Skip to main content
Log in

Contributions to the antimicrobial spectrum of hop constituents

  • Special Section on Medicinal Plants
  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humulus lupulus (hops) bitter acids, which are well known for their antimicrobial property against Gram-positive bacteria have negligible activity against Gram-negative bacteria. The hop acids are, however, antiprotozoal. Ciliated protozoa were more sensitive to hop acids than amoebae. Plasmodia were also sensitive but at a lower level than to the synthetic anti malarial drugs. Beta resin, tetra iso alpha acid and xanthohumol were studied and the latter was found to be particularly potent against the protozoa. Carbon dioxide enhanced the protozoicidal effect of hop acids. New data were also presented on specific antifungal activities. In agreement with the literature hop had very little antifungal property, however a slight coaction was seen between hop and sorbate on R. nigricans. Carbon dioxide had no enhancing effect on the inhibitory activity of hop against fungi as well as E. coli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ashurst, P. R. 1967. The chemistry of hop resins. Progress in Chemistry of Organic Natural Products. Editor L. Zechmeister. Wien. Springer-Verlag, New York. 25:63–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya et al. 2003. Inhibition of Streptococcus and Other Oral Streptococci by Hop (Humulus Lupulus L.)

  • Chin et al. 1949. Antituberculosis activity and toxicity of lupulone for the mouse. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 70: 158–162.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cyzan, F. C. 1992. Hopfen (Humulus lupulus): Morphologie und Systematik, Kultur und Kunstgeschichte Zeitschrift fuer Phytotherapie 13:141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouin, F. 1958. Die Hopfenbitterstoffe als Antibiotica. Brauwissenschaft 11:230–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas G. J., and E. Herman. 1977a. Pet food preservation. U.S. Patent 4,049,835.

  • Haas G. J., and E. Herman. 1977b. Pet food preservation. U.S. Patent 4,048,342.

  • Haas G. J., and P. D. Mathews. 2002. The Effect of High Pressure Carbon Dioxide on Microorganisms. Chapter VIII in Control of Foodborne Microorganisms. Pages 235–244 in Vijay K. Juneja and John Sofos, eds.

  • —, and R. Barsoumian. 1994. Antimicrobial activity of hop resins. Journal of Food Protection 57(1):59–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harpstrite, S. E., A. A. Beatty, A. D. Collins, A. Oksman, D. E. Goldberg, and V. Sharma 2003. Metalloantimalarials: Targeting of P. falciparum strains with novel iron(III) and gallium(III) complexes of an amine phenol ligand. Inorganic Chemistry 42(7):2294–2300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hough, J. S., and G. A. Howard. 1957. Bacteriostatic activities of hop resin materials. Journal of Brewing Industry Research Foundation 63:331–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudo, R. R. 1931. Protozoology, fifth edition. Charles C Thomas Publisher.

  • Michener, H. D., N. Snell, and E. J. Jansen. 1948. Arch. Biochem. Antifungal activity of hop resin constituents and a new method for isolation of lupulon. 19(2): 199–208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, C. L., et al. 1999. Antiproliferative and cytotxic effects of prenylated flavonoids from hops in human cancer cell lines. Food and Chemical Toxicology 37:271–285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mizobuchi, S., and Y. Sato. 1984. A new flavanone with antifungal activity isolated from hops. Agric. Bio. Chem. 48(11):2771–2775.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, and —. 1985. Antifungal activities of hop bitter resins and related compounds. Agric. Bio. Chem. 48:399–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutter, L., et al. 1998. Hexahydrolupulones useful as anticancer agents. U.S. Patent 5,827,895.

  • Ohsugi, M., et al. 1997. Antibacterial activity of traditional medicines and an active constituent lupulone from H. lupulus against Helicobacter pylori. Journal of Traditional Medicines 14:186–191.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piendl A., and G. Schneider. 1981. Ueber die Physiologischen Eigenschaften des Hopfens. Brauwelt 15:600–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, L. E., and E. M. Humphreys. 1951. Antagonistic effect of serum on bacteriostatic action of lupulone. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 76:234–238.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salle, A. J., et al. 1949. Lupulone—an antibiotic extracted from the strobiles of H. lupulus. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 70:409–411.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalreck, A. F., M. Teuber, Reininger, and A. Hartl. 1975. Structural features determining antibiotic potencies of natural and synthetic hop bitter resins, their precursors and derivatives. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 21:205–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, W. J. 1993. Ionophoric action of trans-isohumulone on Lactobacillus brevis. Journal of General Microbiology 139:1041–1045.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, and A. R. Smith. 1992. Factors affecting antibacterial activity of hop compounds and their derivatives. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 72:327–334.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teuber, M., et al. 1973. Membrane leakage in Bacillus subtilis 168 induced by Hop Constituents lupulone, humulone, isohumulone and humulinic acid. Arch. Mikrobiol. 94:159–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srinivasan, V., Goldberg, D. & Haas, G.J. Contributions to the antimicrobial spectrum of hop constituents. Econ Bot 58 (Suppl 1), S230–S238 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2004)58[S230:CTTASO]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2004)58[S230:CTTASO]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation