Abstract
Although the impact of road transport on urban air quality has achieved a high profile in China, still greater attention is required as it has not yet been considered fully even in relation to the road network linking cities and urban areas. Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is a systematic and comprehensive process for evaluating the environmental impacts of a policy, plan or program in publicly accountable decision-making. Air pollution has been recognized as a significant issue in most transport SEA practices. The Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Hubei Road Network Plan (2002–2020) (HRNP) was introduced as one of the World Bank’s pilot SEA projects. An effective framework was developed to investigate the functional relationship between the road network and its potential air pollutant emissions. In this study, two indicators were identified: emission intensity/inventory of pollutants and the spatial distribution of the most polluted areas. Because strategic actions are inherently nebulous and data quality is often disappointing, three alternative scenarios were employed to address uncertainties and data/scale issues. Calculations were made using emission models and results were analyzed with the help of statistical tools and the geographic information system (GIS). The results from the project implementation and the feedback from the World Bank have both shown that the proposed framework is effective in the transport SEA process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahrens, C.D., 2003. Meteorology Today—An Introduction to Weather, Climate and the Environment (7th Ed.). Thomson Brooks/Cole, California.
Bai, Y., Wu, J., Zhu, T., 2004. Theories and practices on strategic environmental assessment of urban transportation plan in the Euramerican countries. Environmental Protection in Transportation, 25:40–43.
Bartlett, S.R., Brunstad, B., 2006. Scenario-based Approaches in Strategic Environmental Assessment. IAIA Annual Conference, Stavanger.
Bina, O., 2001. Strategic Environmental Assessment of Transport Corridors: Lessons Learned Comparing the Method of Five Member State. European Commission, Directorate General for Environment, Brussels.
Chen, M., 2005. Strategic environmental assessment is the starting point of constructing an environmentally-friendly society—An interview of Pan Yue, deputy director general of the Chinese SEPA. Environmental Protection, 11:6–12.
Colvile, R.N., Hutchinson, E.J., Mindell, J.S., Warren, R.F., 2001. The transport sector as a source of air pollution. Atmospheric Environment, 35(9):1537–1565. [doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00551-3]
Costabile, F., Allegrini, I., 2008. A new approach to link transport emissions and air quality: An intelligent transport system based on the control of traffic air pollution. Environmental Modelling & Software, 23(3):258–267. [doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.03.001]
Donnelly, A., Jones, M., O’Mahony, T., Byrne, G., 2007. Selecting environmental indicator for use in strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(2):161–175. [doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2006.10.006]
Duinker, P.N., Grelg, L.A., 2007. Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: Improving explorations of the future. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(3):206–219. [doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2006.11.001]
Fahy, F., Cinneide, M.O., 2008. Developing and testing an operational framework for assessing quality of life. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(6):366–379. [doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2007.10.002]
Faiz, A., 1993. Automotive emissions in developing countries—relative implications for global warming, acidification and urban air quality. Transportation Research, 27(3):167–186.
Fischer, T.B., 2002. Strategic Environmental Assessment in Transport and Land Use Planning. Earthscan London.
Fischer, T.B., 2003. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(2):155–170. [doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00094-X]
Fischer, T.B., 2004. Transport policy making and SEA in Liverpool, Amsterdam and Berlin—1997 and 2002. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(3):319–336. [doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.017]
Fischer, T.B., 2006. Strategic environmental assessment and transport planning: towards a generic framework for evaluating practice and developing guidance. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(3):183–197. [doi:10.3152/147154606781765183]
Jantunen, M.J., HaKnninen, O., Katsouyanni, K., 1998. Air pollution exposure in European cities: the EXPOLIS’ study. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 8:495–518.
Joao, E., 2007. A research agenda for data and scale issues in Strategic Environmental Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(5):479–491. [doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.009]
Jonsson, D.K., Johansson, J., 2006. Indirect effects to include in strategic environmental assessments of transport infrastructure investments. Transport Reviews, 26(2):151–166. [doi:10.1080/01441640500332406]
Lim, L.L., Hughes, S.J., Hellawell, E.E, 2005. Integrated decision support system for urban air quality assessment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 20(7):947–954. [doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.04.013]
Mediavilla-Sahagún, A., ApSimon, H.M., 2006. Urban scale integrated assessment for London: which emission reduction strategies are more effective in attaining prescribed PM10 air quality standards by 2005? Environmental Modelling & Software, 21(4):501–513. [doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.06.010]
OECD, 2004. Strategic Environmental Assessment Guidance for Transport Plan and Programs. TAG Unit 2.
Ozden, O., Dogeroglu, T., Kara, S., 2008. Assessment of ambient air quality in Eskisehir, Turkey. Environmental International, 34(5):678–687. [doi:10.1016/j.envint.2007.12.016]
Partidario, M.R., 2000. Elements of an SEA framework improving the added-value of SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20:647–663.
Rutherford, D., Leonard, O., 2008. Air quality impacts of Tokyo’s on-road diesel emission regulations. Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment, 13(4):239–254. [doi:10.1016/j.trd.2008.02.004]
Smit, R., Brown, A.L., Chan, Y.C., 2008. Do air pollution emissions and fuel consumption models for roadways include the effects of congestion in the roadway traffic flow? Environmental Modelling & Software, 23(10–11):1262–1270. [doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.03.001]
Sokhi, R.S., Mao, H.J., Srimath, S.T.G., Fan, S.Y., Kitwiroon, N., Luhana, L., Kukkonen, J., Haakana, M., Karppinen, A., van den Hout, K.D., Boulter, P., et al., 2008. An integrated multi-model approach for air quality assessment: Development and evaluation for the OSCAR Air Quality Assessment System. Environmental Modelling and Software, 23(3):268–281. [doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.03.006]
Solazzo, E., Cai, X.M., Vardoulakis, S., 2009. Improved parameterization for the numerical modeling of air pollution without an urban street canyon. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24:381–388. [doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.08.001]
Sturm, P.J., Baltensperger, U., Bacher, M., 2003. Roadside measurements of particulate matter size distribution. Atmospheric Environment, 37(37):5273–5281. [doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.05.006]
Therivel, R., 2004. Strategic Environmental Assessment in Action. Earthscan Publication, London.
Therivel, R., Wilson, E., Thompson, S., 1992. Strategic Environmental Assessment. Earthscan Publication, London.
Tonk, J., Verheem, R., 2000. Enhancing effectiveness: Strategic environmental assessment: one concept, multiple forms. Impact Assessment and Project Appraise, 18:177–182.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Project supported by the Environment Department of the World Bank, and the National Project 985: Circular Economy Innovational Platform in Nankai University, China
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bai, Ht., Wang, Hz., Xu, H. et al. Quantitative evaluation of air pollution in transport strategic environmental assessment: a case study based on uncertainty analysis and graphic information system technology. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 11, 370–381 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0900333
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0900333