한국비교정부학보
PY - 2016
VL - 20
IS - 4
PB - 한국비교정부학회
SP - 305-324
SN - 1598-964X
AB - The use of drone is expanding globally. Unmanned aerial vehicles are used in various fields and are used not only for the creation of new industries but also for public interest purposes such as criminal investigation and disaster response. Along with such a forward function, concern about security such as intrusion or crash of important facilities in the country and the possibility of invasion of privacy by aerial shooting is a problem. While the drone market and industry are rapidly growing globally, It will also cause to trend of deregulation the domestic drone market. In order to develop the drone industry, promotion policies must be promoted and regulations should be relaxed. However, regulations that can prevent dysfunction using drone are also done at the same time. Important regulatory issues concerning drone are securing safety and protecting privacy. Currently, in domestic drone policy, regulations for securing safety are in place, but the system for privacy protection needs to be supplemented. As newly established Article 23-4 of the Aeronautics Act, it was included in the subject of application of the Personal Information Protection Law and Location Information Use Law to pilots, but this provision is merely provision of declaration. Besides that, it is necessary to prepare a complementary method to prevent access to the property of another person and to restrict the photograph shooting and use by referring to the foreign legislation cases.
KW - 무인항공기, 드론, 드론정책, 항공법, 초경량비행장치
DO - 10.18397/kcgr.2016.20.4.305
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.18397/kcgr.2016.20.4.305
ER -

이한영 and 차성민 (2016). 드론 정책 비교 연구. 한국비교정부학보, 20( 4), 305- 324.

이한영 and 차성민 . 2016, “드론 정책 비교 연구”, 한국비교정부학보, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 305-324. Available from: doi:10.18397/kcgr.2016.20.4.305

이한영 차성민 et al. “드론 정책 비교 연구” 한국비교정부학보 20.4 pp. 305-324 (2016): 305.

이한영 , 차성민 . 드론 정책 비교 연구 한국비교정부학보 [Internet]. 2016; 20( 4), : 305-324. Available from: doi:10.18397/kcgr.2016.20.4.305

이한영 and 차성민 . “드론 정책 비교 연구” 한국비교정부학보 20, no.4 (2016): 305-324. doi: 10.18397/kcgr.2016.20.4.305

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

드론 정책 비교 연구

한국비교정부학보

약어 : KCGR

2016, vol.20, no.4, pp.305 - 324

DOI : 10.18397/kcgr.2016.20.4.305

발행기관 : 한국비교정부학회

연구분야 : 행정학

이한영¹ , 차성민²

¹중앙대학교

²한남대학교

인용한 논문 수 : 15 서지 간략 보기

초록

The use of drone is expanding globally. Unmanned aerial vehicles are used in various fields and are used not only for the creation of new industries but also for public interest purposes such as criminal investigation and disaster response. Along with such a forward function, concern about security such as intrusion or crash of important facilities in the country and the possibility of invasion of privacy by aerial shooting is a problem. While the drone market and industry are rapidly growing globally, It will also cause to trend of deregulation the domestic drone market. In order to develop the drone industry, promotion policies must be promoted and regulations should be relaxed. However, regulations that can prevent dysfunction using drone are also done at the same time. Important regulatory issues concerning drone are securing safety and protecting privacy. Currently, in domestic drone policy, regulations for securing safety are in place, but the system for privacy protection needs to be supplemented. As newly established Article 23-4 of the Aeronautics Act, it was included in the subject of application of the Personal Information Protection Law and Location Information Use Law to pilots, but this provision is merely provision of declaration. Besides that, it is necessary to prepare a complementary method to prevent access to the property of another person and to restrict the photograph shooting and use by referring to the foreign legislation cases.

키워드

무인항공기, 드론, 드론정책, 항공법, 초경량비행장치

참고문헌(20)

[학술지] 김선이 / 2014 / 무인항공기의 사생활 침해에 대한 법적 대응 : 미국 정책·입법안 분석을 중심으로 / 항공우주정책 ·법학회지 29 (2) : 137 ~ 163
[학술지] 김종복 / 2013 / 국내 상업용 무인항공기 운용을 위한 법제화 고찰 / 항공우주정책 ·법학회지 28 (1) : 3 ~ 54
[학술지] 김중수 / 2015 / 드론의 활용과 안전 확보를 위한 항공법상 법적 규제에 관한 고찰 / 법학논총 39 (3) : 267 ~ 298
[학술지] 류창호 / 2015 / 드론(Drone)의 운행과 토지소유권의 침해 / 경희법학 50 (4) : 233 ~ 279
[보고서] 미래기술경영연구소 / 2016 / 미국 드론(UAV) 정책·전략과 핵심 특허 분석
[학술지] 박철순 / 2015 / 무인항공기 시장·기술·법제도 실태분석 및 정책적 대응방안 연구 / 항공우주정책 ·법학회지 30 (2) : 373 ~ 401
[학술지] 안진영 / 2015 / 세계의 무인항공시시스템(UAS) 관련 규제 현황 / 우주항공산업기술동향 13 (1) : 60
[학술대회] 윤대상 / 2016 / 중국 드론 산업 동향 / 중국산업경제브리핑 8 : 13
[학술지] 윤자영 / 2016 / 드론의 현황과 규제완화 정책 / KIET산업경제 10 : 19 ~ 20
[보고서] 임현 / 2015 / 무인항공기 이용 활성화를 위한 법제분석
[기타] 정종경 / 2016 / 드론 산업, '진흥'과 '규제' 어떻게 풀까 / 보안24
[기타] 주간조선 / 2016 / 사고뭉치 드론 규제 완화도 좋지만…
[기타] / 2016 / 전깃줄 걸려 드론 추락…웨스트할리우드 정전 사태 / 중앙일보 미주판
[기타] Bundesministerium fur Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie / 2015 / unbemannte Geräte = Drohnen ... und was Sie darüber wissen müssen
[기타] European Aviation Safety Agency / 2015 / Proposal to Create Common Rules for Operating Drones in Europe
[기타] Federal Aviation Administration / 2016 / Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems / BILLING CODE 4910-13-P : 8 ~ 13
[인터넷자료] / TechCruch
[인터넷자료] / 국토교통부
[인터넷자료] / 일본 경찰청
[인터넷자료] / 한국드론산업진흥협회