Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Synthesis of a CKD modified fly ash based geopolymer cementitious material for enhancing pumpable roof support

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pumpable roof supports have been increasingly used as secondary support in longwall mining to provide a safe mining environment.This study examines the feasibility of using class F fly ash (FFA) with added cement kiln dust (CKD) to synthesize a geopolymer cementitious material (GCM) that will address the limitations of current cementitious materials (CMs) for building pumpable roof supports. The GCM is designed to be a combination of two individual pumpable grout streams: stream 1 being a slurry composed of FFA, CKD, superplasticizer and water, and stream 2 being an alkaline solution prepared with sodium silicate (SS) and sodium hydroxide (SH). When the two streams stay alone, they remain as a slurry and a solution, respectively, and can be easily handled and transported. When they are mixed together, a GCM is formed. The study systematically analyzed the influence of different factors on pumpability, setting time, and mechanical performance of the GCM. The results show that stream 1 can be designed to be pumpable for a long distance within a certain period of time simply by adjusting the water to solid ratio and superplasticizer content. Stream 2 is an alkaline solution containing SH and SS and can be easily pumped. The setting time can be effectively adjusted by including CKD. Furthermore, the GCM shows much higher peak and residual strength than the pumpable CMs currently used in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and models generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

References

  1. NIOSH (2017) Mining topic: Roof Support. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/topics/RoofSupport.html

  2. Peng SS (2000) Cutting through open entries require proper support. Coal Age 6:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mark C, Barczack TM (2000) Proceedings: new technology for coal mine roof support. In: New technology for coal mine roof support. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH), pp 23–42

  4. Esterhuizen G, Berk I (2016) Application of the strength reduction method in coal mine roof support design. In: ISMS symposium. pp 659–665

  5. TM Barczak 2005 An overview of standing roof support practices and developments in the United States Third Southern African rock engineering symposium Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 301 334

  6. Dolinar D (2010) Ground and Standing Support Interaction in Tailgates of Western U . S . Longwall mines used in the development of a design methodology based on the ground reaction curve. In: Proceedings of 22nd international conference on ground control in mining. pp 152–160

  7. Zhang P, Milam M, Mishra M, et al (2012) Requirements and performanc of pumpable cribs in longwall tailgate entries and bleeders. In: 31st International conference on ground control in mining. pp 1–5

  8. Bower JP, Fleagle SS (2012) Pumpable crib bag assembly and methods of installation

  9. Cheng J, Li W, Zhang P (2015) A novel backfill material for roof supports in the cut-through entries of longwall mining. Teh Vjesn - Tech Gaz. 22:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Batchler T (2017) Analysis of the design and performance characteristics of pumpable roof supports. Int J Min Sci Technol 27:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2016.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barczak TM, Tadolini SC (2008) Pumpable roof supports: an evolution in longwall roof support technology. Trans Soc Min Metall Explor 324:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hird D (2011) Pumpable cementitious grout system for use in the production of underground roof support systems and other load bearing structures

  13. Davidovits J (1991) Geopolymers: inorganic polymeric new materials. J Therm Anal 37:1633–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davidovits J (1994) High-alkali cements for 21st century concretes. Spec Publ 144:383–398

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davidovits J (2008) Geopolymer chemistry & application. Institute Géopolymèr, F-02100 Saint-Quentin, France

  16. Zhang YJ, Li S, Xu DL et al (2010) A novel method for preparation of organic resins reinforced geopolymer composites. J Mater Sci 45:1189–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-4063-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bai T, Song ZG, Wu YG et al (2018) Influence of steel slag on the mechanical properties and curing time of metakaolin geopolymer. Ceram Int 44:15706–15713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaya NA, Yun-Ming L, Cheng-Yong H et al (2020) Correlation between pore structure, compressive strength and thermal conductivity of porous metakaolin geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 247:118641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo L, Wu Y, Xu F et al (2020) Sulfate resistance of hybrid fiber reinforced metakaolin geopolymer composites. Compos Part B Eng 183:107689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Jaarsveld JGS, Van Deventer JSJ, Lorenzen L (1998) Factors affecting the immobilization of metals in geopolymerized flyash. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 29:283–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-998-0032-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Provis JL, Van Deventer JSJ (2009) Geopolymers: structure, processing, properties, and industrial applications. Woodhead Publishing Limited, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Wongsa A, Kunthawatwong R, Naenudon S et al (2020) Natural fiber reinforced high calcium fly ash geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 241:118143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun Q, Tian S, Sun Q et al (2019) Preparation and microstructure of fly ash geopolymer paste backfill material. J Clean Prod 225:376–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nikvar-Hassani A, Manjarrez L, Zhang L (2022) Rheology, setting time, and compressive strength of class F fly ash-based geopolymer binder containing ordinary portland cement. J Mater Civ Eng 34:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0004008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pacheco-Torgal F, Castro-Gomes J, Jalali S (2007) Investigations about the effect of aggregates on strength and microstructure of geopolymeric mine waste mud binders. Cem Concr Res 37:933–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang L, Ahmari S, Zhang J (2011) Synthesis and characterization of fly ash modified mine tailings-based geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 25:3773–3781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ahmari S, Zhang L, Zhang J (2012) Effects of activator type/concentration and curing temperature on alkali-activated binder based on copper mine tailings. J Mater Sci 47:5933–5945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6497-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang N, Hedayat A, Bolaños Sosa HG et al (2021) Specimen size effects on the mechanical behaviors and failure patterns of the mine tailings-based geopolymer under uniaxial compression. Constr Build Mater 281:122525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang N, Hedayat A, Bolaños Sosa HG et al (2021) Damage evaluation and deformation behavior of mine tailing-based Geopolymer under uniaxial cyclic compression. Ceram Int 47:10773–10785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dimas DD, Giannopoulou IP, Panias D (2009) Utilization of alumina red mud for synthesis of inorganic polymeric materials. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 30:211–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827500802498199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang S, Qiao W, Li Y et al (2019) Effect of additives on the rheological and mechanical properties of microfine-cement-based grout. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1931453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li Y, Min X, Ke Y et al (2019) Preparation of red mud-based geopolymer materials from MSWI fly ash and red mud by mechanical activation. Waste Manag 83:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yip CK, Lukey GC, Van Deventer JSJ (2005) The coexistence of geopolymeric gel and calcium silicate hydrate at the early stage of alkaline activation. Cem Concr Res 35:1688–1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hu S, Wang H, Zhang G, Ding Q (2008) Bonding and abrasion resistance of geopolymeric repair material made with steel slag. Cem Concr Compos 30:239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Manjarrez L, Zhang L (2018) Utilization of copper mine tailings as road base construction material through geopolymerization. J Mater Civ Eng 30:04018201. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Manjarrez L, Nikvar-Hassani A, Shadnia R, Zhang L (2019) Experimental study of geopolymer binder synthesized with copper mine tailings and low-calcium copper slag. J Mater Civ Eng 31:04019156. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bakharev T (2005) Geopolymeric materials prepared using Class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing. Cem Concr Res 35:1224–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis JL et al (2007) Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J Mater Sci 42:2917–2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kong DLY, Sanjayan JG (2010) Effect of elevated temperatures on geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete. Cem Concr Res 40:334–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Majidi B (2009) Geopolymer technology, from fundamentals to advanced applications: a review. Mater Technol 24:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang L (2013) Production of bricks from waste materials - a review. Constr Build Mater 47:643–655. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES.2017.8275309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. American Petroleum Institute (1990) API SPEC 10: Specifications for materials and testing for well cements. Am Pet Inst

  43. ASTM C191 (2013) standard test method for time of setting of hydraulic cement by vicat needle. Am Soc Test Mater i:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0191-13.2

  44. ASTM C39/C39M - 16b (2016) Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM Int 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0039

  45. Güllü H, Cevik A, Al-Ezzi KMA, Gülsan ME (2019) On the rheology of using geopolymer for grouting: a comparative study with cement-based grout included fly ash and cold bonded fly ash. Constr Build Mater 196:594–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jang JG, Lee NK, Lee HK (2014) Fresh and hardened properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes with superplasticizers. Constr Build Mater 50:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nath P, Sarker PK (2014) Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Constr Build Mater 66:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Memon FA, Nuruddin MF, Demie S, Shafiq N (2012) Effect of superplasticizer and extra water on workability and compressive strength of self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 4:407–414

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nematollahi B, Sanjayan J (2014) Effect of different superplasticizers and activator combinations on workability and strength of fly ash based geopolymer. Mater Des 57:667–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Musaddiq Laskar S, Talukdar S (2017) Development of ultrafine slag-based geopolymer mortar for use as repairing mortar. J Mater Civ Eng 29:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Chouhan RK, Mudgal M, Bisarya A, Srivastava AK (2018) Rice-husk-based superplasticizer to increase performance of fly ash geopolymer concrete. Emerg Mater Res 7:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1680/jemmr.18.00035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Jithendra C, Elavenil S (2019) Role of superplasticizer on GGBS based geopolymer concrete under ambient curing. Mater Today Proc 18:148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Alrefaei Y, Wang YS, Dai JG (2019) The effectiveness of different superplasticizers in ambient cured one-part alkali activated pastes. Cem Concr Compos 97:166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Muhammad F, Huang X, Li S et al (2018) Strength evaluation by using polycarboxylate superplasticizer and solidification efficiency of Cr6+, Pb2+ and Cd2+ in composite based geopolymer. J Clean Prod 188:807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Roussel N (2012) Understanding the rheology of cement. Woodhead Publishing Limited, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. Porcherie O, Pershikova E, Rimmele G, et al (2011) Pumpable geopolymers comprising a mixing and dispersing agent

  57. Gong W, Xu H, Lutze W, Pegg IiL (2019) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2019 / 0059733 A1 (43)

  58. Hardjito D, Rangan BV (2005) Development and properties of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Res Rep GC 94

  59. Hardjito D, Cheak CC, Lee Ing CH (2008) Strength and setting times of Low calcium fly ash-based geopolymer mortar. Mod Appl Sci 2:3–11. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v2n4p3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Granizo ML, Blanco-Varela MT, Martínez-Ramírez S (2007) Alkali activation of metakaolins: parameters affecting mechanical, structural and microstructural properties. J Mater Sci 42:2934–2943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0565-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kusbiantoro A, Ibrahim MS, Muthusamy K, Alias A (2013) Development of sucrose and citric acid as the natural based admixture for fly ash based geopolymer. Procedia Environ Sci 17:596–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang MH, Islam J (2012) Use of nano-silica to reduce setting time and increase early strength of concretes with high volumes of fly ash or slag. Constr Build Mater 29:573–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Deb PS, Sarker PK, Barbhuiya S (2015) Effects of nano-silica on the strength development of geopolymer cured at room temperature. Constr Build Mater 101:675–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Nath P, Sarker PK (2015) Use of OPC to improve setting and early strength properties of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete cured at room temperature. Cem Concr Compos 55:205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Nath P, Sarker PK (2017) Flexural strength and elastic modulus of ambient-cured blended low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 130:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Nath P, Sarker PK, Rangan VB (2015) Early age properties of low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete suitable for ambient curing. Procedia Eng 125:601–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lee NK, Lee HK (2013) Setting and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag concrete manufactured at room temperature. Constr Build Mater 47:1201–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Huseien GF, Mirza J, Ismail M, Hussin MW (2016) Influence of different curing temperatures and alkali activators on properties of GBFS geopolymer mortars containing fly ash and palm-oil fuel ash. Constr Build Mater 125:1229–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Kumar S, Kumar R, Mehrotra SP (2010) Influence of granulated blast furnace slag on the reaction, structure and properties of fly ash based geopolymer. J Mater Sci 45:607–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3934-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Triwulan PW, JANUARTI JE (2016) Addition of superplasticizer on geopolymer concrete. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 11:14456–14462

    Google Scholar 

  71. Oderji SY, Chen B, Shakya C et al (2019) Influence of superplasticizers and retarders on the workability and strength of one-part alkali-activated fly ash/slag binders cured at room temperature. Constr Build Mater 229:116891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Pilehvar S, Arnhof M, Pamies R et al (2020) Utilization of urea as an accessible superplasticizer on the moon for lunar geopolymer mixtures. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Adak D, Sarkar M, Mandal S (2014) Effect of nano-silica on strength and durability of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 70:453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Hardjito D, Wallah S (2004) On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Mater J 101:467–472

    Google Scholar 

  75. Okoye FN, Durgaprasad J, Singh NB (2015) Mechanical properties of alkali activated flyash/kaolin based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 98:685–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ahmari S, Zhang L (2013) Utilization of cement kiln dust (CKD) to enhance mine tailings-based geopolymer bricks. Constr Build Mater 40:1002–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. García-Lodeiro I, Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A (2013) Variation in hybrid cements over time. Alkaline activation of fly ash-portland cement blends. Cem Concr Res 52:112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.03.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Mehta A, Siddique R (2017) Properties of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete incorporating OPC as partial replacement of fly ash. Constr Build Mater 150:792–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Ahmari S, Zhang L (2012) Production of eco-friendly bricks from copper mine tailings through geopolymerization. Constr Build Mater 29:323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Group H (2001) Heitech Pumbable Cribs

  81. Jennmar (2013) J-CRIB Pumpable Crib. Jennmar Co

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Alpha Foundation for the Improvement of Mine Safety and Health, Inc. (ALPHA FOUNDATION) funded this research. The authors' views, ideas, and suggestions are entirely their own, and they do not indicate support by the ALPHA FOUNDATION, its Directors, or staff.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Mechanics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA

    Arash Nikvar-Hassani & Lianyang Zhang

Authors
  1. Arash Nikvar-Hassani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lianyang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Arash Nikvar-Hassani or Lianyang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 11 and Fig. 12

Fig. 11
figure 11

SEM micrographs of (a) FFA; and (b) CKD

Full size image
Fig. 12
figure 12

XRD pattern of FFA and CKD powders [M: Al2.272O4.864Si0.728, Q: SiO2, C: CaO, O: CaCO3, T: Ca(OH)2]

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikvar-Hassani, A., Zhang, L. Synthesis of a CKD modified fly ash based geopolymer cementitious material for enhancing pumpable roof support. Mater Struct 55, 64 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01899-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01899-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation