초록

Although democratic peace thesis and Habermas’ cosmopolitan project are based on Kantian peace in terms of their own theoretical origin, their argumentative contents and positions are distinct and different from each other. Kantian peace had been based on a peaceful league or union of free states, yet the membership for the union could not be understood as reserved only for narrowly defined western liberal democracies. In this regard, so-called democratic peace thesis is fundamentally problematic from the point of Kantian peace. Moreover, as possible use of force in the name of humanitarian intervention that reflected unilaterality understood moralism by some major western powers is to be recognized implicitly for democratic peace, it appears to be essentially contrary to the Kantian peace. Habermas’ version of Kantian project for the pursuit of cosmopolitan legal order in terms of constitutionalization of international law seems to be more persuasive and valid from the Kantian peace. In particular, as to the problem of humanitarian intervention, which is being regarded as one of the most difficult problems of international legal community,Habermas’ project has attained stronger argumentative position, as it may provide proper procedures and conditions for it supported by international law as a constitution of cosmopolitan community. This is because Habermas’ cosmopolitan project in which constitutionalization of intentional law is firmly established may guarantee universal protection of human rights and democratic practices without the possibility of misuse of military forces by some major powers. Having said that, Habermas’ cosmopolitan project is far from perfect. Rather,it must be accompanied by material reformative programs for international organizations, such as the UN in a fundamental way. In order for real cosmopolitan legal order to be established and developed, international institutions and organizations must be restructured from the legislative, executive and judicial perspectives. In addition, constructive roles and functions that could be played by sovereign states should also be noted for establishing cosmopolitan legal order. Only by firmly guaranteeing protection of human rights and democratic practices at the domestic level provided by sovereign states could emerge a real cosmopolitan community.

키워드

칸트의 평화사상(Kantian peace), 민주평화론(democratic peace thesis), 세계법적 질서(cosmopolitan legal order), 국제법의 입헌화(constitutionalization of international law), 세계시민권(world citizenship)

참고문헌(21)open

  1. [학술지] 문성훈 / 2010 / 칸트의 세계시민사회이념과 인정 / 사회와 철학 (19) : 185 ~ 226

  2. [학술지] 이혜정 / 2008 / 민주평화론의 패러독스: 칸트 평화사상의 왜곡과 오용 / 한국정치외교사논총 29 (2) : 129 ~ 154

  3. [학술지] 장은주 / 2009 / 인권의 보편성과 인도적 개입의 정당성 - ‘북한 인권 문제’의 올바른 해법을 위한 철학적 토대의 모색과 관련하여 - / 사회와 철학 (17) : 285 ~ 324

  4. [학술지] Kevin E. Dodson / 1993 / Kant’s Perpetual Peace : Universal Civil Society or League of States / Southwest Philosophical Studies 15 : 1 ~ 9

  5. [단행본] Jürgen Habermas / 1997 / Kant’s Idea of Perpetual Peace, with the Benefit of Two Hundred Years’ Hindsight, In Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Idea / MIT Press : 113 ~ 153

  6. [단행본] Jürgen Habermas / 2006 / The Divided West / Polity Press

  7. [학술지] Jürgen Habermas / 1999 / Bestiality and Humanity: A War on the Border Between Law and Morality / Die Zeit 54 (18) : 1 ~ 8

  8. [단행본] Otfried Höffe / 2006 / Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace / Cambridge University Press

  9. [학술지] Pauline Kleingeld / 2004 / Approaching Perpetual Peace : Kant’s Defence of a League of States and his Ideal of a World Federation / European Journal of Philosophy 12 : 304 ~ 325

  10. [단행본] Immanuel Kant / 1991 / Conjectures on the Beginning of Human History, In Kant: Political Writings / Cambridge University Press : 221 ~ 234

  11. [단행본] Immanuel Kant / 1991 / On the Common Saying: This May be True in Theory, but it does not Apply in Practice, In Kant: Political Writings / Cambridge University Press : 61 ~ 87

  12. [단행본] Immanuel Kant / 1991 / The Metaphysics of Morals, In Kant: Political Writings / Cambridge University Press : 131 ~ 175

  13. [단행본] Immanuel Kant / 1991 / Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch, In Kant: Political Writings / Cambridge University Press : 93 ~ 131

  14. [단행본] Geoffrey Best / 1982 / War and Society in Revolutionary Europe1770-1870 / St. Martin’s

  15. [학술지] Robert Jervis / 1985 / From Balance to Concert : A Study of International Security Cooperation / World Politics 38 : 58 ~ 79

  16. [학술지] Patrick Capps / 2010 / Kant’s Concept of International Law / Legal Theory 16 : 229 ~ 257

  17. [단행본] Alexander V. Kozhemiakin / 1998 / Expanding the Zone of Peace? Democratization and International Security / St. Martin’s

  18. [단행본] Alan Gilbert / 1999 / Must Global Politics Constrain Democracy? Great Power Realism, Democratic Peace, and Democratic Internationalism / Princeton University Press

  19. [단행본] Michael W. Doyle / 2001 / Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, In Debating the Democratic Peace / MIT Press : 3 ~ 57

  20. [학술지] Robyn Eckersley / 2007 / From cosmopolitan nationalism to cosmopolitan democracy / Review of International Studies 33 : 675 ~ 692

  21. [학술지] Robert Fine / 2003 / Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Cosmopolitanism / Constellations 10 : 469 ~ 487