Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2005, 50(7):289-299 | DOI: 10.17221/4170-CJAS

Changes in boar semen with a high and low level of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa

J. Čeřovský, S. Frydrychová, A. Lustyková, M. Rozkot
Research Institute of Animal Production, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic

The aim of the paper was to find out the level of changes in the sperm quality in two groups of boars in the insemination (A and B) with diametrically different contents of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa (AS) with an interval of 25 weeks between semen collection I and collection II. In the group A there were 22 boars with the AS content up to 10%, in the group B 16 of boars with the AS content above 40% in collection I. Both groups were comparable concerning the parameters of the performance test results and in quantitative parameters of the semen from collection I. They differed significantly in the AS content (P < 0.01) and in the age (P < 0.05). In collection II in both groups the semen volume increased significantly (A - P < 0.01; B - P < 0.05), in the group A the number of spermatozoa per ejaculate and per day also increased (P < 0.01). In the group B there was an insignificant clear decrease in the sperm concentration (P > 0.05). In comparison with the group B the group A can be characterized as a group with significantly higher dynamics in the sperm production per ejaculate. An opposite trend was noted in the total AS content. In the group A there was a significant increase (P < 0.001) and in the group B a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in collection II. In the group A there was a deterioration of the AS content in 7 boars (31.8%), in the group B an improvement in 7 boars (43.7%). Particular monitored AS forms are given. A significant difference in the total AS content between both groups was in favour of the group A (P< 0.001). While no boars from the group A exceeded the limit in the AS content for the applicability of semen for insemination (in theCzech Republic25%), in the group B they remained above this limit without applicability possibility. The detected variations and prevailing stability in the AS occurrence in boars kept in the same conditions lead us to a consideration of hereditary characteristics of the spermatogenesis factor, of considerable persistence of the level of monitored characteristics and to a consideration of applicability of the phenotype AS presentation to selection of boars for artificial insemination.

Keywords: boars; semen quality; morphological analysis spermatozoa; different development

Published: July 31, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Čeřovský J, Frydrychová S, Lustyková A, Rozkot M. Changes in boar semen with a high and low level of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa. Czech J. Anim. Sci.. 2005;50(7):289-299. doi: 10.17221/4170-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Alanko M. (1985): The effect of acrosomal defects in boar sperms on fertilization of sow ova. In: 36th Ann. Meet. Europ. Assoc. for Anim. Production, Halkidiki, Greece, Session IV.
  2. Andersson M., Lehtinen P., Sirkko K., Sironen A., Vikki J. (2002): Eradication of a hereditary sperm defect by marker assisted genetic selection (MAS) in the pig. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 37 (Abstract P 1.4), 224.
  3. Becker R.B., Wilcox C.J. (1969): Hereditary defects of spermatozoa. A. I. Digest, 17 (12), 8-10.
  4. Blom E. (1973): Studies on boar semen I. A new major defect in the sperm head, the SME - defect. Acta Vet. Scand., 14, 633-635. Go to PubMed...
  5. Blom E., Andersen A. B. (1975): The ultrastructure of a characteristic sperm head - defect in the boar: the SME - defect. Andrologia, 7, 199-209. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Blom E. (1977): Sperm morphology with reference to bull infertility. In: First All-India Symposium on Anim. Reprod., Ludhiana, India, 61-81.
  7. Flowers W.L. (1997): Management of boars for efficient semen production. J. Reprod. Fertil., 52 Suppl., 67-78.
  8. Gadea J. (2002): Sperm under the microscope. Pig Internat., 32, 24-27.
  9. Grandjot G. (1997): Grosser oder kleiner Wurf - wieviel liegt am Eber? Schweinez. Schweinemast, 45, 36-39.
  10. Gibson Ch. D. (1983): Clinical evaluation of the boar for breeding soundness: physical examination and semen morphology. Comp. Cont. Educ., 5, 244-250.
  11. Itoh Y., Toyama Y. (1995): Characteristics and fertility of boar semen with a high proportion of knobbed sperm. Jpn. J. Swine Sci., 32, 175-180. Go to original source...
  12. Itoh Y., Toyama Y., Nomura T. (1996): A boar with a high proportion of decapitated and decaudated spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Develop., 42, 7-13. Go to original source...
  13. Kojima Y., Kinoshita Y., Fukuda M. (1974): Multiple head spermatozoa in the boar testes. Jpn. J. Veter. Sci., 36, 363-374. Go to original source...
  14. Lahrmann K. H., Gardner I. (1994): Influence of endogenous and exogenous factors on fertility of A. I. boars. In: Reproduction Domestic Animals (Zuchthygiene), (Abstract 1.) 29, 65-288
  15. Larsson K., Darenius K., Johansson K. (1980): Sperm morphology and in vitro viability in diluted semen in relation to fertility of A. I. boars. Nord. Vet.-Med., 32, 533-542.
  16. Larsson K., Malmgren L., Einarsson S. (1988): Exposure of boars to elevated ambient temperature - consequences for hormone secretion, sperm morphology and fertility. Pig News and Information, 9, March, 4 pp.
  17. Malmgren L. (1989) Experimentally induced testicular alterations in boars: Sperm morphology changes in mature and peripubertal boars. J. Vet. Med. A, 36, 411-420. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Remmen J.L.A.M., Tielen M.J.M. (1976): Sperma - onderzoek bij de beer. Tijdschr. Diergeneesk., 101, 599-610.
  19. Stemmler K.H., Bach S., Neundorf P., Mudra K., Ueckert H. (1982): Der Einfluss von Spermienanomalien auf die Befruchtungsleistung beim Eber. Mh. Vet.-Med., 37, 467-470.
  20. Waberski D., Meding S., Dirksen G., Weitze K.F., Leiding C., Hahn R. (1994): Fertility of long-term stored boar semen: Influence of extender (Androhep and Kiev), storage time and plasma droplets in the semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 36, 145-151. Go to original source...
  21. Yoshida M., Kojima Y. (1989): Male pronuclear formation by a boar spermatozoon with harpin-curved tail in zona-free hamster egg. Jpn. J. Vet. Sci., 51, 428-430. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.