Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spontaneous revegetation of cutwaway peatlands of North America

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern extraction methods permit peat to be extracted to the minerotrophic layer of ombrotrophic peatlands (bogs). As the environmental conditions of these harvested peatlands are similar to minerotrophic peatlands (fens), such sites should be restored towards a fen system. However, it is not known whether fen species would recolonize such harvested sites on their own. We surveyed vegetation and environmental variables in 28 harvested peatlands with minerotrophic residual peat across Canada and in Minnesota, USA, and compared them to 11 undisturbed fens. Compared to harvested bogs previously studied, the harvested fens sampled in this study revegetated remarkably quickly (50%–70% vegetation cover) when the hydrological conditions were suitable. However, revegetation was less extensive for sites that were still drained (25% vegetation cover). A high water table and a thin layer of residual peat were the most important factors contributing to rapid recolonization rates. Although the harvested fens were rapidly recolonized, species composition was not the same as observed on undisturbed fens. Carex and Sphagnum, dominant in undisturbed fens, generally did not recolonize harvested fens. Thus, whether the goal is to increase species richness or to ensure the return of peat accumulating functions, fen species may have to be actively introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Andersen, R., A.-J. Francez, and L. Rochefort. 2006. The physicochemical and microbial status of a restored bog in Québec: identification of relevant criteria to monitor success. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38: 1375–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. E. 1990. A checklist of Sphagnum in North America north of Mexico. Bryologist 93: 500–01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. E., H. A. Crum, and W. R. Buck. 1990. List of the mosses of North America north of Mexico. Bryologist 93: 448–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, B. L. and K. S. Godwin. 2003. Fens of the United States: distribution, characteristics, and scientific connection versus legal isolation. Wetlands 23: 608–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogren, K. and S. Hofer. 2001. Determination of orthophosphate in Bray or Mehlich extracts of soils by flow injection analysis. In Zellweger Analytics Lachat Instruments. Methods Manual. Quick-Chem Method 12-115-01-1-A. Zellweger Analytics, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, A. 2000. The use of natural processes in reclamation-advantages and difficulties. Landscape and Urban Planning 51: 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, R. L. and L. T. Kurtz. 1945. Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science 59: 39–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cobbaert, D., L. Rochefort, and J. Price. 2004. Experimental restoration of a fen plant community after peat mining. Applied Vegetation Science 7: 209–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. and L. MacDonald. 2000. Restoring the vegetation of mined peatlands in the southern Rocky Mountains of Colorado, USA. Restoration Ecology 8: 103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada. 2002. Canadian climate normals 1971–2000. Atmospheric Environment Service, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Famous, N. C., M. Spencer, and H. Nilsson. 1991. Revegetation patterns in harvested peatlands in central and eastern North America. p. 48–66. In D. N. Grubich and T. J. Malterer (eds.) Peat and Peatlands: The Resource and its Utilization. Proceedings of the International Peat Symposium Duluth, Minnesota, USA.

  • Girard, M., C. Lavoie, and M. Thériault. 2002. The regeneration of a highly disturbed ecosystem: a mined peatland in southern Québec. Ecosystems 5: 274–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorham, E. and J. A. Janssens. 1992. Concepts of fen and bog reexamined in relation to bryophyte cover and the acidity of surface waters. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 61: 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S., S. J. Ross, and J. H. Lawton. 1992. Beta diversity on geographic gradients in Britain. Journal of Animal Ecology 61: 151–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillel, D. 1998. Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., L. Kerschaw, and A. MacKinnon. 1995. Plants of the Western Boreal Forest and Aspen Parkland. Lone Pine Publishing, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhry, P., B. Nicholson, L. Gignac, D. Vitt, and S. E. Bayley. 1993. Development of Sphagnum-dominated peatlands in boreal continental Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanta, V., J. Dolezal, and J. Samata. 2004. Vegetation patterns in a cut-away peatland in relation to abiotic and biotic factors: a case study from the Sumava Mts., Czech Republic. Suo 55: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, C., P. Grosvernier, M. Girard, and K. Marcoux. 2003. Spontaneous revegetation of mined peatlands: a useful restoration tool? Wetlands Ecology and Management 11: 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, C. and L. Rochefort. 1996. The natural revegetation of a harvested peatland in southern Québec: a spatial and dendroecological analysis. Écoscience 3: 101–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. and E. Gallagher. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. E. 2003. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malterer, T. J., E. S. Verry, and J. Erjavec. 1992. Fiber content and degree of decomposition in peats: review of national methods. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56: 1200–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marie-Victorin, F. 1995. Flore Laurentinne (3éme Edition). Gaëtan Morin Éditeur, Boucherville, QC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehlich, A. 1984. Mehlich-3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich-2 extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 15: 1409–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Climatic Data Center. 2001. US climate normals, 1971–2000. http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/normals/usnormals.html.

  • Newmaster, S., A. Harris, and L. Kershaw. 1996. Wetland Plants of Ontario. Lone Pine Publishing, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, C. (ed.). 2000. Cutover and Cutaway Bogs Education Pack. Irish Peatland Conservation Council, Dublin, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patzelt, A., U. Wild, and J. Pfadenhauer. 2001. Restoration of wet fen meadows by topsoil removal: vegetation development and germination biology of fen species. Restoration Ecology 9: 127–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, M., L. Rochefort, F. Quinty, and C. Lavoie. 2005. Spontaneous revegetation of mined peatlands in eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 83: 539–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prach, K., B. Sandor, P. Pysek, R. van Diggelen, and G. Wiegleb. 2001. The role of spontaneous vegetation succession in ecosystem restoration: a perspective. Applied Vegetation Science 4: 111–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J., A. L. Healthwaite, and A. J. Baird. 2003. Hydrological processes in abandoned and restored peatlands: an overview of management approaches. Wetlands Ecology and Management 11: 65–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, L. 2000. Sphagnum-a keystone genus in habitat restoration. New Frontiers in Bryology and Licehnology 103: 505–08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, L., F. Quinty, S. Campeau, K. W. Johnson, and T. J. Malterer. 2003. North American approach to the restoration of Sphagnum dominated peatlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management 11: 3–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, S., T. Seeger, P. Poschlod, J. Pfadenhauer, and M. Succow. 1999. Establishment of helophytes in the course of fen restoration. Applied Vegetation Science 2: 131–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, R. 2001. The ecological restoration through natural revegetation of industrial cutaway peatlands in Ireland. Ph.D. Dissertation. University College, Dublin, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen, V. 1992. Plant colonization of harvested peat surfaces. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoch, W. H. 1988. Botanical Macro-remains. Paul Haupt Berne. Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoggan, H. J. 1978. The Flora of Canada. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjörs, H. 1952. On the relation between vegetation and electrolytes in north Swedish mire waters. Oikos 2: 241–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sliva, J. 1997. Renaturierung von industriell abgeforften Hochmooren am Beispiel der Kendlmühlfilzen. Ph.D. Dissertation. Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sliva, J. and J. Pfadenhauer. 1999. Restoration of cut-over raised bogs in southern Germany- a comparison of methods. Applied Vegetation Science 2: 137–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soro, A., S. Sundberg, and H. Rydin. 1999. Species diversity, niche metrics and species associations in harvested and undisturbed bogs. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 549–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Duren, I. C., R. K. Strykstra, A. P. Grootjans, G. N. J. ter Heerdt, and D. M. Pegtel. 1998. A multidisciplinary evaluation of restoration measures in a degraded Cirsio-Molinietum fen meadow. Applied Vegetation Science 1: 115–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitt, D. H. 2006. Functional characteristics and indicators of boreal peatlands. p. 9–24. In R. K. Wieder and D. H. Vitt (eds.) Boreal Peatland Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vitt, D. H. and W.-L. Chee. 1990. The relationship of vegetation to surface water chemistry and peat chemisty in fens of Alberta, Canada. Vegetatio 89: 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wind-Mulder, H. L., L. Rochefort, and D. H. Vitt. 1996. Water and peat chemistry comparisons of natural and post-harvested peatlands across Canada and their relevance to peatland restoration. Ecological Engineering 7: 161–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wind-Mulder, H. L. and D. H. Vitt. 2000. Comparison of water and peat chemistries of a post-harvested and undisturbed peatland with relevance to restoration. Wetlands 20: 616–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martha D. Graf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graf, M.D., Rochefort, L. & Poulin, M. Spontaneous revegetation of cutwaway peatlands of North America. Wetlands 28, 28–39 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1672/06-136.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/06-136.1

Key Words

Navigation