Abstract
An attempt has been made to assess the quality of compressed stabilized earth blocks (CSEBs) through non-destructive testing. As a potential approach, this study analyzes the influence of crushed brick waste (CBW) particle size and replacement ratio on compressive strength and structural anisotropy of CSEBs using ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV). The correlations between UPV measurements, dry density and the compressive strength were analyzed. Furthermore, microscopic observations were undertaken to emphasize the particle interface bonding. A statistical analysis was then conducted to predict the compressive strength in terms of CBW content, dry density and anisotropy for three types of CBW. The results manifest that UPV is a complementary method to evaluate the influence of particle size on mechanical performance of CSEB. Irrespective of CBW particle size, the block compressive strength decreases as the replacement percentage reaches to 100% which is well spotted by UPV values. The effect of removal of fines has hardly any influence on UPV readings. Block density reduces by almost 25.5% compared to reference, when sand was completely replaced with CBW of particle size less than 0.15 mm. CBW particle size affects the relation between strength and UPV in different ways. However, a significant exponential correlation 0.94 was found for CSEBs produced with CBW particle size lesser than 0.15 mm. For the three types of CBW a strong correlation between dry density and UPV was established. SEM analysis showed distinct morphology of CSEBs with CBW particle size and replacement ratio. The proposed equation can predict the compressive strength with correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.87, 0.95 and 0.95 for CF, CM and CL blocks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Murmu AL, Patel A (2018) Towards sustainable bricks production: An overview. Constr Build Mater 165:112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.038
Heathcote K (1991) Compressive strength of cement stabilized pressed earth blocks. Build Res Inf 19:101–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613219108727106
Reddy BVV, Lal R, Nanjunda Rao KS (2007) Optimum Soil Grading for the Soil-Cement Blocks. J Mater Civ Eng 19:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2007)19:2(139)
Kouakou CH, Morel JC (2009) Strength and elasto-plastic properties of non-industrial building materials manufactured with clay as a natural binder. Appl Clay Sci 44:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2008.12.019
Goodary R, Lecomte-Nana GL, Petit C, Smith DS (2012) Investigation of the strength development in cement-stabilised soils of volcanic origin. Constr Build Mater 28:592–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.054
Reddy BVV, Latha MS (2014) Influence of soil grading on the characteristics of cement stabilised soil compacts. Mater Constr 47:1633–1645. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0142-1
Morel JC, Pkla A, Walker P (2007) Compressive strength testing of compressed earth blocks. Constr Build Mater 21:303–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.021
Bruno AW, Gallipoli D, Perlot C, Mendes J (2017) Mechanical behaviour of hypercompacted earth for building construction. Mater Constr 50:160. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1027-5
Ruiz G, Zhang X, Edris WF et al (2018) A comprehensive study of mechanical properties of compressed earth blocks. Constr Build Mater 176:566–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.077
Weed DA, Tennant AG, Motamedi MH et al (2020) Finite element model application to flexural behavior of cement stabilized soil block masonry. Mater Struct 53:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01490-z
González-López RJ, Juárez-Alvarado AC, Ayub-Francis B, Mendoza-Rangel J (2018) Compaction effect on the compressive strength and durability of stabilized earth blocks. Constr Build Mater 163:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.074
Demirboǧa R, Türkmen I, Karakoç MB (2004) Relationship between ultrasonic velocity and compressive strength for high-volume mineral-admixtured concrete. Cem Concr Res 34:2329–2336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.017
Tarek M, Hasan A, Ibna R et al (2017) Effects of maximum size of brick aggregate on properties of concrete. Constr Build Mater 134:713–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.164
Mendes SES, Oliveira RLN, Cremonez C et al (2019) Mixture Design of Concrete Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity. Int J Civ Eng 18:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00464-9
Ben MM, Ogam E, Fellah ZEA et al (2016) Characterization of compressed earth blocks using low frequency guided acoustic waves. J Acoust Soc Am 139:2551–2560. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4948573
Carrasco EVM, Silva SR, Mantilla JNR (2014) Assessment of mechanical properties and the influence of the addition of sawdust in soil-cement bricks using the technique of ultrasonic anisotropic inspection. J Mater Civ Eng 26:219–225. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000723
Canivell J, Martin-del-Rio JJ, Alejandre FJ et al (2018) Considerations on the physical and mechanical properties of lime-stabilized rammed earth walls and their evaluation by ultrasonic pulse velocity testing. Constr Build Mater 191:826–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.207
Martín-del-Rio JJ, Canivell J, Falcón RM (2020) The use of non-destructive testing to evaluate the compressive strength of a lime-stabilised rammed-earth wall: Rebound index and ultrasonic pulse velocity. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118060
Cultrone G, Sebastián E, Cazalla O et al (2001) Ultrasound and mechanical tests combined with ANOVA to evaluate brick quality. Ceram Int 27:401–406
Kwon H, Le AT, Nguyen NT (2010) Influence of Soil Grading on Properties of Compressed Cement-soil. KSCE J Civ Eng 14:845–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0648-9
Standard Australia (2002) The Australian earth building handbook
Indian Standard. (2013) Stabilized soil blocks used in general building construction-Specification. IS 1725, New Delhi, India
Walker PJ (1995) Strength, durability and shrinkage characteristics of cement stabilised soil blocks. Cem Concr Compos 17:301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0958-9465(95)00019-9
Bachar M, Azzouz L, Rabehi M, Mezghiche B (2015) Characterization of a stabilized earth concrete and the effect of incorporation of aggregates of cork on its thermo-mechanical properties: Experimental study and modeling. Constr Build Mater 74:259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.106
Sukmak P, De Silva P, Horpibulsuk S, Chindaprasirt P (2015) Sulfate resistance of clay-portland cement and clay high-calcium fly ash geopolymer. J Mater Civ Eng 27:04014158. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001112
Hallal MM, Sadek S, Najjar SS (2018) Evaluation of engineering characteristics of stabilized rammed-earth material sourced from natural fines-rich soil. J Mater Civ Eng 30:04018273. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002481
Islam MS, Tausif-E-Elahi SAR et al (2020) Strength and Durability Characteristics of Cement-Sand Stabilized Earth Blocks. J Mater Civ Eng 32:04020087. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003176
Kasinikota P, Tripura DD (2021) Evaluation of compressed stabilized earth block properties using crushed brick waste. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122520
Arrigoni A, Beckett CTS, Ciancio D et al (2018) Rammed Earth incorporating Recycled Concrete Aggregate: a sustainable, resistant and breathable construction solution. Resour Conserv Recy 137:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.025
Bogas JA, Silva M, Glória Gomes M (2019) Unstabilized and stabilized compressed earth blocks with partial incorporation of recycled aggregates. Int J Arch Herit 13:569–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1442891
Narayanaswamy AH, Walker P, Venkatarama Reddy BV et al (2020) Mechanical and thermal properties, and comparative life-cycle impacts, of stabilised earth building products. Constr Build Mater 243:118096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118096
Oti JE, Kinuthia JM, Robinson RB (2014) The development of unfired clay building material using Brick Dust Waste and Mercia mudstone clay. Appl Clay Sci 102:148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.09.031
Seco A, Omer J, Marcelino S et al (2018) Sustainable unfired bricks manufacturing from construction and demolition wastes. Constr Build Mater 167:154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.026
Joshi AM, Basutkar SM, Ahmed MI et al (2019) Performance of stabilized adobe blocks prepared using construction and demolition waste. J Build Path Rehabil 4:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-019-0052-x
Jyothi TK, Jitha PT, Pattaje SK et al (2019) Studies on the strength development of Lime-Pozzolana cement–soil–brick powder based geopolymer composites. Inst Eng Ser A 100:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-018-0350-3
Indian Standard. (1972) Methods of test for soils: Determination of shrinkage factors. IS 2720 (Part 6), New Delhi, India
Indian Standard. (1977) Method of test for soils: Determination of free swell index of soils. IS 2720 (Part 40), New Delhi, India
Indian Standard. (1980) Methods of Test for Soils: Determination of water content-dry density relation using light compaction. IS 2720 (Part 7), New Delhi, India
Indian Standard. (1980) Methods of test for soils: Determination of specific gravity, Fine grained soils. IS 2720 (Part 3), New Delhi, India
Indian Standard. (1985) Methods of test for soils: Determination of liquid limit and plastic limit. IS 2720 (Part 5), New Delhi, India
Indian Standard. (1985) Methods of test for soils: grain size analysis. IS 2720 (Part 4), New Delhi, India
British Standard. (2013) Test for mechanical and physcial properties of aggregates: Determination of particle density and water absorption. 1–54
Indian Standard. (1963) Method of Test for aggregate for concrete. IS 2386 (Part 3), New Delhi, India
Indian Standard. (2013) Specification for 43 grade ordinary portland cement. IS 8112, New Delhi, India
Muntohar AS (2011) Engineering characteristics of the compressed-stabilized earth brick. Constr Build Mater 25:4215–4220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.061
Bahar R, Benazzoug M, Kenai S (2004) Performance of compacted cement-stabilised soil. Cem Concr Compos 26:811–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.01.003
Walker PJ (2004) Strength and Erosion Characteristics of Earth Blocks and Earth Block Masonry. J Mater Civ Eng 16:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1061/0899-1561(2004)16:5(497)
Indian Standard. (1992) IS 13311–1 (1992): Method of Non-destructive testing of concret, Part 1: Ultrasonic pulse velocity. IS 13311 (Part 1), New Delhi, India 1–7
Ercikdi B, Karaman K, Cihangir F et al (2016) Core size effect on the dry and saturated ultrasonic pulse velocity of limestone samples. Ultrasonics 72:143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2016.08.006
Indian Standard. (2010) Test for Determination of Moisture Content–Dry Density Relation for Stabilized Soils Mixtures. IS 4332 (Part 3), New Delhi, India 1–18
Indian Standard. (1992) Methods of tests of burnt clay building bricks. IS 3495 (Part 2), New Delhi, India
Kurda R (2017) Indirect evaluation of the compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete with high fly ash ratios. Mag Concr Res 1–13
Korah LV, Nigay PM, Cutard T et al (2016) The impact of the particle shape of organic additives on the anisotropy of a clay ceramic and its thermal and mechanical properties. Constr Build Mater 125:654–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.094
Ma G, Li Z, Wang L et al (2019) Mechanical anisotropy of aligned fiber reinforced composite for extrusion-based 3D printing. Constr Build Mater 202:770–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.008
Noor-E-Khuda S, Albermani F (2019) Mechanical properties of clay masonry units: Destructive and ultrasonic testing. Constr Build Mater 219:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.166
Vasanelli A, Calia E, Micelli VLF (2017) Ultrasonic pulse velocity test for non-destructive investigations of historical masonries: an experimental study of the effect of frequency and applied load on the response of a limestone. Mater Struct 50:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0892-7
Beckett C, Ciancio D (2014) Effect of compaction water content on the strength of cement-stabilized rammed earth materials. Can Geotech J 51:583–590. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0339
Toufigh V, Kianfar E (2019) The effects of stabilizers on the thermal and the mechanical properties of rammed earth at various humidities and their environmental impacts. Constr Build Mater 200:616–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.050
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank National Institute of Technology Agartala for their support during the experimental program. Also the authors gratefully acknowledge the Central Instrumentation Center, Tripura University for SEM analysis.
Funding
This work was supported by Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Grant no. EEQ/2017/000001, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Kasinikota Pardhasaradhi: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – original draft. Deb Dulal Tripura: Conceptualization, Visualization, Supervision, Resources, Writing—review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kasinikota, P., Tripura, D.D. Predicting the effect of crushed brick particle size on anisotropy, physical and mechanical properties of compressed stabilized earth blocks using ultrasonic pulse velocity. Mater Struct 54, 112 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01712-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01712-y