Vet Med - Czech, 2005, 50(1):24-32 | DOI: 10.17221/5593-VETMED

Effect of sample size and staining methods on stallion sperm morphometry by the Sperm Class Analyzer

M. Hidalgo1, I. Rodriguez1, J. Dorado1, J. Sanz1, C. Soler2
1 Reproduction and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
2 Physical Anthropology Unit, Department of Functional Biology and Physical Anthropology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Computer-assisted sperm morphometry analysis has improved the assessment of sperm morphology, but the results depend on the use of adequate evaluation and staining procedures of spermatozoa from individual species. In this study, the morphological module of the Sperm Class Analyzer®was used for the morphometric analysis of stallion sperm heads and midpieces. Semen samples were obtained from six fertile stallions in order to evaluate the influence of three staining procedures (Diff-Quik, Hemacolor and Harris' Haematoxylin) on the accuracy of image processing and sperm morphometry, and the effect of the sample size on sperm morphometric measurements. Harris' Haematoxylin was the staining technique of choice on the accuracy of the image processing with an optimum contrast of sperm cells with the surrounding background that allows an efficient boundary detection and segmentation which results in the highest proportion of sperm heads and midpieces assessed (80.47%). The results indicate that the staining methods affected significantly the sperm dimensions with increased values from Diff-Quik than Hemacolor and Harris' Haematoxylin respectively (Diff-Quik > Hemacolor > Harris' Haematoxylin). No differences in morphometric parameters were found when 100, 150, 175 or 200 spermatozoa were analysed. In conclusion, to obtain objective and accurate sperm morphometric measurements by the Sperm Class Analyzer® system in the stallion, it's recommended the analysis of 100 spermatozoa from slides which have been previously stained with Harris' Haematoxylin.

Keywords: ASMA; sperm head; midpiece; morphometric anlaysis; validation

Published: January 31, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hidalgo M, Rodriguez I, Dorado J, Sanz J, Soler C. Effect of sample size and staining methods on stallion sperm morphometry by the Sperm Class Analyzer. Vet Med-Czech. 2005;50(1):24-32. doi: 10.17221/5593-VETMED.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Boersma A., Rasshofer R., Stolla R. (2001): Influence of sample preparation, staining procedure and analysis conditions on bull sperm head morphometry using the morphology analyser integrated visual optical system. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 36, 222-229. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Buendia P., Soler C., Paolicchi F., Gago C., Urquieta B., Perez-Sanchez F., Bustos-Obregon E. (2002): Morphometric characterization and classification of alpaca sperm heads using the Sperm-Class Analyzer® computer assisted system. Theriogenology, 57, 1207-1218. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Casey P.J., Gravance C.G., Davis R.O., Chabot D.D., Liu I.K.M. (1997): Morphometric differences in sperm head dimensions of fertile and subfertile stallions. Theriogenology, 47, 575-582. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Chandler J.E., Painter C.L., Adkinson R.W., Memon M.A., Hoyt P.G. (1988): Semen quality characteristics of dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science, 71, 1638-1646. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Colenbrander B., Gadella B.M., Stout T.A.E. (2003). The predictive value of semen analysis in the evaluation of stallion fertility. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 38, 305-311. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Cooper T.G., Atkinson A.D., Nieschlag E. (1999): Experience with external quality control in spermatology. Human Reproduction, 14, 765-769. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Davis R.O., Gravance C.G. (1993): Standardization of specimen preparation, staining, and sampling methods improves automated sperm-head morphometry analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 59, 412-417. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Davis R.O., Bain D.E., Siemers R.J., Thal D.M., Andrew J.B., Gravance C.G. (1992): Accuracy and precision of the CellForm-Human Automated sperm morphometry instrument. Fertility and Sterility, 58, 763-769. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Davis R.O., Gravance C.G., Casey P.J. (1993): Automated morphometric analysis of stallion spermatozoa. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 54, 1808-1811.
    10. de Monserrat J.J., Perez-Sanchez F., Tablado L., Soler C. (1995): The Sperm-Class Analyzer®: a new automated system for human sperm morphometry and classification. Contraception Fertilité Sexualité, 23, S126.
    11. Foote R.H., Schermerhorn E.C., Simkin M.E. (1986): Measurements of semen quality, fertility and reproductive hormones to asses dibromochloropropane (DPBC) effects in live rabbits. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 6, 628-637. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Gago C., Perez-Sanchez F., Yeung C.H., Tablado L., Cooper T.G., Soler C. (1998): Standardization of sampling and staining methods for the morphometric evaluation of sperm heads in the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) using computer-assisted image analysis. International Journal of Andrology, 21, 169-176. Go to original source...
    13. Gravance C.G., Lewis K.M., Casey P.J. (1995): Computer automated sperm head morphometry analysis (ASMA) of goat spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 44, 989-1002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Gravance C.G., Vishwanath R., Pitt C., Casey P.J. (1996): Computer automated morphometric analysis of bull sperm heads. Theriogenology, 46, 1205-1215. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Hafez E.S.E. (1987): Semen evaluation. In: Hafez E.S.E. (ed.): Reproduction in Farm Animals. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia. 455-480.
    16. Hidalgo M., Rodriguez I., Pérez C., Dorado M., Sanchez, M. (2004): Comparison of three staining procedures used for computer-assisted buck sperm head morphometry analysis. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 39, 271.
    17. Iguer-Ouada M., Verstegen J. (2001): Evaluation of the Hamilton Thorn Computer Based automated system for dog semen analysis. Theriogenology, 55, 733-749. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Jagoe J.R., Wasbrook N.P., Pratsis L., Hudson E.A. (1987): Sperm morphology by image analysis compared with subjective assessments. British Journal of Urology, 60, 457-462. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Jasko D.J., Lein D.H., Foote R.H. (1990): Determination of the relationship between sperm morphologic classifications and fertility in stallions: 66 cases (1987- 1988). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 197, 389-394. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Jequier A.M., Ukombe E.B. (1983): Errors inherent in the performance of routine semen analysis. British Journal of Urology, 55, 434-436. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Kruger T.F., Acosta A.A., Simmonn K.F., Swanson R.J., Matta J.F., Oehninger S. (1988): Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 49, 112-117. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Kruger, T.F., Du Toit, T.C., Franken, D.R., Acosta, A.A., Oehninger, S.C., Menkveld, R. and Lombard, C.J. (1993): A new computerized method of reading sperm morphology (strict criteria) is as efficient as technician reading. Fertility and Sterility, 59, 202-209. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Kusunoki H., Kato S., Kanda S. (1988): Identification of acrosome reacted goat sperm by trypan blue-giemsa method. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science, 59, 235-240. Go to original source...
    24. Lacquet F.A., Kruger T.F., du Toit T.C., Lombart C.J., Sanchez Sarmiento C.A., de Villiers A., Coetzee K. (1996): Slide preparation and staining procedures for reliable results using computerised morphology (IVOS). Archives of Andrology, 36, 133-138. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. Menkveld R., Stander F.S.H., Kotze T. Jv. W., Kruger T.F., van Zil J.A. (1990): The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Human Reproduction, 5, 586-592. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Oettle E.E. (1986): Using a new acrosome stain to evaluate sperm morphology. Veterinary Medicine, 81, 263- 266.
    27. Ombelet W., Pollet H., Bosmans E., Vereecken A. (1997): Results of a questionnaire on sperm morphology assessment. Human Reproduction, 12, 1015-1020. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. Rijsselaere T., Soom A.V., Hoflack G., Maes D., Kruif A. (2004): Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser. Theriogenology, 62, 1292-1306. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Rodriguez I., Sanz J., Perez C., Felipe M., Dorado J., Hidalgo M. (2001): Fertilidad in vivo del esperma congelado-descongelado. I Jornadas de Investigacion, Cordoba, Spain, 317-321.
    30. Sancho M., Perez-Sanchez P., Tablado L., de Monserrat J.J., Soler C. (1998): Computer-assisted morphometric analysis of ram sperm heads: evaluation of different fixative techniques. Theriogenology, 50, 27-37. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Sekoni V.O., Gustafsson B.K. (1987): Seasonal variations in the incidence of sperm morphological abnormalities in dairy bulls regularly used for artificial insemination. British Veterinary Journal, 143, 312-317. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    32. Soler C., Perez-Sanchez F., Schulze V., Bergmann M., Oberpenning F., Yeung C.H., Cooper T.G. (2000): Objective evaluation of the morphology of human epididymal sperm heads. International Journal of Andrology, 23, 77-84. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. Soler C., de Monserratt J.J., Gutierrez R., Nunez J., Nunez M., Sancho M., Perez-Sanchez F., Cooper T.G. (2003): Use of the Sperm-Class Analyser®for objective assessment of human sperm morphology. International Journal of Andrology, 26, 262-270. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    34. Verstegen J., Iguer-Ouada M., Onelin, K. (2002): Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology, 57, 149-179. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    35. Voss J.L., Picket B.W., Squires E.L. (1981): Stallion spermatozoal morphology and motility and their relationship to fertility. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 178, 287-289. Go to PubMed...
    36. Zaini A., Jennings M.G., Baker H.W.G. (1985): Are conventional sperm morphology and motility assessments of predictive value in subfertile men. International Journal of Andrology, 8, 427-435. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content