Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2007, 53(4):173-183 | DOI: 10.17221/860-AGRICECON

Enforcement of the 2003 CAP reform in 5 countries of the West European Union: Consequences on land rent and land market

J.P. Boinon, J.C. Kroll, D. Lepicier, A. Leseigneur, J.B. Viallon
ENESAD, Dijon Cedex, France

This paper analyses the enforcement of the 2003 CAP reform in 5 countries of the West European Union: France, Germany, Italy, Spain and United Kingdom. The reform gives multiple possibilities of adaptation at a national or regional level. Two standard strategies are foreseen: that of the States which mobilized to the maximum the innovations that the reform allowed, and that of the States which have chosen the option of a minimal application, to limit the effects of reorientation of the productions (maximum sectors remain coupled) or of the redistribution of the payments (historical references). The great diversity of the conditions of agricultural production is one of the main explanations of the differences of enforcement of the reform. We analyse the first impacts of the reform. One can generally expect that the market of entitlements will be a priori limited, because of the links of the entitlements to land. The regionalisation of the calculation of the entitlements is incontestably the mechanism, which introduces the most redistributive effects, compared to the individual historical references. We examine also the consequences of the Single Payment System (SPS) on land rent and land market.

Keywords: decoupling, CAP, Single Payment System, land market

Published: April 30, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Boinon JP, Kroll JC, Lepicier D, Leseigneur A, Viallon JB. Enforcement of the 2003 CAP reform in 5 countries of the West European Union: Consequences on land rent and land market. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2007;53(4):173-183. doi: 10.17221/860-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bazin G., Levesque R. (2005): La nouvelle PAC et le coût du foncier agricole. Etudes foncières, (113): 17-21.
    2. Boinon J.P, Kroll J.C, Lépicier D., Leseigneur A, Viallon J.B. (2006): La mise en śuvre des DPU et de l'article 69 dans les Etats membre de l'Union Européenne Ministère de l'Agriculture. ENESAD, Dijon, 71 (2): 71-111.
    3. CAAV (The Central Association of Agricultural Valuers) (2005). Mid Term Review a Valuer's Second Interim Guide. Colrford CAAV, No. 180, dec, 176 p.
    4. Chambre d'Agriculture (2004). PAC, une réforme en profondeur. No. 930, pp. 9-64, mars.
    5. Council of the European Union (2002). Brussels European Council 24 and 25 October 2002. Presidency Conclusions, 22 p.
    6. DEFRA (2004), CAP single payment scheme: basis for allocation of entitlement. Impacts of the scheme to be adopted in England. Available on http://www.defra.gov.ik/farm/capreform/backgroundpdf/webnoterev16.pdf
    7. European Union (2003). Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003. 111 p.
    8. European Commission (2005). Prospects for agricultural markets and income in the EU-25 2005-2012. 115 p. Go to original source...
    9. Frascarelli A. (2005): Valutazioneed effetti delle sceltenatzionali delle riforma Fischler della Pac. XLII convegno annuale Sidea, Pisa 22-24 settembre 2005, 29 p.
    10. Garcia Alvarez Coque J.M. (2006): La reforma de la Politica Agraria Comun, EUMEDIA-MAPYA.
    11. Kleinhanss W., Hüttel S., Offermann F. (2004): Auswirkungen des MTR-Beschlüsse und ihrer nationalen Umsetzung. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, 38 p.
    12. Kroll J.C. (2004): La réforme de juin 2003ou la fin d'une Politique Agricole Commune européenne. Revue OCL, 11 (3), mai-juin. John Libbey Eurotext. Go to original source...
    13. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentacion (2004). El Modelo de desarrollo y aplicacion de la reforma de la Pac en Espana. 30 p.
    14. OCDE (2002). The incidence and income transfer efficiency of farm support measures. 36 p.
    15. Sourie J.C., Millet G., Guinde L., Wepierre A.S. (2003): La révision à mi-parcours de la PAC (juin 2003) et les exploitations céréalières des régions intermediaries. INRA Sciences Sociales La réforme de la politique agricole commune de juin 2003, Paris, 10 décembre.
    16. Veysset P., Bebin D., Lherm M. (2005): Adaptation to Agenda 2000 (CAP reform) and optimisation of the farming system of French suckler cattle farms in the Charolais area: a model-based study. Agricultural Systems, (83): 179-202. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content