Gender-Specific Peculiarities of Motor Preparedness of Children Aged 6-10

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2017.1.1180

Keywords:

discriminant function, pedagogical control, classification, modeling, motor preparedness, girls and boys aged 6-10

Abstract

The objective is to determine the gender-specific peculiarities of motor preparedness of children aged 6-10. 

Materials and methods: the participants in the study were girls aged 6 (n = 36), aged 7 (n = 48), aged 8 (n = 57), aged 9 (n = 38), aged 10 (n = 46); boys aged 6 (n = 48), aged 7 (n = 45), aged 8 (n = 60), aged 9 (n = 47), aged 10 (n = 40). To achieve the tasks set, the study relied on the following research methods: analysis of scientific literature, pedagogical testing and methods of mathematical statistics of research data reduction. The study used discriminant analysis as the modeling method.

Results: the classification results of motor preparedness of girls and boys aged 6-10 indicate that the study has correctly classified 81.9-100% of the initial observations. The graphic material demonstrates the density of objects within each class and a clear distinction between the classes. This allows to maintain that there is a significant difference between girls and boys aged 6-10 in their motor preparedness.

Conclusions. The girls aged 6-10 show the best results in movement coordination related to combinations of movements of arms and legs, as well as flexibility. The girls aged 10 show the best results in test No. 10 “300-m Race”. The boys aged 6-10, unlike the girls, show the best results in the development of general coordination of movements, strength, speed strength, strength and general endurance. It is possible to argue with a high level of reliability that by their classification characteristics girls and boys belong to different classes, and significantly differ in motor preparedness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balsevich, V.K. (2000). Ontokineziologiia cheloveka. M.: Teoriia i praktika fizicheskoi kultury, 275.

Krutsevych, T.Yu., & Bezverkhnia, H.V. (2010). Rekreatsiia u fizychnii kulturi riznykh hrup naselennia: Navch. posibnyk. K.: Olimpiiska literatura, 248.

Nosko, M.O., Yermakov, S.S., & Harkusha, S.V. (2010).Teoretyko-metodychni aspekty zmitsnennia fizychnoho zdorovia uchnivskoi ta studentskoi molodi. Visnyk Chernihivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pedahohichni nauky. Fizychne vykhovannia ta sport. Chernihiv: Vyd-vo ChDPU, (76), 243–247.

Piccinno, Andrea & Colella, Dario (2014). Physical fitness level in Italian high-school adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES), 14 (3), 431-437.

Coskun, Ali & Sahin, Gulsah (2014). Two different strength training and untrained period effects in children. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES), 14(1), 42–46.

Paranicheva, T. M., Babenkova, E. A., Tiurina, E. V. & Orlov, K. V. (2011). Sostoianie zdorovia i vozrastno-polovye osobennosti fizicheskogo razvitiia malchikov i devochek mladshego shkolnogo vozrasta. Novye issledovaniia, (28), 33–45.

Krivolapchuk, I. A. (2008). Konditcionnye dvigatelnye sposobnosti i nespetcificheskaia reaktivnost detei mladshego shkolnogo vozrasta na razlichnye vidy nagruzok. Novye issledovaniia, (17), 39–51.

Perkov, A. V. (2010). Vozrastnye periody intensivnogo razvitiia osnovnykh fizicheskikh kachestv uchashchikhsia mladshikh klassov obshcheobrazovatelnykh shkol. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P.F. Lesgafta, 64 (6), С.55–59.

Grews, D.J., Lochbaum, M.R., & Landers, D.M. (2004). Aerobic physical activity effects on psychological well-being in low-income Hispanic children. Percept Mot Skill, 98 (1), 319–324.

Khudolii, O.M., Ivashchenko, O.V., Iermakov, S.S., & Rumba, O.G. (2016). Computer simulation of junior gymnasts’ training process. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 8 (3), 215–228.

Lopatiev, A., Ivashchenko, O., Khudolii, O., Pjanylo, Y., Chernenko, S., & Yermakova, T. (2017). Systemic approach and mathematical modeling in physical education and sports. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES), 17 (1), 146-155.

Ivashchenko, O.V. (2016). Modelyuvannya protsesu fizychnoho vykhovannya shkolyariv: Monohrafiya [Modelling of physical education students: Monograph]. Kharkiv: OVS.

Ivashchenko, O., Khudolii, O., Iermakov, S., Marc R. Lochbaum, Cieslicka, M., Zukow, W., Nosko, M., & Yermakova, T. (2016). Intra-group factorial model as the basis of pedagogical control over motor and functional fitness dynamic of 14-16 years old girls. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES), 16(4), 1190–1201.

Ivashchenko, O.V. (2017). Special aspects of motor fitness influence on level of 11-13 years’ age girls’ physical exercises’ mastering. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems Of Physical Training And Sports, (1), 11–17. doi:10.15561/18189172.2017.0102

Dorita du Toit, Anita E. Pienaar, Leani Truter (2011). Relationship between physical fitness and academic performance in South African children. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education & Recreation, 33(3), 23–35.

Khudolii, O.M. & Ivashchenko, O.V. (2014). Modelyuvannya protsesu navchannya ta rozvytku rukhovykh zdibnostey u ditey i pidlitkiv: Monohrafiya. Kharkiv: OVS, 320.

Khudolii, O.M. (2011). Teoretyko-metodychni zasady systemy pidhotovky yunykh himnastiv 7–13 rokiv: Avtoreferat dysertatsiyi doktora nauk z fiz.vykh. i sportu: 24.00.01. K.: NUFViS, 44.

Khudolii, O. M. & Iermakov, S. S. (2011). Zakonomirnosti protsesu navchannya yunykh himnastiv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna, (5), 3–18, 35–41. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2011.5.707

Khudolii, O. M. & Ivashchenko, O. V. (2013). Informatsiyne zabezpechennya protsesu navchannya i rozvytku rukhovykh zdibnostey ditey i pidlitkiv (na prykladi sportyvnoyi himnastyky). Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna, (4), 3–18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2013.4.1031

Khudolii, O.M., & Ivashchenko, O.V. (2014). Osoblyvosti funktsionalnoi, koordynatsiinoi i sylovoi pidhotovlenosti divchat 7–8 klasiv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna, (2), 15–21. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2014.2.1095

Ivashchenko, O., & Khudolii, O. (2016). Metodolohichni pidkhody do pedahohichnoho kontrolyu u protsesi fizychnoho vykhovannya divchat 12—14 rokiv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna, 0(4), 13–24. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2016.4.1175

Bar-Or, O. & Rouland, T. (2009). Zdorove detei i dvigatelnaia aktivnost: ot fiziologicheskikh osnov do prakticheskogo primeneniia. K. : Olimp. l-ra, 528.

Marchenko, S. I. (2009). Modelyuvannya rozvytku shvydkosti u shkolyariv 2—4 klasiv zasobamy rukhlyvykh ihor. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna, (10), 10–14.

Marchenko, S. I. (2008). Kharakterystyka vplyvu ihrovykh zasobiv na dynamiku rozvytku vytryvalosti v uchniv molodshoho shkilnoho viku. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna, (10), 38–49.

Titarenko, A. A. (2010). Osoblyvosti rozvytku rukhovykh zdibnostei u divchatok molodshoho shkilnoho viku. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna, (9), 3–13.

Serhiienko, L. P. (2001). Testuvannia rukhovykh zdibnostei shkoliariv. K.: Olimpiiska literatura, 439.

Liakh, V. І. (2000). Dvigatelnye sposobnosti shkolnikov: Osnovy teorii i metodiki razvitiia. M.: Terra–Sport, 192.

Miroshnychenko, D.T. (2014). Faktorna model’ rozvytku rukhovoyi funktsiyi u khlopchykiv molodshykh klasiv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna, 0(4), 23–31. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2014.4.1114

Ivashchenko O.V. (2017). Classification of 11-13 yrs girls’ motor fitness, considering level of physical exercises’ mastering. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems Of Physical Training And Sports, 21(2), 18–23. doi:10.15561/18189172.2017.0203

Ivashchenko, O., Khudolii, O., Iermakov, S., Chernenko, S., & Holovko, A. (2015). Pedahohichnyi kontrol rivnia rukhovoi pidhotovlenosti khlopchykiv molodshykh klasiv. Teoria ta metodika fizicnogo vihovanna, 0(2), 32–40. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2015.2.1140

Published

2017-03-25

How to Cite

Ivashchenko, O. V. (2017). Gender-Specific Peculiarities of Motor Preparedness of Children Aged 6-10. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 17(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2017.1.1180

Issue

Section

Physical Training at School

Most read articles by the same author(s)