Abstract
Passport data for Mexico’s Guanajuato State were used to locate the sites where maize was collected in the 1940s and 1950s in an effort to document and conserve diversity. A map presenting survey points illustrates that collections have occurred repeatedly in the same locations. Observations of these locations reveal that urbanization and industrialization, not high yielding varieties, are displacing traditional varieties. Non-linear principal components analysis was used to assess associations between variables in areas where maize persists. Landraces appear to be associated with mountains and mesas, mixed cropping, little or no access to irrigation and areas classified as having low agricultural capacity; conversely, landraces have more commonly been replaced in areas of high agricultural capacity. The areas of high agriculture capacity, located in the riparian areas and plains, also have been the easiest to develop for urban and industrial use. Increasingly high rates of urbanization and development in areas of high agriculture capacity will impede the conservation of crop diversity in these areas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Aguirre Gomez, J. A., M. R. Bellon, and M. Smale. 2000 A regional analysis of maize biological diversity in southeastern Guanajuato, Mexico. Economic Botany 54(l):60–72.
Aquino, P., F. Carrión, R. Calvo, and D. Flores. 2001. Selected maize statistics. Pages 45–57 in P. L. Pingali, ed., CIMMYT 1999-2000 world maize facts and trends, meeting world maize needs: Technological opportunities and priorities for the public sector. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico D. F.
Bellon, M. R. 1996. The dynamics of crop infraspecific diversity: A conceptual framework at the farmer level. Economic Botany 50:26–39.
—. 2000. Demand and supply of crop infraspecific diversity on farms: Towards a policy framework for on-farm conservation: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) Economics Working Paper 01-01. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F.
Berger, J., S. Abbot, and N. C. Turner. 2003. Ecogeography of annual wildCicer species: The poor state of the world collection. Crop Science 43:1076–1090.
Brading, D. A. 1978. Haciendas and ranchos in the Mexican Bajío: León 1700–1860. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Brush, S. B., J. E. Taylor, and M. R. Bellon. 1992 Biological diversity and technology adoption in Andean potato agriculture. Journal of Development Economics 39:365–87.
—. 2004. Farmers’ bounty: Locating crop diversity in the contemporary world. Yale University Press, New Haven (CT) and London.
Butzer, K. W. and E. K. Butzer. 1997. The‘natural’ vegetation of the Mexican Bajío: Archival documentation of a 16th-century savanna environment. Quaternary International 43(44):161–172.
Collier, G. A. 1994. Reforms of Mexico’s agrarian code: Impacts of the peasantry. Research in Economic Anthropology 1:105–127.
Cotter, J. 2003. Troubled harvest: Agronomy and revolution in Mexico, 1880-2002. Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (1998) World reference base for soil resources: 84 World Soil Resource Reports. International Society of Soil Science, Rome, Italy.
Gifi, A. 1990. Nonlinear multivariate analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
Gobierno del Estado de Guanajuato. 2006. About Guanajuato. URL: http://www.guanajuato.gob.mx [Accessed January 23, 2006].
Goodman, M. 2004 Are GM crops a threat to biological diversity? AgBiotech Buzz, Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology: Washington, DC. Vol 3(5), URL: http://pewagbiotech.org/buzz/index.php3?IssueID=23 [Accessed October 10, 2005].
Harlan, J. R. 1975. Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188:618–621.
Hijmans, R. J., K. A. Garrett, Z. Human, D. P. Zhang, M. Schreuder, and M. Bonierbale. 2000. Assessing the geographic representativeness of genebank collections: The case of Bolivian wild potatoes. Conservation Biology 14:1755–1765.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informatica (INEGI). 1980. Síntesis Geográfica de Guanajuato Secretaría de Programación y Resupuesto. Coordinatión General de los Servicios Nacionales de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, Mexico, D. F.
Jarvis, A., S. Yearman, L. Guarino, and J. Tohme. 2005. The role of geographic analysis in locating, understanding, and using plant genetic diversity. Methods in Enzymology 395:279–298.
Kroonenberg, P. M, B. D. Harch, K. E. Basford, and A. Cruickshank. 1997. Combined analysis of categorical and numerical descriptors of Australian groundnut accessions using nonlinear principal components analysis. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 2(3):294–312.
Marshall, D. R. 1989. Limitations to the use of germplasm collections. Pages 105–120 in A. H. D. Brown, O. H. Frankel, D. R. Marshall, J. T. Williams, eds., The use of plant genetic resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Murphy, M. E. 1986. Irrigation in the Bajío region of colonial Mexico: Dellplain Latin American Studies, No. 19. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Plucknett, D. L, N. J. H. Smith, J. T. Williams, and N. Murthi Anishetty. 1983. Crop germplasm conservation and developing countries. Science 220:165–169.
R Development Core Team. 2005. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: http://www.R-project.org.
Serratos-Hernández, J. A. (coordinator). 2002. Consensus document on the biology of maize. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (INIFAP-CIMMYT), Mexico D.F.
Smith, M. P. 2003. Transnationalism, the state, and the extraterritorial citizen. Politics and Society 31(4): 467–502.
Taylor, E. J. 2003. The microeconomics of globalization: Evidence from China and Mexico. Pages 213–231 in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Agricultural trade and poverty: Making policy analysis count. OECD, Paris.
Thrupp, L. A. 2004. The importance of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Pages 315–337 in D. Clements and A. Shrestha, eds., New dimensions in agroecology. Food Products Press, Binghamton, NY.
Tripp, R. 1996. Biodiversity and modern crop varieties: Sharpening the debate. Agriculture and Human Values 13:48–62.
Van Dusen, E. 2000. In situ conservation of crop genetic resources in the Mexican milpa system. Ph.D. Dissertation, Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, CA.
Vivó Escoto, J. A. 1964. Weather and climate of Mexico and Central America. Pages 187–215 in R. C. West, ed., Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 1: Natural Environment and Early Cultures. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
Welhausen, E. J., L. M. Roberts, and E. Hernandez X. 1952. Races of maize in Mexico. Bussey Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
—, A. Fuenets, A. H. Corso, and P. C. Mangelsdorf. 1957. Races of maize in Central America. Publication 511, NAS-NRC, Washington, DC.
Wilkes, H. G. and K. K. Wilkes. 1972. The green revolution. Environment 14:32–39.
Wright, A. 1984. Innocents abroad: American agriculture research in Mexico. Pages 135–151 in W. Jackson, W. Berry, and B. Coleman, eds., Meeting the expectations of the land: Essays in sustainable agriculture and stewardship. North Point Press, San Francisco, CA.
Zimmerer, K. S. 1991. Managing diversity in potato and maize fields of the Peruvian Andes. Journal of Ethnobiology 11:23–49.
—. 1996. Changing fortunes: Biodiversity and peasant livelihood in the Peruvian Andes. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chambers, K.J., Brush, S.B., Grote, M.N. et al. Describing maize (Zea Mays L.) landrace persistence in the Bajío of Mexico: A survey of 1940s and 1950s collection locations. Econ Bot 61, 60–72 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[60:DMZMLL]2.0.CO;2
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[60:DMZMLL]2.0.CO;2