Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 2005, 41(3):96-104 | DOI: 10.17221/3667-CJGPB

Grains of Nontraditional Crops as Sources of Retrograded Resistant Starch

D Mikulíková, I Čičová, G Antalíková, J Kraic
Institute of Applied Genetics and Breeding, Research Institute of Plant Production, Piešťany, Slovak Republic

The content of retrograded resistant starch of the RS3 type was determined in six plant species and their accessions. Besides sorghum and foxtail millet, plant genotypes were cultivated in Piešťany locality in the year 2003. There were significant differences in RS3 and total starch content in analysed crops and their accessions. Chickpea and buckwheat had the highest average content of RS3, 5.2% and 3.8%, respectively. Millet and foxtail millet contained less RS3, 2.9% and 2.8%, respectively. Millet was rich in total starch. The lowest amounts of RS3 were detected in sorghum (1.6%) and amaranth (1.2%). The lowest variation in the RS3 content was detected within the set of millet accessions and the highest within amaranths.

Keywords: resistant starch; retrograded starch; amaranth; buckwheat; chickpea; foxtail millet; millet; sorghum

Published: September 30, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mikulíková D, Čičová I, Antalíková G, Kraic J. Grains of Nontraditional Crops as Sources of Retrograded Resistant Starch. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed.. 2005;41(3):96-104. doi: 10.17221/3667-CJGPB.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. A G., T D.L. (1994): Nutritional role of resistant starch: chemical structure vs. physiological function. Annual Review of Nutrition, 14: 297-320. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. A N.G., B I. (1992): Resistant starch. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 3: 111-114. Go to original source...
    3. B L.A., R -D P. (1998): Retrogradation of amaranth starch at different storage temperatures and the effects of salt and sugars. Cereal Chemistry, 75: 308-314. Go to original source...
    4. B K.M., H J.C. (1995): Effect of long-term consumption of amylose vs. amylopectin starch on metabolic variables in human subjects. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 61: 334-340. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. B K.M., S D.J., Y I., C J. (1989): Diets containing high amylose vs. amylopectin starch: effects on metabolic variables in human subjects. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 49: 337-344. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. B I., L H., Ö E. (2000): Low glycaemic index foods. British Journal of Nutrition, 83: 149-155. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. B R.A., B J.D., S A.M., B M.K., T H. (1995): Starch branching enzyme belonging to distinct enzyme families are differentially expressed. Plant Physiology, 7: 3-15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. E H.N., K S.M. (1990): Dietary fibre and resistant starch. A nutritional classification of plant polysaccharides. In: K D., B C., A J. W. (eds): Dietary Fibre: Chemistry, Physiology, and Health Effects. Plenum Press, New York, 512.
    9. E H.N., K J.H. (1992): Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 46: 33-50.
    10. H G., D L., L J., S A., V V. (1992): Izolácia škrobu zo zrna láskavca metlitého. Bulletin potravinárskeho výskumu, 31: 79-87.
    11. H M.J. (1995): Bacterial fermentation of complex carbohydrate in the human colon. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 4: 353-358. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. H A.C., S B. (1996): Research needs for establishing the safety of functional foods. Nutrition Review, 54: 143-148. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. H S., G A., D G., A H., B H.P., C S.U., K H., S W. (1998): Effect of resistant starch on the colon in healthy volunteers. Possible implication for cancer prevention. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 67: 136-142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. K P., M J. (2000): Composition and nutritional value of amaranth seeds. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 18: 201-206. Go to original source...
    15. L H., B I. (1994): Bioavailability of starch in bread products. Postprandial glucose and insulin response in healthy subjects in vitro resistant starch content. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 48: 151- 163.
    16. L S., M J.E., S M.J., H M.D., H F.B., H S.E., W W.C. (2001): Dietary glycaemic load assessed by food frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma high-densitylipoprotein cholesterol and fasting plasma triacylglycerols. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73: 560-566. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. M C B.V., M N M., R P. (2002): Measurement of resistant starch by enzymatic digestion in starch and selected plant materials: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 85: 1103-1111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. M P.B., C M.R. (1996): Short-chain fa y acid in the human colon. Relation to gastrointestinal health and disease. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 31: 132-148. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. O K., S S. (1981): Glutinous and nonglutinous starches in perisperm of grain amaranths. Cereal Research Communications, 9: 305-310.
    20. P M.A., J D.R., P J.J., R S.K., G M.D., S J.L., S E.R. (2002): Effect of whole grains on insulin sensitivity in overweight hyperinsulinemic adults. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 75: 848-855. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. P Y. (1992): Research and development regarding enzyme resistant starch (RS) in the USA - a review. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 46: 63-68.
    22. P J. (1991): Biology and molecular biology of starch synthesis and its regulation. Oxford Surveys of Plant Molecular and Cell Biology, 7: 59-114. Go to original source...
    23. Q J., R -D P., G L. (1998): Partial characterization of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) starch. Cereal Chemistry, 75: 365-373. Go to original source...
    24. S M., W S., F N. (1983): Molecular identification and isolation of the waxy locus in maize. Cell, 35: 225-233. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. S K.R., E H.N., C J.H. (1995): Ileal recovery of starch from whole diets containing resistant starch measured in vitro and fermentation of ileal effluent. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 62: 403-411. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. S V., K I. (1998): Resistant starch formation following autoclaving of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) groats. An in vitro study. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 46: 2020-2023. Go to original source...
    27. S V., L H.N., K I. (1998): Effects of hydrothermal processing of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) groats on starch enzymatic availability in vitro and in vivo in rats. Journal of Cereal Science, 28: 209-214. Go to original source...
    28. S -S M, F L., F J. (1984): Characterization of buckwheat grain starch and the effect of hydrothermal processing upon its chemical composition, properties and structure. Starch, 36: 153-158. Go to original source...
    29. S P.S., R D.S., S P.S. (1993): Genetic isolation, cloning and analysis of mutatorinduced dominant antimorph of maize amyloseextender 1 locus. Plant Cell, 5: 1556-1566. Go to original source...
    30. S J., P Y. (1991): Starch and enzymeresistant starch from high-amylose barley. Cereal Chemistry, 68: 589-596.
    31. T J., F A., B I., A N.G. (1990): Starch content and α-amylolysis rate in precooked legume flours. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 38: 488-493. Go to original source...
    32. W W., M J., L S. (2002): Glycaemic index, glycaemic load and risk of type 2 diabetes. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 76: 74-280.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content