Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2019, Volume: 24 Issue: 2, 245 - 251, 15.12.2019

Yasar Kavut

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.655175
Cited By: 2

Abstract

References

  • Aasen, A., V.S. Baron, G.W. Clayton, A.C. Dick and D.H. McCartney. 2004. Swath grazing potential of spring cereals, field pea and mixtures with other species. Can. J. Plant Sci. 84: 1051-1058.
  • Acar Z., E. Gulumser, O.O. Asci, U. Basaran, H. Mut and I. Ayan. 2017. Effects of sowing ratio and harvest periods on hay yields, quality and competitive characteristics of Hungarian vetch – cereal mixtures. Legume Research 40(4) 2017: 677-683.
  • Acikgoz, N., E. Ilker and A. Gokcol. 2004. Assessment of biological research on the computer. Ege University TOTEM, Izmir.
  • Aguilar-López, E.Y., J.L. Bórquez, I.A. Domínguez, A. Morales-Osorio, M.G. Gutiérrez-Martínez and M.G. Ronquillo. 2013. Forage yield chemical composition and in vitro gas production of tiriticale (xTriticosecale wittmack) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) asociated with common vetch (Vicia sativa) preserved as hay or silage. Journal of Agricultural Science 5 (2): 227-238.
  • Albayrak, S., M. Guler and M.O. Tongel. 2004. Effects of seed rates on forage production and hay quality of vetch+triticale mixtures. The Journal of Agricultural Reseach 48 (2): 171-179.
  • Ansar, M., Z.I. Ahmed, M.A. Malik, M. Nadeemi, A. Majeed and B.A. Rischkowsky. 2010. Forage yield and quality potential of winter cereal+vetch mixtures under rainfed conditions. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 22: 25-36.
  • Anwar, A., M. Ansar, M. Nadeem, G. Ahmad, S. Khan and A. Hussain. 2010. Performance of non-traditional winter legumes with oats for forage yield under rainfed conditions. Journal of Agric. Res. 48 (2): 171-179.
  • Arzani, H., M. Zohdi, E. Fish, G.H. Zahedi Amiri, A. Nikkhah and D. Wester. 2004. Phenological effects on forage quality of five grass species. J Range Manage. 57: 624-629.
  • Asci, O.O., Z. Acar and Y.K. Arıcı. 2015. Hay yield, quality traits and interspecies competition of forage pea-triticale mixtures harvested at different stages. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 20(2):166-173.
  • Ashworth, A.J., P. Keyser, F. Allen, G. Bates and C. Harper. 2012. Intercropping Legumes with Native Warm-season Grasses for Livestock Forage Production in the Mid-South, University of Tennesse, Extension Bulletin, report no: SP731-G.
  • Budakli C.E. and N. Celik. 2014. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with triticale and annual ryegrass. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 19 (1): 66-69.
  • Caballero, R., E. Fernfindez, J. Rioprrez, M. Arauzo and P.J. Hernaiz. 1992. Nutritional status and performance of Manchega ewes grazing cereal stubbles and cultivated pastures. Small Ruminant Res. 7: 315-329.
  • Cabellero, R., E.L. Goicoechea and P.J. Hernaiz. 1995. Forage yields and quality of common vetch and oat sown at varying seeding ratios and seeding rates of common vetch. Field Crop Res. 41: 135-140.
  • Collar, C. and G. Aksland. 2001. Harvest stage effects on yield and quality of winter forage. p. 133- 142. In: 31st California Alfalfa Symposium. 12- 13 December, 2001. University of California Cooperative Extension. University of California, Davis, USA.
  • Contreras-Gova, F.E., K.A. Albrecht and R.E. Muck. 2006. Spring yield and silage characteristics of Kura clover, winter wheat and mixtures. Agronomy Journal 98: 781-787.
  • De Ruiter, J.M. and R. Hanson. 2004. Whole crop cereal silageproduction and use in dairy, beef, sheep and deer farming. Christchurch, NZ: NZ Institute for Crop and Food Research Ltd.
  • El-Kramany, E., T.A. Elewa and A.B. Bakry. 2012. Effect of mixture rates on forage mixture of Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) with triticale (xTriticosecale Wittmack) under newly reclaimed sandy soil. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 6 (5): 40-44.
  • Etebari, H. and V. Tansi. 1994. Research on determining the effects of maize intercropped with vigna in Cukurova on the grain yield and some agricultural characters, 1st Turkish National Field Crops Congress, 25-29 April 1994, 3: 132- 135.
  • Geren, H. 2014. Dry matter yield and silage quality of some winter cereals harvested at different stages under mediterranean climate conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 19 (2): 206-211.
  • Gilliland, T.J. and J. Johnston. 1992. Barley/pea mixture as cover crops for grass re-seeds. Grass and Forage Sci. 47 (1): 1-7.
  • Haj-Ayed, M., J. Gonzalez, R. Caballero and M.R. Alvir. 2000. Nutritive value of on-farm common vetch-oat hays. II. Ruminal degradation of dry matter and crude protein. Ann. Zootech. 49: 391–398.
  • Haynes, R.J. 1980. Competitive aspects of the grass-legume association. Adv. Agron. 33: 227-261.
  • Hunady, I. and M. Hochman. 2014. Potential of legume-cereal for Increasing yields and yield stability for self-sufficiency with animal fodder in organic farming. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 50 (2): 185-194.
  • Karagic, D., S. Vasiljević, S. Katić, A. Mikić, D. Milić, B. Milošević and N. Dušanić. 2011. Yield and quality of winter common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) haylage depending on sowing method. Biotechnol Anim Husbandry 27: 1585- 1594.
  • Kavut, Y.T., H. Geren, H. Soya, R. Avcioglu and B. Kir. 2014. Effects of rate of mixture and time of harvest on the winter second crop performances of mixtures of some Annual legumes and Italian ryegrass. Journal of Ege Univ. Agr. Fac. 51 (3): 279-288.
  • Kavut, Y.T. and R. Avcioglu. 2015. Yield and quality performances of various alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars in different soil textures in a Mediterranean environment. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 20 (1): 65-71.
  • Kokten, K., F. Toklu, I. Atisand and R. Hatipoglu. 2009. Effects of seeding rate on forage yield and quality of vetch (Vicia sativa L.)+triticale (Triticosecale Wittm.) mixtures under east mediterranean rainfed conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology 8 (20): 5367-5372.
  • Kramberger, B., A. Gselman, M. Podvršnik, J. Kristl and M. Lešnik. 2013. Environmental advantages of binary mixturesof Trifolium incarnatum and Lolium multiflorum over individual pure stands. Plant Soil Environ. 59 (1): 22- 28.
  • Kusvuran, A., M. Kaplan and R.I. Nazli. 2014. Effects of mixture ratio and row spacing in Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) and annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) intercropping system on yield and quality under semiarid climate conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 19 (1): 118-128.
  • Lithourgidis, A.S., K.V. Dhima, I.B. Vasilakoglou, C.A. Dordas. and M.D. Yiakoulaki. 2007. Sustainable production of barley and wheat by intercropping common vetch. Agron. Sustain. Develop. 27: 95-99.
  • Peyraud, J.L., A. Le Gall and A. Luscher. 2009. Potential food production from forage legume-based-systems in Europe: an overview. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Researc. 48 (2): 115-135.
  • Priyadharshini, J. and T Seran. 2010. Paddy husk ash as a source of potassium for growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4 (2): 67- 76. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/jas.v4i2.1646
  • Putnam, D.H., D.J. Undersander and M.W. Wolf. 2001. Understanding forage quality, American Farm Bureau Federation Publication, 1-01, Park Ridge, IL. Available at:http://forages.oregonstate.edu/resources/publications/forag equality.pdf (Accessed November15, 2017).
  • Rahetlah, V.B., J.M. Randrianaivoarivony, B. Andrianarisoa, L.H. Razafimpamoa and V.L. Ramalanjaona. 2013. Yields and quality of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and common vetch (Vicia sativa) grown in monocultures and mixed cultures under irrigated conditions in the highlands of Madagascar. Sustainable Agriculture Research 2 (1): 15-25.
  • Rebolé, A., C. Alzueta, L.T. Ortiz, C. Barro, M.L. Rodriguez and R. Caballero. 2004. Yields and chemical composition of different parts of the common vetch at flowering and at two seed filling stages. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2 (4): 550-557.
  • Šarūnaitė, L., I. Deveikytė and Z. Kadžiulienė. 2010. Intercropping spring wheat with grain legume for increased production in an organic crop rotation. Zemdirbystė=Agriculture 97 (3): 51-58.
  • Sadeghpour, A., E. Jahanzad, A.S. Lithourgidis, M. Hashemi, A. Esmaeili and M.B. Hosseini. 2014. Forage yield and quality of barley+annual medic intercrops in semi-arid environments. International J. of Plant Production. 8 (1): 77- 89.
  • Staniak M., J. Księżak and J. Bojarszczuk. 2014. Mixtures of legumes with cereals as a source of feed for animals. Pilipavicius V. (ed.). Organic agriculture towards sustainability. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/58358.
  • Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics, second edition, New York: McGraw-Hill. Tan, M. and O. Mentese. 2003. Effects of anatomic structure and chemical composition on Forage Quality. Journal of Ataturk Univ. Agri. Fac. 34 (1): 97-103.
  • Thompson, D.J. and D.G. Stout. 1997. Mixtures of Persian clover with Italian ryegrass or barley-Italian ryegrass for annuall forage. Can J Plant Sci. 77: 579-585.
  • Turk M. and S. Albayrak. 2012. Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17 (2): 111-114.
  • Turk M., S. Albayrak and Y. Bozkurt. 2015. The change in the forage quality of alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.) in grazing and non-grazing artificially established pastures. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 25 (1): 69-77.
  • Uzun, A. and F.F. Asik. 2012. The effect of mixture rates and cutting stages on some yield and quality characters of pea (Pisum sativum L.) + oat (Avena sativa L.) mixture. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17 (1): 62-66.
  • Vasilakoglou, I. and K. Dhima. 2008. Forage yield and competition indices of berseem clover intercropped with barley. Agronomy Journal 100 (6): 1749-1756.
  • Willey, R.W. and D.S.O. Osiru. 1972. Studies on mixture of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), with particular reference to plant population, J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 79: 517- 529.
  • Yavuz, T. 2017. The Effects of different cutting stages on forage yield and quality in pea (Pisum sativum L.) and oat (Avena sativa L.) mixtures, Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute 26 (1): 67-74 (in Turkish).
  • Zhang, J., B. Yin, Y. Xie, Y., J. Li, Z. Yang and G. Zhang. 2015. Legume-cereal intercropping improves forage yield, quality and degradability. PLoS One 10 (12): 1-14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144813.

EFFECTS OF SEEDING PATTERN AND HARVEST DATE OF PERSIAN CLOVER AND ANNUAL RYEGRASS ON HAY YIELD AND QUALITY IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT

Year 2019, Volume: 24 Issue: 2, 245 - 251, 15.12.2019

Yasar Kavut

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.655175
Cited By: 2

Abstract

This study was carried out at Experimental fields of Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Bornova/Izmir/Turkey, during the years of 2012-2014. Three different harvest dates (Early Spring, Mid Spring and Late Spring) and mixture rates (100+0%, 80+20%, 60+40%, 40+60%, 20+80% and 0+100%, respectively) of Persian clover (Trifolium resupinatum) with annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) were tested. The experiment was arranged in a split block design with three replications. As the average of 2 years results, highest yield were recorded in sole Persian clover sown as catch crop and harvested in late spring under Mediterrenean climatic conditions. The data also indicated that pure Persian cover sowing provided the highest green matter, dry matter and crude protein yields, being 36.04 t ha-1, 5.61 t ha-1 and 89 kg ha-1, respectively. Legume ratio, NDF and ADF concentrations increased by advancing harvest dates.

Keywords

Harvest date Lolium multiflorum mixture rate Trifolium resupinatum yield and forage quality

References

  • Aasen, A., V.S. Baron, G.W. Clayton, A.C. Dick and D.H. McCartney. 2004. Swath grazing potential of spring cereals, field pea and mixtures with other species. Can. J. Plant Sci. 84: 1051-1058.
  • Acar Z., E. Gulumser, O.O. Asci, U. Basaran, H. Mut and I. Ayan. 2017. Effects of sowing ratio and harvest periods on hay yields, quality and competitive characteristics of Hungarian vetch – cereal mixtures. Legume Research 40(4) 2017: 677-683.
  • Acikgoz, N., E. Ilker and A. Gokcol. 2004. Assessment of biological research on the computer. Ege University TOTEM, Izmir.
  • Aguilar-López, E.Y., J.L. Bórquez, I.A. Domínguez, A. Morales-Osorio, M.G. Gutiérrez-Martínez and M.G. Ronquillo. 2013. Forage yield chemical composition and in vitro gas production of tiriticale (xTriticosecale wittmack) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) asociated with common vetch (Vicia sativa) preserved as hay or silage. Journal of Agricultural Science 5 (2): 227-238.
  • Albayrak, S., M. Guler and M.O. Tongel. 2004. Effects of seed rates on forage production and hay quality of vetch+triticale mixtures. The Journal of Agricultural Reseach 48 (2): 171-179.
  • Ansar, M., Z.I. Ahmed, M.A. Malik, M. Nadeemi, A. Majeed and B.A. Rischkowsky. 2010. Forage yield and quality potential of winter cereal+vetch mixtures under rainfed conditions. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 22: 25-36.
  • Anwar, A., M. Ansar, M. Nadeem, G. Ahmad, S. Khan and A. Hussain. 2010. Performance of non-traditional winter legumes with oats for forage yield under rainfed conditions. Journal of Agric. Res. 48 (2): 171-179.
  • Arzani, H., M. Zohdi, E. Fish, G.H. Zahedi Amiri, A. Nikkhah and D. Wester. 2004. Phenological effects on forage quality of five grass species. J Range Manage. 57: 624-629.
  • Asci, O.O., Z. Acar and Y.K. Arıcı. 2015. Hay yield, quality traits and interspecies competition of forage pea-triticale mixtures harvested at different stages. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 20(2):166-173.
  • Ashworth, A.J., P. Keyser, F. Allen, G. Bates and C. Harper. 2012. Intercropping Legumes with Native Warm-season Grasses for Livestock Forage Production in the Mid-South, University of Tennesse, Extension Bulletin, report no: SP731-G.
  • Budakli C.E. and N. Celik. 2014. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with triticale and annual ryegrass. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 19 (1): 66-69.
  • Caballero, R., E. Fernfindez, J. Rioprrez, M. Arauzo and P.J. Hernaiz. 1992. Nutritional status and performance of Manchega ewes grazing cereal stubbles and cultivated pastures. Small Ruminant Res. 7: 315-329.
  • Cabellero, R., E.L. Goicoechea and P.J. Hernaiz. 1995. Forage yields and quality of common vetch and oat sown at varying seeding ratios and seeding rates of common vetch. Field Crop Res. 41: 135-140.
  • Collar, C. and G. Aksland. 2001. Harvest stage effects on yield and quality of winter forage. p. 133- 142. In: 31st California Alfalfa Symposium. 12- 13 December, 2001. University of California Cooperative Extension. University of California, Davis, USA.
  • Contreras-Gova, F.E., K.A. Albrecht and R.E. Muck. 2006. Spring yield and silage characteristics of Kura clover, winter wheat and mixtures. Agronomy Journal 98: 781-787.
  • De Ruiter, J.M. and R. Hanson. 2004. Whole crop cereal silageproduction and use in dairy, beef, sheep and deer farming. Christchurch, NZ: NZ Institute for Crop and Food Research Ltd.
  • El-Kramany, E., T.A. Elewa and A.B. Bakry. 2012. Effect of mixture rates on forage mixture of Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) with triticale (xTriticosecale Wittmack) under newly reclaimed sandy soil. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 6 (5): 40-44.
  • Etebari, H. and V. Tansi. 1994. Research on determining the effects of maize intercropped with vigna in Cukurova on the grain yield and some agricultural characters, 1st Turkish National Field Crops Congress, 25-29 April 1994, 3: 132- 135.
  • Geren, H. 2014. Dry matter yield and silage quality of some winter cereals harvested at different stages under mediterranean climate conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 19 (2): 206-211.
  • Gilliland, T.J. and J. Johnston. 1992. Barley/pea mixture as cover crops for grass re-seeds. Grass and Forage Sci. 47 (1): 1-7.
  • Haj-Ayed, M., J. Gonzalez, R. Caballero and M.R. Alvir. 2000. Nutritive value of on-farm common vetch-oat hays. II. Ruminal degradation of dry matter and crude protein. Ann. Zootech. 49: 391–398.
  • Haynes, R.J. 1980. Competitive aspects of the grass-legume association. Adv. Agron. 33: 227-261.
  • Hunady, I. and M. Hochman. 2014. Potential of legume-cereal for Increasing yields and yield stability for self-sufficiency with animal fodder in organic farming. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 50 (2): 185-194.
  • Karagic, D., S. Vasiljević, S. Katić, A. Mikić, D. Milić, B. Milošević and N. Dušanić. 2011. Yield and quality of winter common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) haylage depending on sowing method. Biotechnol Anim Husbandry 27: 1585- 1594.
  • Kavut, Y.T., H. Geren, H. Soya, R. Avcioglu and B. Kir. 2014. Effects of rate of mixture and time of harvest on the winter second crop performances of mixtures of some Annual legumes and Italian ryegrass. Journal of Ege Univ. Agr. Fac. 51 (3): 279-288.
  • Kavut, Y.T. and R. Avcioglu. 2015. Yield and quality performances of various alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars in different soil textures in a Mediterranean environment. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 20 (1): 65-71.
  • Kokten, K., F. Toklu, I. Atisand and R. Hatipoglu. 2009. Effects of seeding rate on forage yield and quality of vetch (Vicia sativa L.)+triticale (Triticosecale Wittm.) mixtures under east mediterranean rainfed conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology 8 (20): 5367-5372.
  • Kramberger, B., A. Gselman, M. Podvršnik, J. Kristl and M. Lešnik. 2013. Environmental advantages of binary mixturesof Trifolium incarnatum and Lolium multiflorum over individual pure stands. Plant Soil Environ. 59 (1): 22- 28.
  • Kusvuran, A., M. Kaplan and R.I. Nazli. 2014. Effects of mixture ratio and row spacing in Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) and annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) intercropping system on yield and quality under semiarid climate conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 19 (1): 118-128.
  • Lithourgidis, A.S., K.V. Dhima, I.B. Vasilakoglou, C.A. Dordas. and M.D. Yiakoulaki. 2007. Sustainable production of barley and wheat by intercropping common vetch. Agron. Sustain. Develop. 27: 95-99.
  • Peyraud, J.L., A. Le Gall and A. Luscher. 2009. Potential food production from forage legume-based-systems in Europe: an overview. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Researc. 48 (2): 115-135.
  • Priyadharshini, J. and T Seran. 2010. Paddy husk ash as a source of potassium for growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4 (2): 67- 76. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/jas.v4i2.1646
  • Putnam, D.H., D.J. Undersander and M.W. Wolf. 2001. Understanding forage quality, American Farm Bureau Federation Publication, 1-01, Park Ridge, IL. Available at:http://forages.oregonstate.edu/resources/publications/forag equality.pdf (Accessed November15, 2017).
  • Rahetlah, V.B., J.M. Randrianaivoarivony, B. Andrianarisoa, L.H. Razafimpamoa and V.L. Ramalanjaona. 2013. Yields and quality of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and common vetch (Vicia sativa) grown in monocultures and mixed cultures under irrigated conditions in the highlands of Madagascar. Sustainable Agriculture Research 2 (1): 15-25.
  • Rebolé, A., C. Alzueta, L.T. Ortiz, C. Barro, M.L. Rodriguez and R. Caballero. 2004. Yields and chemical composition of different parts of the common vetch at flowering and at two seed filling stages. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2 (4): 550-557.
  • Šarūnaitė, L., I. Deveikytė and Z. Kadžiulienė. 2010. Intercropping spring wheat with grain legume for increased production in an organic crop rotation. Zemdirbystė=Agriculture 97 (3): 51-58.
  • Sadeghpour, A., E. Jahanzad, A.S. Lithourgidis, M. Hashemi, A. Esmaeili and M.B. Hosseini. 2014. Forage yield and quality of barley+annual medic intercrops in semi-arid environments. International J. of Plant Production. 8 (1): 77- 89.
  • Staniak M., J. Księżak and J. Bojarszczuk. 2014. Mixtures of legumes with cereals as a source of feed for animals. Pilipavicius V. (ed.). Organic agriculture towards sustainability. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/58358.
  • Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics, second edition, New York: McGraw-Hill. Tan, M. and O. Mentese. 2003. Effects of anatomic structure and chemical composition on Forage Quality. Journal of Ataturk Univ. Agri. Fac. 34 (1): 97-103.
  • Thompson, D.J. and D.G. Stout. 1997. Mixtures of Persian clover with Italian ryegrass or barley-Italian ryegrass for annuall forage. Can J Plant Sci. 77: 579-585.
  • Turk M. and S. Albayrak. 2012. Effect of harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of different leaf types pea cultivar. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17 (2): 111-114.
  • Turk M., S. Albayrak and Y. Bozkurt. 2015. The change in the forage quality of alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.) in grazing and non-grazing artificially established pastures. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 25 (1): 69-77.
  • Uzun, A. and F.F. Asik. 2012. The effect of mixture rates and cutting stages on some yield and quality characters of pea (Pisum sativum L.) + oat (Avena sativa L.) mixture. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17 (1): 62-66.
  • Vasilakoglou, I. and K. Dhima. 2008. Forage yield and competition indices of berseem clover intercropped with barley. Agronomy Journal 100 (6): 1749-1756.
  • Willey, R.W. and D.S.O. Osiru. 1972. Studies on mixture of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), with particular reference to plant population, J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 79: 517- 529.
  • Yavuz, T. 2017. The Effects of different cutting stages on forage yield and quality in pea (Pisum sativum L.) and oat (Avena sativa L.) mixtures, Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute 26 (1): 67-74 (in Turkish).
  • Zhang, J., B. Yin, Y. Xie, Y., J. Li, Z. Yang and G. Zhang. 2015. Legume-cereal intercropping improves forage yield, quality and degradability. PLoS One 10 (12): 1-14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144813.
There are 47 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Yasar Kavut

Publication Date December 15, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 24 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kavut, Y. (2019). EFFECTS OF SEEDING PATTERN AND HARVEST DATE OF PERSIAN CLOVER AND ANNUAL RYEGRASS ON HAY YIELD AND QUALITY IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, 24(2), 245-251. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.655175
AMA Kavut Y. EFFECTS OF SEEDING PATTERN AND HARVEST DATE OF PERSIAN CLOVER AND ANNUAL RYEGRASS ON HAY YIELD AND QUALITY IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT. TJFC. December 2019;24(2):245-251. doi:10.17557/tjfc.655175
Chicago Kavut, Yasar. “EFFECTS OF SEEDING PATTERN AND HARVEST DATE OF PERSIAN CLOVER AND ANNUAL RYEGRASS ON HAY YIELD AND QUALITY IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 24, no. 2 (December 2019): 245-51. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.655175.
EndNote Kavut Y (December 1, 2019) EFFECTS OF SEEDING PATTERN AND HARVEST DATE OF PERSIAN CLOVER AND ANNUAL RYEGRASS ON HAY YIELD AND QUALITY IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 24 2 245–251.
IEEE Y. Kavut, “EFFECTS OF SEEDING PATTERN AND HARVEST DATE OF PERSIAN CLOVER AND ANNUAL RYEGRASS ON HAY YIELD AND QUALITY IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT”, TJFC, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 245–251, 2019, doi: 10.17557/tjfc.655175.
ISNAD Kavut, Yasar. “EFFECTS OF SEEDING PATTERN AND HARVEST DATE OF PERSIAN CLOVER AND ANNUAL RYEGRASS ON HAY YIELD AND QUALITY IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 24/2 (December 2019), 245-251. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.655175.
JAMA Kavut Y. EFFECTS OF SEEDING PATTERN AND HARVEST DATE OF PERSIAN CLOVER AND ANNUAL RYEGRASS ON HAY YIELD AND QUALITY IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT. TJFC. 2019;24:245–251.
MLA Kavut, Yasar. “EFFECTS OF SEEDING PATTERN AND HARVEST DATE OF PERSIAN CLOVER AND ANNUAL RYEGRASS ON HAY YIELD AND QUALITY IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, vol. 24, no. 2, 2019, pp. 245-51, doi:10.17557/tjfc.655175.
Vancouver Kavut Y. EFFECTS OF SEEDING PATTERN AND HARVEST DATE OF PERSIAN CLOVER AND ANNUAL RYEGRASS ON HAY YIELD AND QUALITY IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT. TJFC. 2019;24(2):245-51.

Cited By

False Seedbed for Agroecological Weed Management in Forage Cereal–Legume Intercrops and Monocultures in Greece
Agronomy
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010123
DETERMINATION OF SEEDING RATE IN THE BLUE MELILOT (Melilotus caeruleus (L.) Desr.) FOR FORAGE YIELD AND SOME QUALITY FEATURES UNDER SUBTROPICAL CONDITIONS
Turkish Journal Of Field Crops
Hazim TENIKECIER
https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.831970

Turkish Journal of Field Crops is published by the Society of Field Crops Science and issued twice a year.
Owner : Prof. Dr. Behçet KIR
Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture,Department of Field Crops
Editor in Chief : Prof. Dr. Emre ILKER
Address : 848 sok. 2. Beyler İşhanı No:72, Kat:3 D.313 35000 Konak-Izmir, TURKEY
Email :  turkishjournaloffieldcrops@gmail.com contact@field-crops.org
Tel : +90 232 3112679
Tel/Fax : : +90 232 3432474