Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 2003, 39(1):9-14 | DOI: 10.17221/3715-CJGPB

Effect of Genotype and Explant Type on Shoot Regeneration in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in vitro

J. Gubiš, Z. Lajchová, J. Faragó, Z. Jureková
1 Slovak Republic
2 Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Research Institute of Plant Production in Piešťany, Slovak Republic
3 Laboratory of Explant Cultures and Biomolecular Methods, Slovak University of Agriculture, Slovak Republic

The regeneration capacity of six types of explants (segments from hypocotyl, cotyledons, epicotyl, leaf, internodes and petiole) was compared in 13 cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Explants were cultured on a regeneration medium containing 1 mg/l zeatin and 0.1 mg/l indole-3-acetic acid. The number of shoot primordia and shoots with 1 or more fully developed leaves was evaluated after 6 weeks. The regeneration capacity was significantly influenced by cultivars and explant types. The total number of shoot primordia produced in all types of explants was highest in the cultivars Hana and Premium and lowest in UC 82 and Money Marker. Cv. Hana also produced the highest number of shoots. The most responsive explants in most cultivars were hypocotyls and epicotyls with up to 100% regeneration and mean production of 6.3 and 6.5 shoot primordia per explant, respectively.

Keywords: culture in vitro; organogenesis; Murashige-Skoog medium; indole-3-acetic acid; zeatin

Published: March 31, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gubiš J, Lajchová Z, Faragó J, Jureková Z. Effect of Genotype and Explant Type on Shoot Regeneration in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in vitro. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed.. 2003;39(1):9-14. doi: 10.17221/3715-CJGPB.
Download citation

References

  1. A M.A.M., K M.F.M., M R.E.A., S S.Y., E -S A.M.A. (1994): Somatic embryogenesis in berseem (Trifolium alexanderinum L.): the influence of genetic background. Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol., 23: 131-141.
  2. A I., G C., S E., R L., M V. (2001): In vitro plant regeneration and gene transfer in the wild tomato Lycopersicon cheesmanii. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol., 76: 413-418. Go to original source...
  3. A N., M S., K O., S M. (1995): High frequency regeneration of diploids from apical end of cultured hypocotyl tissue in tomato. Breeding Sci., 15: 455-459. Go to original source...
  4. B L., L B. (2000): Phytochrome A and phytochrome B1 control the acquisition of competence for shoot regeneration in tomato hypocotyl. Plant Cell Rep., 19: 604-609. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. B C., B G., D P., R A., B M. (1990): Auxin structure and activity on tomato morphogenesis in vitro and pea stem elongation. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 24: 105-114. Go to original source...
  6. C M.E., V R.E. (1991): Shoot, root and flower morphogenesis on tomato inflorescence explants. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 24: 223-231. Go to original source...
  7. F A., E E.D. (1996): An examination of factors affecting the efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato. Plant Cell Rep., 16: 235-240. Go to original source...
  8. H -F E. (2001): Studies on the reaction in tissue culture of tomato genotypes under biotic stress. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol., 70: 5-10. Go to original source...
  9. I K., O M. (1995): Stimulation of shoot regeneration from cotyledon segments of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) by agar and its extract. J. Jpn Soc. Hortic. Sci., 64: 135-141. Go to original source...
  10. L K. (1992): Genetic manipulation of crop plants. J. Biotechnol., 26: 1-28. Go to original source...
  11. L H-Q., K D., G M.W. (1998): Effect of ticarcillin/potassium clavulanate on callus growth and shoot regeneration in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Plant Cell Rep., 17: 843-847. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. M R.E.A., S H., F K. (1999): Plant regeneration from hypocotyl and cotyledon explant of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 45: 639-646. Go to original source...
  13. M T., S F. (1962): A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plantarum, 15: 473-497. Go to original source...
  14. N F.T.S., C M.G., F M.L., O W.C., F F.L. (2001): In vitro regenerations of "Santa Clara" tomato plantlets and its natural mutant "Firme". Sci. Agrotec., Lavras, 25: 36-71.
  15. P L.E.P., M P.G., V C., K J.E., S M-A. (2001): Shoot regeneration capacity from roots and transgenic hairy roots of tomato cultivars and wild related species. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 65: 37-44.
  16. P G.C., C G.B. (1984): Red clover and other forage crops. In: S W.R., E D.A., A P.V., Y Y. (eds): Hand Book of Plant Cell Culture. Macmillan Publ. Co., New York: 169-210.
  17. R B.M. (1999): Desing a micropropagation system: Workshop presentation from the 1998 SIVB Congr. on in vitro Biology. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.-Plant, 35: 275-284. Go to original source...
  18. V R J.S.C., D B., M L.S., H A. (1993): Factors influencing transformation frequency of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Plant Cell Rep., 12: 644-647. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Y R., K V., W E.G. (1987): Clonal propagation in vitro from immature embryos and flower buds of Lycopersicon peruvianum and L. esculentum. Plant Sci., 52: 237-242. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.