Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T01:59:34.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Globalit, Inc.; or, The Cultural Logic of Global Literary Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Abstract

“Charter'd Companies may indeed be the form the world has now increasingly begun to take,” announces Charles Mason in Thomas Pynchon's 1997 novel Mason and Dixon. Taking that cryptic comment as a starting point and drawing on Giovanni Arrighi's account of the recurrent organization of capital by metropolitan “spaces-of-flows,” this essay investigates what it might mean for Mason's comment to be true of both his late-eighteenth-century moment and the late-twentieth-century moment of the novel's publication and asks what such a reading of the “form [of] the world” implies for contemporary attempts to rethink literary study under the sign of the global. The essay offers “laws” of such a global form (expansion contracts, contraction enriches, enrichment haunts) and deploys them to read the two modes of globalized literary study that have achieved dominance of late: global literary study as method and as project—the key method in question understood here as a type of global historicism and the key project as the appeal to reconfigure literary study as the study of something called global literature.

Type
Talks from the Convention
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Althusser, Louis, and Balibar, Etienne. Reading Capital. London: Verso, 1997.Google Scholar
Arrighi, Giovanni. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso, 1994.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Ed. Urmson, J. O. and Sbisa, Marina. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1962.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981.Google Scholar
Bérubé, Michael. The Employment of English: Theory, Jobs, and the Future of Literary Studies. New York: New York UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Chandler, James. England in 1819: The Politics of Literary Culture and the Case of Romantic Historicism. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1998.Google Scholar
Clifford, James. Lecture. Duke U. Fall 1997.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Signature Event Context.” Margins of Philosophy. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1982. 307–30.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Spectres of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Dickson, P. G. M. The Financial Revolution in England: A Study in the Development of Public Credit, 1688-1756. New York: St. Martin's, 1967.Google Scholar
Gordon, Avery. Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1997.Google Scholar
Goux, Jean-Joseph. Symbolic Economies: After Marx and Freud. Trans. Jennifer Curtiss Gage. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. Shakespearean Negotiations. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. Address. The Living Archive. Conf. sponsored by the African and Asian Visual Artists Lib. London. Mar. 1998.Google Scholar
Homer. The Odyssey. Trans. Robert Fitzgerald. New York: Vintage, 1990.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. “A Brief Response.” Social Text 6.2 (1987): 2627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. “Marx's Purloined Letter.” New Left Review 1st ser. 209 (1995): 75109.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. “Third-World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism.” Social Text 5.3 (1986): 6588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Alan. “Local Transcendence: Cultural Criticism, Postmodernism, and the Romanticism of Detail.” Representations 32 (1990): 75113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukács, Georg. The Historical Novel. Trans. Hannah Mitchell and Stanley Mitchell. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1962.Google Scholar
Makdisi, Saree. Romantic Imperialism: Universal Empire and the Culture of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: Intl., 1977.Google Scholar
Meek, Ronald. “Economics and Ideology” and Other Essays. London: Chapman, 1967.Google Scholar
Michaels, Walter Benn. “For You Who Never Was There': Slavery and the New Historicism, Deconstruction and the Holocaust.” Narrative 4 (1996): 116.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. Introduction. Edmund Burke: Reflections on the Revolution in France. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987. l-lvi.Google Scholar
Pynchon, Thomas. Mason and Dixon. New York: Henry Holt, 1997.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organizations 47. 1 (1993): 139–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Walter. Waverly. London: Penguin, 1983.Google Scholar
Simpson, David. The Academic Postmodern and the Rule of Literature: A Report on Half-Knowledge. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993.Google Scholar
Special Topic.” PMLA 113 (1998): 358.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Scattered Speculations on the Question of Value.” In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. New York: Methuen, 1987. 154–75.Google Scholar
Sara, Suleri. The Rhetoric of English India. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.Google Scholar
Thomas, Hugh. The Atlantic Slave Trade. New York: Simon, 1997.Google Scholar