Central European Business Review 2012, 1(3):28-36 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.28

How Relational Capabilities Matter? Organizational Context and Performance of Internationally Oriented SMEs

Mariola Ciszewska-Mlinarič1, Krzysztof Ob³ój2, Franjo Mlinarič3
1 Mariola Ciszewska-Mlinarič, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Strategic Management, Kozminski University, Jagiellonska 59, 03-301 Warsaw, Poland, mariolac@kozminski.edu.pl
2 Prof. Krzysztof Ob³ój, Ph.D., Full Professor of Strategic Management, Head of Strategy Department, Warsaw University, School of Management, Szturmowa 1/3, 02-678 Warsaw, Poland, Kozminski University, Jagiellonska 59, 03-301 Warsaw, Poland, kobloj@alk.edu.pl
3 Franjo Mlinarič, MSc., Senior Lecturer of Corporate Finance, University of Maribor, Razlagova 14, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia, franjo.mlinaric@uni-mb.si

This article sheds light on the organizational context enhancing development of relational capabilities and examines the significance of relational capabilities for SMEs' financial and non-financial performance. The firm's relational capability is measured separately in customers' and suppliers' networks. This study is based on a sample of 67 SMEs from the five most internationalized industries in Slovenia. Research hypotheses are tested with linear regression models. The results support our prediction that fostering internal social capital, coupled with the usage of economic motivators, augments a firm's relational capability in a supplier network, which in turn is associated with better performance outcomes, both financial and non-financial. The results on relational capability in a customer network with respect to performance are less conclusive, indicating that vertical ties of internationally oriented SMEs (with suppliers and customers) are not of equal importance.

Keywords: relational capability, vertical ties, performance, SME
JEL classification: F23, M16

Received: August 25, 2012; Revised: November 30, 2012; Published: December 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ciszewska-Mlinarič, M., Ob³ój, K., & Mlinarič, F. (2012). How Relational Capabilities Matter? Organizational Context and Performance of Internationally Oriented SMEs. Central European Business Review1(3), 28-36. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.28
Download citation

References

  1. Andersen, O., Kheam, L. S. (1998). Resource-based theory and international growth strategies: an exploratory study. International Business Review, 7 (2): 163-184. Go to original source...
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99-120. Go to original source...
  3. Baum, J. A. C, Calabrese, T., Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic management Journal, 21 (3): 267-294. Go to original source...
  4. Bruton, G. D., Ahstrom, D., Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32 (1): 1-14. Go to original source...
  5. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128-152. Go to original source...
  6. Dyer, J. H., Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (4): 660-679. Go to original source...
  7. Elango, B., Pattnaik, C. (2007). Building capabilities for international operations through networks: a study of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4):541-555. Go to original source...
  8. Ellis, P. (2000). Social ties and foreign market entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (3): 443-469. Go to original source...
  9. Gnyawali, D. R., Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26 (3):431-445. Go to original source...
  10. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3): 203-215. Go to original source...
  11. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 28 (3): 413-446. Go to original source...
  12. Johanson, J., Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1): 25-34. Go to original source...
  13. Lorenzoni, G., Baden Fuller, Ch. (1995). Creating a strategic management centre to manage a web of partners. California Management Review, 37 (3): 146-163. Go to original source...
  14. Lorenzoni, G., Lipparani, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (4): 317-338. Go to original source...
  15. Mathews, J. (2006). Dragon multinationals: new players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23 (1): 5-27. Go to original source...
  16. Meyer, K. E., Peng, M. W. (2005). Probing theoretically into central and eastern Europe: Transactions, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (6): 600-621. Go to original source...
  17. Nadkarni, S., Perez P. D. (2007). Prior conditions and early international commitment: the mediating role of domestic mindset. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (1): 160-176. Go to original source...
  18. Nahapiet, J., Goshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2): 242-266. Go to original source...
  19. Nelson, R., Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
  20. Obloj, T., Obloj, K., Pratt, M. (2010). Dominant logic and entrepreneurial firm's performance in a transitional economy. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34 (1): 151-170. Go to original source...
  21. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.
  22. Reuber, A. R., Fischer, E. (1997). The influence of the management team's international experience on the internationalization behaviors of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (4): 807-825. Go to original source...
  23. Rynes, S. L., Gerhard, B., Minette, K. A. (2004). The importance of pay in employee motivation: Discrepancies between what people say and what they do. Human Resource Management, 43 (4): 381-394. Go to original source...
  24. Shipton, H., Dawson, J., West, M., Patterson, M. (2002). Learning in manufacturing organizations: what factors predict effectiveness? Human Resource Development International, 5 (1): 55-72. Go to original source...
  25. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness; impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 27-43. Go to original source...
  26. Suarez-Ortega, S. M., Alamo-Vera, F. R. (2005). SMES' internationalization: firms and managerial factors. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 11 (4): 258-279. Go to original source...
  27. Van Gorder, B. E. (1990). Moving back to centralization. Credit, May-June, 12-15.
  28. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., Tontti, V. (2002). Social capital, Knowledge, and the international growth of technology based new firms. International Business Review, 11 (3): 279-304. Go to original source...
  29. Zhou, L., Wu, W., Luo, X. (2007). Internationalization and the performance of born-global SMEs: the mediating role of social networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 673-690. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.