Skip to main content
Log in

Within-pond parameters affecting oviposition by wood frogs and spotted salamanders

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research on habitat associations of pond-breeding amphibians has used community assemblages as response variables because the intensive labor required to quantify population size is usually prohibitive. However, wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) and spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum) oviposit egg masses that can be surveyed rapidly; thus, we were able to quantify the influence of within-pond parameters on their annual breeding effort. During 2000–2001, we assessed the effects of hydroperiod, within-pond vegetation, canopy closure, hydrologic isolation, fish occurrence, and pond size on egg mass counts of wood frogs and spotted salamanders at 124 ponds in western Rhode Island. Study sites were stratified by road density, which served as an indirect measure of non-breeding habitat quality and quantity. Hydroperiod had a significant influence on annual breeding effort. Egg masses of both species were most abundant in seasonal ponds that dried between 1 August and 30 November. Breeding populations of spotted salamanders were smaller in ponds that dried before the end of July, whereas breeding populations of wood frogs were reduced in ponds that did not dry during our two-year study. Both species usually attached egg masses to shrubs or branches in shallow water near the water surface, which may explain why both species oviposited more egg masses in ponds with substantial vegetation complexity, including extensive coverage by shrubs and persistent non-woody vegetation. Although wood frogs were more likely than spotted salamanders to avoid ovipositing in ponds with fish, egg mass counts of both species were substantially reduced in ponds containing fish. Numbers of egg masses for spotted salamanders and wood frogs were similar between larger ponds and those as small as 0.05 ha and 0.15 ha, respectively. Previously, researchers proposed protecting isolated wetlands > 0.2 ha to sustain populations of pond-breeding amphibians, but our research suggests that wetlands as small as 0.05 ha may provide critical breeding habitat for some species in southern New England.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Anderson, A. M., D. A. Haukos, and J. T. Anderson. 1999. Habitat use by anurans emerging and breeding in playa wetlands. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:759–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. R., K. P. Burnham, and W. L. Thompson. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:912–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • August, P. V. A., A. J. McCann, and C. L. Labash. 1995. Geographic information systems in Rhode Island. Environmental Data Center, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA, Natural Resource Facts Fact Sheet No. 95-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt, K. J. and G. W. Tanner. 2000. Use of temporary wetlands by anurans in a hydrologically modified landscape. Wetlands 20: 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. G., J. H. Burk, W. D. Pitts, F. S. Gilliam, and M. W. Schwartz. 1999. Terrestrial Plant Ecology, Third Edition. Benjamin and Cummings. Menlo Park, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berven, K. A. 1995. Population regulation in the wood frog, Rana sylvatica, from three diverse goegraphic localities. Australian Journal of Ecology 20:385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burne, M. R. 2001. Massachusetts aerial photo survey of potential vernal pools. Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. Westborough, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, A. J. K., T. E. Walls, S. S. Stockwell, and M. McCollough. 2003. Evaluating vernal pools as a basis for conservation strategies: a Maine case study. Wetlands 23:70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, A. S. 1988. Mortality of toads (Bufo bufo) on roads near a Cambridgeshire breeding site. Bulletin of the British Herpetological Society 121:789–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L. M. V., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Biological Services Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, W. B. and W. C. Paton. 2000. Using egg-mass counts to monitor wood frog populations. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:895–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, R. S. 2001. Within-pond and landscape-level factors influencing the breeding effort of Rana sylvatica and Ambystoma maculatum. M. S. Thesis. University of Rhode Island. Kingston, RI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L., J. H. Pedlar, S. E. Pope, P. D. Taylor, and J. F. Wegner. 1995. Effects of road traffic on amphibian density. Biological Conservation 73:177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figiel, C. R. and R. D. Semlitsch. 1990. Population variation and metamorphosis of larval salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum) in the presence and absence of fish predation. Copeia 1990:818–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T. and R. D. Deblinger. 2000. The ecological road-effect zone of a Massachusetts (U.S.A.) suburban highway. Conservation Biology 14:36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formanowicz, D. R. and M. S. Bobka. 1989. Predation risk and microhabitat preference: an experimental study of the behavioral responses of prey and predator. American Midland Naturalist 121:379–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, J. E. and E. L. Thompson. 1981. Breeding habitat association of spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum) in western Maryland. The Journal of Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 97:209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P. 2000. Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 14:314–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heenar, S. J. and R. T. M. Closkey. 1997. The effects of predatory fish on amphibian species richness and distribution. Biological Conservation 79:123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopey, M. E. and J. W. Petranka. 1994. Restriction of wood frogs to fish-free habitats: how important is adult choice? Copeia 1994: 1023–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kats, L. B., J. W. Petranka, and A. Sih. 1988. Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69:1865–1870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemens, M. W. 1993. Amphibians and reptiles of Connecticut and adjacent regions. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut, New Haven, CT, USA. Bulletin Number 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, R. M., S. M. Galatowitsch, and J. R. Tester. 1999. Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. M. and P. C. Trenham. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conservation Biology 15:40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, P. W. C. and W. B. Crouch III. 2002. Using phenology of pond-breeding amphibians to develop conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 18:194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechmann, J. H. K., D. E. Scott, J. W. Gibbons, and R. D. Semlitsch. 1989. Influence of wetland hydroperiod on diversity and abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians. Wetlands Ecology and Management 1:3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, S. E., L. Fahrig, and H. G. Merriam. 2000. Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations. Ecology 81:2498–2508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, K. O. and A. L. Azous. 1995. Amphibian occurrence and wetland characteristics in the Puget Sound basin. Wetlands 15:305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, C. L. and W. A. Dunson. 1995. Impacts of hydroperiod on growth and survival of larval amphibians in temporary ponds of central Pennsylvania, USA. Oecologia 102:397–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seale, D. B. 1982. Physical factors influencing oviposition by the wood frog, Rana sylvatica, in Pennsylvania. Copeia 1982:627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seigel, R. A. and C. K. Dodd, Jr. 2002. Translocation of amphibians: proven management method or experimental technique? Conservation Biology 16:552–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R. D. 1988. Allotopic distribution of two salamanders: effects of fish predation and competitive interactions. Copeia 1988:290–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R. D. 2000. Principles for management of aquatic-breeding amphibias. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:615–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R. D. 2002. Critical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic-breeding amphibians. Conservation Biology 16:619–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R. D. and J. R. Bodie. 1998. Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conservation Biology 12:1129–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R. D., D. E. Scott, J. H. K. Pechmann, and J. W. Gibbons. 1996. Structure and dynamics of an amphibian community: evidence from a 16-year study of a natural pond. p. 217–248. In P. M. L. Cody and J. A. Smallwood (eds.) Long-Term Studies of Vertebrate Communities. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shoop, R. C. 1974. Yearly variation in larval survival of Ambystoma maculatum. Ecology 55:440–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelly, D. K. 1996. Pond drying, predators, and the distribution of Pseudacris tadpoles. Copeia 1996:599–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelly, D. K., E. E. Werner, and S. A. Cortwright. 1999. Long-term distributional dynamics of a Michigan amphibian assemblage. Ecology 80:2326–2337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. W., M. J. Komoroski, A. L. Bryan Jr., and J. Burger. 2000a. Relationships among isolated wetland size, hydroperiod, and amphibian species richness: implications for wetland regulations. Conservation Biology 14:414–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. W., A. L. Bryan, Jr., and J. Burger. 2000b. Development of expectations of larval amphibian assemblage structure in southeastern depression wetlands. Ecological Applications 10: 1219–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J. 1992. Vernal pools in Massachusetts: aerial photographic identification, biological and physiographic characteristics, and state certification. M. S. Thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelder, J. J., H. M. J. Aarts, and H.-J. W. M. Staal. 1986. Routes and speed of migrating toads (Bufo bufo): a telemetric study. Herpetological Journal 1:111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E. and K. S. Glennemeir. 1999. Influence of forest canopy cover on the breeding pond distributions of several amphibian species. Copeia 1999:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, H. M. 1980. Complex life cycles. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, H. M. and J. P. Collins. 1973. Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science 182:1305–1314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis—Fourth edition. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egan, R.S., Paton, P.W.C. Within-pond parameters affecting oviposition by wood frogs and spotted salamanders. Wetlands 24, 1–13 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0001:WPAOBW]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0001:WPAOBW]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation