Skip to main content
Log in

The qualitative advantages of quantities of information: bigger is better

  • Keynotes and Invited Speech on Digital Library
  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digitization projects should focus on quantity rather than quality. Increasing quantities of information produce qualitatively more valuable services. Online writing and searching are now common, and it is only online reading that is still limiting our use of online books. New interfaces might increase our willingness to read online, which should be encouraged rather than fought, since it represents an increase both the amount of information available and the participation of more people in the writing and exchange of information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AES (Audio Engineering Society), 2002. Recommendation for Delivery of Recorded Music Projects. http://www.aes.org/technical/documents/AES TD 1002.1.03-10_1.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., 2004. The Long Tail. WIRED, Oct. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D.P., Cobb, J., Korpela, E., Lebofsky, M., Werthimer, D., 2002. SETI@home: an experiment in public-resource computing. Commun. ACM, 45(11):56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, D.E., Lesk, M.E., Ketchum, R.D., Lochbaum, C.C., Remde, J.R., Littman, M., Landauer, T.K., 1991. Hypertext for the Electronic Library? CORE Sample Results. Hypertext 91, Proc. 3rd Annual ACM Conference on Hypertext, San Antonio, p.299–312.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, C., Sutherland, J., 2005. http://www.pgdp.net (Distributed Proofreaders’ site).

  • Friess, S., 2002. The Web Didn’t Kill Libraries. Christian Science Monitor, July 25, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M., 2004. Google and God’s Mind. Los Angeles Times, Dec. 17, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, I., 1996. Quoted by Jim Milliot in “Publishers still searching for profits in new media.” Publishers Weekly, 243(1):22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauslin, J.F., 2005. Statement by European Librarians on the Web at http://www.hasgard.net/article.php3?id_article= 668.

  • Jeanneney, J.N., 2005. See Agence-France Press, April 28, 2005.

  • Lenstra, A., Manasse, M., 1990. Factoring by Electronic Mail. In: Advances in Cryptology. EUROCRYPT'89, p.355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesk, M., 1997. Practical Digital Libraries: Books, Bytes and Bucks. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesk, M., 2004. Understanding Digital Libraries Morgan Kaufmann (2nd Edition of the 1997 Book). San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., 1899. Modern England Before the Reform Bill. T. Fisher Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, M., 2005. North American Book Market. http://www.fonerbooks.com/booksale.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titmuss, R., 1970. The Gift Relationship. Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia, 2005. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia (it seems only fair to cite their own article about themselves, although there are now many others).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lesk Michael.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michael, L. The qualitative advantages of quantities of information: bigger is better. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 6, 1169–1178 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2005.A1169

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2005.A1169

Key words

Document code

CLC number

Navigation