Res. Agr. Eng., 2010, 56(1):26-32 | DOI: 10.17221/18/2009-RAE

An ultrasound based technique for the determination of poultry egg quality

M. Aboonajmi1, A. Akram1, T. Nishizu2, N. Kondo3, S.K. Setarehdan4, A. Rajabipour1
1 Faculty of Biosystem Engineering, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
2 Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan
3 Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto city, Japan
4 Control and Intelligent Processing Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

The present study investigates the possibility of the non-destructive prediction of the main quality indices of commercial eggs by calculating the ultrasound phase velocity within the egg material. The phase velocity of the ultrasound signal in the egg material was determined by analysing the recorded ultrasound signals using the Fast Fourier Transform. Three hundred commercial eggs (Boris Brown, 33 weeks age) from the first day of egg laying were purchased from a farm and divided in two groups. The first group was kept at the room temperature (22-25°C) and the second group was kept in a refrigerator (5°C). Every week, 25 eggs from both the room and the refrigerator were first submitted to the non-destructive ultrasound test at weekly basis at the room temperature. Immediately after testing, the air cell, the thick albumen heights, the Haugh unit and the yolk index of the eggs were also determined destructively for the comparison purposes. The results were analysed to find any possible correlation between the computed ultrasonic phase velocity and the destructive parameters, during a storage period of five weeks. The tests were carried out using an ultrasound beam with a frequency of 150 kHz with a sampling rate of 2.5 Gs/S on the eggs under a controlled temperature situation. Significant differences between the means of the destructive analysis on different days of the eggs storage were found using ANOVA. The results showed that the phase velocity significantly differs between the eggs stored at the room temperature and those stored in the refrigerator. It was found that the phase velocity decreased as the storage time of the eggs increased in three consecutive weeks.

Keywords: phase velocity; poultry egg; quality; ultrasound; freshness

Published: March 31, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Aboonajmi M, Akram A, Nishizu T, Kondo N, Setarehdan SK, Rajabipour A. An ultrasound based technique for the determination of poultry egg quality. Res. Agr. Eng.. 2010;56(1):26-32. doi: 10.17221/18/2009-RAE.
Download citation

References

  1. Cotterill O.J, Winter A.R., 1955. Egg white lysozime. The effect of pH on the lysozime-ovomucine interaction. Poultry Science, 34: 679-686. Go to original source...
  2. Curtis P.A., Gardner F.A., Mellor D.B., 1986. A comparison of selected quality and compositional characteristics of brown and white shell eggs. III. Compositional and nutritional characteristics. Poultry Science, 65: 501-507. Go to original source...
  3. Donovan J.W., Davis J.G., Wiele M.B., 1972. Viscosimetric studies of alkaline degradation of ovomucin. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 20: 223-228. Go to original source...
  4. Ducay E.D., Kline L., Mandeles S., 1960. Free amino acid content of infertile chicken eggs. Poultry Science, 39: 831-835. Go to original source...
  5. EC (Commission Regulation) No. 2295/2003, December 23, 2003: Official Journal of the European Union L 340/16.
  6. Fromm D., Matrone G., 1962. A rapid method for evaluating the strength of the vitelline membrane of the hen's egg yolk. Poultry Science, 41: 1516-1521. Go to original source...
  7. Funk E.M., 1948. The relation of the yolk index determined in natural position to the yolk index, as determined after separating the yolk from the albumen. Poultry Science, 27: 367. Go to original source...
  8. Haugh R.R., 1937. A new method for determining the quality of an egg. US Egg Poultry, 39: 27-49.
  9. Hill A.T., Hall J.W., 1980. Effects of various combinations of oil spraying, washing, sanitizing, storage time, strain, and age upon albumen quality changes in storage and minimum sample sizes required for their measurement. Poultry Science, 59: 2237-2242. Go to original source...
  10. Javanaud C., 1988. Applications of ultrasound to food systems. Ultrasonic, 26: 117-123. Go to original source...
  11. Karoui R., Kemps B.F., Bamelis, De Ketelaere B., Decuypere E., De Baerdemaeker J., 2006. Method to evaluate egg freshness in research and industry: A review. Eurpean Food Research and Technology, 222: 727-732. Go to original source...
  12. Kato A., Ogata S., Matsudomi N., Kobayashi K., 1981. Comparative study of aggregated and disaggregated ovomucin during egg white thinning. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 9: 821-823. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Knorr D., Zenker M., Heinz V., Dong-Un L., 2004. Application and potential of ultrasonics in food processing. Trend in Food Science and Technology, 15: 261-266. Go to original source...
  14. Li-Chan E., Nakai S., 1989. Biochemical basis for the properties of egg white. Poultry Biology, 2: 21-50.
  15. McClements D.J., 1994. Ultrasonic NDT of foods and drinks. In: McGonnagle, W.J. (ed.), In International Advances in Nondestructive Testing. Yverdon, Gordon and Breach Science, 17: 63-95.
  16. McClements D.J., 1995. Advances in the application of ultrasound in food analysis and processing. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 6: 293-299. Go to original source...
  17. Povey M.J.W., Wilkinson C., 1980. Application of the ultrasonic pulse echo technique to egg albumen quality testing: A preliminary report. British Poultry Science, 21: 489-495. Go to original source...
  18. Povey M.J.W., McClements D.J., 1988. Ultrasonics in food engineering: part I. Introduction and experimental methods. Journal of Food Engineering, 8: 217-245. Go to original source...
  19. Robinson D.S., Monsey J.B., 1972. Changes in the composition of ovomucin during liquefaction of thick egg white, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 23: 29-38. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Robinson E., Chokyun L.R., 1981. Apparent shear viscosity of native egg white. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 17: 595-606. Go to original source...
  21. Romanoff A.L., Romanoff A., 1949. The Avian Egg. New York, John Wiley and Sons.
  22. Stadelman W.J., Cotterill O.J., 1995. Egg Science and Technology. 4th Ed. New York, Food Product Press.
  23. Thapon J.L., Bourgeois C.M., 1994. L'śuf et les ovoproduits. Technique et Documentation (Lavoisier), Paris.
  24. USDA (United State Department of Agriculture), 1995. United States Standards, grades, and weight classes for shell eggs. Washington, D.C., USA.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.