Conversion Energy from the Movement of the Solar System through Universal Pressure: Reflections Inseismic Events and Global Temperatures

Article Preview

Abstract:

The velocity (~242 km·s-1) of the Solar System around the galactic center within the universal pressure (~10-10 Pascal) produces energies within the earth’s volume that is equivalent to that released by the sum of all earthquakes per unit time. The available energy within the earth and solar volume from the expected spatial variations of this pressure along this perimeter, which requires about 250 million years to traverse, can accommodate the increased geomagnetic activity from the expanding solar corona over the last approximately 100 years as well as the increase in global warming. Inferences of a varying structure of space that may explain the periodicity and range in solar cycles as well as anomalous minimums (such as the Maunder phenomenon) suggest a central galactic singularity with spatial ripples exhibiting peak-to-peak troughs that approximate the earth’s circumference and frequencies in the order of 7 to 8 Hz. The precise velocity-universal pressure flux density may also explain the millilux-range magnitude of the earth’s night (air) glow. These results and the application of these concepts indicate that origins of seismicity, slow drifts in the intensity of geomagnetic activity, and global warming (and cooling) trends are products of differential interactions with quantitative fluctuations in sub-matter space and that the subtle variations encountered as the Solar System moves along this 1021 m perimeter may be more significant than previously assumed.

Info:

Pages:

78-86

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. P. Wyatt, Principles of Astronomy, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1964.

Google Scholar

[2] M. A. Persinger, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 11 (2014) 18-23.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Borowski, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 11 (2013) 44-53.

Google Scholar

[4] M. A. Persinger, International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics 2 (2012) 125-128.

Google Scholar

[5] M.A. Persinger, Journal of Physics, Astrophysics and Physical Cosmology 3 (2009) 1-3.

Google Scholar

[6] D. A. E. Vares, M. A. Persinger, International Journal of Geosciences 4 (2013) 1321-1325.

Google Scholar

[7] H. E. Puthoff, Physical Review A 39 (1989) 2333-2342.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Bordag, U. Mohideen, V. M. Mostepanenko, Physics Reports 353 (2001) 1-205.

Google Scholar

[9] M. A. El-Borie, S. S. Al-Thoyaib, International Journal of Physical Sciences 1 (2006) 67-74.

Google Scholar

[10] K. Lassen, E. Christensen, Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics 57 (1995) 835-839.

Google Scholar

[11] M. A. Persinger, International Journal of Physical Sciences 4 (2009) 44-46.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Lockwood, R. Stamper, M. D. Wild, Nature 399 (1999) 437-439.

Google Scholar

[13] L. K. Fenton, P. E.Geissler, R. M. Haberie, Nature 446 (2007) 646-649.

Google Scholar

[14] G. Woodbury, Physical Chemistry Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, 1997.

Google Scholar

[15] F. M. White, Heat and Mass Transfer Addison-Wesley, Reading (Mass), 1991.

Google Scholar

[16] I. Nicholson, The Sun, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1982.

Google Scholar

[17] D. A. Gurnett, W. S. Kurth, L. F. Bulaga, N. F. Ness, Science 341 (2013) 1489-1492.

Google Scholar

[18] E. R. Dewey, Cycles, Foundation for the Study of Cycles, Inc., Pittsburg (Penn), 1970.

Google Scholar

[19] M. Mikulecky, Neuroendocrine Letters 28 (2007) 749-756.

Google Scholar

[20] D. C. Van Essen, H. A. Drury, Journal of Neuroscience, 17 (1997) 7079-7102.

Google Scholar

[21] M. A. Persinger, S. A. Koren, G. F. Lafreniere, NeuroQuantology 6 (2008) 262-271. ( Received 24 May 2014; accepted 07 June 2014 )

Google Scholar