Central European Business Review 2022, 11(5):67-83 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.308

Agile or Traditional Project Organization: A Quantitative Assessment of Decision Criteria among Firms in the DACH Region

Nuria Magdalena Maier1, Philip Emmerich ORCID...2
1 Technische Universität Berlin, Faculty of Economics and Management, Institute of Technology and Management, Chair of Technology and Innovation Management, Berlin, Germany, maier@campus.tu-berlin.de
2 Technische Universität Berlin, Faculty of Economics and Management, Institute of Technology and Management, Chair of Technology and Innovation Management, Berlin, Germany, Philip.emmerich@tu-berlin.de

The so-called agile approach is increasingly popular in the world of project management as a response to more dynamic and competitive environments. This study follows the question: What are the decisive criteria that result in the use of agile process models in practice? Therefore, a broad range of decision criteria is investigated, representing different reasons for firms to decide in favour or against the usage of agile process models, namely: Time-saving, increased efficiency, availability of qualified personnel, uniform terminology, project comparability and functions as a knowledge base. Most existing research on agile project management is of qualitative nature; this study uses a quantitative approach to assessing 51 firms and nine different industries within the DACH region. The collected data was analysed in a binary logistic regression model. Results reveal that time-saving positively predicts the use of agile process models, while high ratings in function as a knowledge base and project comparability predict the absence of agile process models. Therefore, practitioners are suggested to educate project and portfolio managers in the creation of hybrid environments and integration of agile process models in traditional project portfolios.
Implications for Central European audience: The results of this study provide valuable insights into the selection of project management approaches across different industries in the DACH region.

Keywords: agile; traditional; waterfall; project organisation; process models; decision criteria
JEL classification: L23, L30, M00

Received: November 2, 2021; Revised: February 19, 2022; Accepted: March 26, 2022; Prepublished online: May 11, 2022; Published: December 2, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Maier, N.M., & Emmerich, P. (2022). Agile or Traditional Project Organization: A Quantitative Assessment of Decision Criteria among Firms in the DACH Region. Central European Business Review, 11(5), 67-83. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.308
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alvarez-Dionisi, L. E., Turner, R., & Mittra, M. (2016). Global Project Management Trends. International Journal of Technology Project Management, 7(3), 54-73. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJITPM.2016070104. Go to original source...
    2. Barlow, J. B., Giboney, J., Keith, M. J., Wilson, D., Schueztler, R., Lowry, P. B., & Vance, A. (2011). Overview and Guidance on Agile Development in Large Organisations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29(2), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1909431. Go to original source...
    3. Boehm, B. (2002). Get ready for agile methods, with care. Computer, 35(1), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.976920. Go to original source...
    4. Chin, C. M. M., & Spowage, A. C. (2010). Defining & Classifying Project Management Methodologies. PM World Today, 7(5), 1-9.
    5. Chin, G. L. (2004). Agile Project Management: How to Succeed in the Face of Changing Project Requirements. New York: AMACOM. Go to original source...
    6. Ciric, D., Lalic, B., Gracanin, D., Tasic, N., Delic, M., & Medic, N. (2019). Agile vs. Traditional Approach in Project Management: Strategies, Challenges and Reasons to Introduce Agile. Procedia Manufacturing, 39, 1407-1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.314. Go to original source...
    7. Collyer, S., Warren, C., Hemsley, B., & Stevens, C. (2010). Aim, fire, aim - Project planning styles in dynamic environments. Project Management Journal, 41(4), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20199. Go to original source...
    8. Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1997). Portfolio Management in New Product Development: Lessons from the Leaders - I. Research-Technology Management, 40(5), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1997.11671152. Go to original source...
    9. DeCarlo, D. (2004). eXtreme Project Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    10. Delisle, C. L., & Olson, D. (2004). Would the real project management language please stand up? International Journal of Project Management, 22(4), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00072-3. Go to original source...
    11. Digital.ai. (2020). 14th Annual State of AgileTM Report. Retrieved June 10, 2021, from https://explore.digital.ai/state-of-agile/14th-annual-state-of-agile-report.
    12. Habermann, F. (2013). Hybrides Projektmanagement - agile und klassische Vorgehensmodelle im Zusammenspiel. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik (50), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340857. Go to original source...
    13. Hass, K. B. (2007). The blending of traditional and agile project management. PM World Today, 9(5), 1-6.
    14. Hobbs, B., & Petit, Y. (2017). Agile Methods on Large Projects in Large Organisations. Project Management Journal, 48(3), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800301. Go to original source...
    15. Hoda, R., Kruchten, P., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2010). Agility in context. Association for Computing Machinery, 45(10), 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1145/1932682.1869467. Go to original source...
    16. Khalil, C., & Khalil, S. (2020). Exploring knowledge management in agile software development organisations. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(2), 555-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00582-9. Go to original source...
    17. Klotz, M., & Marx, S. (2018). Projektmanagement-Normen und -Standards. SIMAT Arbeitspapiere, No. 10-18-033. Fachhochschule Stralsund. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/189826/1/104115237X.pdf
    18. Kononenko, I., & Lutsenko, S. (2018). The Project Management Methodology and Guide Formation's Method. IEEE 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (pp.156-159). https://doi.org/10.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.8526621. Go to original source...
    19. Leffingwell, D. (2007). Scaling software agility: Best practices for large enterprises. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional.
    20. Manifesto for Agile Software Development (2001). Retrieved June 2, from https://agilemanifesto.org/.
    21. Matos, S., & Lopes, E. (2013). Prince2 or PMBOK - A Question of Choice. Procedia Technology, 9, 787-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.087. Go to original source...
    22. Morris, P. W. G. (2001). Updating the Project Management Bodies of Knowledge. Project Management Journal, 32(3), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280103200304. Go to original source...
    23. Morris, P. W. G., Crawford, L., Hodgson, D., Sheperd, M. M., & Thomas, J. (2006). Exploring the role of formal bodies of knowledge in defining a profession - The case of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 710-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.012. Go to original source...
    24. Müller, R., & Turner, R. (2007). Matching the project manager's leadership style to project type. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.04.003 Go to original source...
    25. Munassar, N. M. A., & Govardhan, A. (2010). A comparison between five models of software engineering. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 7(5), 94-101.
    26. Olsson, N. O. E. (2006). Management of flexibility in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.06.010. Go to original source...
    27. Owen, R., Koskela, L., Henrich, G., & Codinhoto, R. (2006). Is agile project management applicable to construction? In R. Sacks, & S. Bertelsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (pp. 51-66). Santiago, Chile: Ponteficia Universidad Católica de Chile.
    28. Pennypacker, J. S. & Grant, K. P. (2002). Project management maturity: an industry-wide assessment. Paper presented at PMI® Research Conference 2002: Frontiers of Project Management Research and Applications, Seattle, Washington. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
    29. Radujcoviæ, M., & Sjekavica, M. (2017). Project Management Success Factors. Procedia Engineering, 196, 607-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.048. Go to original source...
    30. Rubin, E., & Rubin, H. (2011). Supporting agile software development through active documentation. Requirements Engineering, 16(2), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-010-0113-9. Go to original source...
    31. Salameh, H. (2014). What, When, Why, and How? A Comparison between Agile Project Management and Traditional Project Management Methods. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 2(5), 52-74.
    32. Schindler, M., & Eppler, M. J. (2003). Harvesting project knowledge: a review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21(3), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00096-0. Go to original source...
    33. Schwaber, K. (2004). Agile project management with Scrum. Washington: Microsoft press. Go to original source...
    34. Scrum.org, & Berlin People GmbH. (2019). 2019 Scrum Master Trends. Retrieved June 10, 2021, from https://scrumorg-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/drupal/2019-02/2019%20Scrum%20Master%20Trends%20%282019-02-06%29.pdf.
    35. Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press. Go to original source...
    36. ©pundak, M. (2014). Mixed Agile/Traditional Project Management Methodology - Reality or Illusion? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 939-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.105. Go to original source...
    37. Starkweather, J. A. (2011). PMP Certification as a Core Competency: Necessary but Not Sufficient. Project Management Journal, 42(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20174. Go to original source...
    38. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2007). Klassifikation der Wirtschaftszweige. Ausgabe 2008. Wiesbaden.
    39. Stettina, C. J., & Heijstek, W. (2011). Five agile factors: helping self-management to self-reflect. In: O'Connor, R.V., Pries-Heje J., & Messnarz, R. (Eds.), Systems, Software and Service Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 172 (pp. 84-96). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22206-1_8. Go to original source...
    40. Stettina, C. J., Heijstek, W., & Fægri, T. E. (2012). Documentation Work in Agile Teams: The Role of Documentation Formalism in Achieving a Sustainable Practice. 2012 Agile Conference, (pp. 31-40). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/Agile.2012.7. Go to original source...
    41. Stettina, C. J., & Hörz, J. (2015). Agile portfolio management: An empirical perspective on the practice in use. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 140-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.008. Go to original source...
    42. Storme, M., Suleyman, O., Gotlib, M., & Lubart, T. (2020). Who is agile? An investigation of the psychological antecedents of workforce agility. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 39(6), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22055. Go to original source...
    43. Sundqvist, E., Backlund, E., & Chronéer, D. (2014). What is Project Efficiency and Effectiveness? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.032. Go to original source...
    44. Thamhain, H. J. (2014). Can We Manage Agile in Traditional Project Environments? Proceedings of PICMET '14 Conference: Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology; Infrastructure and Service Integration, (pp. 2497-2505).
    45. Thesing, T., Feldmann, C., & Burchardt, M. (2021). Agile versus Waterfall Project Management: Decision Model for Selecting the Appropriate Approach to a Project. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 746-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.227. Go to original source...
    46. Timinger, H. (2017). Modernes Projektmanagement. Mit traditionellem, agilem und hybridem Vorgehen zum Erfolg. Weinheim: Wiley.
    47. Williams, T. (2005). Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(4), 497-508. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2005.856572. Go to original source...
    48. Wysocki, R. K. (2007). Effective project management. Indianapolis: Wiley.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content