Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic Management of Maize Landraces in Central Mexico

  • Research
  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conservationists of crop genetic resources have feared that in situ conservation was not viable for agriculture precisely because of changes resulting from introduction of new varieties of existing crops, new crops, and new farm practices. In addition, conservation within farming systems necessarily implies a constantly changing crop population resulting from the processes of crop evolution. Even though in situ conservation of crop genetic resources is now generally understood to be dynamic, there are few examples of how evolution takes place in farmers fields. This study describes several changes in maize landraces in four communities along an altitude transect in Central Mexico (1200 to 2400 masl). While true modern varieties have not been widely adopted in the study region, farmer management results in numerous changes in maize landrace populations. Five types of dynamic management were observed: (1) purposeful hybridization between traditional and modern maize types, (2) possible creation of a new maize landrace by directional selection of the progeny of hybridization between two traditional landraces, (3) displacement of a local landrace by the introduction of a modern variety and a non-local landrace, (4) maintenance of stable populations of a locally dominant landrace, and (5) market-driven selection for a minor variety. We concur that in situ conservation of crops must be conceived as an open process where the objective is not to maintain historic varieties or static genetic conditions. Rather, in situ conservation of crops is totally in the hands of the farmer, although interventions may be designed to influence farmers’ management of agrobiodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Allard, R. W. 1996. Genetic basis of the evolution of adaptedness in plants. Euphytica 92:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., and L. C. Merrick. 1987. In situ conservation of crop genetic resources through maintenance of traditional farming systems. Economic Botany 41:86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, E., ed. 1968. Record of the FAO/IBP technical conference on the exploration, utilization, and conservation of plant genetic resources, 1967. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, B. F. 1986. Taxonomy and evolution of Mexican maize. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Botany. University of Wisconsin, Madison. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor.

  • Bretting, P. K., and D. N. Duvick. 1997. Dynamic conservation of plant genetic resources. Advances in Agronomy 61:1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. L., and E. Anderson. 1948. The southern dent corns. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 35:255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, J. A. 1991. In situ conservation: the only way of conserving genetic diversity and assuring continuing host-pathogen-hyperparasite coevolution. Israel Journal of Botany 40:515–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. B. 1995. In situ conservation of landraces in centers of crop diversity. Crop Science 35:346–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, ed. 1999. Genes in the field: on farm conservation of crop diversity. IPGRI, IDRC, Lewis, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervantes S., T., and H. Mejía A. 1970. Programa de mejoramiento de maíz del Plan Puebla. Informe de trabajo de 1970. Unpublished manuscript.

  • —. 1984. Maíces nativos del área del Plan Puebla: recolección de plasma germinal y evaluatión del grupo tardío. Revista Chapingo 9(43-44):64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIMMYT (Centro International de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo). 1969. The Puebla project 1967–1969. CIMMYT. El Batan, Texcoco, México, pp. 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1973. El Plan Puebla, siete años de experiencia: 1967–1973. CIMMYT. El Batan, Texcoco, México, pp. 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, D. A., D. Soleri, and S. E. Smith. 2000. A biological framework for understanding farmers’ plant breeding. Economic Botany 54:377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras R., J., and H. López S. 1992. Evaluación del efecto del medio ambiente y tecnología sobre los rendimientos del maíz mediante lotes climatológicos. Pages 22–23 in Anonymous, ed., Sintesis del informe anual 1991. Colegio de Postgraduados, SARH. Puebla, Puebla, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, O. H., and E. Bennett, eds. 1970. Genetic resources in plants—their exploration and conservation. IBP Handbook No. 11. International Biological Program and Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,A. H. D. Brown, and J. J. Burdon. 1995. The conservation of plant biodiversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, E. 1973. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Universidad National Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. 1987. Maize. Pages 249–294 in W. R. Fehr, ed., Principles of cultivar development. Volume 2. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, J. R. 1970. Evolution of cultivated plants. Pages 12–32 in O. H. Frankel and E. Bennett, eds., Genetic resources in plants—their exploration and conservation. IBP Handbook No. 11. International Biological Program and Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera C, B. E. 1999. Diversidad genetica y valor agronomico entre poblaciones de maiz de la raza Chalqueño. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Ciencias, Genetica. Colegio de Postgraduados. Montecillo, Texcoco, Mexico.

  • INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática). 1994. México. Resultados definitivos. VI Censo agrícola ganadero. INEGI. México, D. F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato Y., T. A. 1967. Informe general sobre las nuevas colecciones de maíz en México. Unpublished manuscript.

  • —,and B. McClintock. 1981. Constitutión cromosómica de las razas de maíz en Norte y Centroamérica. Pages 9–124 in B. McClintock, T. A. Kato Y, and A. Blumenschein, eds., Constitutión cromosómica de las razas de maíz. Colegio de Postgraduados, Chapgingo, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louette, D. 1999. Traditional management of seed and genetic diversity: what is a landrace? Pages 109–142in S. B. Brush, ed., Genes in the field: Conservation of Crop Diversity On-farm. IPGRI, IDRC, and Lewis, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C. 1965. The evolution of maize. Pages 23–49 in J. Hutchinson, ed., Essays on crop plant evolution. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxted, N., B. V. Ford-Lloyd, and J. G. Hawkes, eds. 1997. Plant genetic conservation, the in situ approach. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz O., A., A. Carballo C, and V. A. González. 1976a. Mejoramiento del maíz en el CIAMEC. I. Análisis crítico y reenfoque del programa. Pages 124–130 in Anonymous, ed., Memoria VI Congreso Nacional de Fitogenética. Sociedad Mexicana de Fitogenética, A.C. Monterrey, N.L., México.

    Google Scholar 

  • -, V. A. González H., M. Livera M., A. López H., and J. Ron P. 1976b. Mejoramiento de maíz en el CIAMEC II. Ampliatión de la base germoplasmica y su aprovechamiento considerando caracteres agronómicos y rendimiento. Pages 113–123 in Anonymous, ed., Memoria VI Congreso Nacional de Fitogenética Sociedad Mexicana de Fitogenetica, A.C. Monterrey, N.L., México.

  • Perales R., H. R. 1998. Conservation and evolution of maize in Amecameca and Cuautla valleys of Mexico. Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, Davis. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,S. B. Brush, and C. O. Qualset. 1998. Economic and agronomic competitiveness of maize landraces and in situ conservation in Mexico. Pages 109–125 in M. Smale, ed., Fanners, gene banks and crop breeding: economic analyses of diversity in wheat, maize, and rice. CIMMYT and Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2003. Landraces of maize in central Mexico: an altitudinal transect. Economic Botany 57(1): 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, E., M. Smale, and J. L. Blanco. 1998. Farmer’s use of improved seed selection practices in Mexican maize: evidence and issues from the Sierra de Santa Marta. World Development 26:1625–1640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, W. A. 1991. Genetic improvement of maize yields. Advances in Agronomy 46:245–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salinas M., Y., J. Castillo M., and G. Vazquez C. 1994. Aspectos reologicos y de textura en masa y tortilla de maiz(Zea mays L.). Informe anual de actividades 1993. Laboratorio Nacional de Maiz. CIRCE Centro INIFAP. Chapingo, Mexico. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Sanchez González, J. J. 1989. Relationships among the Mexican races of maize. Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,M. M. Goodman, and J. O. Rawlings. 1993. Appropriate characters for racial classification in maize. Economic Botany 47:44–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. E., F. Castillo G., and F. Gómez. 2001. Participatory plant breeding with maize in Mexico and Honduras. Euphytica 122:551–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, G. F., and S. A. Eberhart. 1977. Corn Breeding. Pages 305–362 in G. F. Sprague, ed., Corn and corn improvement. 2nd edition. Agronomy Monographs No. 18. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.

  • Vega Z. G, 1973. Estudio de la infiltratión genética de los maíces mejorados sobre los criollos de temporal de los estados de México, Puebla y Tlaxcala. M. Sc. thesis, Colegio de Postgraduados, Chapingo, Texcoco, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellhausen, E. J., L. M. Roberts, and E. Hernandez X. 1951. Razas de maíz en México. Folleto Técnico No. 5. Oficina de Estudios Especiales, Secretaría de Agriculture y Ganadería, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., and J. M. Lenné. 1997. The conservation of agrobiodiversity on-farm: questioning the emerging paradigm. Biodiversity and Conservation 6:109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, ECOSUR Agroecologia, San Cristóbal de las Casas, Apartado Postal 63, 29290, Chiapas, Mexico

    Hugo Perales R.

  2. Human and Community Development, University of California, 95616, Davis, CA

    S. B. Brush

  3. Genetic Resources Conservation Program, University of California, 95616, Davis, CA

    C. O. Qualset

Authors
  1. Hugo Perales R.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. B. Brush
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. O. Qualset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hugo Perales R., S. B. Brush or C. O. Qualset.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perales R., H., Brush, S.B. & Qualset, C.O. Dynamic Management of Maize Landraces in Central Mexico. Econ Bot 57, 21–34 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2003)057[0021:DMOMLI]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2003)057[0021:DMOMLI]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Search

Navigation