Email this article 
Proses Metakognitif Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah High Order Thinking
Abstract
Abstract: Metacognitive plays an important role in supporting students' success in solving High Order Thinking questions. The ability to think high-level includes analyzing, evaluating, and creating. Based on the type metacognitive consists of awareness, regulation, and evaluation. The data collected in this study is descriptive because the main data from this study are verbal data in the form of student expressions. This study aims to describe the metacognitive process of students in solving high order mathematical thinking problems. The metacognitive process of the type of awareness occurs when students try to understand the High Order Thinking problem and rethink what was previously known from the problem. metacognitive process type of regulation occurs when students rethink work steps and strategies that will be used in solving High Order Thinking problems. The metacognitive process type of evaluation occurs when students feel doubtful about the answers obtained, so rethink the results and check the truth of the answers obtained.
Abstrak: Metakognitif memainkan peran penting dalam mendukung kesuksesan siswa menyelesaikan soal High Order Thinking. Kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi, meliputi menganalisis, mengevaluasi, dan mencipta. Berdasarkan jenisnya metakognitif terdiri dari awareness, regulation, dan evaluation. Data yang dikumpulkan pada penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif karena data utama dari penelitian ini adalah data verbal yang berupa ungkapan-ungkapan siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses metakognitif siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal high order thinking matematika. Proses metakognitif jenis awareness terjadi saat siswa berusaha untuk memahami soal High Order Thinking dan memikirkan kembali apa yang diketahui sebelumnya dari soal. proses metakognitif jenis regulation terjadi saat siswa memikirkan kembali langkah kerja dan strategi yang akan digunakan dalam menyelesaikan soal High Order Thinking. Proses metakognitif jenis evaluation terjadi saat siswa merasa ragu dengan jawaban yang diperoleh sehingga memikirkan kembali hasil dan memeriksa kebenaran jawaban yang diperoleh.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aydogdu, M., & Kesan, C. (2014). A Research on Geometry Problem Solving Strategies Used by Elementary Mathematics
Teacher Candidates. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in The World, 4(1).
Conklin, W. (2012). Higher Order Thinking Skills to Develop 21st Century Learners. Huntington Neach: Shell Educational
Publishing, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research
(4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring, and Mathematical Performance. Journal for
Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163–176.
King, F. J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2009). Higher Order Thinking Skills. Center for Advancement of Learning and
Assessment. Retrieved 20 February 2018, from http://www.cala.fsu.edu/files/higher_order_thinking_skills.pdf
Kuzle, A. (2013). Patterns of Metacognitive Behavior During Mathematics Problem-Solving in a Dynamic Geometry
Environment. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education – IΣJMΣ, 8(1), 20–40.
Magiera, M. T., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2011). Characterizations of Social-Based and Self-Based Contexts Associated with
Students’ Awareness, Evaluation, and Regulation of Their Thinking during Small-Group Mathematical Modeling. Journal
for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(5), 486–520.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand
Oaks: SAGE.
Mora, F. B., & Rodriguez, A. R. (2013). Cognitive Processes Developed by Students When Solving Mathematical Problems
within Technological Environment. TME, 10(1), 109–136.
Murni, A. (2010). Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif Berbasis Masalah Kontekstual. Prosiding
Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika.
Özsoy, G., & Ataman, A. (2009). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Training on Mathematical Problem Solving
Achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 68–83.
Resnick, L. B. (1992). Education and Learning to Think. Washington: National Academy Press.
Reys, R., Lindquist, M. M., & Lambdin, D. V. (2009). Helping Children Learn Mathematics (9th ed.). Nebraska: John Wiley
Sons, Inc.
Sanjaya, W. (2013). Penelitian Pendidikan: Jenis, Metode, dan Prosedur. Jakarta: Kencana.
Siegel, M. A. (2012). Filling in the distance between us: Group Metacognition during Problem Solving in a Secondary
Education Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 325–341.
Subanji. (2013). Pembelajaran Matematika Kreatif dan Inovatif. Malang: UM Press.
Tarim, K. (2009). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Preschoolers’ Mathematics Problem-Solving Ability. Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 72(3), 325–340.
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and Learning: Conceptual and
Methodological Considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14.
Wilson, J., & Clarke, D. (2004). Towards the Modelling of Mathematical Metacognition. Mathematics Education Research
Journal, 16(2), 25–48.
Yong, H. T., & Kiong, L. N. (2006). Metacognitive Aspect of Mathematics Problem Solving. MARA University of Technology
Malaysia.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i12.13084
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jojor Janni Astuti Sigalingging, Makbul Muksar, Abdul Qohar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
