Central European Business Review 2023, 12(2):1-17 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.318

V4-India Partnership as an Example of Broader EU and Indo-Pacific Region Partnership

Kristína Drieniková ORCID...1, Ľubica Zubaľová ORCID...2, Jana Gordanová3
1 University of Economics, Faculty of Commerce, Department of International Trade, Bratislava, Slovakia, kristina.drienikova@euba.sk
2 University of Economics, Faculty of Commerce, Department of International Trade, Bratislava, Slovakia, lubica.zubalova@euba.sk
3 University of Economics, Faculty of Commerce, Department of International Trade, Bratislava, Slovakia, jana.gordanova@gmail.com

The EU has stepped up its efforts to reinforce its presence in Asia, especially in the Indo-Pacific region, due to its increasing geo-strategic importance for the EU, high mutual interconnectedness, as well as trade and investment engagement. In September 2021, the EU adopted its first Indo-Pacific Strategy. The aim of the paper is to point out the development of the partnership between the EU and the Asian (Indo-Pacific) region based on an evaluation of an analysis of trade and investment cooperation between the EU and India with a focus on mutual trade and investment relations between the Visegrad Group countries and India (and point out the comparative advantages that the V4 countries might use to extend mutual trade cooperation). The paper is based on trade analysis and uses the empirical methods of RCA and Grubel-Lloyd indices. There is room for expanding cooperation between the V4 countries and India in deepening intra-industry trade in commodities where the countries have a similar RCA profile. Moreover, the cooperation could complement bilateral relations between both regions.
Implications for Central European audience: The paper evaluates V4’s competitiveness and assesses V4’s export potential (RCA index) with India and potential trade prospects with India (RCA1) to confirm that there is room for expanding trade cooperation between the regions. We consider the V4 countries to be one of the regions that could deepen its mutual relations with India and intensify political dialogue and, therefore, take mutual cooperation and relations to the next level as well as deepen cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region. 

Keywords: EU; Asia; Indo-Pacific; Visegrad group; trade
JEL classification: F10, F15, F19

Received: June 7, 2022; Revised: August 22, 2022; Accepted: September 2, 2022; Prepublished online: November 17, 2022; Published: May 25, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Drieniková, K., Zubaľová, Ľ., & Gordanová, J. (2023). V4-India Partnership as an Example of Broader EU and Indo-Pacific Region Partnership. Central European Business Review12(2), 1-17. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.318
Download citation

References

  1. Balme, R., & Bridges, B. (2008). Introducing Asia, Europe and the Challenges of Globalization. In: Balme R., Bridges B. (eds) Europe-Asia Relations. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583467_1. Go to original source...
  2. Berg, T., Biedermann, Z., Fürst, R., Horký-Hlucháň, O., Hornát, J., Kałan, P., Kugiel, P., Majer, M., Němec, J., Ricz, J., Sárvári, B., Szczudlik, J., Szunomár, Á., Wąsiński, M., & Wnukowski, D. (2016). V4 Goes Global: Exploring Opportunities and Obstacles in the Visegrad Countries´ Cooperation wiith Brazil, India, China and South Africa. (P. Kugiel, Ed.) Warsaw: Polski Instytut Spraw Miedzynarodovych.
  3. Borrell, J. (2021). The EU needs a strategic approach for the Indo-Pacific. European External Action Service. Retrieved 27 January 2022, from https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/south-korea/94898/eu-needs-strategic-approach-indo-pacific_en.
  4. Chaudhury, D. R. (2019). India explores partnership with Visegrad Group in Central Europe with Jaishankar visit. The Economic Times. Retrieved 22 January 2022, from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/india-explores-partnership-with-visegrad-group-in-central-europe-with-jaishankar-visit/articleshow/70862243.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst.
  5. Cihelková, E. (2003). Vnější ekonomické vztahy Evropské unie. Praha: EKON Jihlava.
  6. Commission of the European Communities (1994). Towards a new Asia Strategy. Retrieved 27 January 2022, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:51994DC0314&from=EN.
  7. Denisov, I., Paramonov, O., Arapova, E., & Safranchuk, I. (2021). Russia, China, and the concept of Indo-Pacific. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 12(1), 72-85. Go to original source...
  8. Doidge, M. (2017). The Changing Place of Development in EU-Asia Relations. The European Journal of Development Research, 29(4), 926-941. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-016-0070-3. Go to original source...
  9. Drieniková, K., & Zubaľová, Ľ. (2013). Zahraničnoobchodná politika EÚ v meniacich sa podmienkach globálneho hospodárskeho prostredia. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo EKONÓM.
  10. Dubey, M. (2021). India-EU cooperation: Relinquishing benign neglect of Central and Eastern Europe. Observer Research Foundation. Retrieved 22 January 2022, from https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/india-eu-cooperation/.
  11. Dubravčíková, K., Šebok, F., Šebeňa, M., Šimalčík, M., & Turcsányi, R. Q. (2019). Prospect for Developing the V4 + China Cooperation Platform. Bratislava: Central European Institute of Asian Studies. Retrieved 24 January 2022, from https://ceias.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/V4-China-cooperation_FINAL.pdf.
  12. EEAS (2021). The EU strategy for cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. Retrieved 22 January 2022, from https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/jointcommunication_2021_24_1_en.pdf.
  13. European Commission (2001). EU-Asia: European Commission adopts new strategy for enhanced partnership. Retrieved 25 January 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_01_1238.
  14. European Commission. (2018). Developments and Forecasts of Growing Consumerism. Retrieved 25 January 2022, from https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/foresight/topic/growing-consumerism/more-developments-relevant-growing-consumerism_en.
  15. European Commission. (2020). Joint Report to the European Parliament and the Council. Report on the Generalised Scheme of Preferences covering the period 2018 - 2019. 21 s. Retrieved 24 January 2022, from https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2018/january/tradoc_156536.pdf
  16. European Commission. (2021a). EU and India launched the High-Level Dialogue on Trade and Investment. Retrieved 28 January 2022, from https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=2242.
  17. European Commission. (2021b). Trade Policy Review - An Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy. Retrieved 22 January 2022, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0066&qid=1614007663855 https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2021/april/tradoc_159541.0270_EN_05.pdf.
  18. Eurostat. (2021). European Statistics Database. Retrieved 10 November 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
  19. Grare, F., & Reuter, M. (2021). Moving closer: European views of the Indo-Pacific. European Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 10 February 2022, from https://ecfr.eu/special/moving-closer-european-views-of-the-indo-pacific/.
  20. Greenaway, D., & Milner, C. (1993). Trade and Industrial Policy in Developing Countries: A Manual Policy Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22782-2. Go to original source...
  21. Gulevich, V. (2019). India and Visegrad Four: Meeting Each Other Halfway. Modern Diplomacy. Retrieved 07 February 2022, from https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2019/10/23/india-and-visegrad-four-meeting-each-other-halfway/.
  22. Institut Montaigne (2021). The Europe-India Balance Sheet: Trade, Like-Mindedness and Strategic Interests. Retrieved 22 August 2022, from: https://www.institutmontaigne.org/ressources/pdfs/publications/note_europe_india_balance_sheet-REPORT%20%281%29_0.pdf.
  23. ITC (2021 b). Trade map. Retrieved 15 March 2021, from: https://www.trademap.org/.
  24. ITC (2021a). Export Potential Map. Retrieved 23 March 2021, from https://exportpotential.intracen.org/en/products/tree-map?exporter=3&fromMarker=r&toMarker=j&market=699&whatMarker=k.
  25. ITC (2022). Trade map. Retrieved 11 April 2022, from: https://www.trademap.org/.
  26. Kašťáková, E., Zábojník, S., & Bebiaková, D. (2019). Changes in Foreign Trade between Slovakia and Ukraine. Studia Commercialia Bratislavensia 12(42/2), 232-249.
  27. Krishnamurthy, B. (2021). India, Europe and the Indo-Pacific. In: Jain R.K. (eds) India, Europe and Asia. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4608-6_7. Go to original source...
  28. Kugiel, P. (2021). The EU and India in Indo-Pacific: Partners for a Resilient and Cooperative Order. Retrieved 9 February 2022, from https://euindiathinktanks.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/The-EU-and-India-in-Indo-Pacific_Partners-for-a-Resilient-and-Cooperative-Order.pdf.
  29. Kugiel, P., & Upadhyay, D. K. (2017): India and Central and Eastern Europe: Post-Cold War Engagement. International Studies, 54(1-4), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881718790165. Go to original source...
  30. Lai, S., Holland, M., & Kelly, S. (2019). The Emperor's new clothes? Perceptions of the EU's strategic partnerships in Asia. Asia Europe Journal, 17(3), 341-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-019-00558-y. Go to original source...
  31. Laš, L. (2017). Bridging the Visegrad Group and East Asia Through Cooperation. In Kamiński, T. (Ed.) Overcoming Controversies in East Asia. Łódź: Łódź University Press, 137-154. https://doi.org/10.18778/8088-758-9.09. Go to original source...
  32. Lukazsuk, T. (2020). The evolution of India - Central Europe relations after Cold war. Studia Politologiczne, 56, 231-254. https://doi.org/10.33896/SPolit.2020.56.15. Go to original source...
  33. Mazur, G. (2018). European Union-East Asia Trade Relations in 21st Century. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 7(2), 31-61.
  34. Moens, B. (2021). Beijing´s rise rekindles EU-India romance. Politico. Retrieved 24 January 2022, from https://www.politico.eu/article/china-rise-eu-india-trade-deal/.
  35. Mohan, G. (2019). A European Approach to the Indo-Pacific? Global Public Policy Institute (GPPi). Retrieved 25 January 2022, from https://www.gppi.net/2020/08/20/a-european-approach-to-the-indo-pacific.
  36. Mohan, G. (2021). Assessing the EU's new Indo-Pacific strategy. Retrieved 25 January 2022, from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2021/09/24/assessing-the-eus-new-indo-pacific-strategy/.
  37. Mohapatra, D. R. (2015). Trade and Investment Flows between India and the European Union. Issues and Challenges. Buzau: Bridge Center. Retrieved 18 December 2021, from http://www.euacademic.org/BookUpload/12.pdf.
  38. Obadi, S. M., & Korček, M. (2016). The "Revealed" Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness of the EU´s International Trade vis à vis the USA. Ekonomický časopis, 64(5), 397-422.
  39. Okano-Heijmans, M., & Sundar, V. (2018). Bringing the gap: sustainable connectivity in EU-India relations. Retrieved 24 January 2022, from https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2018-10/PB_Bridging_the_gap.pdf.
  40. Pant, H. V., & Basu, P. (2021). India in the Indo-Pacific: China, COVID-19 and the Reconfigured Regional Order. The Journal of Indian and Asian Studies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2717541321400027. Go to original source...
  41. Selivanov, M., & Casarini, N. (2018). Australia and the EU in the Indo-Pacific: Is Cooperation towards a Rules-Based Order Possible? Istituto Affari Internazionali. Retrieved 20 January 2022, from https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/australia-and-eu-indo-pacific-cooperation-towards-rules-based-order-possible.
  42. Svobodová, V. H., & Fernandes, O. (2014). New focus on India: A CEE perspective for investment, business and trade development. Studia Commercialia Bratislavensia, 7(27), 417-425. https://doi.org/10.2478/stcb-2014-0041. Go to original source...
  43. UnctadStat (n. d.). Revealed Comparative Advantage. Retrieved 20 January 2022, from https://unctadstat.unctad.org/en/RcaRadar.html.
  44. Utkulu, U., & Seymen, D. (2004). Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness: Evidence for Turkey vis-à-vis the EU/15. European Trade Study Group 6th Annual Conference, ETSG. Economics Department, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir.
  45. Visegradroup. (n. d.). Aims and Structure. Retrieved 20 January 2022, from https://www.visegradgroup.eu/about/aims-and-structure.
  46. World Bank (2010). Trade Indicators. Retrieved 20 January 2022, from https://wits.worldbank.org/wits/wits/witshelp/Content/Utilities/e1.trade_indicators.htm.
  47. WTO (2020). World Trade Tariffs. Retrieved 13 September 2021, from https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/tariff_profiles20_e.pdf.
  48. Zastupiteľský úrad ČR v Dillí. (2020). Souhrnná teritoriální informace Indie. Retrieved 22 March 2021, from http://publiccontent.sinpro.cz/PublicFiles/2020/12/02/Nahled%20STI%20(PDF)%20Indie%20-%20Souhrnna%20teritorialni%20informace%20-%202020.165502961.pdf.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.