Plant Soil Environ., 2013, 59(6):241-246 | DOI: 10.17221/704/2012-PSE

Effects of chitinase-transgenic (McChit1) tobacco on the rhizospheric microflora and enzyme activities of the purple soil

B. Wang1, H. Shen1, X. Yang2, T. Guo1, B. Zhang1, W. Yan1
1 College of Resources and Environments, Southwest University, Chongqing, P.R. China
2 College of Life Science, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, P.R. China

In order to evaluate the bio-security of genetically modified (GM) plants in the purple soil, we carried out a pot experiment about rhizospheric microflora at different development stages of a chitinase-transgenic (McChit1) tobacco (T-Chit), a plasmid-transgenic tobacco (T-Vi), and a non-transgenic tobacco (Nt-X) that were grown in the same purple soil, and surveyed the growth of three tobaccos and the properties of soil (i.e. the dynamic changes of the cultivable rhizospheric bacteria and fungi, soil enzyme activity and pH). The results showed that, compared with Nt-X plant as a control, T-Chit and T-Vi at the stages of flowering and mature significantly decreased the number of cultivable rhizospheric bacteria, but at their stubble stage the bacteria number returned to the same levels. Moreover, there were no significant differences about the number of cultivable rhizospheric fungi and the ratio of fungi to bacteria (F/B) among three treatments. It was of interest that soil catalase activities of T-Chit and T-Vi were lower than that of Nt-X during the same period, and urease activities of T-Vi and T-Chit were also lower than that of Nt-X at the stages of budding and stubble. Protease activity and the biomass of tobacco, however, showed no significant difference. This indicated that 1-year-old transgenic tobacco plants (T-Vi and T-Chit) inhibited the catalase and urease activities of the purple soil. In conclusion, the results revealed that 1-year-old T-Chit and T-Vi plants were non-toxic to the colony-forming units of cultivable bacteria and fungi in the studied purple soil during tobacco growth.

Keywords: GM tobacco; chitinase; soil ecosystem; soil microbe; enzymatic activity

Published: June 30, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Wang B, Shen H, Yang X, Guo T, Zhang B, Yan W. Effects of chitinase-transgenic (McChit1) tobacco on the rhizospheric microflora and enzyme activities of the purple soil. Plant Soil Environ.. 2013;59(6):241-246. doi: 10.17221/704/2012-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Castaldini M., Turrini A., Sbrana C., Benedetti A., Marchionni M., Mocali S., Fabiani A., Landi S., Santomassimo F., Pietrangeli B., Nuti M., Miclaus N., Giovannetti M. (2005): Impact of Bt corn on rhizospheric and on beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis and soil eubacterial communities iosis in experimental microcosms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71: 6719-6729. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Chen Z., Chen L., Wu Z. (2012): Relationships among persistence of Bacillus thuringiensis and Cowpea trypsin inhibitor proteins, microbial properties and enzymatic activities in rhizosphere soil after repeated cultivation with transgenic cotton. Applied Soil Ecology, 53: 23-30. Go to original source...
  3. Cook J. (1999): Science-based risk assessment for the approval and use of plants in agricultural and other environment. In: Proceedings of an International Conference Washington, D.C., 21-22 October, 123-130.
  4. Dunfield K.E., Germida J.J. (2004): Impact of genetically modified crops on soil- and plant-associated microbial communities. Journal of Environmental Quality, 33: 806-815. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Flores S., Saxena D., Stotzky G. (2005): Transgenic Bt plants decompose less in soil than non-Bt plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37: 1073-1082. Go to original source...
  6. He Y. (2003): Purple Soils in China. Science Press of China, Beijing.
  7. Ibekwe A.M., Kennedy A.C., Frohne P.S., Papiernik S.K., Yang C.H., Crowley D.E. (2002): Microbial diversity along a transect of agronomic zones. Federation of European Microbiological Societies Microbiology Ecology, 39: 183-191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. James C. (2011): Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2011. International Service for the Acquisition of AgriBiotech Applications, 43.
  9. Johnson J., Temple K.L. (1964): Some variables affecting the measurement of 'catalase activity in soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 28: 207-209. Go to original source...
  10. Jun T.H., Mian M.A.R., Freewalt K., Mittapalli O., Michel A.P. (2012): Development of genic-SSRs markers from soybean aphid sequences generated by high-throughput sequencing of cDNA library. Journal of Applied Entomology, 136: 614-625. Go to original source...
  11. Ladd J., Butler J. (1972): Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 4: 19-30. Go to original source...
  12. Liu W., Lu H.H., Wei Q.K., Chen Y.X, Thies J.E. (2008): Transgenic Bt rice does not affect enzyme activities and microbial composition in the rhizosphere during crop development. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40: 475-486. Go to original source...
  13. Losey J.E., Rayor L.S., Carter M.E. (1999): Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature, 399: 214. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Luo X., Zeng X., Xiao Y., Luo M., Yang X., Pei Y. (2005): Overexpression of antimicrobial peptide genes and a chitinase gene in transgenic tobacco enhances resistance to Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae and Alternaria alternata. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 35: 249-255. (In Chinese)
  15. Nap J.P., Metz P.L.J., Escaler M., Conner A.J. (2003): The release of genetically modified crops into the environment - Part I. Overview of current status and regulations. Plant Journal, 33: 1-18. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Saxena D., Stotzky G. (2001): Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin released from root exudates and biomass of Bt corn has no apparent effect on earthworms, nematodes, protozoa, bacteria, and fungi in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33: 1225-1230. Go to original source...
  17. Siciliano S.D., Germida J.J. (1999): Taxonomic diversity of bacteria associated with the roots of field-grown transgenic Brassica napus cv. Quest, compared to the non-transgenic B. napus cv. Excel and B. rapa cv. Parkland. Federation of European Microbiological Societies Microbiology Ecology, 29: 263-272. Go to original source...
  18. Tabatabai M. (1994): Soil enzymes. In: Weaver R.W., Angle S., Bottomley P., Bezdicek D., Smith S., Tabatabai A., Wollum A. (eds): Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and Biochemical Properties. Soil Science Society of America: 797-798. Go to original source...
  19. Taylor D.L., Michael G.B., Jack W.M., Herriott I.C., Niall L., Chad N., Thomas M. (2008): Increasing ecological inference from high throughput sequencing of fungi in the environment through a tagging approach. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8: 742-752. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Wei M., Tan F., Zhu H., Cheng K., Wu X. (2012): Impact of Bt-transgenic rice (SHK601) on soil ecosystems in the rhizosphere during crop development. Plant, Soil and Environment, 58: 217-223. Go to original source...
  21. Wu W.X., Ye Q.F., Min H., Duan X.J., Jin W.M. (2004): Bt-transgenic rice straw affects the culturable microbiota and dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities in a flooded paddy soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36: 289-295. Go to original source...
  22. Xiao Y.H., Li X.B., Yang X.Y., Luo M., Hou L., Guo S.H., Luo X.Y., Pei Y. (2007): Cloning and characterization of a balsam pear class I chitinase gene (Mcchit1) and its ectopic expression enhances fungal resistance in transgenic plants. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 71: 1211-1219. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Ye W., Zhang W.Q., Zhou P.X., Xie J.Z., Zhang Y.L. (1983): Experimental Methods of Soil Microbes. Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.