Czech J. Food Sci., 2012, 30(4):377-384 | DOI: 10.17221/314/2010-CJFS

Germination index as an indicator of malting potential

Helena Frančáková, Miriam Líšková, Tatiana Bojňanská, Ján Mareček
Department of Storing and Processing of Plant Products, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovak Republic

The malting industry requires malt with a high extract yield, high levels of enzyme activity, and good modification to manufacture beer of excellent quality. The basic raw material for the beer production is the malting barley whose quality is of primary significance. Therefore, barley must be able to germinate vigorously and be post-harvest mature to meet these requirements. We find out to what extent barley physiological parameters influence the changes of malt technological parameters during post-harvest storage. The malt technological parameters investigated were the extract, relative extract at 45°C, Kolbach index, apparent final attenuation, friability, and wort β-glucan in relation to the germination energy and germination index. On the basis of the results obtained, it was found out that the germination index is the most suitable physiological parameter in view of the correlations with malt technological parameters, mainly the extract (r = 0.57) and relative extract at 45°C (r = 0.77). The germination index could be therefore used in the malting industry as a suitable indicator of the malting potential.

Keywords: barley; germination; malt; technological parameters

Published: August 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Frančáková H, Líšková M, Bojňanská T, Mareček J. Germination index as an indicator of malting potential. Czech J. Food Sci.. 2012;30(4):377-384. doi: 10.17221/314/2010-CJFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Bamforth C.W., Barclay A.H.P. (1993): Malting technology and the uses of malt. In: MacGregor A.W., Bhatty R.S. (eds): Barley: Chemistry and Technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists Inc., St. Paul: 297-354.
  2. Briggs D.E. (1995): Aspects of Dormancy. Pauls Malt, London: 31-35.
  3. Burger W.C., Laberge D.E. (1985): Malting and brewing quality. In: Rasmusson D.C. (ed.): Barley Agronomy Monograph. No. 26. ASACSSA-SSSA, Madison: 387. Go to original source...
  4. Carreck N.L., Christian D.G. (1997): A study of grain dormancy and viability in spring barley. European Journal of Agronomy, 6: 155-161. Go to original source...
  5. Chandra G.S., Proudlove M.O., Baxter E.D. (1999): The structure of barley endosperm - an important determinant of malt modification. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 79: 37-46. Go to original source...
  6. Coles G., Haslemore R., Hay A., Boone J., Fautrier A. (1996): Barley maltability - definition and prediction. In: Proceedings 46th Australian Cereal Chemistry Conference. Sydney, NSW, Australia: 176-179.
  7. Enari T.M., Sopanen T. (1968): Mobilisation of endospermal reserves during the germination of barley - Centenary review. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 92: 25-31. Go to original source...
  8. EBC (1998): Analytica-EBC, EBC-Analysis. European Brewery Convention. Fachverlag Hans Carl, Nurnberg.
  9. Frančáková H., Líšková M. (2009): Dormancy of malting barley in relation to physiological parameters of barley grain. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, 12: 20-23.
  10. Larsenet J. (1994): Targets for tailored breeding. In: Symposium Malting Technology, Andernach, European Brewing Convention. Monograph. Fachverlag Hans Carl, Nürnberg: 152-164.
  11. Li Y., Schwarz P.B., Barr J.M., Horsley R.D. (2008): Factors predicting malt extract within a single cultivar. Journal of Cereal Science, 48: 531-538. Go to original source...
  12. Lu M.Q., O'Brien L., Stuart I.M. (2000): Barley malting quality and yield interrelationships and the effect on yield distribution of selection for malting barley quality in early generations. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 51: 247-258. Go to original source...
  13. Mareček J., Sychra L., Psota V. (2000): Long-term storage of malting barley and its effect on grain quality. Acta Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendeleianae Brunensis, XLVIII (5): 61-67.
  14. Molina-Cano J.L., Ramo T., Ellis R.P., Swanston J.S., Bain H., Uribe-Echeverria T., Perez-Vederell A.M. (1995a): Effect of grain composition on water uptake by malting barley: A genetic and environmental study. Journal of Institute of Brewing, 101: 79-83. Go to original source...
  15. Molina-Cano J.L., Francesch M., Perez-Vendrell A.M., Ramo T., Voltas J., Brufau J. (1995b): Genetic and environmental variation in malting and feed quality of barley. Journal of Cereal Science, 25: 37-47. Go to original source...
  16. Mebak (2006): Mitteleuropäische Brautechnische Analysenkommision: Brautechnische Analysenmethoden Band Rohstoffe 3.1.4.11 Maischemethode nach HartongKretschmer VZ 45°C, 65°C-Meische Selbstverlag der MEBAK, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany. Available at http://www.mebak.org/analyse_rohstoffe-e.php
  17. Moller B. (2004): Screening analyses for quality criteria in barley. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Department of Food Science, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
  18. Munck L., Moller B. (2004): A new germinative classification model of barley for prediction of malt quality amplified by a near infrared transmission spectroscopy calibration for vigour "on-line" both implemented by multivariate data analysis. Journal Institute of Brewing, 110: 2-17. Go to original source...
  19. Palmer G.H. (2000): Malt performance is more related to inhomogeneity of protein and β-glucan breakdown than to standard malt analyses. Journal of Institute of Brewing, 106: 189-192. Go to original source...
  20. Prokeš J. (2003): Dormance ječmene v letech 2001 a 2002. Kvasný průmysl, 49: 293-294. Go to original source...
  21. Reuss R., Cassells J., Green J., Willis T., Nischwitz R. (2006): The effect of storage conditions on post-harvest maturation and maltability of barley. In: Proceedings 12 th Australian Barley Technical Symposium. Hobart, Australia.
  22. Riss P., Bang-Olsen K. (1991): Germination profile - A new term in malting barley analysis. In: Proceedings 23rd European Brewery Convention. Lisabon: 100-108. Go to original source...
  23. Samuro M., Morioka Y., Yumoto T., Kitamura Y., Yamazumi K. (1980): Observations on the malting quality of clipper and dampier barley varieties. In: Proceedings Institute of Brewing, 16 th Convention. Sydney, NSW, Australia: 81-89.
  24. Sychra L., Psota V., Mareček J. (2001): Effect of longterm storage of malting barley on malt quality. Monatsschrift für Brauwissenschaft, 54: 114.
  25. Swanston J.S., Taylor K. (1990): The effects of different steeping regimes on water uptake, germination rate, milling energy and hot water extract. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 96: 3-6. Go to original source...
  26. Woods J.L., McCallum D.J. (2000): Dormancy in malting barley: Quantifying the effect of storage temperature on different varieties and the response to sudden cooling. Journal of Institute of Brewing, 106: 251-258. Go to original source...
  27. Woonton B., Jacobsen J.V., Sherkat F., Stuart I.M. (2001): Effect of post-harvest storage period on barley germination and malt quality. In: Proceedings 10th Australian Barley Technical Symposium, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
  28. Woonton B., Jacobsen J.V., Sherkat F., Stuart I.M. (2005a): Changes in germination and malting quality during storage of barley. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 111: 33-41. Go to original source...
  29. Woonton B., Sherkat F., Maharjan P. (2005b): The influence of barley storage on respiration and glucose6-phosphate dehydrogenase during malting. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 111: 388-395. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.