Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 2019, 27(3-4):45-60 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.627

Family Business – Sustainability Model

Petr Svoboda
University of Economics, Prague, Faculty of Management

Family firms form a considerable global economic pillar and have a long tradition. Due to their restricted ownership structure and extended value structure, they deal with specific managerial challenges. In comparison with their generally owned competitors, family firms tend to be more stable, accountable and trustable. On the other hand, they have to combine private and business life, deal with succession issues and the relative closeness of the top management while resolving nonstandard governance mechanisms. The main objective of this paper is to propose how to create a dynamic model that can further propose viable strategies for the long-term sustainability of family businesses that maximise the stakeholders` utility. To be able to understand the internal dynamics of family businesses, as well as to fully incorporate the changing external environment, an underlying systemic model is required. It is proposed to incorporate several gradually evolving and mutually interlinked stages and to formalise knowledge acquired from the present literature extended with available data. The initial modelling stage, the mind mapping, summarises the key terminology and outlines the basic structure. These findings are subsequently refined through system and causal loop diagrams. The latter allows the formulation, discussion and generalisation of behavioural hypotheses related to the researched sustainability phenomenon. It was found that standard techniques and strategic planning tools do not fully support all the abovementioned aspects of family businesses. Thus, these specific features, reflecting various aspects of “familiness” were modelled and incorporated into a general framework for strategic planning and management. The proposed paper deals with specific internal matters of family-owned firms. It suggests and justifies a transparent model for their implementation, thus eliminating the major bottlenecks. With this knowledge, the addressed companies can sustainably develop their businesses and keep the quality of their private life on a desirable level.

Keywords: family firms, familiness, family business, internal dynamics, sustainability model
JEL classification: D21

Accepted: March 2, 2020; Published: May 31, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Svoboda, P. (2019). Family Business – Sustainability Model. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 27(3-4), 45-60. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.627
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Amos, E.A., and Weathington, B.L. (2008). An Analysis of the Relation between Employee-Organization Value Congruence and Employee Attitudes. The Journal of Psychology, 142(6),pp. 615-632. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.142.6.615-632 Go to original source...
    2. Ashforth, B.E., Harrison, S.H., and Corley, K.G. (2008). Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), pp. 325-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059 Go to original source...
    3. Bartholomew, K.J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R.M., and Thogersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Psychological Need Thwarting in the Sport Context: Assessing the Darker Side of Athletic Experience. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(1), pp. 75-102. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.1.75 Go to original source...
    4. Cakirpaloglu, P. (2004). Psychologie hodnot [Psychology of Values]. Olomouc: Votobia. Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M. (1980). The Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic Motivational Processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, pp. 39-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60130-6 Go to original source...
    5. Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Boston, MA: Springer. Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), pp. 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 Go to original source...
    6. Edwards, J.R., and Cable, D.M. (2009). The Value of Value Congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), pp. 654-677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014891 Go to original source...
    7. Harquail, C.V., and King, A.W. (2010). Construing Organizational Identity: The Role of Embodied Cognition. Organization Studies, 31(12), pp. 1619-1648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610376143 Go to original source...
    8. Akkermans, H.A., and Van Oorschot, K.E. (2005). Relevance Assumed: A Case Study of Balanced Scorecard Development Using System Dynamics. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(8), pp. 931-941. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601923 Go to original source...
    9. Anderson, L., Hibbert, P., Mason, K., and Rivers, C. (2018). Management Education in Turbulent Times. Journal of Management Education, 42(4), pp. 423-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562918779421 Go to original source...
    10. Anglin, A.H., Reid, S.W., Short, J.C., Zachary, M.A., and Rutherford, M.W. (2017). An Archival Approach to Measuring Family Influence: An Organizational Identity Perspective. Family Business Review, 30(1), pp. 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516669254 Go to original source...
    11. Barnabe, F. (2011). A 'System Dynamics-Based Balanced Scorecard` to Support Strategic Decision Making: Insights from a Case Study. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(5), pp. 446-473. 10.1108/17410401111140383 Go to original source...
    12. Bianchi, C., and Montemaggiore, G.B. (2008). Enhancing Strategy Design and Planning in Public Utilities through 'Dynamic` Balanced Scorecards: Insights from a Project in a City Water Company. System Dynamics Review, 24(2), pp. 175-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.395 Go to original source...
    13. Cabrera-Suárez, M.K., Déniz-Déniz, M.C., and Martín-Santana, J.D. (2015). Family Social Capital, Trust within the TMT, and the Establishment of Corporate Goals Related to Nonfamily Stakeholders. Family Business Review, 28(2), pp. 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486514526754 Go to original source...
    14. Canavati, S. (2018). Corporate Social Performance in Family Firms: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(3), pp. 235-273. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-05-2018-0015 Go to original source...
    15. Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., and Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the Family Business by Behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), pp. 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402 Go to original source...
    16. Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., Steier, L. P., and Rau, S.B. (2012). Sources of Heterogeneity in Family Firms: An Introduction. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(6), pp. 1103-1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00540.x Go to original source...
    17. Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., De Massis, A., and Wang, H. (2018). Reflections on Family Firm Goals and the Assessment of Performance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(2), pp. 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.02.001 Go to original source...
    18. Cleary, P., Quinn, M., and Moreno, A. (2019). Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms: A Longitudinal Content Analysis of Corporate Disclosures. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(2), pp. 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.11.002 Go to original source...
    19. Craig, J., and Moores, K. (2005). Balanced Scorecards to Drive the Strategic Planning of Family Firms. Family Business Review, 18(2), pp. 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00035.x Go to original source...
    20. Craig, J., and Moores, K. (2010). Strategically Aligning Family and Business Systems Using the Balanced Scorecard. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(2), pp. 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.04.003 Go to original source...
    21. Da Silva Bastos Sales, L., Roses, L.K., and Do Prado, H.A. (2016). Application of Dynamic Balanced Scorecard in the Brazilian Army Information Technology Governance. Gestao & Produçao, 23(4), pp. 757-770. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x2155-15 Go to original source...
    22. Danes, S.M., Rueter, M.A., Kwon, H.-K., and Doherty, W. (2002). Family FIRO Model: An Application to Family Business. Family Business Review, 15(1), pp. 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00031.x Go to original source...
    23. Danes, S.M., Stafford, K., Haynes, G., and Amarapurkar, S.S. (2009). Family Capital of Family Firms: Bridging Human, Social, and Financial Capital. Family Business Review, 22(3), pp. 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486509333424 Go to original source...
    24. Daspit, J.J., Long, R. G., and Pearson, A.W. (2019). How Familiness Affects Innovation Outcomes Via Absorptive Capacity: A Dynamic Capability Perspective of the Family Firm. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(2), pp. 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.11.003 Go to original source...
    25. Dayan, M., Ng, P.Y., and Ndubisi, N.O. (2019). Mindfulness, Socioemotional Wealth, and Environmental Strategy of Family Businesses. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(3), pp. 466-481. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2222 Go to original source...
    26. Delmas, M.A., and Gergaud, O. (2014). Sustainable Certification for Future Generations: The Case of Family Business. Family Business Review, 27(3), pp. 228-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486514538651 Go to original source...
    27. Faller, C.M., and zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. (2018). Does Equity Ownership Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility? A Literature Review of Theories and Recent Empirical Findings. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), pp. 15-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3122-x Go to original source...
    28. Figge, F.H.J., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., and Wagner, M. (2002). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard. Linking Sustainability Management to Business Strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), pp. 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.339. Go to original source...
    29. Heck, R.K.Z. et al. (2006). The Family`s Dynamic Role within Family Business Entrepreneurship. In P.Z. Poutziouris, K.X. Smyrnios, and S.B. Klein, eds. Handbook of Research on Family Business (pp. 80-105). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    30. Kang, J.-S., Chiang, C.-F., Huangthanapan, K., and Downing, S. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: The Case Study of Family-Owned Hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 48, pp. 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.05.001 Go to original source...
    31. Khakbaz, S.B., and Hajiheydari, N. (2015). Proposing a Basic Methodology for Developing Balanced Scorecard by System Dynamics Approach. Kybernetes, 44(6/7), pp. 1049-1066. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2014-0287 Go to original source...
    32. Lee, T. (2019). Management Ties and Firm Performance: Influence of Family Governance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(2), pp. 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.12.003 Go to original source...
    33. Li, F., and Song, F. (2019). Building a Scientific Workflow Framework to Enable Real-Time Machine Learning and Visualization. Concurrency and Computation, 31(16). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4703. Go to original source...
    34. Lucia, M.D., Noye, B., and Pelligana, D. (2018). Family Business Survey 2018 report - KPMG Australia [online]. KPMG.com. Available at: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/au/pdf/2018/family-business-survey-2018-report.pdf [Accessed 7 Sep. 2019]
    35. Naujoks, H. (2010). Strategic Management in Turbulent Times. In L. Stadtler, A. Schmitt, P. Klarner, and T. Straub, eds. More than Bricks in the Wall: Organizational Perspectives for Sustainable Success (pp. 104-111). Heidelberg: Springer. Go to original source...
    36. Neubaum, D.O., Kammerlander, N., and Brigham, K.H. (2019). Capturing Family Firm Heterogeneity: How Taxonomies and Typologies Can Help the Field Move Forward. Family Business Review, 32(2), pp. 106-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519848512 Go to original source...
    37. Olson, P.D., Zuiker, V.S., Danes, S.M., Stafford, K., Heck, R.K.Z., and Duncan, K.A. (2003). The Impact of the Family and the Business on Family Business Sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), pp. 639-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00014-4 Go to original source...
    38. Reay, T., Jaskiewicz, P., and Hinings, C.R. (2015). How Family, Business, and Community Logics Shape Family Firm Behavior and 'Rules of the Game` in an Organizational Field. Family Business Review, 28(4), pp. 292-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515577513 Go to original source...
    39. Sanchez-Ruiz, P., Daspit, J.J., Holt, D.T., and Rutherford, M.W. (2019). Family Social Capital in the Family Firm: A Taxonomic Classification, Relationships with Outcomes, and Directions for Advancement. Family Business Review, 32(2), pp. 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519836833 Go to original source...
    40. Schutz, W.C. (1958). FIRO: A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior. Oxford, UK: Rinehart.
    41. Stafford, K., Duncan, K.A., Dane, S., and Winter, M. (1999). A Research Model of Sustainable Family Businesses. Family Business Review, 12(3), pp. 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00197.x Go to original source...
    42. Tur-Porcar, A., Roig-Tierno, N., and Mestre, A.L. (2018). Factors Affecting Entrepreneurship and Business Sustainability. Sustainability, 10(2), p. 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020452 Go to original source...
    43. Vollero, A., Siano, A., and Della Volpe, M. (2019). A Systems Perspective for Conceptualizing Sustainability in Long-lived Family Businesses. Research Proposals on Risk Taking and Innovativeness. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36(1), pp. 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2548 Go to original source...
    44. Wang, Y.-B., and Ho, C.-W. (2017). No Money? No Problem! The Value of Sustainability: Social Capital Drives the Relationship among Customer Identification and Citizenship Behavior in Sharing Economy. Sustainability, 9(8), p. 1400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081400 Go to original source...
    45. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future [online]. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf [Accessed 25 Jul. 2019]
    46. Zellweger, T.M., Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., and Steier, L.P. (2019). Social Structures, Social Relationships, and Family Firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 43(2), pp. 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718792290 Go to original source...
    47. Zellweger, T.M., Nason, R.S., Nordqvist, M., and Brush, C.G. (2013). Why Do Family Firms Strive for Nonfinancial Goals? An Organizational Identity Perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), pp. 229-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00466.x Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content