Soil & Water Res., 2010, 5(3):113-119 | DOI: 10.17221/39/2009-SWR

Assessment of the soil quality as a complex of productive and environmental soil function potentialsOriginal Paper

Pavel NOVÁK, Jan VOPRAVIL, Jitka LAGOVÁ
Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague, Czech Republic

Soil quality is a measure of the ability of soil to carry out particular ecological and plant productive functions. It reflects the combination of chemical, physical, and biological properties. Some of the soil properties are relatively more important than the others and unchangeable. Others can be significantly changed by human activity. Nowadays, three groups of soil functions are usually defined: soil utility function (productive function, infrastructure area, source of materials); functions of soil in the environment (non-productive functions such as: water infiltration and water retention, transport of matter, buffering and sanitary functions); soil cultural function (history of nature and humans). The cultural function is, from our point of view, different from the others. The complex assessment of the soil quality is the topic of this paper and includes both the productive and environmental functions. The productive function (productive potential) of Czech soils has been long studied and is ± known. It is expressed by means of a one-hundred-point scale in the Czech Land Evaluation System. Its point values depend on different soil and local characteristics together with the natural conditions and their influence on the plant production. A similar principle was used for the assessment of the non-productive soil functions. The importance of the individual soil characteristics is defined. The values of the environmental soil function potentials are determined from the common soil characteristics and are compared with the values of the soil productive potential. Total soil quality can be then expressed as the average or as the sum of the points for all individual functions. Some selected function can be preferred by increasing its value coefficient for a specific land use area (for example, an area for obtaining underground water). Three texturally different forms of Chernozem (middle textured, clayic, arenic) which correspond to the Main Soil Units of the Czech Land Evaluation System are given as an example of the assessment. The evaluation of the total soil quality would then involve not only the agricultural and locality determined financial values but also an assessment of all environmental functions of the soil.

Keywords: ecological soil functions; points scale; soil characteristics; soil value assessment

Published: September 30, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
NOVÁK P, VOPRAVIL J, LAGOVÁ J. Assessment of the soil quality as a complex of productive and environmental soil function potentials. Soil & Water Res.. 2010;5(3):113-119. doi: 10.17221/39/2009-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Arshad M.A., Coen G.M. (1992): Characterization of soil quality. Physical and chemical criteria. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 7: 25-31. Go to original source...
  2. Bedrna Z., Dlapa P. (1995): Environmental properties of soil. Acta Environmentalica Universitastis Comenianae (Bratislava), 4-5: 95-103.
  3. Blum W.H. (1988): Problems of soil conservation. Nature and Environment Series, No. 39, Strassburg.
  4. Blum W.H. (1990): Soil protection in Europe. Environment Conservation, 17: 72-75. Go to original source...
  5. Blum W.H. (1998): Basic Concepts: Methods for Assessment of Soil Degradation. Advances in Soil Science. CRC Press, Boka Raton, 1-17.
  6. Blum W.E.H. (2002): The role of soils in sustaining society and the environment: realities and challenges for the 21st century. In: 17th World Congress of Soil Science. August 2002, Bangkok, Keynote Lectures, IUSS, 66-86
  7. Blum W.E.H., Warkentin B.P., Frossard E. (2006): Soil, human society and the environment. In: Frossard E., Blum W.E.H., Warkentin B.P. (eds): Function of Soils for Human Societies and the Environment. Geological Society, London, Special Publications No. 266, 1-8. Go to original source...
  8. Bouma J. (1989): Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation. Advances in Soil Science, 9: 177-183. Go to original source...
  9. Bujnovský R., Juráni B. (1999): On the problem of soil quality evaluation. Vědecká práce VÚPOP Bratislava, 25-32.
  10. Bujnovský R., Vilček J. (2008): Legal, Economic and Etnical Aspects of Agricultural Soil Protection. In: Proc. 5th Soil-Science Days in Slovakia, Sielnica, 69-76.
  11. Doran J.W., Parkin T.B. (1994): Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran J.W., Coleman D.C., Bezdicek D.F., Stewart B.A. (eds): Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. SSSA Special Publication No. 35, 3-21. Go to original source...
  12. Doran J.W., Parkin T.B. (1996): Quantitative indicators of soil quality: A minimum data set. In: Doran J.W., Jones A.J. (eds): Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. SSSA Special Publication No. 49, 25-37. Go to original source...
  13. Karlen D.L., Stott D.E. (1994): A framework for evaluating physical and chemical indicators of soil quality. In: Doran J.W., Coleman D.C., Bezdicek D.F., Stewart B.A. (eds): Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. SSSA Special Publication No. 35, 53-72. Go to original source...
  14. Karlen D.L., Mausbach M.J., Doran J.W., Cline R.G. (1997): Soil Quality: A concept, definition and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61: 4-10. Go to original source...
  15. Manrique L.A., Jones C.A. (2001): Bulk density of soils in relation to soil physical and chemical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65: 476-481. Go to original source...
  16. Mašát K., Džatko M., Němeček J. (1983): Productive potential of Soils of the Czech Republic. Rostlinná výroba, 29: 1011-1021.
  17. Mašát K. et al. (2002): Methodics of Delimitation and Mapping of Evaluated Soil-ecological Units. Ministry of Agricultutre - RISWC, Prague. (in Czech)
  18. Němeček J. et al. (2001): Taxonomic Classification System of Soils of the Czech Republic. Czech Agricultural University, Prague. (in Czech)
  19. Novák P. et al. (1995): Methodics of point of soil quality determination. [Report of Project No. 093095002.] RISWC, Prague. (in Czech)
  20. Novák P., Vopravil J. et al. (2007): Analyse and mapping of soil infiltration ability and water retention capacity in the Czech Republic. [Final report of project No. VaV 1D/1/5/05.] RISWC, Prague. (in Czech)
  21. Olson B.M., Janzen H.H., Larney F.J., Selinger L.J. (1996): A proposed method for measuring the effect of soil quality on soil productivity. Agronomy Journal, 88: 497-500. Go to original source...
  22. Schjonning P., Elmholt S., Christensen B.T. (2004): Managing Soil Quality: Challenges in Modern Agriculture. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 315-333. Go to original source...
  23. Vopravil J., Novák P. et al. (1995-2008): Soil Characteristics and Properties Data Base System of the Czech Republic. RISWC, Prague. (in Czech)
  24. Wander M.M., Walter G.L., Nissen T.M., Bollero G.A., Andrews S.S. (2002): Soil Quality: Science and Progress. Agronomy Journal, 94: 23-32. Go to original source...
  25. Warkentin B.P. (1992): Soil science for environmental quality - how do we know what we know. Journal of Environmental Quality, 21: 163-166. Go to original source...
  26. WRB (2006): World Reference Base for Soil Resources. ISRIC - FAO, Rome.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.