Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access
Total views : 1286

Demographic Factors Impacting the Financial Risk Tolerance of Retail Investors of Urban West Bengal

Affiliations

  • Research Scholar, Department of Management Studies, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur - 713 209, West Bengal, India
  • Professor, Department of Management Studies, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur - 713 209, West Bengal, India

Abstract


Prior knowledge of willingness or capacity to take financial risks of a retail investor can be very useful in targeting potential clients for investment agencies offering various low, medium, or high risk instruments for investment. Previous research has showed that the financial risk tolerance (FRT) of an individual is influenced by several demographic factors of the individual such as age, gender, marital status, education, profession, income, number of dependents in the family, etc. The capacity also varies from country to country and place to place within a country. Hence, knowledge of the demographic data of the individual can help researchers to understand how each of these factors impact the retail investors residing in a particular place, city, or a state in taking financial risk. In this paper, we collected primary demographic data from 2000 residents of Kolkata, Asansol, and Durgapur, the three major cities of the state of West Bengal in India with an aim to find out the impact of each of these demographic factors of the respondents (the potential retail investors) on their tolerance to financial risk. The primary data were analyzed using logistic regression method which revealed gender and profession as the two demographic factors that had the most significant impact on the FRT of the retail investors; whereas, income and number of dependents had a negligible impact.

Keywords

Logistic Regression Analysis, Financial Risk Tolerance, Investor Behavior, Demographic Factors, Logistic Regression, Retail Investor.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 1)

References


  • Bayer, P. J., Bernheim, B. D., & Scholz, J. K. (2009). The effects of financial education in the workplace: Evidence from a survey of employers. Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, 47(4), 605-624. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00156.x
  • Blais, A. R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgement and Decision Making, 1(1), 33-47.
  • Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking : A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383.
  • Chang, C. (2004). The interplay of product class knowledge and trial experience in attitude formation. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 83-92.
  • Chen, H., & Volpe, R. P. (1998). An analysis of personal financial literacy among college students. Financial Services Review, 7(2), 107-128.
  • Cohen, J. B. (1982). The role of affect in categorization: Towards a reconstruction of the concept of attitude. In, A. Mitchell (ed.), Advances in consumer research. USA : Ann Arbor.
  • Cook, W., & Whittle, R. (2015). Do individuals' risk and time preferences predict entrepreneurial choice ? (MPRA Paper No. 66674). Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/66674.html
  • Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448-474.
  • D'Zurilla, T. J., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Kant, G. L. (1998). Age and gender differences in social problem-solving ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 241-252.
  • Dangi, M., & Kohli, B. (2018). Role of behavioral biases in investment decisions : A factor analysis. Indian Journal of Finance, 12(3), 43-57. https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2018/v12i3/121997
  • Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioural consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522-550.
  • Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625-635.
  • Gautam, S., & Matta, M. (2016). A study of socio-demographic and attitudinal factors on consumer behavior by individual investors in the Indian context. Indian Journal of Finance, 10(7), 48-59. https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2016/v10i7/97256
  • Grable, J. E. (2000). Financial risk tolerance and additional factors that affect risk taking in every day money matters. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(4), 625-630.
  • Grable, J. E., & Joo, S.-H. (2004). Environmental and biopsychosocial factors associated with financial risk tolerance. Journal of Financial Counselling and Planning, 15(1), 73-82.
  • Grable, J., & Lytton, R. H. (1999). Financial risk tolerance revisited : The development of a risk assessment instrument. Financial Services Review 8(3), 163-181.
  • Hallahan, T., Faff, R., & McKenzie, M. (2003). An exploratory investigation of the relation between risk tolerance scores and demographic characteristics. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 13(4), 483-502.
  • Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644-1655.
  • Isidore, R. R., & Christie, P. (2018). Investment behavior of secondary equity investors : An examination of the relationship among the biases. Indian Journal of Finance, 12(9), 7-20. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.17010/ijf/2018/v12i9/131556
  • Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36(4), 620-630.
  • Junkus, J. C., & Berry, T. C. (2010). The demographic profile of socially responsible investors. Managerial Finance, 36(6), 474-481.
  • Kannadhasan, M. (2015). Retail investors' financial risk tolerance and their risk-taking behavior : The role of demographics as differentiating and classifying factors. IIMB Management Review, 27(3), 175-184.
  • MacCrimmon, K. R., & Wehrung, D. A. (1986). Taking risks: The management of uncertainty. New York : Free Press.
  • Niessen, A., & Ruenzi, S. (2007). Sex matters: Gender differences in a professional setting (Working Papers 06-01). Cologne : Center for Financial Research (CFR), University of Cologne.
  • Paramashivaiah, P., Puttaswamy, & Ramya, S. K. (2014). Changing risk perception of women investors: An empirical study. Indian Journal of Finance 8(6), 22-33. https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2014/v8i6/71909
  • Raut, R. K., & Das, N. (2015). Behavioral prospects of individual investor decision making process: A review. Indian Journal of Finance, 9(4), 44-55. https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2015/v9i4/71457
  • Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (USA), 106(36), 15268-15273.
  • Schooley, D. K., & Worden, D. D. (1999). Investors' asset allocations vs. life-cycle funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), 37-43.
  • Shtudiner, Z. (2019). Risk tolerance, time preference and financial decision-making: Differences between self-employed people and employees. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3269877
  • Tversky, A., & Kahnemann, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4), 1124-1131.
  • Weber, M., Weber, E. U., & Nosić, A. (2013). Who takes risks when and why: Determinants of changes in investor risk taking. Review of Finance, 17(3), 847-883.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.